Batch Effects Remain a Fundamental Barrier to Universal Embeddings in Single-Cell Foundation Models

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Constructing a cell universe requires integrating heterogeneous single-cell RNA-seq datasets, but is hindered by diverse batch effects. Single-cell foundation models (scFMs), inspired by large language models, aim to learn universal cellular embeddings from large-scale single-cell data. However, unlike language, single-cell data are sparse, noisy, and strongly affected by batch effects that limit cross-dataset transferability. Our systematic evaluation across diverse batch scenarios reveals that current scFMs fail to effectively remove batch effects, with batch signals persisting in pretrained embeddings. Post-hoc batch-centering partially improves alignment, highlighting the need for future scFMs to integrate explicit batch-effect correction mechanisms to achieve true universal cellular embeddings.
Full text 897 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Constructing a cell universe requires integrating heterogeneous single-cell RNA-seq datasets, but is hindered by diverse batch effects. Single-cell foundation models (scFMs), inspired by large language models, aim to learn universal cellular embeddings from large-scale single-cell data. However, unlike language, single-cell data are sparse, noisy, and strongly affected by batch effects that limit cross-dataset transferability. Our systematic evaluation across diverse batch scenarios reveals that current scFMs fail to effectively remove batch effects, with batch signals persisting in pretrained embeddings. Post-hoc batch-centering partially improves alignment, highlighting the need for future scFMs to integrate explicit batch-effect correction mechanisms to achieve true universal cellular embeddings. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00