Abstract
Despite rivers’ cornerstone place in global biodiversity and the key ecosystem services they provide to human societies, their soundscapes are severely understudied. Three challenges are in part responsible for this gap: the active nature of rivers complicates deployment logistics, their structural noise hinders the detection of significant events, and occuring sounds are largely under-characterised and unattributed to specific species. Here, we present a hardware set-up designed for long-term underwater river monitoring, and a computational framework to identify and analyse the highly diverse events that occur in this still largely unexplored acoustic environment. Our low-cost/low-power hydrophone recording solution is comprised of a portable weighted hydrophone mount and a separate land-based audio recording unit, well-suited to flexible deployment in freshwater streams and rivers. Our software protocol then allows us to detect and analyse stand-out events of geomorphic or biological nature despite the major background noise variations that naturally occur in fluvial settings. Applying this method on the River Ness allows us to monitor sediment movements across environmental conditions, and to detect significant bioacoustic signals including salmonid redd-cutting, water surface events, and bird vocalisations. Further application of the framework proposed in this paper will allow for continuous monitoring of rivers across Scotland, a clearer grasp of both sedimentary and biological events happening in underwater soundscapes, and a stronger understanding of their interactions.
Full text
2,496 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Despite rivers’ cornerstone place in global biodiversity and the key ecosystem services they provide to human societies, their soundscapes are severely understudied. Three challenges are in part responsible for this gap: the active nature of rivers complicates deployment logistics, their structural noise hinders the detection of significant events, and occuring sounds are largely under-characterised and unattributed to specific species. Here, we present a hardware set-up designed for long-term underwater river monitoring, and a computational framework to identify and analyse the highly diverse events that occur in this still largely unexplored acoustic environment. Our low-cost/low-power hydrophone recording solution is comprised of a portable weighted hydrophone mount and a separate land-based audio recording unit, well-suited to flexible deployment in freshwater streams and rivers. Our software protocol then allows us to detect and analyse stand-out events of geomorphic or biological nature despite the major background noise variations that naturally occur in fluvial settings. Applying this method on the River Ness allows us to monitor sediment movements across environmental conditions, and to detect significant bioacoustic signals including salmonid redd-cutting, water surface events, and bird vocalisations. Further application of the framework proposed in this paper will allow for continuous monitoring of rivers across Scotland, a clearer grasp of both sedimentary and biological events happening in underwater soundscapes, and a stronger understanding of their interactions.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2QT0D
Life Sciences
bioacoustics, ecoacoustics, brown trout, soundscapes, freshwater, spawning, acoustic monitoring, hydrophone, AudioMoth, sediment, river, salmon
Published: 2026-05-04 13:58
Last Updated: 2026-05-04 13:58
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Data is available upon request to the authors. A link to the code will be uploaded once the paper has been reviewed and published.
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.