Alternative splicing in 300 human cells and tissues is sparsely distributed and strongly associated with cell identity

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT In eukaryotes, alternative splicing allows RNA sequences to be changed as required in their cellular context. While the use of gene expression without considering transcript isoforms is commonly used to classify cell types, the significance of alternative splicing to cell identity is not fully understood. Using data-driven classification and clustering methods, we analysed the RNA Atlas, an ultra-deep total RNA and polyA capture sequencing dataset obtained from 300 different types of cell and tissue samples across the human body. We show that splice inclusion values can distinguish cell identity effectively, and sometimes better than gene expression. These specific differences in alternative splicing are biologically relevant, with many splice events expressed in a limited number of cell types. We show that distributions of splice inclusion levels are “sparser” than gene expression levels, being discontinuous and containing outliers – akin to a control dial with a few settings. Gene expression levels display finer variation, taking on a diverse range of values akin to a control dial with many increments. Complementary analysis of comparable RNA-Seq samples from the ENCODE dataset yielded consistent results regardless of the splice event or gene expression quantification tools used, as well as the choice of RiboMinus TM or polyA capture-derived RNA libraries. Our results highlight the utility of alternative splicing data in data-driven and functional analyses, and the unique relationship between alternative splicing and cell identity.
Full text 1,645 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT In eukaryotes, alternative splicing allows RNA sequences to be changed as required in their cellular context. While the use of gene expression without considering transcript isoforms is commonly used to classify cell types, the significance of alternative splicing to cell identity is not fully understood. Using data-driven classification and clustering methods, we analysed the RNA Atlas, an ultra-deep total RNA and polyA capture sequencing dataset obtained from 300 different types of cell and tissue samples across the human body. We show that splice inclusion values can distinguish cell identity effectively, and sometimes better than gene expression. These specific differences in alternative splicing are biologically relevant, with many splice events expressed in a limited number of cell types. We show that distributions of splice inclusion levels are “sparser” than gene expression levels, being discontinuous and containing outliers – akin to a control dial with a few settings. Gene expression levels display finer variation, taking on a diverse range of values akin to a control dial with many increments. Complementary analysis of comparable RNA-Seq samples from the ENCODE dataset yielded consistent results regardless of the splice event or gene expression quantification tools used, as well as the choice of RiboMinusTM or polyA capture-derived RNA libraries. Our results highlight the utility of alternative splicing data in data-driven and functional analyses, and the unique relationship between alternative splicing and cell identity. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00