Accurate computation of ionic concentrations in the synaptic cleft requires the full Poisson–Nernst–Planck (PNP) equations

The synaptic cleft between neighboring neurons is the site of neurotransmitter-mediated communication that underlies normal brain function, including learning and memory. When an action potential reaches the presynaptic terminal, released neurotransmitters cross the cleft under the combined influence of diffusion and electrical forces to activate postsynaptic receptors. Despite this, synaptic-cleft transport is commonly modeled using a pure diffusion model, neglecting electrical drift. Here, we quantify the relative contributions of diffusion and electrical terms in the Poisson–Nernst–Planck (PNP) framework and assess whether the pure diffusion approximation is adequate. We solve the full PNP system in a three-dimensional computational model of the synaptic cleft at nanometer-scale resolution, tracking five ionic species (Na + , K + , Ca 2+ , Cl − , Glu − ) with full spatial and temporal detail. Solutions are compared directly with those of the pure diffusion (D) model. The D and PNP models produce markedly different ionic concentration fields. Analysis of ionic fluxes confirms that diffusive and electrical contributions are of comparable magnitude across all species. These discrepancies are robust across parameter variations, including the number of AMPA receptors, the amount of released glutamate, the cleft height, and the cleft diffusion coefficient, and are amplified as the number of AMPA receptors increases, the cleft becomes narrower or diffusion more restricted. The quantitative and qualitative differences between the pure D model and the full PNP model demonstrate that neglecting electrical forces in the synaptic cleft has consequences. These discrepancies are large enough to alter the predicted dynamics and biological interpretation of synaptic transmission, establishing that accurate computation of ionic concentrations in the synaptic cleft requires the full PNP equations.