“But I can’t preregister my research”: Improving the reproducibility and transparency of ecology and conservation with adaptive preregistration for model-based research

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

1. Preregistration is an open-science practice which aims to improve research transparency and mitigate questionable research practices, like cherry-picking results. It helps protect against cognitive biases, like hindsight bias, that can influence how study outcomes are interpreted. There has been little uptake of preregistration in ecology and conservation, arguably because existing pre-registration templates focus on null-hypothesis significance testing whereas ecology and conservation often rely on different types of statistical modelling. 2. We argue that preregistration in model-based research in ecology and conservation is both possible and beneficial, using templates adapted for domain-specific methodologies. We applied a user-centred design approach to translate the concept of preregistration into model-based research practice for ecology and conservation. 3. To better align the internal logic of preregistration with the iterative and non-linear process of ecological modelling, we propose, test and evaluate a methodology for ‘adaptive preregistration’, using a case study of modelling managed water releases (“environmental flows modelling”) in regulated rivers for maintaining riparian vegetation condition in Victoria, Australia. 4. This research provides a template and methodology for implementing adaptive preregistration of ecological models. Although we focus on ecology and conservation in this paper, the concept of adaptive preregistration, and the templates developed here, could be applied to model-based research in other scientific disciplines within science more broadly. Modelers in ecology and conservation need no longer cry “but I can’t preregister my research.”
Full text 2,939 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. 1. Preregistration is an open-science practice which aims to improve research transparency and mitigate questionable research practices, like cherry-picking results. It helps protect against cognitive biases, like hindsight bias, that can influence how study outcomes are interpreted. There has been little uptake of preregistration in ecology and conservation, arguably because existing pre-registration templates focus on null-hypothesis significance testing whereas ecology and conservation often rely on different types of statistical modelling. 2. We argue that preregistration in model-based research in ecology and conservation is both possible and beneficial, using templates adapted for domain-specific methodologies. We applied a user-centred design approach to translate the concept of preregistration into model-based research practice for ecology and conservation. 3. To better align the internal logic of preregistration with the iterative and non-linear process of ecological modelling, we propose, test and evaluate a methodology for ‘adaptive preregistration’, using a case study of modelling managed water releases (“environmental flows modelling”) in regulated rivers for maintaining riparian vegetation condition in Victoria, Australia. 4. This research provides a template and methodology for implementing adaptive preregistration of ecological models. Although we focus on ecology and conservation in this paper, the concept of adaptive preregistration, and the templates developed here, could be applied to model-based research in other scientific disciplines within science more broadly. Modelers in ecology and conservation need no longer cry “but I can’t preregister my research.” https://doi.org/10.32942/X2GW66 Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Research Methods in Life Sciences adaptive preregistration, ecological modelling, environmental flows modelling, good modelling practice, metascience, preregistration, open science, transparency Published: 2025-08-19 16:33 Last Updated: 2025-08-19 16:33 CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: Case study data and code are available at https://github.com/egouldo/VEFMAP_VEG_Stage6 and will be made available following double-blind peer-review. Our preregistration template is available as a quarto template extension at https://github.com/egouldo/EcoConsModPreReg and our user guide to adaptive preregistration is located at https://egouldo.github.io/EcoConsPreReg/ Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00