The value of luteal support with progesterone in gonadotropin-induced cycles
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This study investigated the effectiveness of progesterone supplementation for luteal phase support during fertility treatments involving gonadotropins.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of luteal support with vaginal P suppositories in hMG- and hCG-induced cycles.DesignBetween March 1988 and February 1989 patients did not receive luteal support, while between March 1989 and January 1990 P was given routinely in the luteal phase. Induction protocol and patient selection remained otherwise unchanged.SettingInfertility clinic of a tertiary care hospital.PatientsTwenty-seven patients with hypogonadotropic amenorrhea (World Health Organization [WHO] group I) (11 women with luteal support, 16 women without) and 102 patients with euprolactinemic clomiphene citrate (CC)-resistant anovulation (WHO group II) (52 women with luteal support, 50 women without).InterventionVaginal P suppositories 200 mg/d in the luteal support group.Main outcome measuresPregnancy rate (PR), pregnancy outcome.ResultsThe overall PR in 118 cycles with luteal support was 26.3% whereas 10.4% pregnancies were achieved in 115 cycles of the control group. The influence of luteal support was more pronounced in patients with CC-resistant anovulation (25.2% versus 6.9%) than in patients with hypogonadotropic amenorrhea (33.3% versus 21.4%, not significant). The abortion rate was not significantly changed.ConclusionLuteal support with P increases the PR after hMG and hCG induction. The need for supplementary P seems to be related to the underlying cause of ovarian disturbance.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (13)
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54357-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60122-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48494-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0028-2243(92)90276-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46873-1 via openalex
- W16524621 via openalex
- W128941478 via openalex
- W1536166167 via openalex
- W6605198934 via openalex
- W6632102331 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/pgmj.55.644.436-b via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53997-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14470.x via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-13T18:37:28.025090+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK