Cognitive ethology of nest building in a shell-dwelling cichlid

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,584 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
SUMMARY Across animal taxa, nest-building behavior is performed using a generalizable and flexible mental representation of an action sequence – a ‘schema’. In order to accomplish its goal (a stable nest), the brain appears to compare intermediate steps in the process to stored mental images, or ‘templates’. Deviations from these templates drive progress, preferences, and corrections in the execution of this behavior. The stereotypy vs. plasticity of both schema and mental templates have rarely been defined in an experimentally accessible system. Here we investigated nest building by the cichlid Lamprologus ocellatus, a fish species that manipulates abandoned snail shells to build shelters for breeding and protection. We find that nest building is composed of a sequence of behaviors that are tied together by a series of stimulus-response loops, allowing for restarts and shortcuts as the behavioral program unfolds. The attraction to a shell object is innate, as is the final appearance of the nest. The behavior in an inexperienced animal is initially uncoordinated, but is fine-tuned by repeated building opportunities. Shells need to conform to rigid geometric criteria in order to be acceptable as a potential home. Nest building is accompanied by focused neural activity in brain regions homologous to the mammalian hippocampus and neocortex. In conclusion, we have uncovered the constraints and flexibility of cognitive template matching underlying an instinctive, goal-directed behavior. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00