The selfish yet forgetful brain: Stable cerebral oxygen metabolism during hypoglycemia but impaired memory consolidation

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,870 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The continuous supply of glucose and oxygen is essential for healthy brain function. Accordingly, the Selfish Brain Theory proposes that the human brain prioritizes its own energy demands, making it less vulnerable to fluctuations in systemic energy availability. Although studies have reported decreases in cerebral glucose metabolism, alternative energy sources other than glucose might be oxidized for ATP production. However, cerebral oxygen metabolism (CMRO2) has never been quantified across the human brain. In this study, we investigated the influence of insulin-induced hypoglycemia on CMRO2 in healthy male participants. Additionally, we explored the prolonged effects of hypoglycemia on cognitive function following the restoration of euglycemia. We found that CMRO2 remained stable under hypoglycemia, even at blood glucose levels below 49 mg/dL. Interestingly, we detected a significant increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) of up to 11%, particularly in regions involved in higher cognitive processing. Despite stable rates of oxygen metabolism, we identified a selective impairment in memory consolidation following hypoglycemia, even after normal glucose levels were restored, with no effects observed in memory encoding or attention. In favor of the Selfish Brain Theory, the stability in CMRO2 suggests that the brain efficiently shifts to alternate energy pathways under hypoglycemia, potentially using astrocytic glycogen. Despite this metabolic flexibility, our results indicate that prior hypoglycemia imposes long-lasting effects on memory consolidation, possibly linked to glycogen depletion and impaired glutamate synthesis. In summary, our study suggests that clinical states of hypoglycemia pose a critical impact on patients’ brain health and functioning. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00