A Modern Reanalysis of McManus’ Genetic Model of Handedness

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,675 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. We replicate and critically evaluate McManus’ (1985) single-locus genetic model of handedness, which remains influential in laterality research. Using the original familial and twin datasets, we reproduce McManus’ parameter estimates while correcting reporting errors and miscalculations. Our reproduction confirms that the model is reproducible but reveals sensitivity to dataset inconsistencies and outliers. We extend the framework by generalizing correction matrices, implementing simulations, and applying bootstrap methods to estimate confidence intervals. We further analyze a modern dataset from Flores and Adonara, Indonesia, providing a test of the model in a different cultural setting and comparing triplet versus multi-offspring representations. Our findings emphasize both the historical value and the current limitations of the Dextral–Chance framework, offering a modern foundation for testing genetic and cultural theories of handedness with contemporary datasets. https://doi.org/10.32942/X25W7S Life Sciences, Social and Behavioral Sciences Published: 2025-10-13 06:52 Last Updated: 2025-10-13 06:52 CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: Data: N/A; Source code on GitHub Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00