Case
A 41-year-old female patient diagnosed with deep pelvic endometriosis underwent surgery, including appendectomy, for symptoms that were refractory to clinical management. The appendix was resected because of the presence of an endometriotic lesion, a finding reported in approximately 2.8% of surgical endometriosis cases. (
21
,
22
) Resection was performed using an endoscopic linear stapling device.
Approximately 12 days after surgery, the patient developed early postoperative intestinal obstruction, presenting with nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, and colicky pain. Initial management was conservative, consisting of fasting, nasogastric tube insertion, and intravenous hydration, based on the suspicion of postsurgical peritoneal adhesions as the cause of obstruction. However, because the symptoms persisted, computed tomography (CT) was performed, revealing an air-fluid level and small bowel dilatation (
Figure 1
), findings consistent with intestinal obstruction.
Exploratory videolaparoscopy identified an internal hernia caused by the attachment of a surgical staple at the base of the appendiceal suture line, which had encircled the mid-jejunal loop (
Figures 2
and
3
). The staple was detached from the loop and removed, resolving the obstruction without evidence of intestinal ischemia. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged 7 days after the procedure.
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of
Hospital Santa Joana
(CAAE: 79274924.4.0000.5443; #6.837.452).
Intro
The use of endoscopic linear stapling devices in laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries has become increasingly common because of their effectiveness, safety, speed, and ease of manipulation compared with other techniques for closing the appendicular stump. (
1
) Although, in most cases, their use is not associated with morbidity, there have been reports of complications related to the attachment of staples to adjacent viscera, which may lead to intestinal obstruction.
Postsurgical intestinal obstruction is relatively common, occurring in approximately 10% of patients who undergo abdominal surgery. (
2
) However, in appendectomy, it is less frequent, affecting approximately 0.4%–1.54% of patients. (
3
) The role of staples in such events remains poorly understood, with few reports available in the literature. Nonetheless, staples are estimated to cause obstructive complications in approximately 1.8% of laparoscopic surgical procedures. (
4
) Given that postoperative obstruction is most frequently attributed to adhesions, (
5
,
6
) it is important to recognize that less common mechanisms such as staple-related complications, may also contribute and should be considered in the differential diagnosis.
Fourteen case reports have been identified in the literature describing intestinal obstruction caused by surgical staples. Most documented cases result from loose staples remaining within the peritoneal cavity. (
7
-
17
) However, there are a few reports in which functional staples from the suture line have been implicated as the cause of obstruction. (
18
-
20
)
We present a case of postsurgical intestinal obstruction caused by an internal hernia formed by the attachment of a staple from the angle of an appendectomy suture line to a jejunal loop.
Discussion
This case represents an unusual cause of postoperative intestinal obstruction. The final staple at the end of the appendiceal suture line acted as a hook, catching an intestinal loop and predisposing the patient to internal hernia formation and, consequently, mechanical obstruction. In this case, all staples were properly applied and well formed, as confirmed during surgery. Obstruction caused by staples usually occurs early in the postoperative period, as observed in our case, although delayed presentations have also been reported. (
8
,
13
)
Although postoperative obstruction may result from various causes, its initial management should always be conservative, whether the obstruction is functional or mechanical. Adhesions are often responsible and typically respond to clinical measures such as fasting, gastric decompression, and analgesia. Given that these are not infectious events, patients can be safely monitored for symptom resolution. When conservative management fails and symptoms persist, surgical intervention becomes necessary, as in the present case. Performing the procedure using a minimally invasive approach allows diagnostic confirmation and facilitates appropriate treatment while minimizing patient morbidity.
Most cases reported in the literature describe events caused by free staples left within the peritoneal cavity, (
7
-
17
) whereas only a few implicate staples from the suture line itself, as in this case. (
18
-
20
) Although three previous reports have documented similar mechanisms, such events remain extremely rare and likely under-recognized. The present case reinforces the importance of including staple-related complications in the differential diagnosis of postoperative intestinal obstruction. It also contributes to the limited literature by illustrating the clinical presentation and successful management of this complication in a unique context—a patient who underwent appendectomy for endometriosis.
Despite the significant benefits and advances of stapling techniques in recent years, this case underscores the need for awareness of potential complications, even when staples are correctly applied. Surgeons should ensure that all loose staples are removed from the cavity, confirm the integrity of the suture line, and verify that the staples are properly formed. Furthermore, manufacturers and device developers should continue to investigate the mechanisms predisposing to such complications and develop preventive solutions.
Data Availability
The underlying content is contained within the manuscript.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.