A reversed interpretation of the Dunning-Kruger effect based on disturbance

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

The Dunning-Kruger effect describes a phenomenon where individuals with low ability allegedly tend to overestimate their ability. According to a contemporary operationalization of the Dunning-Kruger effect, individuals with low measured ability are predicted to have higher self-rated ability in a LOESS (locally estimated scatterplot smoothing) model compared with a linear regression model. In simulations we show that a Dunning-Kruger effect can appear due to an impact of disturbance on measured ability, even when self-rated ability is a perfect measure of true ability. A higher self-rated than measured ability may be due to measured ability underestimating true ability rather than due to self-rated ability being an overestimation. Hence, Dunning-Kruger effects do not prove that individuals with low measured ability overestimate their true ability.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00