Endogenous Expression and Subcellular Localization of Core Apoptosis Regulators Reveal Key Differences Between Embryonic and Germline Apoptosis in C. elegans

Endogenous Expression and Subcellular Localization of Core Apoptosis Regulators Reveal Key Differences Between Embryonic and Germline Apoptosis in C. elegans | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Endogenous Expression and Subcellular Localization of Core Apoptosis Regulators Reveal Key Differences Between Embryonic and Germline Apoptosis in C. elegans Gokul Gopakumar, Afroza Aman, Stephane Rolland, Anton Gartner, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8728396/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 9 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Apoptosis is a highly conserved form of programmed cell death controlled by a core molecular pathway that was first defined in Caenorhabditis elegans and is conserved in mammals. This pathway is composed of egl-1/ BH3-only, ced-9 /Bcl-2, ced-4 /Apaf-1, and ced-3/ Caspase. Despite being discovered more than 20 years ago, tissue-specific apoptosis induction as well as endogenous expression pattern and dynamic subcellular localization of apoptosis proteins remain incompletely defined. Here, we generated a complete set of CRISPR/Cas9-engineered transcriptional and translational reporters for all four apoptosis genes and systematically analyzed their expression and subcellular localization in the C. elegans germline and embryo. We show that somatic apoptosis is driven by precise, lineage-specific activation of egl-1 , whereas ced-9 , ced-4 , and ced-3 are ubiquitously expressed. In contrast, DNA-damage triggers a robust CEP-1/p53-dependent-induction of egl-1 throughout the germline, yet apoptosis occurs only in late pachytene cells. We also identify intron1 of egl-1 as essential for CEP-1–dependent transcriptional activation. Analysis of brc-1 and syp-2 mutants demonstrates that distinct meiotic surveillance pathways converge on egl-1 induction. Analysis of the subcellular localization of the downstream regulators CED-9, CED-4, and CED-3 reveals dynamic, tissue-specific localizations that refine the classical apoptosis model. CED-4 transitions from a perinuclear distribution in the germline and early embryos to a predominantly mitochondrial localization later in embryogenesis, while CED-3 changes its subcellular localization depending on developmental stage and apoptotic status. CED-9 localizes to distinct mitochondrial foci in both embryo and germline. Together, these reporters reveal that C. elegans apoptosis is governed by two mechanistically distinct programs: ( 1 ) lineage-specific egl-1 activation in embryos and ( 2 ) checkpoint-mediated activation of egl-1 in the germline, where additional, yet unidentified pathways restrict apoptotic execution. These reporters also provide a comprehensive toolbox for dissecting apoptotic and non-apoptotic functions of the conserved apoptotic machinery in vivo . Biological sciences/Cell biology Biological sciences/Genetics Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Introduction Apoptosis, the best-characterized form of programmed cell death, is a vital process that ensures proper development, maintains tissue homeostasis, and eliminates damaged cells in multicellular organisms ( 1 – 3 ). Genetic studies in Caenorhabditis elegans identified the evolutionarily conserved core components of the apoptotic pathway, which were later found to be conserved in mammalian cells ( 4 ). While egl-1 encodes a BH3-only protein that functions as the most upstream pro-apoptotic factor, ced-9 encodes a Bcl-2–like anti-apoptotic protein. ced-4 encodes an Apaf-1–related pro-apoptotic protein lacking the cytochrome c–binding domain, and ced-3 encodes a caspase related to both initiator caspase-9 and executioner caspase-3 ( 4 – 11 ). While the apoptotic machinery is conserved in mammals, how apoptosis is spatially and temporally regulated during development remains incompletely understood ( 1 ). The genetic tractability and essentially invariant cell lineage of C. elegans make it an ideal system to dissect these mechanisms. During C. elegans development, 131 of the 1090 somatic cells are programmed to die ( 12 , 13 ), raising the question of how these 131 cells, which arise from multiple cell lineages, are selectively destined to die while their sisters survive. Cell-specific apoptosis induction largely depends on the transcriptional upregulation of egl-1 , which is controlled by cis -regulatory sequences located upstream and downstream of its transcription start site ( 14 ). Several transcription factors have been shown to regulate egl-1 expression in a cell-specific manner ( 5 , 9 , 11 , 14 , 15 ). In contrast, ced-9 , ced-4 , and ced-3 are expressed broadly, including in cells that do not undergo apoptosis ( 16 – 22 ). Post-transcriptional mechanisms have also been shown to fine-tune the expression of egl-1 (ref. 23, 24), as well as ced-9 and ced-3 (ref. 25). The lack of suitable antibodies and endogenous reporters has hampered the systematic analysis of the expression of core apoptosis machinery genes during embryogenesis, and this is especially the case for egl-1 . Recent work has begun to overcome these limitations: Lambie and colleagues ( 16 ) and Tucker and colleagues ( 26 ) used CRISPR/Cas9–mediated tagging of endogenous ced-9 , ced-4 , and ced-3 loci to visualize their expression and subcellular localization in live embryos. In contrast, comparable endogenous reporters for egl-1 and systematic analyses of its embryonic expression is still lacking. The adult germline is the only proliferative tissue in C. elegans , and apoptosis is restricted to female germ cells during late meiotic pachytene. A baseline level of physiological germ-cell apoptosis removes approximately half of the germ cells in an egl-1 –independent manner to maintain tissue homeostasis ( 27 ). By contrast, germ-cell apoptosis triggered by DNA damage or defects in meiotic recombination ( 28 ) are dependent on egl-1 and its transcriptional induction by the C. elegans CEP-1/p53-like transcription factor ( 29 – 32 ). Immunostaining revealed broad cytoplasmic localization of EGL-1::V5 translational fusion protein in the late pachytene region upon ionizing radiation IR ( 33 ), whereas CED-9 (ref. 17), CED-4 (ref. 17), and CED-3 (ref. 19, 22) are constitutively expressed. However, expression of these genes in the germline has not been systematically characterized, and it remains unclear whether the localization of these proteins dynamically changes upon induction of apoptosis or during specific apoptotic stages. Notably, reliable transgene germline expression requires single-copy integration at endogenous loci to minimize silencing ( 34 ). According to the classic model of apoptosis, CED-9 inhibits apoptosis in healthy cells by binding a CED-4 dimer at the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) ( 35 ). Upon apoptotic induction, EGL-1 binds to CED-9, inducing a conformational change of CED-9, triggering the release of CED-4, which then assembles into the apoptosome at the perinuclear membrane to activate the CED-3 caspase ( 36 , 37 ). However, several observations challenge this model and suggest that it requires refinement. CED-4 and CED-3 remain localized at mitochondria during mid-embryogenesis in both healthy and apoptotic cells ( 16 ). Although perinuclear CED-4 localization has been reported in ced-9 loss-of-function (lf) mutants, and upon egl-1 overexpression ( 17 , 26 , 38 ), this redistribution is not consistently observed ( 16 ). Additionally, CED-4 exhibits a perinuclear localization in all germ cells, including those not undergoing apoptosis ( 17 , 20 , 21 , 38 ). Here, we describe the developmental expression patterns and subcellular localizations of C. elegans apoptosis genes, egl-1, ced-9, ced-4 and ced-3 , using transcriptional and translational reporters generated by CRISPR/Cas9 at their endogenous loci. A central unresolved question is how transcriptional activation of apoptosis genes is translated into protein abundance, localization, and apoptotic execution. Using these reporters, we dissect how transcriptional output, protein localization, and tissue-specific competence together shape apoptotic outcome in the germline and embryos. Materials and Methods General C. elegans Maintenance and Strains C. elegans strains were cultured and maintained at 15°C and 20°C unless stated otherwise ( 39 ). The Bristol N2 strain was used as the wild-type strain. Worms were kept on nematode growth medium (NGM) plates seeded with OP50 bacteria (~ 100 µl per plate). The strains used in this study are listed in Table S2 . All translational reporter strains were maintained as homozygotes. All transcriptional reporter strains are homozygous viable and behave as null alleles. The ced-9(syb5190) transcriptional reporter is viable only in the ced-3(n717) mutant background. CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing As indicated in Table S2 , some genome edits were generated by Sunybiotech. egl-1(gt3323), egl-1(gt3399), egl-1(gt3361), ced-9(gt3374), ced-4(gt3372), syp-2(gt3637) and brc-1(gt3334) were generated in the Gartner laboratory using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing following established methods ( 40 ). For the generation of each genome edit, ∼10 young adult hermaphrodites were injected into one or both gonad arms. They were then recovered individually into 5 µl of M9 buffer in the center of the OP50-seeded plate. Recovered worms were then maintained at 15°C. F1 progenies that displayed the roller phenotype were singled 5–7 days post-injection and subsequently screened by pheno- and genotyping, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or sequencing after being permitted to lay eggs for 24–48 hours. For the edits generated in the Gartner laboratory, the sequences of the CRISPR RNA (crRNA), single-stranded OligoDeoxyNucleotide (ssODN), and primers for the amplification of double stranded DNA (dsDNA) fragments are shown in Table S3. Generation of Transcriptional and Translational Reporters Fluorescent protein sequences (eGFP and mKate2) were obtained from the Frøkjær-Jensen laboratory, and a codon-optimized tdTomato sequence was used as previously described ( 41 , 42 ). To ensure germline expression and minimize silencing, a synthetic Periodic An/Tn Cluster (PATC) intron was inserted into each reporter (Table S1 , Fig. S1 -S3) ref. ( 34 ). For the transcriptional reporters, an SV40 nuclear localization sequence (NLS) was placed at the N-terminus and an egl-13 NLS at the C-terminus, separated from the fluorescent protein coding sequence by linker sequences (Table S1 , Fig. S1 -S3). To enable efficient exchange of fluorescent markers, guide RNA target sites were introduced flanking the fluorescent protein coding region (Fig. S1 -S3, Table S3). Ionizing Radiation (IR) Treatment and Preparation of of C. elegans Germlines for Live Imaging A synchronized population of L4-staged worms was obtained by performing a layoff. In short, 15–20 adult hermaphrodite worms were transferred to a medium plate and allowed to lay eggs for 6 hours at 20°C. The adult worms were removed, and the plates were then incubated at 20°C or 15°C until the worms reached the L4 stage. Synchronized L4-staged worms were then treated with a 0 Gy or 90 Gy dose of IR using a Biological X-ray irradiator (Rad Source; RS-2000). 24 hours post-IR treatment, the adult hermaphrodites were transferred onto a 2% agar pad into 10 ul of 5 mM tetramisole to immobilize the worms. An 18 x 18 mm coverslip (1.5H Zeiss) was placed on top and sealed with (for confocal and long-term live imaging) or without (for 4D microscopy germline imaging) vaseline to prevent desiccation. Live imaging of the C. elegans germline was performed as described below. Confocal Image Acquisition of C. elegans Germlines Z-stacks of the entire germline were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM880, Carl Zeiss) with either a 40x/1.2 NA water-immersion objective or a 63x/1.4 NA oil-immersion objective, and the Zen 2.3 SP1 software (Zeiss). The imaging settings are listed in Table S4. Image analysis was performed using Fiji software, and the following LUT settings were used (Table S5). 'n' represents the number of germlines analyzed. Spinning Disk Confocal Long-term Live Imaging of C. elegans Germlines Live imaging of the zhIs198 [Plim-7::Δpes-10::mCherry::PH(PLC1delta1)::unc-54 3'UTR] I; egl-1(gt3361) V ( 43 ) animals was performed using a spinning disk confocal microscope (ECLIPSE Ti2-E, Nikon) with spinning disk head (CSU-W1, Yokogawa Electric Corporation) and the NIS element software (Nikon). A 60x/1.4 NA oil objective was used to capture the images. The acquisition parameters used were 488 nm laser at 40% intensity, 561 nm laser at 25% intensity, 300 ms exposure time, no binning, and image capture every 5 minutes for a total duration of 2 hours. Image and video analysis were carried out in Fiji using the following LUT settings: Magenta (mCherry) – (105–150); Green (eGFP) – (105–150). 4D microscopy Image Acquisition of C. elegans Germlines The Z-stack of the entire germline was captured using a 4D microscope (Axio Imager M2, Zeiss) and Time to Live software (Caenotec) ( 44 , 45 ). A 100x/1.3 NA oil objective was used to capture the images. For eGFP the following acquisition parameters were used: LED intensity: 15%; exposure time: 150 ms; binning: ON. Image analysis was performed using Fiji software, and the min and max (brightness) were adjusted to 0-255 for all the images, except when indicated otherwise in the figure legends. C. elegans Germline Apoptosis Counting A synchronized population of L4-staged worms was obtained by filtering L1 worms from freshly starved plates, as previously described ( 46 ). In short, from a freshly starved medium NGM plate, worms were washed using 2 ml of M9. The solution was then collected in a 20 ml syringe and passed through a nylon mesh (11 µm Nylon net filters, Millipore), with holes large enough only to allow L1 larvae to pass. The L1 worms were then transferred to an NGM medium plate with OP50 bacteria using a glass pipette and allowed to dry. The plates were then incubated at 20°C or 15°C until the worms reached the L4 stage. Apoptotic cell corpses in the germline were quantified using Nomarski optics as described previously ( 27 ). Briefly, the synchronized population of L4-staged worms was exposed to 0 Gy or 90 Gy dose of IR (using a Biological X-ray irradiator (Rad Source; RS-2000)). 24-, 36-, and 48-hours post-IR treatment, the adult hermaphrodites were transferred onto a 2% agar pad containing a drop of 5 mM tetramisole to immobilize the worms. An 18 x 18 mm coverslip (1.5H Zeiss) was placed on top, and the number of cell corpses per gonad arm was scored using a 4D microscope/Axio Imager M2 microscope (Zeiss) using a 100x/1.3 NA oil objective. All quantifications were performed blind. Experiment to Monitor Time and Dose Dependency of the egl-1 Reporter Induction by IR For time-course analysis of the egl-1(gt3323) and egl-1(gt3361) animals, L4-staged worms synchronized by filtration were irradiated with 90 Gy dose of IR, and imaged using a 4D microscope/Axio Imager M2 microscope (Zeiss) equipped with a 100x/1.3 NA oil objective at specified time points post-irradiation (0-, 0.5-, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-hours). For eGFP the following acquisition parameters were used: LED intensity: 15%; exposure time: 150 ms; binning: ON. Image analysis was performed using the Fiji software, and the min and max (brightness) were adjusted to 0-255 for all the images. For dose-response analysis, L4-staged worms were treated with 0 Gy, 30 Gy, 60 Gy, or 90 Gy, and imaged 24 hours post-IR treatment using a 4D microscope/Axio Imager M2 microscope (Zeiss) equipped with a 100x/1.3 NA oil objective. For eGFP the following acquisition parameters were used: LED intensity: 15%; exposure time: 150 ms; binning: ON. Image analysis was performed using the Fiji software, and the min and max (brightness) were adjusted to 0-255 for all the images. Immunostaining of the C. elegans Germline Immunostaining of the C. elegans germline was performed as previously described ( 47 ). Briefly, adult hermaphrodites (24 hours post-L4 stage) were transferred to a glass dish containing phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) + 0.2 mM tetramisole. The heads of the worms were cut off using a blade, and the gonads were collected into a 1.5 ml low protein-binding Eppendorf tube using a Pasteur pipette. Immediately after transfer, 1 ml of 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS was added, and samples were incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes. Following fixation, the gonads were washed with PBST (PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20) and post-fixed in 1 ml of 100% methanol for 5 min. After three quick washes with PBST, the gonads were permeabilized in 500 µl of PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes at room temperature; this step was repeated four times. Samples were then washed twice with PBS and incubated overnight (∼12–14 hours) in blocking buffer PBSTB (PBST + 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA)). Primary antibodies [anti-Mitomix (mouse anti-ATP5A, anti-Cytochrome C, and anti-PDHA1; 1:200; Abcam) ( 48 ) and rabbit anti-HA (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology)] in PBSTB were added, and samples were incubated for approximately 12 hours at 4°C. Gonads were subsequently washed five times with PBST for 5 minutes each and incubated overnight at 4°C with secondary antibodies [Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:5000; Invitrogen) and Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated donkey anti-mouse (1:500; Invitrogen)] in PBSTB. After five additional washes with PBST (5 minutes each), 20 µl of Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Labs) was added to the tube containing the gonads. Gonads were then transferred onto a large 2% agarose pad, covered with a 22 × 22 mm coverslip, and incubated at 4°C overnight to allow drying. Slides were finally sealed with nail polish. For image acquisition, the gonads were analyzed using a high-resolution confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 980; Carl Zeiss). A 40x/1.2 NA water objective was used to capture the images. The images were acquired using the following settings: 488 nm laser intensity: 1%; Master Gain: 800 V; Digital Gain: 1.0; 561 nm laser intensity: 1%; Master Gain: 690 V; Digital Gain: 1.0; 405 nm laser intensity: 1%; Master Gain: 750 V; Digital Gain: 1.0. 4D Microscopy of the C. elegans Embryo The method for 4D microscopy was described previously ( 45 ). Modifications of this system are described in ( 44 ). All recordings were acquired at 25°C. Lineage Analysis Lineage analysis of the C. elegans embryo was performed as previously described ( 44 , 45 ). All 4D-recordings generated were analyzed using the Software Database SIMI©BioCell (SIMI Reality Motion Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany; http://www.simi.com/ ). The observer follows cells and the coordinates are recorded approximately every 2 minutes. The cell cleavages are assessed by marking the mother cell before the cleavage furrows ingress and subsequently by marking the centers of the daughter cells three frames later (105 seconds). By marking every cell throughout embryonic development, the complete cell lineage of an embryo is generated. These data can be used to create 3D representations of all nuclear positions at any given developmental stage. For the analysis of apoptotic events, we tracked the first 13 apoptotic events from the AB lineage and the MSpaapp apoptotic event. GFP scans are indicated by horizontal green lines in Fig. 3 . Immunostaining of the C. elegans Embryo Immunostaining of the C. elegans embryo was performed as previously described ( 49 ). Microscope slides were cleaned with 70% ethanol. Following this, each microscope slide was heated on a hot plate at 80°C and then coated twice with poly-L-lysine (0.25 mg/ml), with drying in-between at 80°C. After the second poly-L-lysine coating, the slides were cooled down on the bench before the next step. C. elegans embryos were then transferred using a P10 pipette onto the coated microscope slide. A new 18 × 18 mm coverslip (1.5H Zeiss) was then placed on top of the area where the embryos were transferred (at ∼45° angle, with the corner of the coverslip hanging over the edge of the coated microscope slide). The microscope slide was then immediately flash-frozen on dry ice (for at least 30 minutes). The coverslip was then very quickly removed by flicking it (freeze–crack method), and the slides were incubated in 100% methanol for 5 minutes, followed by 100% acetone for 5 minutes. Following the fixation, the slides were air-dried (for ∼8 minutes) before being stored at − 20°C if the next step was not performed right away. Permeabilization of the embryos was performed by incubating the slides 4 times for 10 minutes in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 at room temperature. Slides were then washed twice with PBS and incubated overnight at 4°C (∼12–14 hours) in blocking buffer PBSTB. Primary antibody [anti-GFP rabbit (Abcam Ab290) 1:500, anti-Mitomix (mouse anti-ATP5A, anti-Cytochrome C, and anti-PDHA1; 1:200; Abcam) ( 48 ) and rabbit anti-HA (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology)] ( 49 ) in PBSTB was added to the embryos, and incubation was performed overnight at 4°C in a humid chamber. After three washes with PBST for 10 minutes, a secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated donkey anti-mouse (1:500; Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (1:500; Invitrogen) in PBSTB was added to the embryos, and incubation was performed overnight at 4°C in a humid chamber. After two washes with PBST and one wash with PBS, post-fixation with PBS + 3.7% PFA (Paraformaldehyde) was performed for 10 minutes. The slide was then washed with PBS for 10 min, with PBST (twice for 10 minutes each), and with PBS for 10 min. Afterwards, except for the area containing the embryos, the rest of the slide was dried using a KIMTECH tissue. 10 µl of Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Labs) was then added to the area containing the embryos, and an 18 × 18 mm coverslip (1.5H Zeiss) was placed on top. Nail polish (clear) was then used to seal the slides, with the nail polish allowed to dry in the dark. Once all slides were sealed correctly, they were then placed at 4°C until analysis. For image acquisition, embryos were analyzed using a high-resolution confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 980; Carl Zeiss). A 63× oil objective (1.4 NA) was used to capture the images, with a Z-stack of 0,13 µm per step used. Embryos were sequentially illuminated by a 465 nm laser (for DAPI), a 488 nm Laser (for Alexa 488 anti-rabbit), and a 561 nm Laser ( for Alexa 594 anti-mouse). Analysis of Embryonic Lethality and Brood Size Analysis of brood size and embryonic lethality was performed as previously described ( 50 ). Briefly, L4 worms were picked and either maintained at 15°C and 25°C. The worms were transferred to fresh small (35 mm) plates with food twice a day (morning and evening) until they no longer laid eggs. Shortly after transferring the worms to a fresh plate, the number of eggs laid was counted. After 24–36 hours, the number of dead eggs was counted and after 24–48 hours, the number of animals hatched was counted. Results We generated transcriptional and translational reporters at the endogenous loci using CRISPR/Cas9 to measure physiological steady-state gene expression and protein subcellular localization (as described in Materials and Methods) (Table S1 + S2, Fig. S1 -S3). IR-Induced egl-1 Expression in the Germline Requires the First Intron of egl-1 To investigate egl-1 transcription, we designed two transcriptional reporters. The egl-1(syb4530) , replaces the entire open reading frame with our NLS::linker::eGFP::linker::NLS cassette, whereas egl-1(gt3323) , retains exon1, intron1, and the first codon of exon2 (Fig. S4A). Although egl-1 transcription is induced by IR ( 51 ), only egl-1(gt3323) supported IR-induced expression in the germline (Fig. 1 A and S4C/C'). We further show that this induction is time- and dose-dependent (Fig. S5 + S6). Loss of reporter expression in a cep-1(lg12501) -deficient background confirmed that IR-induced egl-1 transcription is CEP-1-dependent (Fig. S4C/C') ( 51 ). Consistent with the presence of canonical p53-consensus binding sites within intron1 (Fig. S4A + B) ( 52 ), IR-induced expression was abolished in egl-1(gt3399) , which lacks intron1 (Fig. S4A+S4C/C'). Together, these data identify intron1 as a CEP-1–responsive regulatory module required for IR-induced egl-1 transcription. IR-Induced egl-1 Expression in the Germline is Ubiquitous, but Apoptosis Only Occurs in a Subset of Cells IR-induced germ-cell apoptosis is blocked in the egl-1(gt3323) transcriptional reporter, whereas egl-1 -independent physiological germ-cell apoptosis remains unperturbed (Fig. S8A) ( 27 , 48 ). Wild-type levels of IR-induced germ-cell apoptosis in the egl-1(gt3361) translational reporter demonstrates the reporter's functionality (Fig. S8A). We further show this reporter is induced by IR in a time- and dose-dependent manner (Fig. S5 + S7). Confocal imaging revealed that EGL-1 is ubiquitously and uniformly expressed upon IR throughout the mitotic, and meiotic part of the germline up to late pachytene, with heterogeneous expression emerging in late pachytene and early diakinesis (Fig. 1 A). Long-term spinning-disk confocal imaging (~ 2 hours (n = 3)) using the CED-1 engulfment reporter ( zhIs198 ) to mark apoptotic corpses uncovered diverse EGL-1 protein dynamics among apoptotic germ cells ( 43 ). Small apoptotic corpses lacking EGL-1 entirely, consistent with egl-1 -independent physiological germ-cell apoptosis (Fig. 2 A/A’), ( 27 , 48 ). Small apoptotic corpses showing an increase in EGL-1, followed by a decrease, EGL-1 appearing to congregate on one side of the corpse (Fig. 2 B/B'). Large apoptotic corpses exhibiting a marked and sustained increase of EGL-1 leading to hyperaccumulation (Fig. 2 C/C'). Large apoptotic corpses with moderate EGL-1 expression, not showing hyperaccumulation (Fig. 2 D/D', Movie S1-S4). Thus, our observations reveal that EGL-1 protein dynamics varies substantially between apoptotic germ cells. Notably, EGL-1 is also expressed in non-apoptotic cells. In summary, our findings show that IR robustly induces egl-1 in a CEP-1-dependent manner throughout the germline and that this induction is necessary ( 51 , 53 ), but not sufficient for IR-induced apoptosis, which occurs only on late pachytene cells. Thus, mechanisms unrelated to EGL-1 induction specify which cells undergo apoptosis. Recombination and Chromosome Pairing Defects Induce egl-1 Expression Defects in meiotic recombination and chromosome pairing induce germ-cell apoptosis ( 54 – 57 ). We, therefore, examined egl-1 induction in brc-1 /BRCA1 and syp-2 mutants, which are defective in recombinational repair and meiotic chromosome pairing, respectively ( 58 – 60 ). egl-1 was induced in both mutants, even in the absence of IR. In brc-1 mutants, egl-1 expression was detected in both mitotic and meiotic regions of the germline, consistent with activation of the DNA damage checkpoint (Fig. S9A). In contrast, egl-1 expression in syp-2 mutants was restricted to the pachytene region (Fig. S9B), consistent with defects in chromosome synapsis that delay repair of meiotic double-strand breaks via inter-sister recombination ( 58 , 59 ). Thus, disruptions in either DNA repair or chromosome pairing activate distinct checkpoint signals that converge on egl-1 induction to eliminate defective germ cells. Embryonic Lineage Analysis Reveals Precise Coupling between egl-1 Expression and Apoptosis To test whether egl-1 expression correlates with apoptosis induction during embryogenesis, we performed cell lineage analysis of the first 13 apoptotic deaths occuring after the 9th round of cell division in the AB lineage and the MSpaapp death. The transcriptional egl-1(gt3323) reporter was specifically expressed in cells programmed to die, but apoptosis is blocked since egl-1(gt3323) is a null allele (Fig. 1 B + 3, S10A). Comparing wild-type embryos and those carrying the transcriptional reporter side-by-side revealed that reporter expression generally initiated after apoptotic corpse formation (Fig. 3 ). For example, the ABalapapaa corpse forms 13 minutes after birth of the cell in wild-type embryos. Reporter expression begins ~ 31 min after birth in the transcriptional egl-1(gt3323) reporter, likely reflecting low initial egl-1 expression levels and/or eGFP maturation time. The translational egl-1(gt3361) reporter was detected in cells programmed to die without blocking apoptosis, indicating full functionality (Fig. 1 C+S10A). Altogether, these findings show that cell-specific egl-1 activation closely matches the execution of apoptosis. EGL-1 Mitochondrial Localization in the Germline and During Embryonic Apoptosis We analyzed the subcellular localization of the EGL-1 protein in the germline and during embryogenesis. Upon IR, EGL-1 colocalized with mitochondria throughout the entire germline (Fig. 4 A+ S13). A subset of apoptotic corpses, identified by button-like morphology under DIC optics, exhibited pronounced EGL-1 hyperaccumulation. However, its functional significance remains unclear (Fig. 4 A). Because these corpses were already undergoing engulfment, and mitochondria in conjunction with EGL-1 congregated on one side of the corpse, they likely represent corpses during late-stage of engulfment (Fig. 2 B’). In embryos, high-resolution confocal microscopy of fixed samples revealed single cells with intense EGL-1 staining that colocalizes with mitochondria (Fig. 4 B + C). We hypothesize that these cells are cells destined to die. Ubiquitous ced-3 Expression with Apoptosis-Specific Changes in CED-3 Localization To systematically study ced-3 expression, we generated a transcriptional reporter, ced-3(syb5182) , replacing the entire coding sequence, and a translational reporter, ced-3(syb5180) , with a C-terminal linker::eGFP sequence to tag both CED-3 isoforms (Fig. S1 B). As expected, germline and embryonic apoptosis were abolished in the transcriptional ced-3(syb5182) reporter, phenocopying a strong ced-3( lf ) mutant. In contrast, apoptosis occurred at wild-type levels in the translational ced-3(syb5180) reporter, confirming full functionality (Fig. S8D+S10A). Both reporters are ubiquitously expressed with and without IR in the germline (Fig. 5 A). Without IR, the CED-3 protein displays a diffuse localization in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus (Fig. 5 A). Upon IR, CED-3 localization remained unchanged in 4/9 animals (Fig. S11B), but redistributed to structures around the nuclear periphery and in the cytoplasm in 5/9 animals. These structures form a pattern broadly similar to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) ( 61 ). Notably, CED-3 also accumulated in the cytoplasm of some late-stage apoptotic corpses in both irradiated and unirradiated germlines (Fig. 5 A, arrows). In unirradiated germlines, CED-3 localizes to the nuclei of diplotene-stage oocytes, with increasing nuclear enrichment in late-stage oocytes (Fig. 5 A, arrowheads). Colocalization with the H2B-reporter ( ltls37) confirmed association of CED-3 with condensed meiotic chromosomes in proximal oocytes (Fig. S11A). During embryogenesis, the transcriptional ced-3(syb5182) and translational ced-3(syb5180) reporters are ubiquitously expressed (Fig. 5 B + C) consistent with previous reports ( 16 ). Interestingly, the translational ced-3(syb5180) reporter localizes to both the cytoplasm and the nucleus in all cells. In apoptotic corpses, it adopts a cytoplasmic ring-like pattern, indicating a shift toward predominantly cytoplasmic localization (Fig. 5 C). In summary, CED-3 is expressed ubiquitously in the germline and embryos and its localization changes upon induction of apoptosis. CED-4 Subcellular Localization Differs Between the Germline and Embryo and Changes Dynamically During Embryogenesis. To systematically study ced-4 expression, we generated a transcriptional reporter, ced-4(syb4540) , replacing the entire coding sequence, and a translational reporter, ced-4(syb4536) , with a C-terminal linker::eGFP sequence to tag both CED-4 isoforms (Fig. S1 C). The transcriptional ced-4(syb4540) reporter revealed ubiquitous ced-4 expression in the germline (independently of IR) (Fig. 6 A) and in embryos starting from the 8-12-cell stage (Fig. 6 B). Analysis of the functional translational ced-4(syb4536) reporter (Fig. S8C+S10A) confirmed that CED-4 is ubiquitously expressed in the germline and localizes to the perinuclear membrane, consistent with previous observations ( 17 ) (Fig. 6 A+S12A). In early embryos (1-4-cell stage), CED-4 also localizes to the perinuclear membrane, whereas in later embryonic stages its localization became predominantly cytoplasmic (Fig. 6 C) with high-resolution imaging showing colocalization of CED-4 with mitochondria ( 48 ) (Fig. S12B). The subcellular localization in early embryos likely persists from the germline, and the relocalization in later stage embryos (> 8-12-cell stage) may be necessary for proper apoptosis. Altogether, these data demonstrate that CED-4 is ubiquitously expressed in the germline and embryo, and that its subcellular localization differs between these tissues. Our observation reconciles earlier findings ( 17 , 38 ) by identifying a developmental switch in CED-4 localization from the perinuclear membrane to mitochondria. CED-9 is Ubiquitously Expressed and Forms Distinct Foci on Mitochondria in Both the Germline and the Embryo To examine ced-9 expression, we generated a transcriptional reporter, ced-9(syb5190) , replacing the entire coding sequence. This reporter is engineered into the ced-3( lf ) background to prevent apoptosis associated with ced-9(syb5190) (Fig. S1 D). This reporter revealed ubiquitous ced-9 expression in embryos and the germline (Fig. 7 A + C). Attempts to generate a translational reporter by N-terminal eGFP tagging failed to produce viable homozygotes, indicating disruption of CED-9 function. As an alternative, we generated an N-terminal 3×HA-tagged reporter, ced-9(gt3374) (Fig. S1 D). This reporter does not exhibit excessive embryonic apoptosis and embryonic lethality (Fig. S1 0A + C), indicating that it is functional in embryos. It is only partially functional in the germline, where it causes elevated apoptosis with or without IR (Fig. S8B) and a significantly reduced brood size (Fig. S1 0B). Immunostaining confirmed that in embryos, CED-9 localizes to distinct foci on mitochondria, consistent with previous reports (Fig. 7 D) ( 17 ). Importantly, we further detected these foci throughout the entire germline in the absence of DNA damage (Fig. 7 B+S14). Upon IR, CED-9 foci became spatially restricted to the mitotic and early transition zones and in a few late pachytene cells (Fig. 7 B+S14). Together, these data show that ced-9 is ubiquitously expressed in embryos and in the germline and that CED-9 protein forms distinct foci on mitochondria. In the germline, CED-9 localization becomes spatially restricted in response to DNA damage, revealing an additional layer of regulation. Discussion In this study, we generated CRISPR/Cas9 endogenous transcriptional and translational reporters for all four apoptosis genes, egl-1, ced-9, ced-4 , and ced-3 , and systematically map their expression and subcellular localization in the C. elegans germline and embryos (Fig. 8 ). These analyses provide a framework for interpreting how distinct regulatory logics shape apoptotic outcomes in somatic lineages versus the germline. Distinct Modes of egl-1 Regulation Underly Somatic and Germline Apoptosis in C. elegans . C. elegans developmental apoptosis follows a hardwired program. Our analysis demonstrates that egl-1 transcription is restricted to lineages where cells are destined to die in wild-type animals. Previous work showed that egl-1 mRNA is already present in the mother cell of cell destined to die ( 23 ) suggesting reporter detection may lag due to eGFP maturation kinetics or imaging sensitivity. Nevertheless, the spatial and temporal precision of egl-1 activation supports its role as the decisive trigger for somatic apoptosis. In contrast, ced-9 , ced-4 , and ced-3 are ubiquitously expressed in embryos, as previously reported ( 16 , 26 ). The germline follows a fundamentally different regulatory logic. Both transcriptional and translational egl-1 reporters are strongly induced upon DNA damage. Consistent with previous work, this response is CEP-1/p53-dependent ( 30 ). Using targeted reporter designs, we identified intron1 of egl-1 as a critical cis -regulatory element containing a CEP-1/p53-responsive regulatory module that enables widespread germline induction of egl-1 following genotoxic stress. Some apoptotic germ cells exhibit pronounced EGL-1 hyperaccumulation. This accumulation may reflect either positive feedback between apoptotic and engulfment pathways, as previously suggested ( 62 , 63 ), or delayed corpse clearance when high levels of DNA damage–induced apoptosis overwhelm the engulfment machinery. Surprisingly, egl-1 induction is not restricted to late pachytene cells where apoptosis occurs, but extends across the entire germline. These results indicate that egl-1 expression alone is insufficient to commit a germ cell to die, and imply that additional factors, potentially involving checkpoint signaling thresholds, mitochondrial physiological status, or the availability of downstream effectors, define which cells are competent to execute apoptosis. Supporting this model, brc-1 and syp-2 mutants show that distinct meiotic surveillance pathways converge on egl-1 induction in both apoptotic and non-apoptotic cells. Thus, apoptosis in C. elegans is governed by two parallel but mechanistically distinct logics: ( 1 ) lineage-specific egl-1 induction in embryos and ( 2 ) checkpoint-mediated activation of egl-1 in the entire germline, where additional yet unidentified pathways restrict apoptotic execution. Several genes are required for DNA damage-induced germ-cell apoptosis without affecting DNA damage-induced egl-1 transcription, and some act in a cell-nonautonomous manner. These include the IR-induced intestinal secreted SYSM-1 ( 64 ) and the scaffold protein KRI-1 (related to mammalian KRIT1/CCM1), which regulates MAP kinase signaling required for DNA damage–induced germ-cell apoptosis by controlling intestinal zinc sequestration ( 65 ). Finally, several DNA repair and DNA-damage response genes, whose loss blocks DNA damage-induced apoptosis without compromising egl-1 induction, include the SIR-2 histone deacetylase ( 48 ), the GEN-1 Holliday junction resolvase ( 66 ), and Topoisomerase III ( 67 ). It will be interesting to test if any of these factors affect EGL-1 protein abundance, or post-translational modifications. Context-Dependent Localization of CED-9, CED-4, and CED-3 Shapes Apoptosis in C. elegans Our CRISPR/Cas9 reporters uncovered context-dependent localization dynamics of CED-9, CED-4, and CED-3 across the germline and embryos. CED-9 localizes to mitochondria in embryos and in the germline as previously shown ( 16 , 17 ). Interestingly, in the absence of DNA damage, CED-9 foci are observed throughout the germline. In contrast, upon IR, they become spatially restricted to the mitotic zone, early transition zone, and a few cells in the late pachytene zone. This apparent reduction in CED-9 abundance or distribution may contribute to apoptosis induction, as previously reported for physiological germ-cell apoptosis ( 68 ). Surprisingly, EGL-1 protein is detected throughout the germline upon DNA damage and exhibits mitochondrial localization, suggesting that even low levels of mitochondrial CED-9 are sufficient for EGL-1 recruitment, or that EGL-1 can be targeted to mitochondria independently of CED-9. The localization of CED-4 has been debated for two decades. Antibody-based studies reported strong perinuclear enrichment in the germline ( 17 ), whereas earlier work from the Horvitz's laboratory suggested mitochondrial localization in embryos ( 38 ). More recent studies using CRISPR/Cas9 reporter ( 16 ) and antibody staining ( 26 ) confirmed CED-4 mitochondrial localization during mid-embryogenesis but did not address CED-4 localization in early embryos. Our CRISPR/Cas9 reporters reconcile these findings by revealing a developmental transition: CED-4 localizes to the perinuclear membrane in the germline and in early embryos (1-4-cell stage) but progressively relocalizes to mitochondria as embryogenesis proceeds. This transition coincides with the onset of zygotic transcription and likely positions CED-4 for apoptosome assembly later during development. Consistent with Lambie and colleagues ( 16 ), we did not observe translocation of CED-4 to perinuclear membranes in embryonic apoptotic cells, as previously suggested ( 38 ). The analysis of the CED-3 reporter revealed a sequence of regulated localization states. In late oocytes, CED-3 is enriched in the nucleus and occasionally near the chromatin, consistent with early immunostaining studies ( 22 ). Following DNA damage, CED-3 redistributes to ER-like cytoplasmic structures in a subset of germlines. This observation is particularly interesting given recent evidence that CED-3 protects worms against ER stress ( 69 ). During embryogenesis, apoptotic cells display striking ring-like cytoplasmic accumulations of CED-3, whereas adjacent surviving cells maintain a diffuse nuclear–cytoplasmic distribution. Altogether, these findings demonstrate that the apoptotic machinery, except for EGL-1, is broadly expressed during somatic development but functionally constrained by developmentally regulated subcellular dynamics. Rather than operating as a fixed linear pathway, apoptosis in C. elegans is governed by tissue-specific competence states, and stage-specific relocalization of key regulators, thereby refining the classical EGL-1–CED-9–CED-4–CED-3 model. Importantly, these principles are likely conserved across metazoans. In the classical C. elegans somatic apoptosis model, CED-9 directly binds and sequesters CED-4 at the mitochondrial membrane, thereby preventing activation of the caspase CED-3. In contrast, in mammalian cells, BCL-2 family proteins do not directly bind APAF-1; instead, OMM permeabilization triggers cytochrome c release, promoting apoptosome assembly and caspase activation. Notably, in the C. elegans germline, the absence of stable CED-9-CED-4 colocalization brings the nematode apoptosis pathway closer to the mammalian paradigm, suggesting that apoptosome activation in the germline may rely on additional regulatory steps rather than simple sequestration by a BCL-2–like protein. In mammals, BCL-2 family proteins localize not only to mitochondria but also to the ER, where they regulate calcium signaling and ER stress independently of apoptosis ( 70 , 71 ). Apaf-1 and caspases have similarly been implicated in non-apoptotic roles and are subject to spatial and contextual regulation ( 69 , 72 ). Together, our findings in C. elegans support a conserved model in which apoptotic regulators are broadly expressed and multifunctional, with apoptosis emerging only when transcriptional activation, protein localization, and cellular competence converge. Rather than operating as a binary switch, the apoptotic machinery functions as a spatially and temporally regulated network, that ensures robustness against inappropriate cell loss while preserving rapid apoptotic capacity. Future Directions A key unresolved question is why apoptosis occurs exclusively in late pachytene cells despite broad EGL-1 induction upon IR; identifying the factors underlying this restricted competence remains an important direction for future studies. Integrating caspase activity sensors with high-resolution Airyscan and real-time spinning disk microscopy, along with single-cell transcriptomics and tissue-specific proteomics, will be critical for defining the molecular determinants of apoptosis competence in the germline. Conclusions By generating endogenous reporters for the core apoptosis machinery, we provide a comprehensive view of apoptosis gene expression and localization in the C. elegans germline and embryos. Our findings reveal fundamental differences in apoptotic regulation between these tissues, and uncover changes in CED-3 and CED-4 localization that refine the classical model of apoptosis induction. Together, these insights reshape our understanding of apoptotic regulation and provide a foundation for further investigating the apoptotic and non-apoptotic functions of these conserved proteins. Declarations Acknowledgement We are grateful to the members of the Gartner Laboratory and the Korean Institute for Basic Science Center for Genomic Integrity for their fruitful discussions. We especially thank Christian Froekjaer-Jensen for his input on the use of PATC introns and for sharing fluorescent protein sequences. We thank Rosa E. Navarro Gonzalez for sharing RN15 and Alex Hajnal for sharing AH6335. Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). We also thank Orlando Schaerer, Björn Schumacher, and Ulrike Gartner for their comments on the manuscript. We thank Luthfiyyah Mutsnaini and Ratih Khoirunnisa for their excellent technical support. We thank KJ Myung for his unwavering support. Grammarly was used to improve writing. The model illustration (Fig. 8) was created in BioRender (Memar, N. (2026) https://BioRender.com/t8z2gze). Conflict of Interest Statement The authors declare no competing interests. Author Contribution G.G., A.A., S.G.M.R., and N.M. performed experiments. S.G.M.R., N.M., and A.G. provided resources and methodology. G.G., S.G.M.R. N.M., and A.G. participated in the design of experiments, data analysis, and data interpretation. G.G., S.G.M.R., N.M., and A.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors (G.G., A.A., S.G.M.R., N.M., and A.G.) provided input and revisions to successive drafts of the entire manuscript. S.G.M.R., N.M., and A.G. managed the overall project (and secured funding). Funding Statement This work was supported by the Korean Institute for Basic Science Grant IBS-R022-D1 (to G.G., A.A., N.M., S.G.M.R., and A.G.). This work was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant RS-2025-16072019 (to S.G.M.R.), and RS-2024-00509412 (to A.G. and S.G.M.R.). Data Availability Statement All data and material used in this manuscript are available and can be requested from the corresponding authors. References Fuchs Y, Steller H. Programmed cell death in animal development and disease. Cell. 2011;147(4):742–58. Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(4):495–516. Kerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer. 1972;26(4):239–57. Ellis HM, Horvitz HR. Genetic control of programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans. Cell. 1986;44(6):817–29. Conradt B, Horvitz HR. The C. elegans protein EGL-1 is required for programmed cell death and interacts with the Bcl-2-like protein CED-9. Cell. 1998;93(4):519–29. Hengartner MO, Ellis RE, Horvitz HR. Caenorhabditis elegans gene ced-9 protects cells from programmed cell death. Nature. 1992;356(6369):494–9. Xue D, Horvitz HR. Caenorhabditis elegans CED-9 protein is a bifunctional cell-death inhibitor. Nature. 1997;390(6657):305–8. Hao Z, Duncan GS, Chang CC, Elia A, Fang M, Wakeham A, et al. Specific ablation of the apoptotic functions of cytochrome C reveals a differential requirement for cytochrome C and Apaf-1 in apoptosis. Cell. 2005;121(4):579–91. Nehme R, Conradt B. egl-1: a key activator of apoptotic cell death in C. elegans. Oncogene. 2008;27 Suppl 1:S30-40. Yuan J, Horvitz HR. The Caenorhabditis elegans cell death gene ced-4 encodes a novel protein and is expressed during the period of extensive programmed cell death. Development. 1992;116(2):309–20. Conradt B, Wu YC, Xue D. Programmed Cell Death During Caenorhabditis elegans Development. Genetics. 2016;203(4):1533–62. Sulston JE, Brenner S. The DNA of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77(1):95–104. Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1983;100(1):64–119. Conradt B, Horvitz HR. The TRA-1A sex determination protein of C. elegans regulates sexually dimorphic cell deaths by repressing the egl-1 cell death activator gene. Cell. 1999;98(3):317–27. Malin JZ, Shaham S. Cell Death in C. elegans Development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015;114:1–42. Lambie EJ, Greig A, Conradt B. Fluorescent protein tagging of C. elegans core apoptosis pathway components reveals mitochondrial localization of CED-9 Bcl-2, CED-4 Apaf1 and CED-3 Caspase in non-apoptotic and apoptotic cells. Cell Death Differ. 2025. Pourkarimi E, Greiss S, Gartner A. Evidence that CED-9/Bcl2 and CED-4/Apaf-1 localization is not consistent with the current model for C. elegans apoptosis induction. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19(3):406–15. Tzur YB, Friedland AE, Nadarajan S, Church GM, Calarco JA, Colaiacovo MP. Heritable custom genomic modifications in Caenorhabditis elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Genetics. 2013;195(3):1181–5. Jaramillo-Lambert A, Harigaya Y, Vitt J, Villeneuve A, Engebrecht J. Meiotic errors activate checkpoints that improve gamete quality without triggering apoptosis in male germ cells. Curr Biol. 2010;20(23):2078–89. Harders RH, Morthorst TH, Lande AD, Hesselager MO, Mandrup OA, Bendixen E, et al. Dynein links engulfment and execution of apoptosis via CED-4/Apaf1 in C. elegans. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(10):1012. Zhang D, Yang H, Jiang L, Zhao C, Wang M, Hu B, et al. Interaction between DLC-1 and SAO-1 facilitates CED-4 translocation during apoptosis in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Cell Death Discov. 2022;8(1):441. Chen X, Wang Y, Chen YZ, Harry BL, Nakagawa A, Lee ES, et al. Regulation of CED-3 caspase localization and activation by C. elegans nuclear-membrane protein NPP-14. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23(11):958–64. Sherrard R, Luehr S, Holzkamp H, McJunkin K, Memar N, Conradt B. miRNAs cooperate in apoptosis regulation during C. elegans development. Genes Dev. 2017;31(2):209–22. Jiang Y, Conradt B. A genetic screen identifies C. elegans eif-3.H and hrpr-1 as pro-apoptotic genes and potential activators of egl-1 expression. MicroPubl Biol. 2024;2024. Xu J, Jiang Y, Sherrard R, Ikegami K, Conradt B. PUF-8, a C. elegans ortholog of the RNA-binding proteins PUM1 and PUM2, is required for robustness of the cell death fate. Development. 2023;150(19). Tucker N, Reddien P, Hersh B, Lee D, Liu MHX, Horvitz HR. The pro-apoptotic function of the C. elegans BCL-2 homolog CED-9 requires interaction with the APAF-1 homolog CED-4. Sci Adv. 2024;10(41):eadn0325. Gumienny TL, Lambie E, Hartwieg E, Horvitz HR, Hengartner MO. Genetic control of programmed cell death in the Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite germline. Development. 1999;126(5):1011–22. Gartner A, Milstein S, Ahmed S, Hodgkin J, Hengartner MO. A conserved checkpoint pathway mediates DNA damage–induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in C. elegans. Mol Cell. 2000;5(3):435–43. Derry WB, Putzke AP, Rothman JH. Caenorhabditis elegans p53: role in apoptosis, meiosis, and stress resistance. Science. 2001;294(5542):591–5. Schumacher B, Hofmann K, Boulton S, Gartner A. The C. elegans homolog of the p53 tumor suppressor is required for DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Curr Biol. 2001;11(21):1722–7. Schumacher B, Schertel C, Wittenburg N, Tuck S, Mitani S, Gartner A, et al. C. elegans ced-13 can promote apoptosis and is induced in response to DNA damage. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12(2):153–61. Schumacher B, Hanazawa M, Lee MH, Nayak S, Volkmann K, Hofmann ER, et al. Translational repression of C. elegans p53 by GLD-1 regulates DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Cell. 2005;120(3):357–68. Doll MA, Soltanmohammadi N, Schumacher B. ALG-2/AGO-Dependent mir-35 Family Regulates DNA Damage-Induced Apoptosis Through MPK-1/ERK MAPK Signaling Downstream of the Core Apoptotic Machinery in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2019;213(1):173–94. Frokjaer-Jensen C, Jain N, Hansen L, Davis MW, Li Y, Zhao D, et al. An Abundant Class of Non-coding DNA Can Prevent Stochastic Gene Silencing in the C. elegans Germline. Cell. 2016;166(2):343–57. Tan FJ, Fire AZ, Hill RB. Regulation of apoptosis by C. elegans CED-9 in the absence of the C-terminal transmembrane domain. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14(11):1925–35. Yan N, Gu L, Kokel D, Chai J, Li W, Han A, et al. Structural, biochemical, and functional analyses of CED-9 recognition by the proapoptotic proteins EGL-1 and CED-4. Mol Cell. 2004;15(6):999–1006. Qi S, Pang Y, Hu Q, Liu Q, Li H, Zhou Y, et al. Crystal structure of the Caenorhabditis elegans apoptosome reveals an octameric assembly of CED-4. Cell. 2010;141(3):446–57. Chen F, Hersh BM, Conradt B, Zhou Z, Riemer D, Gruenbaum Y, et al. Translocation of C. elegans CED-4 to nuclear membranes during programmed cell death. Science. 2000;287(5457):1485–9. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77(1):71–94. Ghanta KS, Ishidate T, Mello CC. Microinjection for precision genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans. STAR Protoc. 2021;2(3):100748. Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BN, Palmer AE, Tsien RY. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22(12):1567–72. Redemann S, Schloissnig S, Ernst S, Pozniakowsky A, Ayloo S, Hyman AA, et al. Codon adaptation-based control of protein expression in C. elegans. Nat Methods. 2011;8(3):250–2. Kohlbrenner T, Berger S, Laranjeira AC, Aegerter-Wilmsen T, Comi LF, deMello A, et al. Actomyosin-mediated apical constriction promotes physiological germ cell death in C. elegans. PLoS Biol. 2024;22(8):e3002775. Schnabel R, Bischoff M, Hintze A, Schulz AK, Hejnol A, Meinhardt H, et al. Global cell sorting in the C. elegans embryo defines a new mechanism for pattern formation. Dev Biol. 2006;294(2):418–31. Schnabel R, Hutter H, Moerman D, Schnabel H. Assessing normal embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans using a 4D microscope: variability of development and regional specification. Dev Biol. 1997;184(2):234–65. Craig AL, Moser SC, Bailly AP, Gartner A. Methods for studying the DNA damage response in the Caenorhabdatis elegans germ line. Methods Cell Biol. 2012;107:321–52. Francis R, Barton MK, Kimble J, Schedl T. gld-1, a tumor suppressor gene required for oocyte development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1995;139(2):579–606. Greiss S, Hall J, Ahmed S, Gartner A. C. elegans SIR-2.1 translocation is linked to a proapoptotic pathway parallel to cep-1/p53 during DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Genes Dev. 2008;22(20):2831–42. Song J, Geary P, Salemova K, Rouse J, Hong Y, Rolland SGM, et al. Functional dissection of the conserved C. elegans LEM-3/ANKLE1 nuclease reveals a crucial requirement for the LEM-like and GIY-YIG domains for DNA bridge processing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53(6). Memar N, Sherrard R, Sethi A, Fernandez CL, Schmidt H, Lambie EJ, et al. The replicative helicase CMG is required for the divergence of cell fates during asymmetric cell division in vivo. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):9399. Greiss S, Schumacher B, Grandien K, Rothblatt J, Gartner A. Transcriptional profiling in C. elegans suggests DNA damage dependent apoptosis as an ancient function of the p53 family. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:334. Hafner A, Bulyk ML, Jambhekar A, Lahav G. The multiple mechanisms that regulate p53 activity and cell fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(4):199–210. Rutkowski R, Dickinson R, Stewart G, Craig A, Schimpl M, Keyse SM, et al. Regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans p53/CEP-1-dependent germ cell apoptosis by Ras/MAPK signaling. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(8):e1002238. Gartner A, Boag PR, Blackwell TK. Germline survival and apoptosis. WormBook. 2008:1–20. Bhalla N, Dernburg AF. A conserved checkpoint monitors meiotic chromosome synapsis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2005;310(5754):1683–6. Silva N, Adamo A, Santonicola P, Martinez-Perez E, La Volpe A. Pro-crossover factors regulate damage-dependent apoptosis in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(9):1209–18. Meier B, Gartner A. Meiosis: checking chromosomes pair up properly. Curr Biol. 2006;16(7):R249-51. Alpi A, Pasierbek P, Gartner A, Loidl J. Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma. 2003;112(1):6–16. Colaiacovo MP, MacQueen AJ, Martinez-Perez E, McDonald K, Adamo A, La Volpe A, et al. Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev Cell. 2003;5(3):463–74. Boulton SJ, Martin JS, Polanowska J, Hill DE, Gartner A, Vidal M. BRCA1/BARD1 orthologs required for DNA repair in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 2004;14(1):33–9. Langerak S, Trombley A, Patterson JR, Leroux D, Couch A, Wood MP, et al. Remodeling of the endoplasmic reticulum in Caenorhabditis elegans oocytes is regulated by CGH-1. Genesis. 2019;57(2):e23267. Hoeppner DJ, Hengartner MO, Schnabel R. Engulfment genes cooperate with ced-3 to promote cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2001;412(6843):202–6. Reddien PW, Cameron S, Horvitz HR. Phagocytosis promotes programmed cell death in C. elegans. Nature. 2001;412(6843):198–202. Soltanmohammadi N, Wang S, Schumacher B. Somatic PMK-1/p38 signaling links environmental stress to germ cell apoptosis and heritable euploidy. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):701. Ito S, Greiss S, Gartner A, Derry WB. Cell-nonautonomous regulation of C. elegans germ cell death by kri-1. Curr Biol. 2010;20(4):333–8. Bailly AP, Freeman A, Hall J, Declais AC, Alpi A, Lilley DM, et al. The Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of Gen1/Yen1 resolvases links DNA damage signaling to DNA double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(7):e1001025. Dello Stritto MR, Bauer B, Barraud P, Jantsch V. DNA topoisomerase 3 is required for efficient germ cell quality control. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(6). Schertel C, Conradt B. C. elegans orthologs of components of the RB tumor suppressor complex have distinct pro-apoptotic functions. Development. 2007;134(20):3691–701. Wei H, Weaver YM, Weaver BP. Xeroderma pigmentosum protein XPD controls caspase-mediated stress responses. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):9344. Popgeorgiev N, Jabbour L, Gillet G. Subcellular Localization and Dynamics of the Bcl-2 Family of Proteins. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2018;6:13. Scorrano L, Oakes SA, Opferman JT, Cheng EH, Sorcinelli MD, Pozzan T, et al. BAX and BAK regulation of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+: a control point for apoptosis. Science. 2003;300(5616):135–9. Ferraro E, Pesaresi MG, De Zio D, Cencioni MT, Gortat A, Cozzolino M, et al. Apaf1 plays a pro-survival role by regulating centrosome morphology and function. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(Pt 20):3450–63. Madeira F, Madhusoodanan N, Lee J, Eusebi A, Niewielska A, Tivey ARN, et al. The EMBL-EBI Job Dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(W1):W521-W5. Sternberg PW, Van Auken K, Wang Q, Wright A, Yook K, Zarowiecki M, et al. WormBase 2024: status and transitioning to Alliance infrastructure. Genetics. 2024;227(1). Additional Declarations There is no duality of interest Supplementary Files GopakumaretalMovieS1.avi Supplementary Movie S1 GopakumaretalMovieS2.avi Supplementary Movie S2 GopakumaretalMovieS3.avi Supplementary Movie S3 GopakumaretalMovieS4.avi Supplementary Movie S4 GopakumaretalSupplementaryTables28.01.2026.pdf Supplementary Tables GopakumeretalSupplementaryFile.pdf Supplementary Materials Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: revise 02 Mar, 2026 Review # 2 received at journal 24 Feb, 2026 Review # 1 received at journal 19 Feb, 2026 Reviewer # 2 agreed at journal 03 Feb, 2026 Reviewer # 1 agreed at journal 03 Feb, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 03 Feb, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 29 Jan, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 29 Jan, 2026 First submitted to journal 29 Jan, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8728396","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":584988535,"identity":"6d0a07ef-a4c9-4373-803e-3f206c48f460","order_by":0,"name":"Gokul Gopakumar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute for Basic Science","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gokul","middleName":"","lastName":"Gopakumar","suffix":""},{"id":584988536,"identity":"d5902c03-c05d-40fa-bd3f-93ea5935412b","order_by":1,"name":"Afroza Aman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute for Basic Science","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Afroza","middleName":"","lastName":"Aman","suffix":""},{"id":584988537,"identity":"92dee5a9-faa7-4f60-a44b-b5e60afdc3c4","order_by":2,"name":"Stephane Rolland","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2774-4029","institution":"UNIST","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Stephane","middleName":"","lastName":"Rolland","suffix":""},{"id":584988538,"identity":"72c262d5-5443-49b3-8211-f6fe37084fc4","order_by":3,"name":"Anton Gartner","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4639-9902","institution":"Institute for Basic Science","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anton","middleName":"","lastName":"Gartner","suffix":""},{"id":584988534,"identity":"c3608e54-9f20-4269-b2e6-5ee4310ef999","order_by":4,"name":"Nadin Memar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute for Basic Science","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nadin","middleName":"","lastName":"Memar","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-01-29 07:31:12","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8728396/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8728396/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":101972755,"identity":"665e0049-8975-49a5-98ff-3f60ba42d7d5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-05 15:02:40","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":14120313,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExpression pattern of the transcriptional \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eegl-1(gt3323)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTC and translational \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eegl-1(gt3361\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e)\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e TL reporters in the germline and embryo.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e(A)\u003c/strong\u003e Confocal live imaging of the transcriptional \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323)\u003c/em\u003e TC and translational \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3361)\u003c/em\u003e TL reporters in the germline with and without IR. L4-staged worms were exposed to 0 Gy or 90 Gy of IR and imaged 24 hours post-treatment. Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Asterisks (*) mark intestinal autofluorescence. White arrows indicate apoptotic germ-cell corpses. Scale bars: 50 µm (main panels), 10 µm (insets). Expression of the \u003cstrong\u003e(B)\u003c/strong\u003e transcriptional \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323)\u003c/em\u003e TC reporter and the \u003cstrong\u003e(C)\u003c/strong\u003e translational \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3361)\u003c/em\u003eTL reporter during embryogenesis (4-cell, pre-morphogenesis, comma stage). Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Scale bars: 10 µm (main panels), 2 µm (insets).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalFigure1egl1scaleupdated.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/d5c6c4bc69d41fec8a0750d3.png"},{"id":101972761,"identity":"62cef09c-c910-49a7-a7ac-9e5a09e74553","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-05 15:02:40","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":10810142,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHyperaccumulation of EGL‑1 in a subset of cell corpses. (A-D)\u003c/strong\u003e Snapshots from long-term spinning-disk confocal imaging of germlines from \u003cem\u003ezhls198\u003c/em\u003e [Plim-7::Δpes-10:: mCherry::PH(PLC1delta1)::unc-54 3'UTR]\u003cem\u003e; egl‑1(gt3361)\u003c/em\u003e animals, imaged 24 hours after exposure to 90 Gy of IR. EGL-1 is visualized in green, and the membrane-localized engulfment marker in magenta. 'z' indicates the focal plane of the z-stack shown, and 't' indicates the elapsed timepoint from the start of the recording in minutes. Insets showed zoom regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels\u003cstrong\u003e. \u0026nbsp;(A’-D’) \u003c/strong\u003eTime-lapse series for different corpses. The first image was set to t=0 to highlight the engulfment duration. \u003cstrong\u003e(A')\u003c/strong\u003eSmall apoptotic corpse that lacks EGL-1 entirely, consistent with physiological germ-cell apoptosis. \u003cstrong\u003e(B')\u003c/strong\u003e Small apoptotic corpse that shows an increase in EGL-1, followed by a decrease. \u003cstrong\u003e(C')\u003c/strong\u003e Large apoptotic corpse that exhibits a marked and sustained increase that culminates in EGL-1 hyperaccumulation. \u003cstrong\u003e(D')\u003c/strong\u003eLarge apoptotic corpse with moderate EGL-1 expression, which does not reach hyperaccumulated levels as in \u003cstrong\u003eC'\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalFigure2germlinecorpsestimelaps.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/5eac4d8f62ffdeffc4ddbce9.png"},{"id":102245196,"identity":"891717c4-7546-46a7-8ee7-47e0a8298cb9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-09 17:52:12","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":7105996,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLineage analysis of the transcriptional \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eegl-1(gt3323\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e) reporter strain and wild type (+/+).\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003eEmbryos of both the transcriptional \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323) \u003c/em\u003ereporter strain and wild type (+/+)\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003ewere recorded side-by-side, and eGFP scans were started after 188 minutes and taken every 6 minutes afterwards (as indicated by the horizontal green lines). Lineaging was performed on the first 13 AB-derived cell deaths, starting after the 9th round of cell division, and on the MSpaapp cell death. The time point at which a cell dies in the wild type is indicated by a cross (X). For the transcriptional\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323\u003c/em\u003e) reporter the time point at which eGFP expression is detectable, is marked by a vertical green line. The cell cycle length of mother cells of each future cell destined to die is indicated. In addition, the time between the birth of a cell until its cell corpse formation (in wild type) or until eGFP expression starts (in the \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323\u003c/em\u003e) reporter strain) is indicated.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalFigure3lineagetg4550andN2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/844a19ef1861343b95688f41.png"},{"id":102295209,"identity":"a947809c-f257-4b23-818c-bc1efd813412","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:09:50","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":10103936,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLocalization of the EGL-1 protein in the germline and embryo. (A) \u003c/strong\u003eConfocal live imaging of the translational \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3361)\u003c/em\u003eTL reporter with the mitochondrial reporter (\u003cem\u003exmSi01\u003c/em\u003e[P\u003cem\u003emex-5::tomm-20::mCherry::tbb-2 3'UTR\u003c/em\u003e]) in the germline with and without IR. L4-staged worms were exposed to 0 Gy or 90 Gy of IR and imaged 24 hours post-treatment. Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. White arrows indicate apoptotic germ-cell corpses. Scale bars: 50 µm (main panels), 10 µm (insets). \u003cstrong\u003e(B)\u003c/strong\u003e Airyscan imaging of immuno-stained \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3361) \u003c/em\u003etranslational TL reporter embryos at the pre-morphogenetic stage. Embryos were stained with anti-GFP and anti-Mitomix antibodies. Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Scale bars: 10 µm (main panels). \u003cstrong\u003e(C)\u003c/strong\u003e Zoom of inset shown in (\u003cstrong\u003eB)\u003c/strong\u003e. 10 µm (insets).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalFigure4subcellularlocalizationegl1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/232b3592452fb020bbc56b72.png"},{"id":102295047,"identity":"23ed28bc-137f-41de-977e-79278d4c87f3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:08:06","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":13400994,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExpression pattern of the transcriptional \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eced-3(syb5182)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTC and translational \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eced-3(syb5180)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e TL reporters in the germline and embryo. (A) \u003c/strong\u003eConfocal live imaging of the transcriptional \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5182) \u003c/em\u003eTC\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003eand translational \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5180)\u003c/em\u003e TL reporters in the germline with and without IR. L4-staged worms were exposed to 0 Gy or 90 Gy and imaged 24 hours post-treatment. Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Asterisks (*) mark intestinal autofluorescence. White arrows indicate apoptotic germ-cell corpses. White arrowheads indicate oocytes. Scale bars: 50 µm (main panels), 10 µm (insets). Expression of the \u003cstrong\u003e(B)\u003c/strong\u003etranscriptional \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5182) \u003c/em\u003eTC and \u003cstrong\u003e(C)\u003c/strong\u003e translational \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5180) \u003c/em\u003eTL reporters during embryogenesis (4-cell, pre-morphogenesis, comma stage). Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Scale bars: 10 µm (main panels), 2 µm (insets).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalFigure5ced3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/39a42cde33f2bddfac3fdced.png"},{"id":102295149,"identity":"cc731c7f-19ab-4daf-b42b-15732d561b5d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:09:17","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":12432764,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExpression pattern of the transcriptional \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eced-4(syb4540)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eand translational \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eced-4(syb4536) \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ereporters in the germline and embryo. (A) \u003c/strong\u003eConfocal live imaging of the transcriptional \u003cem\u003eced-4(syb4540) \u003c/em\u003eTC\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003eand translational \u003cem\u003eced-4(syb4536) \u003c/em\u003eTL reporters in the germline with and without IR. L4-staged worms were exposed to 0 Gy or 90 Gy and imaged 24 hours post-treatment. Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Asterisks (*) mark intestinal autofluorescence. White arrows indicate apoptotic germ-cell corpses. Scale bars: 50 µm (main panels), 10 µm (insets). Expression of the \u003cstrong\u003e(B)\u003c/strong\u003e transcriptional \u003cem\u003eced-4(syb4540) \u003c/em\u003eTC and \u003cstrong\u003e(C)\u003c/strong\u003etranslational \u003cem\u003eced-4(syb4536) \u003c/em\u003eTL reporters during embryogenesis (4-cell, pre-morphogenesis, comma stage). Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Scale bars: 10 µm (main panels), 2 µm (insets). L indicates laser power, and ms indicates exposure time in ms.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalFigure6ced4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/13d935aabc95d0fb3f87dc68.png"},{"id":102294977,"identity":"f28a357a-0b81-4d0f-8927-1a07269b626c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:06:41","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2271448,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExpression pattern of the transcriptional \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eced-9(syb5190) \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTC and translational \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eced-9(gt3374) \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTL reporter in the germline and embryo.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e(A) \u003c/strong\u003eConfocal live imaging of the transcriptional \u003cem\u003eced-9(syb5190) \u003c/em\u003eTC reporter in the germline with and without IR. L4-staged worms were exposed to 0 Gy or 90 Gy and imaged 24 hours post-treatment. Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Asterisks (*) mark intestinal autofluorescence. Scale bars: 50 µm (main panels), 10 µm (insets). \u003cstrong\u003e(B)\u003c/strong\u003e Airyscan imaging of immuno-stained germlines of the translational \u003cem\u003eced-9(gt3374)\u003c/em\u003e TL reporter with anti-HA, anti-Mitomix, and DAPI. L4-stage worms were exposed to 0 Gy or 90 Gy, and immuno-staining was performed 24 hours post-treatment. Insets show zoomed regions (R) outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Scale bars: 50 µm (main panels), 10 µm (insets). \u003cstrong\u003e(C)\u003c/strong\u003e Expression of the transcriptional \u003cem\u003eced-9(syb5190) \u003c/em\u003eTC reporter during embryogenesis (4-cell, pre-morphogenesis, comma stage). Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Scale bars: 10 µm (main panels), 2 µm (insets). \u003cstrong\u003e(D)\u003c/strong\u003e Airyscan imaging of immuno-stained embryos (200-cell stage and pretzel stage) of the translational \u003cem\u003eced-9(gt3374)\u003c/em\u003eTL reporter with anti-HA and anti-Mitomix. Insets show zoomed regions outlined by white boxes in the main panels. Scale bars: 10 µm (main panels), 2 µm (insets). The transcriptional \u003cem\u003eced-9(syb5190) \u003c/em\u003eTC reporter was generated in the \u003cem\u003eced-3(n717)\u003c/em\u003e background to ensure viability.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalFigure7ced9GGedited.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/d250d06514b9046ad2be7f77.png"},{"id":102295037,"identity":"6af4f071-468c-4cfe-b83e-6604186aea4e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:07:49","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1890905,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eModel of the subcellular localization of apoptosis regulators in the germline, early and late embryos of \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eC. elegans.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(A)\u003c/strong\u003e Non-irradiated germline. The core apoptosis regulators CED-9, CED-4, and CED-3 are ubiquitously expressed throughout the germline. CED-3 displays a diffuse localization in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of germ cells, CED-4 exhibits a perinuclear distribution, and CED-9 forms foci on mitochondria. In oocytes, CED-3 becomes more concentrated around the condensed chromosomes. In cells undergoing physiological germ-cell apoptosis, CED-3 is retained in the cytoplasm but is no longer detectable in the nucleus.\u003cstrong\u003e(B)\u003c/strong\u003e Irradiated germline. Upon DNA damage, CED-4 and CED-9 maintain the same subcellular localization patterns as those observed under non-irradiated conditions. However, CED-9 appears less abundant in early and late pachytene. CED-3 redistributes to structures in the cytoplasm that are reminiscent of ER in a subset of germlines, in apoptotic cells and in early and late oocytes. EGL-1 is ubiquitously present throughout the germline but shows pronounced hyperaccumulation in a subset of apoptotic germ cell corpses.\u003cstrong\u003e (C)\u003c/strong\u003e Early embryo. In early embryos, CED-9, CED-4, and CED-3 display broadly ubiquitous localization patterns similar to those observed in the germline. At these stages, CED-4 remains predominantly associated with the perinuclear membrane.\u003cstrong\u003e (D)\u003c/strong\u003e Mid/Late embryo (≥8–12 cell stage). As embryogenesis progresses, CED-4 relocalizes to mitochondria. \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e expression is restricted to cells fated to undergo apoptosis. In these cells, CED-3 is enriched in the cytoplasm and excluded from the nucleus.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalFigure8Model.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/cf7e8d26fdb8de76181acd05.png"},{"id":105903816,"identity":"7acabb3e-a801-40eb-b78c-c0c299282cb5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-01 09:54:08","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":86515442,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/52d6be1a-1a7d-436e-8f11-8bd310ad9d8c.pdf"},{"id":102295309,"identity":"f8748516-677e-4737-ae53-a31e0b069c45","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:10:49","extension":"avi","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":97214,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary Movie S1","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalMovieS1.avi","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/c6267d04e36bb061a45bb249.avi"},{"id":102295041,"identity":"7de34325-660d-4225-b21f-83d43196eae2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:07:51","extension":"avi","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":86152,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Movie S2\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalMovieS2.avi","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/19e0bd480e94a914886d8551.avi"},{"id":102295197,"identity":"c6ff2cdd-a29f-4e2b-b8bc-de067c547673","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:09:49","extension":"avi","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":244466,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Movie S3\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalMovieS3.avi","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/321057b80f92f6cb801917f4.avi"},{"id":102295143,"identity":"051453de-4a5f-4bcd-abd6-0c5a7f8b81a2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:09:13","extension":"avi","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":204574,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Movie S4\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalMovieS4.avi","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/93184a6cf82513fe52528390.avi"},{"id":102295157,"identity":"53f936dd-ae9f-4fbc-9d6e-55c1313116af","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:09:22","extension":"pdf","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":303353,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Tables\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"GopakumaretalSupplementaryTables28.01.2026.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/98101f779bd279b9e4752265.pdf"},{"id":102295125,"identity":"58f0646f-23c2-4be8-a314-b0540e746a0f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:09:02","extension":"pdf","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":21401993,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary Materials","description":"","filename":"GopakumeretalSupplementaryFile.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8728396/v1/2cf771b883c87918b0147562.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"There is no duality of interest","formattedTitle":"Endogenous Expression and Subcellular Localization of Core Apoptosis Regulators Reveal Key Differences Between Embryonic and Germline Apoptosis in C. elegans","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eApoptosis, the best-characterized form of programmed cell death, is a vital process that ensures proper development, maintains tissue homeostasis, and eliminates damaged cells in multicellular organisms (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Genetic studies in \u003cem\u003eCaenorhabditis elegans\u003c/em\u003e identified the evolutionarily conserved core components of the apoptotic pathway, which were later found to be conserved in mammalian cells (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). While \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e encodes a BH3-only protein that functions as the most upstream pro-apoptotic factor, \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e encodes a Bcl-2\u0026ndash;like anti-apoptotic protein. \u003cem\u003eced-4\u003c/em\u003e encodes an Apaf-1\u0026ndash;related pro-apoptotic protein lacking the cytochrome c\u0026ndash;binding domain, and \u003cem\u003eced-3\u003c/em\u003e encodes a caspase related to both initiator caspase-9 and executioner caspase-3 (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR5 CR6 CR7 CR8 CR9 CR10\" citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e). While the apoptotic machinery is conserved in mammals, how apoptosis is spatially and temporally regulated during development remains incompletely understood (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The genetic tractability and essentially invariant cell lineage of \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e make it an ideal system to dissect these mechanisms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e development, 131 of the 1090 somatic cells are programmed to die (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e), raising the question of how these 131 cells, which arise from multiple cell lineages, are selectively destined to die while their sisters survive. Cell-specific apoptosis induction largely depends on the transcriptional upregulation of \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e, which is controlled by \u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e-regulatory sequences located upstream and downstream of its transcription start site (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e). Several transcription factors have been shown to regulate \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e expression in a cell-specific manner (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e). In contrast, \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eced-4\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eced-3\u003c/em\u003e are expressed broadly, including in cells that do not undergo apoptosis (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR17 CR18 CR19 CR20 CR21\" citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e). Post-transcriptional mechanisms have also been shown to fine-tune the expression of \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e (ref. 23, 24), as well as \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eced-3\u003c/em\u003e (ref. 25).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe lack of suitable antibodies and endogenous reporters has hampered the systematic analysis of the expression of core apoptosis machinery genes during embryogenesis, and this is especially the case for \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e. Recent work has begun to overcome these limitations: Lambie and colleagues (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e) and Tucker and colleagues (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e) used CRISPR/Cas9\u0026ndash;mediated tagging of endogenous \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eced-4\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eced-3\u003c/em\u003e loci to visualize their expression and subcellular localization in live embryos. In contrast, comparable endogenous reporters for \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e and systematic analyses of its embryonic expression is still lacking.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe adult germline is the only proliferative tissue in \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e, and apoptosis is restricted to female germ cells during late meiotic pachytene. A baseline level of physiological germ-cell apoptosis removes approximately half of the germ cells in an \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e\u0026ndash;independent manner to maintain tissue homeostasis (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e). By contrast, germ-cell apoptosis triggered by DNA damage or defects in meiotic recombination (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e) are dependent on \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e and its transcriptional induction by the \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e CEP-1/p53-like transcription factor (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR30 CR31\" citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e). Immunostaining revealed broad cytoplasmic localization of EGL-1::V5 translational fusion protein in the late pachytene region upon ionizing radiation IR (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e), whereas CED-9 (ref. 17), CED-4 (ref. 17), and CED-3 (ref. 19, 22) are constitutively expressed. However, expression of these genes in the germline has not been systematically characterized, and it remains unclear whether the localization of these proteins dynamically changes upon induction of apoptosis or during specific apoptotic stages. Notably, reliable transgene germline expression requires single-copy integration at endogenous loci to minimize silencing (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to the classic model of apoptosis, CED-9 inhibits apoptosis in healthy cells by binding a CED-4 dimer at the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e). Upon apoptotic induction, EGL-1 binds to CED-9, inducing a conformational change of CED-9, triggering the release of CED-4, which then assembles into the apoptosome at the perinuclear membrane to activate the CED-3 caspase (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e). However, several observations challenge this model and suggest that it requires refinement. CED-4 and CED-3 remain localized at mitochondria during mid-embryogenesis in both healthy and apoptotic cells (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e). Although perinuclear CED-4 localization has been reported in \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e loss-of-function (lf) mutants, and upon \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e overexpression (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e), this redistribution is not consistently observed (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e). Additionally, CED-4 exhibits a perinuclear localization in all germ cells, including those not undergoing apoptosis (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHere, we describe the developmental expression patterns and subcellular localizations of \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e apoptosis genes, \u003cem\u003eegl-1, ced-9, ced-4\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eced-3\u003c/em\u003e, using transcriptional and translational reporters generated by CRISPR/Cas9 at their endogenous loci. A central unresolved question is how transcriptional activation of apoptosis genes is translated into protein abundance, localization, and apoptotic execution. Using these reporters, we dissect how transcriptional output, protein localization, and tissue-specific competence together shape apoptotic outcome in the germline and embryos.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eGeneral\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eMaintenance and Strains\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e strains were cultured and maintained at 15\u0026deg;C and 20\u0026deg;C unless stated otherwise (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e). The Bristol N2 strain was used as the wild-type strain. Worms were kept on nematode growth medium (NGM) plates seeded with OP50 bacteria (~\u0026thinsp;100 \u0026micro;l per plate). The strains used in this study are listed in Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e. All translational reporter strains were maintained as homozygotes. All transcriptional reporter strains are homozygous viable and behave as null alleles. The \u003cem\u003eced-9(syb5190)\u003c/em\u003e transcriptional reporter is viable only in the \u003cem\u003eced-3(n717)\u003c/em\u003e mutant background.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs indicated in Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e, some genome edits were generated by Sunybiotech. \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323), egl-1(gt3399), egl-1(gt3361), ced-9(gt3374), ced-4(gt3372), syp-2(gt3637)\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ebrc-1(gt3334)\u003c/em\u003e were generated in the Gartner laboratory using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing following established methods (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e). For the generation of each genome edit, \u0026sim;10 young adult hermaphrodites were injected into one or both gonad arms. They were then recovered individually into 5 \u0026micro;l of M9 buffer in the center of the OP50-seeded plate. Recovered worms were then maintained at 15\u0026deg;C. F1 progenies that displayed the roller phenotype were singled 5\u0026ndash;7 days post-injection and subsequently screened by pheno- and genotyping, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or sequencing after being permitted to lay eggs for 24\u0026ndash;48 hours. For the edits generated in the Gartner laboratory, the sequences of the CRISPR RNA (crRNA), single-stranded OligoDeoxyNucleotide (ssODN), and primers for the amplification of double stranded DNA (dsDNA) fragments are shown in Table S3.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eGeneration of Transcriptional and Translational Reporters\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFluorescent protein sequences (eGFP and mKate2) were obtained from the Fr\u0026oslash;kj\u0026aelig;r-Jensen laboratory, and a codon-optimized tdTomato sequence was used as previously described (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e). To ensure germline expression and minimize silencing, a synthetic Periodic An/Tn Cluster (PATC) intron was inserted into each reporter (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e-S3) ref. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e). For the transcriptional reporters, an SV40 nuclear localization sequence (NLS) was placed at the N-terminus and an \u003cem\u003eegl-13\u003c/em\u003e NLS at the C-terminus, separated from the fluorescent protein coding sequence by linker sequences (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e-S3). To enable efficient exchange of fluorescent markers, guide RNA target sites were introduced flanking the fluorescent protein coding region (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e-S3, Table S3).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eIonizing Radiation (IR) Treatment and Preparation of of\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eGermlines for Live Imaging\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA synchronized population of L4-staged worms was obtained by performing a layoff. In short, 15\u0026ndash;20 adult hermaphrodite worms were transferred to a medium plate and allowed to lay eggs for 6 hours at 20\u0026deg;C. The adult worms were removed, and the plates were then incubated at 20\u0026deg;C or 15\u0026deg;C until the worms reached the L4 stage. Synchronized L4-staged worms were then treated with a 0 Gy or 90 Gy dose of IR using a Biological X-ray irradiator (Rad Source; RS-2000). 24 hours post-IR treatment, the adult hermaphrodites were transferred onto a 2% agar pad into 10 ul of 5 mM tetramisole to immobilize the worms. An 18 x 18 mm coverslip (1.5H Zeiss) was placed on top and sealed with (for confocal and long-term live imaging) or without (for 4D microscopy germline imaging) vaseline to prevent desiccation. Live imaging of the \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e germline was performed as described below.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eConfocal Image Acquisition of\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eGermlines\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eZ-stacks of the entire germline were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM880, Carl Zeiss) with either a 40x/1.2 NA water-immersion objective or a 63x/1.4 NA oil-immersion objective, and the Zen 2.3 SP1 software (Zeiss). The imaging settings are listed in Table S4. Image analysis was performed using Fiji software, and the following LUT settings were used (Table S5). 'n' represents the number of germlines analyzed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eSpinning Disk Confocal Long-term Live Imaging of\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eGermlines\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLive imaging of the \u003cem\u003ezhIs198 [Plim-7::Δpes-10::mCherry::PH(PLC1delta1)::unc-54 3'UTR] I; egl-1(gt3361) V\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e) animals was performed using a spinning disk confocal microscope (ECLIPSE Ti2-E, Nikon) with spinning disk head (CSU-W1, Yokogawa Electric Corporation) and the NIS element software (Nikon). A 60x/1.4 NA oil objective was used to capture the images. The acquisition parameters used were 488 nm laser at 40% intensity, 561 nm laser at 25% intensity, 300 ms exposure time, no binning, and image capture every 5 minutes for a total duration of 2 hours. Image and video analysis were carried out in Fiji using the following LUT settings: Magenta (mCherry) \u0026ndash; (105\u0026ndash;150); Green (eGFP) \u0026ndash; (105\u0026ndash;150).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003e4D microscopy Image Acquisition of\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eGermlines\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Z-stack of the entire germline was captured using a 4D microscope (Axio Imager M2, Zeiss) and Time to Live software (Caenotec) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e). A 100x/1.3 NA oil objective was used to capture the images. For eGFP the following acquisition parameters were used: LED intensity: 15%; exposure time: 150 ms; binning: ON. Image analysis was performed using Fiji software, and the min and max (brightness) were adjusted to 0-255 for all the images, except when indicated otherwise in the figure legends.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eGermline Apoptosis Counting\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA synchronized population of L4-staged worms was obtained by filtering L1 worms from freshly starved plates, as previously described (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e). In short, from a freshly starved medium NGM plate, worms were washed using 2 ml of M9. The solution was then collected in a 20 ml syringe and passed through a nylon mesh (11 \u0026micro;m Nylon net filters, Millipore), with holes large enough only to allow L1 larvae to pass. The L1 worms were then transferred to an NGM medium plate with OP50 bacteria using a glass pipette and allowed to dry. The plates were then incubated at 20\u0026deg;C or 15\u0026deg;C until the worms reached the L4 stage. Apoptotic cell corpses in the germline were quantified using Nomarski optics as described previously (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e). Briefly, the synchronized population of L4-staged worms was exposed to 0 Gy or 90 Gy dose of IR (using a Biological X-ray irradiator (Rad Source; RS-2000)). 24-, 36-, and 48-hours post-IR treatment, the adult hermaphrodites were transferred onto a 2% agar pad containing a drop of 5 mM tetramisole to immobilize the worms. An 18 x 18 mm coverslip (1.5H Zeiss) was placed on top, and the number of cell corpses per gonad arm was scored using a 4D microscope/Axio Imager M2 microscope (Zeiss) using a 100x/1.3 NA oil objective. All quantifications were performed blind.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eExperiment to Monitor Time and Dose Dependency of the\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eegl-1\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eReporter Induction by IR\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor time-course analysis of the \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323)\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3361)\u003c/em\u003e animals, L4-staged worms synchronized by filtration were irradiated with 90 Gy dose of IR, and imaged using a 4D microscope/Axio Imager M2 microscope (Zeiss) equipped with a 100x/1.3 NA oil objective at specified time points post-irradiation (0-, 0.5-, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-hours). For eGFP the following acquisition parameters were used: LED intensity: 15%; exposure time: 150 ms; binning: ON. Image analysis was performed using the Fiji software, and the min and max (brightness) were adjusted to 0-255 for all the images.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor dose-response analysis, L4-staged worms were treated with 0 Gy, 30 Gy, 60 Gy, or 90 Gy, and imaged 24 hours post-IR treatment using a 4D microscope/Axio Imager M2 microscope (Zeiss) equipped with a 100x/1.3 NA oil objective. For eGFP the following acquisition parameters were used: LED intensity: 15%; exposure time: 150 ms; binning: ON. Image analysis was performed using the Fiji software, and the min and max (brightness) were adjusted to 0-255 for all the images.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eImmunostaining of the\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eGermline\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImmunostaining of the \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e germline was performed as previously described (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e). Briefly, adult hermaphrodites (24 hours post-L4 stage) were transferred to a glass dish containing phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;0.2 mM tetramisole. The heads of the worms were cut off using a blade, and the gonads were collected into a 1.5 ml low protein-binding Eppendorf tube using a Pasteur pipette. Immediately after transfer, 1 ml of 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS was added, and samples were incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes. Following fixation, the gonads were washed with PBST (PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20) and post-fixed in 1 ml of 100% methanol for 5 min. After three quick washes with PBST, the gonads were permeabilized in 500 \u0026micro;l of PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes at room temperature; this step was repeated four times. Samples were then washed twice with PBS and incubated overnight (\u0026sim;12\u0026ndash;14 hours) in blocking buffer PBSTB (PBST\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA)). Primary antibodies [anti-Mitomix (mouse anti-ATP5A, anti-Cytochrome C, and anti-PDHA1; 1:200; Abcam) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e) and rabbit anti-HA (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology)] in PBSTB were added, and samples were incubated for approximately 12 hours at 4\u0026deg;C. Gonads were subsequently washed five times with PBST for 5 minutes each and incubated overnight at 4\u0026deg;C with secondary antibodies [Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:5000; Invitrogen) and Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated donkey anti-mouse (1:500; Invitrogen)] in PBSTB. After five additional washes with PBST (5 minutes each), 20 \u0026micro;l of Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Labs) was added to the tube containing the gonads. Gonads were then transferred onto a large 2% agarose pad, covered with a 22 \u0026times; 22 mm coverslip, and incubated at 4\u0026deg;C overnight to allow drying. Slides were finally sealed with nail polish.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor image acquisition, the gonads were analyzed using a high-resolution confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 980; Carl Zeiss). A 40x/1.2 NA water objective was used to capture the images. The images were acquired using the following settings: 488 nm laser intensity: 1%; Master Gain: 800 V; Digital Gain: 1.0; 561 nm laser intensity: 1%; Master Gain: 690 V; Digital Gain: 1.0; 405 nm laser intensity: 1%; Master Gain: 750 V; Digital Gain: 1.0.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003e4D Microscopy of the\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eEmbryo\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe method for 4D microscopy was described previously (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e). Modifications of this system are described in (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e). All recordings were acquired at 25\u0026deg;C.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eLineage Analysis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLineage analysis of the \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e embryo was performed as previously described (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e). All 4D-recordings generated were analyzed using the Software Database SIMI\u0026copy;BioCell (SIMI Reality Motion Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany; \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.simi.com/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.simi.com/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e). The observer follows cells and the coordinates are recorded approximately every 2 minutes. The cell cleavages are assessed by marking the mother cell before the cleavage furrows ingress and subsequently by marking the centers of the daughter cells three frames later (105 seconds). By marking every cell throughout embryonic development, the complete cell lineage of an embryo is generated. These data can be used to create 3D representations of all nuclear positions at any given developmental stage.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor the analysis of apoptotic events, we tracked the first 13 apoptotic events from the AB lineage and the MSpaapp apoptotic event. GFP scans are indicated by horizontal green lines in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eImmunostaining of the\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eEmbryo\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImmunostaining of the \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e embryo was performed as previously described (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e). Microscope slides were cleaned with 70% ethanol. Following this, each microscope slide was heated on a hot plate at 80\u0026deg;C and then coated twice with poly-L-lysine (0.25 mg/ml), with drying in-between at 80\u0026deg;C. After the second poly-L-lysine coating, the slides were cooled down on the bench before the next step. \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e embryos were then transferred using a P10 pipette onto the coated microscope slide. A new 18 \u0026times; 18 mm coverslip (1.5H Zeiss) was then placed on top of the area where the embryos were transferred (at \u0026sim;45\u0026deg; angle, with the corner of the coverslip hanging over the edge of the coated microscope slide). The microscope slide was then immediately flash-frozen on dry ice (for at least 30 minutes). The coverslip was then very quickly removed by flicking it (freeze\u0026ndash;crack method), and the slides were incubated in 100% methanol for 5 minutes, followed by 100% acetone for 5 minutes. Following the fixation, the slides were air-dried (for \u0026sim;8 minutes) before being stored at \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;20\u0026deg;C if the next step was not performed right away. Permeabilization of the embryos was performed by incubating the slides 4 times for 10 minutes in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 at room temperature. Slides were then washed twice with PBS and incubated overnight at 4\u0026deg;C (\u0026sim;12\u0026ndash;14 hours) in blocking buffer PBSTB.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrimary antibody [anti-GFP rabbit (Abcam Ab290) 1:500, anti-Mitomix (mouse anti-ATP5A, anti-Cytochrome C, and anti-PDHA1; 1:200; Abcam) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e) and rabbit anti-HA (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology)] (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e) in PBSTB was added to the embryos, and incubation was performed overnight at 4\u0026deg;C in a humid chamber. After three washes with PBST for 10 minutes, a secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated donkey anti-mouse (1:500; Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (1:500; Invitrogen) in PBSTB was added to the embryos, and incubation was performed overnight at 4\u0026deg;C in a humid chamber. After two washes with PBST and one wash with PBS, post-fixation with PBS\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;3.7% PFA (Paraformaldehyde) was performed for 10 minutes. The slide was then washed with PBS for 10 min, with PBST (twice for 10 minutes each), and with PBS for 10 min. Afterwards, except for the area containing the embryos, the rest of the slide was dried using a KIMTECH tissue. 10 \u0026micro;l of Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Labs) was then added to the area containing the embryos, and an 18 \u0026times; 18 mm coverslip (1.5H Zeiss) was placed on top. Nail polish (clear) was then used to seal the slides, with the nail polish allowed to dry in the dark. Once all slides were sealed correctly, they were then placed at 4\u0026deg;C until analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor image acquisition, embryos were analyzed using a high-resolution confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 980; Carl Zeiss). A 63\u0026times; oil objective (1.4 NA) was used to capture the images, with a Z-stack of 0,13 \u0026micro;m per step used. Embryos were sequentially illuminated by a 465 nm laser (for DAPI), a 488 nm Laser (for Alexa 488 anti-rabbit), and a 561 nm Laser ( for Alexa 594 anti-mouse).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eAnalysis of Embryonic Lethality and Brood Size\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnalysis of brood size and embryonic lethality was performed as previously described (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e). Briefly, L4 worms were picked and either maintained at 15\u0026deg;C and 25\u0026deg;C. The worms were transferred to fresh small (35 mm) plates with food twice a day (morning and evening) until they no longer laid eggs. Shortly after transferring the worms to a fresh plate, the number of eggs laid was counted. After 24\u0026ndash;36 hours, the number of dead eggs was counted and after 24\u0026ndash;48 hours, the number of animals hatched was counted.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eWe generated transcriptional and translational reporters at the endogenous loci using CRISPR/Cas9 to measure physiological steady-state gene expression and protein subcellular localization (as described in Materials and Methods) (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;S2, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e-S3).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eIR-Induced\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eegl-1\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eExpression in the Germline Requires the First Intron of\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eegl-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo investigate \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e transcription, we designed two transcriptional reporters. The \u003cem\u003eegl-1(syb4530)\u003c/em\u003e, replaces the entire open reading frame with our NLS::linker::eGFP::linker::NLS cassette, whereas \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323)\u003c/em\u003e, retains exon1, intron1, and the first codon of exon2 (Fig. S4A). Although \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e transcription is induced by IR (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e), only \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323)\u003c/em\u003e supported IR-induced expression in the germline (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA and S4C/C'). We further show that this induction is time- and dose-dependent (Fig. S5\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;S6). Loss of reporter expression in a \u003cem\u003ecep-1(lg12501)\u003c/em\u003e-deficient background confirmed that IR-induced \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e transcription is CEP-1-dependent (Fig. S4C/C') (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e). Consistent with the presence of canonical p53-consensus binding sites within intron1 (Fig. S4A\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;B) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e), IR-induced expression was abolished in \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3399)\u003c/em\u003e, which lacks intron1 (Fig. S4A+S4C/C'). Together, these data identify intron1 as a CEP-1\u0026ndash;responsive regulatory module required for IR-induced \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e transcription.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eIR-Induced\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eegl-1\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eExpression in the Germline is Ubiquitous, but Apoptosis Only Occurs in a Subset of Cells\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIR-induced germ-cell apoptosis is blocked in the \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323)\u003c/em\u003e transcriptional reporter, whereas \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e-independent physiological germ-cell apoptosis remains unperturbed (Fig. S8A) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e). Wild-type levels of IR-induced germ-cell apoptosis in the \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3361)\u003c/em\u003e translational reporter demonstrates the reporter's functionality (Fig. S8A). We further show this reporter is induced by IR in a time- and dose-dependent manner (Fig. S5\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;S7). Confocal imaging revealed that EGL-1 is ubiquitously and uniformly expressed upon IR throughout the mitotic, and meiotic part of the germline up to late pachytene, with heterogeneous expression emerging in late pachytene and early diakinesis (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA). Long-term spinning-disk confocal imaging (~\u0026thinsp;2 hours (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3)) using the CED-1 engulfment reporter (\u003cem\u003ezhIs198\u003c/em\u003e) to mark apoptotic corpses uncovered diverse EGL-1 protein dynamics among apoptotic germ cells (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e). Small apoptotic corpses lacking EGL-1 entirely, consistent with \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e-independent physiological germ-cell apoptosis (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA/A\u0026rsquo;), (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e). Small apoptotic corpses showing an increase in EGL-1, followed by a decrease, EGL-1 appearing to congregate on one side of the corpse (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB/B'). Large apoptotic corpses exhibiting a marked and sustained increase of EGL-1 leading to hyperaccumulation (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC/C'). Large apoptotic corpses with moderate EGL-1 expression, not showing hyperaccumulation (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD/D', Movie S1-S4). Thus, our observations reveal that EGL-1 protein dynamics varies substantially between apoptotic germ cells. Notably, EGL-1 is also expressed in non-apoptotic cells. In summary, our findings show that IR robustly induces \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e in a CEP-1-dependent manner throughout the germline and that this induction is necessary (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e), but not sufficient for IR-induced apoptosis, which occurs only on late pachytene cells. Thus, mechanisms unrelated to EGL-1 induction specify which cells undergo apoptosis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eRecombination and Chromosome Pairing Defects Induce\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eegl-1\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eExpression\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDefects in meiotic recombination and chromosome pairing induce germ-cell apoptosis (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR55 CR56\" citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e). We, therefore, examined \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e induction in \u003cem\u003ebrc-1\u003c/em\u003e/BRCA1 and \u003cem\u003esyp-2\u003c/em\u003e mutants, which are defective in recombinational repair and meiotic chromosome pairing, respectively (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR59\" citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e). \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e was induced in both mutants, even in the absence of IR. In \u003cem\u003ebrc-1\u003c/em\u003e mutants, \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e expression was detected in both mitotic and meiotic regions of the germline, consistent with activation of the DNA damage checkpoint (Fig. S9A). In contrast, \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e expression in \u003cem\u003esyp-2\u003c/em\u003e mutants was restricted to the pachytene region (Fig. S9B), consistent with defects in chromosome synapsis that delay repair of meiotic double-strand breaks via inter-sister recombination (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, disruptions in either DNA repair or chromosome pairing activate distinct checkpoint signals that converge on \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e induction to eliminate defective germ cells.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eEmbryonic Lineage Analysis Reveals Precise Coupling between\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eegl-1\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eExpression and Apoptosis\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo test whether \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e expression correlates with apoptosis induction during embryogenesis, we performed cell lineage analysis of the first 13 apoptotic deaths occuring after the 9th round of cell division in the AB lineage and the MSpaapp death. The transcriptional \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323)\u003c/em\u003e reporter was specifically expressed in cells programmed to die, but apoptosis is blocked since \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323)\u003c/em\u003e is a null allele (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eB\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;3, S10A). Comparing wild-type embryos and those carrying the transcriptional reporter side-by-side revealed that reporter expression generally initiated after apoptotic corpse formation (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). For example, the ABalapapaa corpse forms 13 minutes after birth of the cell in wild-type embryos. Reporter expression begins\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;31 min after birth in the transcriptional \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3323)\u003c/em\u003e reporter, likely reflecting low initial \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e expression levels and/or eGFP maturation time. The translational \u003cem\u003eegl-1(gt3361)\u003c/em\u003e reporter was detected in cells programmed to die without blocking apoptosis, indicating full functionality (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC+S10A). Altogether, these findings show that cell-specific \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e activation closely matches the execution of apoptosis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEGL-1 Mitochondrial Localization in the Germline and During Embryonic Apoptosis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe analyzed the subcellular localization of the EGL-1 protein in the germline and during embryogenesis. Upon IR, EGL-1 colocalized with mitochondria throughout the entire germline (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA+ S13). A subset of apoptotic corpses, identified by button-like morphology under DIC optics, exhibited pronounced EGL-1 hyperaccumulation. However, its functional significance remains unclear (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA). Because these corpses were already undergoing engulfment, and mitochondria in conjunction with EGL-1 congregated on one side of the corpse, they likely represent corpses during late-stage of engulfment (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB\u0026rsquo;).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn embryos, high-resolution confocal microscopy of fixed samples revealed single cells with intense EGL-1 staining that colocalizes with mitochondria (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;C). We hypothesize that these cells are cells destined to die.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eUbiquitous\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eced-3\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eExpression with Apoptosis-Specific Changes in CED-3 Localization\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo systematically study \u003cem\u003eced-3\u003c/em\u003e expression, we generated a transcriptional reporter, \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5182)\u003c/em\u003e, replacing the entire coding sequence, and a translational reporter, \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5180)\u003c/em\u003e, with a C-terminal linker::eGFP sequence to tag both CED-3 isoforms (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eB). As expected, germline and embryonic apoptosis were abolished in the transcriptional \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5182)\u003c/em\u003e reporter, phenocopying a strong \u003cem\u003eced-3(\u003c/em\u003elf\u003cem\u003e)\u003c/em\u003e mutant. In contrast, apoptosis occurred at wild-type levels in the translational \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5180)\u003c/em\u003e reporter, confirming full functionality (Fig. S8D+S10A).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBoth reporters are ubiquitously expressed with and without IR in the germline (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA). Without IR, the CED-3 protein displays a diffuse localization in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA). Upon IR, CED-3 localization remained unchanged in 4/9 animals (Fig. S11B), but redistributed to structures around the nuclear periphery and in the cytoplasm in 5/9 animals. These structures form a pattern broadly similar to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e). Notably, CED-3 also accumulated in the cytoplasm of some late-stage apoptotic corpses in both irradiated and unirradiated germlines (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA, arrows).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn unirradiated germlines, CED-3 localizes to the nuclei of diplotene-stage oocytes, with increasing nuclear enrichment in late-stage oocytes (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA, arrowheads). Colocalization with the H2B-reporter (\u003cem\u003eltls37)\u003c/em\u003e confirmed association of CED-3 with condensed meiotic chromosomes in proximal oocytes (Fig. S11A).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring embryogenesis, the transcriptional \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5182)\u003c/em\u003e and translational \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5180)\u003c/em\u003e reporters are ubiquitously expressed (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eB\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;C) consistent with previous reports (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e). Interestingly, the translational \u003cem\u003eced-3(syb5180)\u003c/em\u003e reporter localizes to both the cytoplasm and the nucleus in all cells. In apoptotic corpses, it adopts a cytoplasmic ring-like pattern, indicating a shift toward predominantly cytoplasmic localization (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eC).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn summary, CED-3 is expressed ubiquitously in the germline and embryos and its localization changes upon induction of apoptosis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eCED-4 Subcellular Localization Differs Between the Germline and Embryo and Changes Dynamically During Embryogenesis.\u003c/span\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo systematically study \u003cem\u003eced-4\u003c/em\u003e expression, we generated a transcriptional reporter, \u003cem\u003eced-4(syb4540)\u003c/em\u003e, replacing the entire coding sequence, and a translational reporter, \u003cem\u003eced-4(syb4536)\u003c/em\u003e, with a C-terminal linker::eGFP sequence to tag both CED-4 isoforms (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eC). The transcriptional \u003cem\u003eced-4(syb4540)\u003c/em\u003e reporter revealed ubiquitous \u003cem\u003eced-4\u003c/em\u003e expression in the germline (independently of IR) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA) and in embryos starting from the 8-12-cell stage (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eB). Analysis of the functional translational \u003cem\u003eced-4(syb4536)\u003c/em\u003e reporter (Fig. S8C+S10A) confirmed that CED-4 is ubiquitously expressed in the germline and localizes to the perinuclear membrane, consistent with previous observations (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA+S12A).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn early embryos (1-4-cell stage), CED-4 also localizes to the perinuclear membrane, whereas in later embryonic stages its localization became predominantly cytoplasmic (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eC) with high-resolution imaging showing colocalization of CED-4 with mitochondria (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e) (Fig. S12B). The subcellular localization in early embryos likely persists from the germline, and the relocalization in later stage embryos (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;8-12-cell stage) may be necessary for proper apoptosis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAltogether, these data demonstrate that CED-4 is ubiquitously expressed in the germline and embryo, and that its subcellular localization differs between these tissues. Our observation reconciles earlier findings (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e) by identifying a developmental switch in CED-4 localization from the perinuclear membrane to mitochondria.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eCED-9 is Ubiquitously Expressed and Forms Distinct Foci on Mitochondria in Both the Germline and the Embryo\u003c/span\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo examine \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e expression, we generated a transcriptional reporter, \u003cem\u003eced-9(syb5190)\u003c/em\u003e, replacing the entire coding sequence. This reporter is engineered into the \u003cem\u003eced-3(\u003c/em\u003elf\u003cem\u003e)\u003c/em\u003e background to prevent apoptosis associated with \u003cem\u003eced-9(syb5190)\u003c/em\u003e (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eD). This reporter revealed ubiquitous \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e expression in embryos and the germline (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;C). Attempts to generate a translational reporter by N-terminal eGFP tagging failed to produce viable homozygotes, indicating disruption of CED-9 function. As an alternative, we generated an N-terminal 3\u0026times;HA-tagged reporter, \u003cem\u003eced-9(gt3374)\u003c/em\u003e (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eD). This reporter does not exhibit excessive embryonic apoptosis and embryonic lethality (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e0A\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;C), indicating that it is functional in embryos. It is only partially functional in the germline, where it causes elevated apoptosis with or without IR (Fig. S8B) and a significantly reduced brood size (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e0B). Immunostaining confirmed that in embryos, CED-9 localizes to distinct foci on mitochondria, consistent with previous reports (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eD) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e). Importantly, we further detected these foci throughout the entire germline in the absence of DNA damage (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eB+S14). Upon IR, CED-9 foci became spatially restricted to the mitotic and early transition zones and in a few late pachytene cells (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003eB+S14). Together, these data show that \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e is ubiquitously expressed in embryos and in the germline and that CED-9 protein forms distinct foci on mitochondria. In the germline, CED-9 localization becomes spatially restricted in response to DNA damage, revealing an additional layer of regulation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn this study, we generated CRISPR/Cas9 endogenous transcriptional and translational reporters for all four apoptosis genes, \u003cem\u003eegl-1, ced-9, ced-4\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eced-3\u003c/em\u003e, and systematically map their expression and subcellular localization in the \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e germline and embryos (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). These analyses provide a framework for interpreting how distinct regulatory logics shape apoptotic outcomes in somatic lineages versus the germline.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"BoldUnderline\" class=\"BoldUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eDistinct Modes of\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"BoldItalicUnderline\" class=\"BoldItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eegl-1\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"BoldUnderline\" class=\"BoldUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eRegulation Underly Somatic and Germline Apoptosis in\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"BoldItalicUnderline\" class=\"BoldItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e developmental apoptosis follows a hardwired program. Our analysis demonstrates that \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e transcription is restricted to lineages where cells are destined to die in wild-type animals. Previous work showed that \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e mRNA is already present in the mother cell of cell destined to die (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e) suggesting reporter detection may lag due to eGFP maturation kinetics or imaging sensitivity. Nevertheless, the spatial and temporal precision of \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e activation supports its role as the decisive trigger for somatic apoptosis. In contrast, \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eced-4\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eced-3\u003c/em\u003e are ubiquitously expressed in embryos, as previously reported (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe germline follows a fundamentally different regulatory logic. Both transcriptional and translational \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e reporters are strongly induced upon DNA damage. Consistent with previous work, this response is CEP-1/p53-dependent (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e). Using targeted reporter designs, we identified intron1 of \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e as a critical \u003cem\u003ecis\u003c/em\u003e-regulatory element containing a CEP-1/p53-responsive regulatory module that enables widespread germline induction of \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e following genotoxic stress. Some apoptotic germ cells exhibit pronounced EGL-1 hyperaccumulation. This accumulation may reflect either positive feedback between apoptotic and engulfment pathways, as previously suggested (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e63\u003c/span\u003e), or delayed corpse clearance when high levels of DNA damage\u0026ndash;induced apoptosis overwhelm the engulfment machinery. Surprisingly, \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e induction is not restricted to late pachytene cells where apoptosis occurs, but extends across the entire germline. These results indicate that \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e expression alone is insufficient to commit a germ cell to die, and imply that additional factors, potentially involving checkpoint signaling thresholds, mitochondrial physiological status, or the availability of downstream effectors, define which cells are competent to execute apoptosis. Supporting this model, \u003cem\u003ebrc-1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003esyp-2\u003c/em\u003e mutants show that distinct meiotic surveillance pathways converge on \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e induction in both apoptotic and non-apoptotic cells. Thus, apoptosis in \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e is governed by two parallel but mechanistically distinct logics: (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e) lineage-specific \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e induction in embryos and (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e) checkpoint-mediated activation of \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e in the entire germline, where additional yet unidentified pathways restrict apoptotic execution. Several genes are required for DNA damage-induced germ-cell apoptosis without affecting DNA damage-induced \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e transcription, and some act in a cell-nonautonomous manner. These include the IR-induced intestinal secreted SYSM-1 (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e64\u003c/span\u003e) and the scaffold protein KRI-1 (related to mammalian KRIT1/CCM1), which regulates MAP kinase signaling required for DNA damage\u0026ndash;induced germ-cell apoptosis by controlling intestinal zinc sequestration (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e65\u003c/span\u003e). Finally, several DNA repair and DNA-damage response genes, whose loss blocks DNA damage-induced apoptosis without compromising \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e induction, include the SIR-2 histone deacetylase (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e), the GEN-1 Holliday junction resolvase (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e66\u003c/span\u003e), and Topoisomerase III (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e67\u003c/span\u003e). It will be interesting to test if any of these factors affect EGL-1 protein abundance, or post-translational modifications.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eContext-Dependent Localization of CED-9, CED-4, and CED-3 Shapes Apoptosis in\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eC. elegans\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur CRISPR/Cas9 reporters uncovered context-dependent localization dynamics of CED-9, CED-4, and CED-3 across the germline and embryos. CED-9 localizes to mitochondria in embryos and in the germline as previously shown (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e). Interestingly, in the absence of DNA damage, CED-9 foci are observed throughout the germline. In contrast, upon IR, they become spatially restricted to the mitotic zone, early transition zone, and a few cells in the late pachytene zone. This apparent reduction in CED-9 abundance or distribution may contribute to apoptosis induction, as previously reported for physiological germ-cell apoptosis (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e68\u003c/span\u003e). Surprisingly, EGL-1 protein is detected throughout the germline upon DNA damage and exhibits mitochondrial localization, suggesting that even low levels of mitochondrial CED-9 are sufficient for EGL-1 recruitment, or that EGL-1 can be targeted to mitochondria independently of CED-9.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe localization of CED-4 has been debated for two decades. Antibody-based studies reported strong perinuclear enrichment in the germline (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e), whereas earlier work from the Horvitz's laboratory suggested mitochondrial localization in embryos (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e). More recent studies using CRISPR/Cas9 reporter (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e) and antibody staining (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e) confirmed CED-4 mitochondrial localization during mid-embryogenesis but did not address CED-4 localization in early embryos. Our CRISPR/Cas9 reporters reconcile these findings by revealing a developmental transition: CED-4 localizes to the perinuclear membrane in the germline and in early embryos (1-4-cell stage) but progressively relocalizes to mitochondria as embryogenesis proceeds. This transition coincides with the onset of zygotic transcription and likely positions CED-4 for apoptosome assembly later during development. Consistent with Lambie and colleagues (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e), we did not observe translocation of CED-4 to perinuclear membranes in embryonic apoptotic cells, as previously suggested (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe analysis of the CED-3 reporter revealed a sequence of regulated localization states. In late oocytes, CED-3 is enriched in the nucleus and occasionally near the chromatin, consistent with early immunostaining studies (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e). Following DNA damage, CED-3 redistributes to ER-like cytoplasmic structures in a subset of germlines. This observation is particularly interesting given recent evidence that CED-3 protects worms against ER stress (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e69\u003c/span\u003e). During embryogenesis, apoptotic cells display striking ring-like cytoplasmic accumulations of CED-3, whereas adjacent surviving cells maintain a diffuse nuclear\u0026ndash;cytoplasmic distribution. Altogether, these findings demonstrate that the apoptotic machinery, except for EGL-1, is broadly expressed during somatic development but functionally constrained by developmentally regulated subcellular dynamics. Rather than operating as a fixed linear pathway, apoptosis in \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e is governed by tissue-specific competence states, and stage-specific relocalization of key regulators, thereby refining the classical EGL-1\u0026ndash;CED-9\u0026ndash;CED-4\u0026ndash;CED-3 model.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImportantly, these principles are likely conserved across metazoans. In the classical \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e somatic apoptosis model, CED-9 directly binds and sequesters CED-4 at the mitochondrial membrane, thereby preventing activation of the caspase CED-3. In contrast, in mammalian cells, BCL-2 family proteins do not directly bind APAF-1; instead, OMM permeabilization triggers cytochrome c release, promoting apoptosome assembly and caspase activation. Notably, in the \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e germline, the absence of stable CED-9-CED-4 colocalization brings the nematode apoptosis pathway closer to the mammalian paradigm, suggesting that apoptosome activation in the germline may rely on additional regulatory steps rather than simple sequestration by a BCL-2\u0026ndash;like protein. In mammals, BCL-2 family proteins localize not only to mitochondria but also to the ER, where they regulate calcium signaling and ER stress independently of apoptosis (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e70\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e71\u003c/span\u003e). Apaf-1 and caspases have similarly been implicated in non-apoptotic roles and are subject to spatial and contextual regulation (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e69\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e72\u003c/span\u003e). Together, our findings in \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e support a conserved model in which apoptotic regulators are broadly expressed and multifunctional, with apoptosis emerging only when transcriptional activation, protein localization, and cellular competence converge. Rather than operating as a binary switch, the apoptotic machinery functions as a spatially and temporally regulated network, that ensures robustness against inappropriate cell loss while preserving rapid apoptotic capacity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eFuture Directions\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA key unresolved question is why apoptosis occurs exclusively in late pachytene cells despite broad EGL-1 induction upon IR; identifying the factors underlying this restricted competence remains an important direction for future studies. Integrating caspase activity sensors with high-resolution Airyscan and real-time spinning disk microscopy, along with single-cell transcriptomics and tissue-specific proteomics, will be critical for defining the molecular determinants of apoptosis competence in the germline.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eBy generating endogenous reporters for the core apoptosis machinery, we provide a comprehensive view of apoptosis gene expression and localization in the \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e germline and embryos. Our findings reveal fundamental differences in apoptotic regulation between these tissues, and uncover changes in CED-3 and CED-4 localization that refine the classical model of apoptosis induction. Together, these insights reshape our understanding of apoptotic regulation and provide a foundation for further investigating the apoptotic and non-apoptotic functions of these conserved proteins.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe are grateful to the members of the Gartner Laboratory and the Korean Institute for Basic Science Center for Genomic Integrity for their fruitful discussions. We especially thank Christian Froekjaer-Jensen for his input on the use of PATC introns and for sharing fluorescent protein sequences. We thank Rosa E. Navarro Gonzalez for sharing RN15 and Alex Hajnal for sharing AH6335. Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). We also thank Orlando Schaerer, Bj\u0026ouml;rn Schumacher, and Ulrike Gartner for their comments on the manuscript. We thank Luthfiyyah Mutsnaini and Ratih Khoirunnisa for their excellent technical support. We thank KJ Myung for his unwavering support. Grammarly was used to improve writing. The model illustration (Fig. 8) was created in BioRender (Memar, N. (2026) https://BioRender.com/t8z2gze).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of Interest Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eG.G., A.A., S.G.M.R., and N.M. performed experiments. S.G.M.R., N.M., and A.G. provided resources and methodology. G.G., S.G.M.R. N.M., and A.G. participated in the design of experiments, data analysis, and data interpretation. G.G., S.G.M.R., N.M., and A.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors (G.G., A.A., S.G.M.R., N.M., and A.G.) provided input and revisions to successive drafts of the entire manuscript. S.G.M.R., N.M., and A.G. managed the overall project (and secured funding).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis\u0026nbsp;work was supported by the Korean Institute for Basic Science Grant IBS-R022-D1 (to G.G., A.A., N.M., S.G.M.R., and A.G.). This work was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant RS-2025-16072019 (to S.G.M.R.), and RS-2024-00509412 (to A.G. and S.G.M.R.).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll data and material used in this manuscript are available and can be requested from\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ethe corresponding authors.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFuchs Y, Steller H. Programmed cell death in animal development and disease. Cell. 2011;147(4):742\u0026ndash;58.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eElmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(4):495\u0026ndash;516.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer. 1972;26(4):239\u0026ndash;57.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEllis HM, Horvitz HR. Genetic control of programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans. Cell. 1986;44(6):817\u0026ndash;29.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eConradt B, Horvitz HR. The C. elegans protein EGL-1 is required for programmed cell death and interacts with the Bcl-2-like protein CED-9. Cell. 1998;93(4):519\u0026ndash;29.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHengartner MO, Ellis RE, Horvitz HR. Caenorhabditis elegans gene ced-9 protects cells from programmed cell death. Nature. 1992;356(6369):494\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXue D, Horvitz HR. Caenorhabditis elegans CED-9 protein is a bifunctional cell-death inhibitor. Nature. 1997;390(6657):305\u0026ndash;8.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHao Z, Duncan GS, Chang CC, Elia A, Fang M, Wakeham A, et al. Specific ablation of the apoptotic functions of cytochrome C reveals a differential requirement for cytochrome C and Apaf-1 in apoptosis. Cell. 2005;121(4):579\u0026ndash;91.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNehme R, Conradt B. egl-1: a key activator of apoptotic cell death in C. elegans. Oncogene. 2008;27 Suppl 1:S30-40.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYuan J, Horvitz HR. The Caenorhabditis elegans cell death gene ced-4 encodes a novel protein and is expressed during the period of extensive programmed cell death. Development. 1992;116(2):309\u0026ndash;20.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eConradt B, Wu YC, Xue D. Programmed Cell Death During Caenorhabditis elegans Development. Genetics. 2016;203(4):1533\u0026ndash;62.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSulston JE, Brenner S. The DNA of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77(1):95\u0026ndash;104.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1983;100(1):64\u0026ndash;119.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eConradt B, Horvitz HR. The TRA-1A sex determination protein of C. elegans regulates sexually dimorphic cell deaths by repressing the egl-1 cell death activator gene. Cell. 1999;98(3):317\u0026ndash;27.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMalin JZ, Shaham S. Cell Death in C. elegans Development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015;114:1\u0026ndash;42.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLambie EJ, Greig A, Conradt B. Fluorescent protein tagging of C. elegans core apoptosis pathway components reveals mitochondrial localization of CED-9 Bcl-2, CED-4 Apaf1 and CED-3 Caspase in non-apoptotic and apoptotic cells. Cell Death Differ. 2025.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePourkarimi E, Greiss S, Gartner A. Evidence that CED-9/Bcl2 and CED-4/Apaf-1 localization is not consistent with the current model for C. elegans apoptosis induction. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19(3):406\u0026ndash;15.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTzur YB, Friedland AE, Nadarajan S, Church GM, Calarco JA, Colaiacovo MP. Heritable custom genomic modifications in Caenorhabditis elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Genetics. 2013;195(3):1181\u0026ndash;5.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJaramillo-Lambert A, Harigaya Y, Vitt J, Villeneuve A, Engebrecht J. Meiotic errors activate checkpoints that improve gamete quality without triggering apoptosis in male germ cells. Curr Biol. 2010;20(23):2078\u0026ndash;89.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarders RH, Morthorst TH, Lande AD, Hesselager MO, Mandrup OA, Bendixen E, et al. Dynein links engulfment and execution of apoptosis via CED-4/Apaf1 in C. elegans. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(10):1012.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang D, Yang H, Jiang L, Zhao C, Wang M, Hu B, et al. Interaction between DLC-1 and SAO-1 facilitates CED-4 translocation during apoptosis in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Cell Death Discov. 2022;8(1):441.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen X, Wang Y, Chen YZ, Harry BL, Nakagawa A, Lee ES, et al. Regulation of CED-3 caspase localization and activation by C. elegans nuclear-membrane protein NPP-14. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23(11):958\u0026ndash;64.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSherrard R, Luehr S, Holzkamp H, McJunkin K, Memar N, Conradt B. miRNAs cooperate in apoptosis regulation during C. elegans development. Genes Dev. 2017;31(2):209\u0026ndash;22.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJiang Y, Conradt B. A genetic screen identifies C. elegans eif-3.H and hrpr-1 as pro-apoptotic genes and potential activators of egl-1 expression. MicroPubl Biol. 2024;2024.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXu J, Jiang Y, Sherrard R, Ikegami K, Conradt B. PUF-8, a C. elegans ortholog of the RNA-binding proteins PUM1 and PUM2, is required for robustness of the cell death fate. Development. 2023;150(19).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTucker N, Reddien P, Hersh B, Lee D, Liu MHX, Horvitz HR. The pro-apoptotic function of the C. elegans BCL-2 homolog CED-9 requires interaction with the APAF-1 homolog CED-4. Sci Adv. 2024;10(41):eadn0325.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGumienny TL, Lambie E, Hartwieg E, Horvitz HR, Hengartner MO. Genetic control of programmed cell death in the Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite germline. Development. 1999;126(5):1011\u0026ndash;22.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGartner A, Milstein S, Ahmed S, Hodgkin J, Hengartner MO. A conserved checkpoint pathway mediates DNA damage\u0026ndash;induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in C. elegans. Mol Cell. 2000;5(3):435\u0026ndash;43.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDerry WB, Putzke AP, Rothman JH. Caenorhabditis elegans p53: role in apoptosis, meiosis, and stress resistance. Science. 2001;294(5542):591\u0026ndash;5.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchumacher B, Hofmann K, Boulton S, Gartner A. The C. elegans homolog of the p53 tumor suppressor is required for DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Curr Biol. 2001;11(21):1722\u0026ndash;7.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchumacher B, Schertel C, Wittenburg N, Tuck S, Mitani S, Gartner A, et al. C. elegans ced-13 can promote apoptosis and is induced in response to DNA damage. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12(2):153\u0026ndash;61.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchumacher B, Hanazawa M, Lee MH, Nayak S, Volkmann K, Hofmann ER, et al. Translational repression of C. elegans p53 by GLD-1 regulates DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Cell. 2005;120(3):357\u0026ndash;68.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDoll MA, Soltanmohammadi N, Schumacher B. ALG-2/AGO-Dependent mir-35 Family Regulates DNA Damage-Induced Apoptosis Through MPK-1/ERK MAPK Signaling Downstream of the Core Apoptotic Machinery in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2019;213(1):173\u0026ndash;94.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFrokjaer-Jensen C, Jain N, Hansen L, Davis MW, Li Y, Zhao D, et al. An Abundant Class of Non-coding DNA Can Prevent Stochastic Gene Silencing in the C. elegans Germline. Cell. 2016;166(2):343\u0026ndash;57.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTan FJ, Fire AZ, Hill RB. Regulation of apoptosis by C. elegans CED-9 in the absence of the C-terminal transmembrane domain. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14(11):1925\u0026ndash;35.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYan N, Gu L, Kokel D, Chai J, Li W, Han A, et al. Structural, biochemical, and functional analyses of CED-9 recognition by the proapoptotic proteins EGL-1 and CED-4. Mol Cell. 2004;15(6):999\u0026ndash;1006.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQi S, Pang Y, Hu Q, Liu Q, Li H, Zhou Y, et al. Crystal structure of the Caenorhabditis elegans apoptosome reveals an octameric assembly of CED-4. Cell. 2010;141(3):446\u0026ndash;57.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen F, Hersh BM, Conradt B, Zhou Z, Riemer D, Gruenbaum Y, et al. Translocation of C. elegans CED-4 to nuclear membranes during programmed cell death. Science. 2000;287(5457):1485\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77(1):71\u0026ndash;94.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGhanta KS, Ishidate T, Mello CC. Microinjection for precision genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans. STAR Protoc. 2021;2(3):100748.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BN, Palmer AE, Tsien RY. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22(12):1567\u0026ndash;72.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRedemann S, Schloissnig S, Ernst S, Pozniakowsky A, Ayloo S, Hyman AA, et al. Codon adaptation-based control of protein expression in C. elegans. Nat Methods. 2011;8(3):250\u0026ndash;2.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKohlbrenner T, Berger S, Laranjeira AC, Aegerter-Wilmsen T, Comi LF, deMello A, et al. Actomyosin-mediated apical constriction promotes physiological germ cell death in C. elegans. PLoS Biol. 2024;22(8):e3002775.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchnabel R, Bischoff M, Hintze A, Schulz AK, Hejnol A, Meinhardt H, et al. Global cell sorting in the C. elegans embryo defines a new mechanism for pattern formation. Dev Biol. 2006;294(2):418\u0026ndash;31.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchnabel R, Hutter H, Moerman D, Schnabel H. Assessing normal embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans using a 4D microscope: variability of development and regional specification. Dev Biol. 1997;184(2):234\u0026ndash;65.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCraig AL, Moser SC, Bailly AP, Gartner A. Methods for studying the DNA damage response in the Caenorhabdatis elegans germ line. Methods Cell Biol. 2012;107:321\u0026ndash;52.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFrancis R, Barton MK, Kimble J, Schedl T. gld-1, a tumor suppressor gene required for oocyte development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1995;139(2):579\u0026ndash;606.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGreiss S, Hall J, Ahmed S, Gartner A. C. elegans SIR-2.1 translocation is linked to a proapoptotic pathway parallel to cep-1/p53 during DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Genes Dev. 2008;22(20):2831\u0026ndash;42.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSong J, Geary P, Salemova K, Rouse J, Hong Y, Rolland SGM, et al. Functional dissection of the conserved C. elegans LEM-3/ANKLE1 nuclease reveals a crucial requirement for the LEM-like and GIY-YIG domains for DNA bridge processing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53(6).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMemar N, Sherrard R, Sethi A, Fernandez CL, Schmidt H, Lambie EJ, et al. The replicative helicase CMG is required for the divergence of cell fates during asymmetric cell division in vivo. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):9399.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGreiss S, Schumacher B, Grandien K, Rothblatt J, Gartner A. Transcriptional profiling in C. elegans suggests DNA damage dependent apoptosis as an ancient function of the p53 family. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:334.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHafner A, Bulyk ML, Jambhekar A, Lahav G. The multiple mechanisms that regulate p53 activity and cell fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(4):199\u0026ndash;210.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRutkowski R, Dickinson R, Stewart G, Craig A, Schimpl M, Keyse SM, et al. Regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans p53/CEP-1-dependent germ cell apoptosis by Ras/MAPK signaling. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(8):e1002238.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGartner A, Boag PR, Blackwell TK. Germline survival and apoptosis. WormBook. 2008:1\u0026ndash;20.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBhalla N, Dernburg AF. A conserved checkpoint monitors meiotic chromosome synapsis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2005;310(5754):1683\u0026ndash;6.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSilva N, Adamo A, Santonicola P, Martinez-Perez E, La Volpe A. Pro-crossover factors regulate damage-dependent apoptosis in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(9):1209\u0026ndash;18.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMeier B, Gartner A. Meiosis: checking chromosomes pair up properly. Curr Biol. 2006;16(7):R249-51.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlpi A, Pasierbek P, Gartner A, Loidl J. Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma. 2003;112(1):6\u0026ndash;16.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eColaiacovo MP, MacQueen AJ, Martinez-Perez E, McDonald K, Adamo A, La Volpe A, et al. Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev Cell. 2003;5(3):463\u0026ndash;74.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBoulton SJ, Martin JS, Polanowska J, Hill DE, Gartner A, Vidal M. BRCA1/BARD1 orthologs required for DNA repair in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 2004;14(1):33\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLangerak S, Trombley A, Patterson JR, Leroux D, Couch A, Wood MP, et al. Remodeling of the endoplasmic reticulum in Caenorhabditis elegans oocytes is regulated by CGH-1. Genesis. 2019;57(2):e23267.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoeppner DJ, Hengartner MO, Schnabel R. Engulfment genes cooperate with ced-3 to promote cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2001;412(6843):202\u0026ndash;6.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eReddien PW, Cameron S, Horvitz HR. Phagocytosis promotes programmed cell death in C. elegans. Nature. 2001;412(6843):198\u0026ndash;202.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSoltanmohammadi N, Wang S, Schumacher B. Somatic PMK-1/p38 signaling links environmental stress to germ cell apoptosis and heritable euploidy. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):701.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIto S, Greiss S, Gartner A, Derry WB. Cell-nonautonomous regulation of C. elegans germ cell death by kri-1. Curr Biol. 2010;20(4):333\u0026ndash;8.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBailly AP, Freeman A, Hall J, Declais AC, Alpi A, Lilley DM, et al. The Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of Gen1/Yen1 resolvases links DNA damage signaling to DNA double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(7):e1001025.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDello Stritto MR, Bauer B, Barraud P, Jantsch V. DNA topoisomerase 3 is required for efficient germ cell quality control. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(6).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchertel C, Conradt B. C. elegans orthologs of components of the RB tumor suppressor complex have distinct pro-apoptotic functions. Development. 2007;134(20):3691\u0026ndash;701.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWei H, Weaver YM, Weaver BP. Xeroderma pigmentosum protein XPD controls caspase-mediated stress responses. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):9344.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePopgeorgiev N, Jabbour L, Gillet G. Subcellular Localization and Dynamics of the Bcl-2 Family of Proteins. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2018;6:13.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eScorrano L, Oakes SA, Opferman JT, Cheng EH, Sorcinelli MD, Pozzan T, et al. BAX and BAK regulation of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+: a control point for apoptosis. Science. 2003;300(5616):135\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFerraro E, Pesaresi MG, De Zio D, Cencioni MT, Gortat A, Cozzolino M, et al. Apaf1 plays a pro-survival role by regulating centrosome morphology and function. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(Pt 20):3450\u0026ndash;63.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMadeira F, Madhusoodanan N, Lee J, Eusebi A, Niewielska A, Tivey ARN, et al. The EMBL-EBI Job Dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(W1):W521-W5.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSternberg PW, Van Auken K, Wang Q, Wright A, Yook K, Zarowiecki M, et al. WormBase 2024: status and transitioning to Alliance infrastructure. Genetics. 2024;227(1).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"cell-death-and-differentiation","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"cdd","sideBox":"Learn more about [Cell Death \u0026 Differentiation](http://www.nature.com/cdd/)","snPcode":"41418","submissionUrl":"https://mts-cdd.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Cell Death \u0026 Differentiation","twitterHandle":"@cddpress","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8728396/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8728396/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eApoptosis is a highly conserved form of programmed cell death controlled by a core molecular pathway that was first defined in \u003cem\u003eCaenorhabditis elegans\u003c/em\u003e and is conserved in mammals. This pathway is composed of \u003cem\u003eegl-1/\u003c/em\u003eBH3-only, \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e/Bcl-2, \u003cem\u003eced-4\u003c/em\u003e/Apaf-1, and \u003cem\u003eced-3/\u003c/em\u003eCaspase. Despite being discovered more than 20 years ago, tissue-specific apoptosis induction as well as endogenous expression pattern and dynamic subcellular localization of apoptosis proteins remain incompletely defined. Here, we generated a complete set of CRISPR/Cas9-engineered transcriptional and translational reporters for all four apoptosis genes and systematically analyzed their expression and subcellular localization in the \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e germline and embryo.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe show that somatic apoptosis is driven by precise, lineage-specific activation of \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e, whereas \u003cem\u003eced-9\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eced-4\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eced-3\u003c/em\u003e are ubiquitously expressed. In contrast, DNA-damage triggers a robust CEP-1/p53-dependent-induction of \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e throughout the germline, yet apoptosis occurs only in late pachytene cells. We also identify intron1 of \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e as essential for CEP-1\u0026ndash;dependent transcriptional activation. Analysis of \u003cem\u003ebrc-1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003esyp-2\u003c/em\u003e mutants demonstrates that distinct meiotic surveillance pathways converge on \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e induction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnalysis of the subcellular localization of the downstream regulators CED-9, CED-4, and CED-3 reveals dynamic, tissue-specific localizations that refine the classical apoptosis model. CED-4 transitions from a perinuclear distribution in the germline and early embryos to a predominantly mitochondrial localization later in embryogenesis, while CED-3 changes its subcellular localization depending on developmental stage and apoptotic status. CED-9 localizes to distinct mitochondrial foci in both embryo and germline.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTogether, these reporters reveal that \u003cem\u003eC. elegans\u003c/em\u003e apoptosis is governed by two mechanistically distinct programs: (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e) lineage-specific \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e activation in embryos and (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e) checkpoint-mediated activation of \u003cem\u003eegl-1\u003c/em\u003e in the germline, where additional, yet unidentified pathways restrict apoptotic execution. These reporters also provide a comprehensive toolbox for dissecting apoptotic and non-apoptotic functions of the conserved apoptotic machinery \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Endogenous Expression and Subcellular Localization of Core Apoptosis Regulators Reveal Key Differences Between Embryonic and Germline Apoptosis in C. elegans","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-05 15:02:35","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8728396/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"revise","date":"2026-03-02T13:04:13+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2026-02-24T15:20:14+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2026-02-19T18:40:55+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2026-02-03T15:36:15+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2026-02-03T13:35:13+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-02-03T11:04:04+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-01-29T16:28:38+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-01-29T07:28:16+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Cell Death \u0026 Differentiation","date":"2026-01-29T07:28:15+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"cell-death-and-differentiation","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"cdd","sideBox":"Learn more about [Cell Death \u0026 Differentiation](http://www.nature.com/cdd/)","snPcode":"41418","submissionUrl":"https://mts-cdd.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Cell Death \u0026 Differentiation","twitterHandle":"@cddpress","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"507470da-99e1-4680-9e25-92e59fa9b60f","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 5th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":62233580,"name":"Biological sciences/Cell biology"},{"id":62233581,"name":"Biological sciences/Genetics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-29T11:02:20+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-05 15:02:35","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8728396","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8728396","identity":"rs-8728396","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}