The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations in regulatory regions of the D. melanogaster genome

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,915 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Although non-coding regions play important roles in gene regulation and contribute to individual fitness, the precise distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of new mutations in these regions remains poorly understood. Here, we carefully compile experimentally validated regulatory regions in non-coding regions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome and identify putatively neutral sites near them. Incorporating a realistic genomic architecture that mimics the placement of the regulatory and coding regions, as well as a realistic heterogeneity in recombination and mutation rates across the genome, we use forward-in-time simulations to assess the power and accuracy of population genetics approaches that infer the DFE of new mutations in these regions. While the parameters of DFEs primarily comprising moderately and strongly deleterious mutations are estimated accurately, those of a DFE comprising mostly mildly deleterious mutations are misinferred. Applying these insights to three African D. melanogaster populations, we find that a large fraction of new mutations in functionally important non-coding regions are moderately deleterious, as opposed to strongly deleterious in coding regions. While the fraction of beneficial substitutions in regulatory regions (0.25-0.45) was also lower in coding regions (∼0.5), our results suggest that non-coding regions contribute a majority of new deleterious mutations and beneficial substitutions in D. melanogaster populations. By incorporating both the genomic distribution and the inferred DFE of non-coding regions, we demonstrate that the effects of background selection across the genome are more accurately captured than with coding regions alone, highlighting the importance of considering selection on non-coding regions when interpreting patterns of genomic variation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00