The prognostic value of the post-treatment serum CA 125 level in patients with advanced endometrial cancer
article
OA: gold
CC0
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this analysis was to assess the prognostic value of the post-treatment serum CA 125 level in each member of a group of advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) patients in comparison to other clinical and pathological parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Records of 266 patients treated at the Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch between the years 2006 and 2018 were included in the study. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 138 months. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were set as the endpoints. The tests chi-squared, Fisher, log-rank, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Cox proportional hazard ratio were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: In the analysed group, there was a significant association between an elevated serum CA 125 level following adjuvant treatment and shorter PFS and OS. After setting a cut-off value for CA 125 there was a statistically significant correlation between the marker and PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis indicated that the post-treatment serum CA 125 level is an independent prognostic factor of the course of aEC. CONCLUSIONS: The post-treatment serum CA 125 level correlates significantly with both PFS and OS in each patient with aEC. The marker is an independent prognostic factor in this group. A low post-treatment level of the marker is a strong indicator of good 5-year survival, with 82% of patients reaching 5-year OS.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (15)
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(86)90358-3 via openalex
- W2460694888 via openalex
- W3159004246 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/igc.0000000000000609 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00286-x via openalex
- doi:10.1006/gyno.2002.6664 via openalex
- doi:10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e11 via openalex
- doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22026-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.130 via openalex
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155145 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/clinchem/44.7.1417 via openalex
- doi:10.5468/ogs.2013.56.5.281 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.09.014 via openalex
- doi:10.5603/gp.a2020.0164 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(88)90163-9 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-13T20:07:10.637958+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK