Leveraging Multi-Modal Feature Learning for Predictions of Antibody Viscosity

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,642 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The shift towards the subcutaneous administration route for biologics therapeutics has gained momentum due to its patient-friendly nature, convenience, reduced healthcare burden, and improved compliance compared to traditional intravenous infusions. However, one of the potentially significant challenges with this transition is managing the viscosity of the administered solutions. High viscosity can pose substantial development and manufacturability challenges, directly impacting the patient by increasing injection time and pain at the injection site. Moreover, high viscosity formulations can prolong residence time at the injection site, affecting absorption kinetics and potentially altering the intended pharmacological profile and therapeutic efficacy of the biologic candidate. This publication explores the application of a multimodal feature learning workflow for predicting the viscosity of antibodies in therapeutics discovery, integrating multiple data sources such as sequence, structural, physicochemical properties, and embeddings from a language model. This approach enables the model to learn from various underlying rules, including physicochemical rules from molecular simulations and molecular protein evolutionary rules by large, pre-trained deep learning foundation models. By comparing the effectiveness of this approach against other selected published viscosity prediction methods, this study offers insights on their intrinsic viscosity predictive potential and usability in therapeutics antibody early development pipelines. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00