Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study

Cognitive function and its determinants in... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384" }, "headline": "Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a...", "datePublished": "2024-11-18T15:24:54", "dateModified": "2025-08-22T15:14:52", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Etty Rekawati" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Winda Eriska" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Utami Rachmawati" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Dwi Nurviyandari Kusuma Wati" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Junaiti Sahar" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Arief Andriyanto" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Jing-Jy Wang" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Sri Susanty" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Faizul Hasan" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background Multiple medical conditions arising from reduced physical and physiological functioning, including cognitive decline, manifest in older persons. This study aims to examine the relationship between cognitive function and associated risk factors in older persons living in long-term care facilities in Indonesia. Methods This study involved 350 elderly individuals residing in long-term care institutions. A cross-sectional design utilizing an analytical survey methodology was implemented. Data were gathered via interviews employing a demographic questionnaire and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS (version 23). Results Univariate analysis demonstrated significant correlations between cognitive performance and gender, ethnicity, level of education, medical history, subjective memory issues, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, dietary intake of fruits and vegetables, and employment history (p < 0.05). Higher education (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56–0.84) and reduced subjective memory complaints (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.20–0.44) correlated positively with enhanced cognitive function, but alcohol intake (OR = 6.79, 95% CI: 2.42–19.1) correlated with impaired cognitive function. Conclusions the level of education, subjective memory complaints, and alcohol intake are substantially correlated with cognitive performance in older persons residing in long-term care facilities. Evaluating demographic characteristics in elderly individuals can assist healthcare professionals in the early detection of cognitive impairment, facilitating prompt interventions in long-term care environments. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384", "name": "Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing..." } } ] } Home Browse Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Rekawati E, Eriska W, Rachmawati U et al. Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.158490.2 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article Revised Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] Etty Rekawati https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5431-3657 1 , Winda Eriska 1 , Utami Rachmawati https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3214-2612 1 , [...] Dwi Nurviyandari Kusuma Wati 1 , Junaiti Sahar 1 , Arief Andriyanto 2 , Jing-Jy Wang 3,4 , Sri Susanty https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-5000 5 , Faizul Hasan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-1328 6 Etty Rekawati https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5431-3657 1 , Winda Eriska 1 , [...] Utami Rachmawati https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3214-2612 1 , Dwi Nurviyandari Kusuma Wati 1 , Junaiti Sahar 1 , Arief Andriyanto 2 , Jing-Jy Wang 3,4 , Sri Susanty https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-5000 5 , Faizul Hasan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-1328 6 PUBLISHED 22 Aug 2025 Author details Author details 1 Department of Community Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia 2 Department of Community Nursing, Universitas Bina Sehat PPNI Mojokerto, Mojokerto, Indonesia 3 Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Tainan City, Taiwan 4 Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan 5 Nurse Professional Education Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, South East Sulawesi, Indonesia 6 Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand Etty Rekawati Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Winda Eriska Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Visualization Utami Rachmawati Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Visualization Dwi Nurviyandari Kusuma Wati Roles: Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Junaiti Sahar Roles: Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Arief Andriyanto Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Jing-Jy Wang Roles: Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Sri Susanty Roles: Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Faizul Hasan Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS Abstract Background Multiple medical conditions arising from reduced physical and physiological functioning, including cognitive decline, manifest in older persons. This study aims to examine the relationship between cognitive function and associated risk factors in older persons living in long-term care facilities in Indonesia. Methods This study involved 350 elderly individuals residing in long-term care institutions. A cross-sectional design utilizing an analytical survey methodology was implemented. Data were gathered via interviews employing a demographic questionnaire and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS (version 23). Results Univariate analysis demonstrated significant correlations between cognitive performance and gender, ethnicity, level of education, medical history, subjective memory issues, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, dietary intake of fruits and vegetables, and employment history (p < 0.05). Higher education (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56–0.84) and reduced subjective memory complaints (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.20–0.44) correlated positively with enhanced cognitive function, but alcohol intake (OR = 6.79, 95% CI: 2.42–19.1) correlated with impaired cognitive function. Conclusions the level of education, subjective memory complaints, and alcohol intake are substantially correlated with cognitive performance in older persons residing in long-term care facilities. Evaluating demographic characteristics in elderly individuals can assist healthcare professionals in the early detection of cognitive impairment, facilitating prompt interventions in long-term care environments. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Cognitive function; elderly individuals; risk factors Corresponding Author(s) Etty Rekawati ( [email protected] ) Faizul Hasan ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding authors: Etty Rekawati, Faizul Hasan Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: This research received grant from the Directorate of Research and Development, Universitas Indonesia under Cluster/Group/Research Centre Grant program: NKB-049/UN2.RST/ HKP.05.00/2022. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Copyright: © 2025 Rekawati E et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Rekawati E, Eriska W, Rachmawati U et al. Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.158490.2 ) First published: 18 Nov 2024, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.158490.1 ) Latest published: 22 Aug 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.158490.2 ) Revised Amendments from Version 1 The revisions enhance transparency by clarifying sampling, exclusions, and model-building. Novelty is highlighted by emphasizing the study's focus on institutionalized elderly—an understudied population—and its global relevance. Reproducibility is strengthened with details on data distribution and missingness. These changes address all reviewer feedback while maintaining the manuscript's core strengths. The revisions enhance transparency by clarifying sampling, exclusions, and model-building. Novelty is highlighted by emphasizing the study's focus on institutionalized elderly—an understudied population—and its global relevance. Reproducibility is strengthened with details on data distribution and missingness. These changes address all reviewer feedback while maintaining the manuscript's core strengths. See the authors' detailed response to the review by Yuni Asri See the authors' detailed response to the review by Made Satya Nugraha Gautama See the authors' detailed response to the review by Rian Adi Pamungkas READ REVIEWER RESPONSES Introduction By 2030, one in six individuals worldwide will be senior citizens. In Indonesia, life expectancy improved from 68.6 years in 2018 to 71.8 years in 2022, with an anticipated increase of 72.2 years for the period 2030–2035. 1 The 2022 Indonesia National Health Survey indicated that 10.5% of the population comprises elderly persons. 2 The aging population has transitioned the illness burden from infectious diseases and malnutrition to chronic ailments such as diabetes, hypertension, neoplasms, and coronary heart disease. 3 These alterations hinder daily functioning and augment economic dependency. 4 Moreover, physical, mental, and emotional deterioration intensifies reliance, impairing social interactions, self-care, and health management. 5 Mental changes in older persons encompass transformations in personality, memory, and cognitive ability, shaped by socio-demographic, physical, and psychological factors, 6 – 9 with loneliness, social isolation, 7 , 10 , 11 and late-life mental diseases. 6 With the expansion of the older adult demographic, cognitive impairment has become increasingly common. 8 Cognitive function denotes the capacity to uphold responsibilities and social interactions, and its deterioration impedes engagement with family and community, imposing a burden on caregivers and communities. 12 Numerous individual factors affect cognitive decline, including age, 13 gender, 14 – 16 level of education, 17 – 19 genetics, and medical history. Chronic disorders include hypertension, 20 , 21 diabetes, 22 – 24 cardiovascular diseases, 25 , 26 gastritis, 27 – 29 and depression 30 , 31 exacerbate cognitive impairment. Environmental factors, including social engagement and physical activity, significantly influence outcomes. 32 – 34 Research has revealed multiple indicators strongly linked to motor-cognitive risk, including extremity functional limits, activities of daily living (ADL) impairment, fatigue, and hypertension. 35 Age, medical history, depression, and resilience are determinants of cognitive function. 36 Timely recognition and intervention of these factors are crucial to avert or alleviate cognitive impairment in elderly individuals. 37 Neuropsychological evaluations, like the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), are essential instruments for identifying cognitive deficits, with MoCA demonstrating heightened sensitivity. 5 Long-term care in Indonesia offers help for anyone requiring extended assistance, especially the elderly or individuals with disabilities. Nonetheless, there is a lack of particular data regarding the population of older adults residing in Long-Term Care Institutions (LTCI). The swift expansion of the elderly demographic has heightened the demand for long-term care insurance, influenced by evolving social dynamics and diminished familial capacity to offer care. Nevertheless, no previous research has investigated the correlation between cognitive function, medical history, and related risk factors in elderly individuals, impeding healthcare practitioners’ capacity to execute preventive measures and inform families. Unlike previous regional studies that predominantly examined community-dwelling elderly, this study focuses on older persons residing in LTCIs, a population with distinct vulnerabilities that has rarely been explored in Indonesia. By addressing this gap, the study provides novel insights that not only contextualize cognitive health in institutional care within Indonesia but also contribute to the broader global discourse on aging, long-term care, and cognitive decline. This cross-sectional study aims to examine the relationship between cognitive function and associated risk factors among older persons in long-term care institutions in Indonesia. Methods Study setting and participants This analytical cross-sectional study was performed in the major Long-Term Care Institutions in Jakarta, Indonesia, from February to April 2023. It comprised older people (≥60 years) devoid of eyesight or hearing impairments. Participants with visual or hearing impairments were excluded because the MoCA-Ina requires intact sensory abilities to ensure valid measurement of cognitive function. Deficits in vision or hearing could interfere with item completion and lead to misinterpretation of test scores as cognitive impairment. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. All residents in the two LTCIs who met the eligibility criteria were screened and included in the study. This approach allowed the inclusion of the entire eligible population. During the preliminary phase, health records were examined to ascertain eligible participants, contingent upon the nursing home’s consent. A total of 350 elderly people participated in the study. Specifically, two major long-term care institutions in Jakarta participated in this study. In addition, the study follow the STROBE guideline ( https://www.equator-network.org/ ). Variables and measures Demographic characteristics Data were obtained via in-person interviews. Demographic variables encompassed age, duration of residence in long-term care institutions and nursing homes, gender, religion, ethnicity, relationship status, level of education, medical history, subjective memory issues, tobacco use, alcohol intake, daily consumption of fruits and vegetables, employment background, utilization of mobility aids, and living situation. The montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA-Ina) The Indonesian adaptation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-Ina) was utilized, with all procedures executed in the native language, Bahasa Indonesia, to guarantee participant comfort. MoCA-Ina has exhibited robust reliability and validity, evidenced by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.976, signifying exceptional internal consistency. 38 Cognitive function, the principal variable, was evaluated using the 30-point MoCA-Ina, with scores ≥11 signifying strong cognitive function and scores <11 denoting low cognitive function. MoCA-Ina is a reliable and sensitive instrument for identifying moderate cognitive impairment in elderly individuals in Indonesia. 39 Data collection procedure Ten trained enumerators aided senior citizens in completing the questionnaire. Authorization was secured from the facility director, and the study protocols were comprehensively elucidated. Subsequent to approval, enumerators obtained consent from participants, who signed consent forms upon their agreement to participate. Eligible participants were apprised of the study’s objectives, advantages, and methodologies prior to receiving the questionnaire. Participation was optional and confidential, with each session lasting 15 to 20 minutes. Ethical consideration Prior to the investigation, this study has approval from the institutional review board (IRB) Committee of Universitas Indonesia with approval number of KET-168/UN2.F12.D1.2.1/PPM.00.02/2022 on June 21, 2022. This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki ( https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ ). Written informed consent was obtained from participants prior joining the study and were apprised of the study’s objectives, benefits, and methods. Data analysis All the information collected were input into Microsoft Excel and analyzed utilizing SPSS version 23 (IBM SPSS Statistics Version 29, 2023). Descriptive data were displayed as numerical values and percentages. Chi-square tests were performed to evaluate the relationships between independent factors and cognitive function. Univariate analysis utilizing logistic regression calculated unadjusted odds ratios and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all relevant risk factors, with significance established at p < 0.05. Variables were included in the multivariate logistic regression model if they were theoretically relevant based on prior research on cognitive decline and/or demonstrated statistical significance in univariate analysis at a threshold of p < 0.25. This approach ensured that the model captured both conceptually important and empirically supported factors. Results Demographic characteristics The frequency distribution of all demographic and clinical variables is presented in Table 1 . No missing data were identified in the dataset, as all 350 participants provided complete information across the included variables. Overall, the mean age of participants was 68.9 years (SD 7.01), with a median of 68. The mean duration of residence in the long-term care institution (LTCI) was almost 3 years (SD 3.6), with a median of 3 years. The average cognitive function score was 12.8 (SD 7.25), with a median of 11. Table 1 reveals that the predominant demographic of respondents consisted of early seniors (60-68 years old), with 186 participants (53.1%), whereas 164 participants (46.9%) were older. Over fifty percent resided in the institution for fewer than three years (227 participants, 64.9%). Female enrollment was greater, with 193 individuals (55.1%), in contrast to male enrollment, which comprised 157 persons (44.9%). The majority of participants identified as Muslim (303 participants, 86.6%), with 148 (42.3%) reporting good health, and hypertension as the most prevalent health concern (50 individuals, 14.3%). The majority consisted of married individuals (138 participants, 39.4%), those of Javanese ethnicity (135 participants, 38.6%), and elementary school graduates (107 participants, 30.6%). Table 1. Demographic characteristics of older adults in nursing homes (n = 350). Frequency (%) Length of stay in nursing home (years) ≤ 3 227 64.9 > 3 123 35.1 Gender Male 157 44.9 Female 193 55.1 Religion Islam 303 86.6 Christianity/Protestantism 35 10 Catholicism 4 1.1 Buddhism 5 1.4 Hinduism 2 0.6 Other 1 0.3 Ethnic group Javanese 135 38.6 Sundanese 51 14.6 Betawi 97 27.7 Sumatran 44 12.6 Chinese 9 2.6 Other 14 4.0 Marital status Married 138 39.4 Divorced dead 79 22.6 Divorced alive 38 10.9 Single 95 27.1 Education level No schooling 52 14.9 Did not graduate from elementary school 93 26.6 Graduated from elementary school 107 30.6 Graduated from junior high school 44 12.6 Graduated from high school 47 13.4 Diploma/Other higher education school 7 2.0 Disease history Hypertension (HT) 50 14.3 Diabetes mellitus (DM) 6 1.7 Cholesterol 2 0.6 Heart failure 2 0.6 Depression 5 1.4 Mental disorders 65 18.6 Strokes 8 2.3 Arthritis 14 4.0 Cataracts 5 1.4 Gastritis 3 0.9 Subjective memory complaint Very bad 3 0.9 Bad 77 22.0 Medium 183 52.3 Very good 87 24.9 Smoking Yes (active) 79 22.6 Yes (passive) 8 2.3 Stopped 47 13.4 Does not smoke 216 61.7 Consumption of alcoholic beverages Which, now 3 0.9 Which, once was 38 10.9 Never 309 88.3 Consumption of fruits and vegetables every day Yes 317 90.6 No 33 9.4 Employment history Formal/professional work 10 2.9 Informal work 335 95.7 Retired 5 1.4 Use of walking aids Yes 44 12.6 No 306 87.4 Living arrangement Living with family 142 40.6 Alone 208 59.4 MoCA High cognitive function 199 56.9 Low cognitive function 151 43.1 Participants indicated moderate subjective memory problems (183 participants, 52.3%), with the majority abstaining from alcohol consumption (309 participants, 88.3%) and not engaging in smoking (216 participants, 61.7%). A considerable percentage of participants ingested fruits and vegetables daily (317 participants, 90.6%). Nearly all participants were informal workers (335 individuals, 95.7%). Fifty-nine point four percent of participants had previously lived alone (208 participants), whereas forty point six percent lived with family (142 participants). Additionally, fifty-nine point four percent of participants (208 individuals) did not utilize walking assistance. A total of 199 participants (56.9%) achieved higher scores on the MoCA, whilst 151 participants (43.1%) attained lower scores. Univariate analysis Table 2 illustrates the association between participant characteristics and MoCA scores, which function as an indicator of cognitive ability. The findings demonstrate that multiple factors significantly correlate with MoCA scores, including gender, ethnicity, level of education, medical history, subjective memory issues, smoking behaviors, alcohol intake, dietary practices (particularly fruit and vegetable consumption), and employment background. Table 2. Association between cognitive levels and risk factors in older adults living in nursing homes. Variable Total MoCA Score P -Value (n= 350) High cognitive function (%) Low cognitive function (%) Length of stay in nursing home ≤ 3 years 227 (64.9) 136 (38.9) 91 (26) 0.117 > 3 years 123 (35.1) 63 (18) 60 (17.1) Gender Male 157 (44.9) 104 (29.7) 53 (15.1) 0.001 Female 193 (55.1) 95 (27.1) 98 (28.0) Religion Islam 303 (86.6) 169 (48.3) 134 (38.3) 0.522 Christian 35 (10) 23 (6.6) 12 (3.4) Catholic 4 (1.1) 2 (0.6) 2 (0.6) Buddhism 5 (1.4) 3 (0.9) 2 (0.6) Hinduism 2 (0.6) 2 (0.6) 0 (0) Others 1 (0.3) 0 (0) 1 (0.3) Ethnic group Javanese 135 (38.6) 68 (19.4) 67 (19.1) 0.044 Sundanese 51 (14.6) 23 (6.6) 28 (8.0) Betawi 97 (27.7) 63 (18) 34 (9.7) Sumatra 44 (12.6) 28 (8) 16 (4.6) Chinese 9 (2.6) 7 (2) 2 (0.6) Other 14 (4) 10 (2.9) 4 (1.1) Marital status Married 138 (39.4) 76 (21.7) 62 (17.7) 0.851 Divorced dead 79 (22.6) 45 (12.9) 34 (9.7) Divorced alive 38 (10.9) 24 (6.9) 14 (4.0) Single 95 (27.1) 54 (15.4) 41 (11.7) Education level Diplomas/higher education 7 (2.0) 6 (1.7) 1 (0.3) 0.000 Graduated high school 47 (13.4) 33 (9.4) 14 (4.0) Graduated middle school 44 (12.6) 32 (9.1) 12 (3.4) Graduated from elementary school 107 (30.6) 65 (18.6) 42 (12.0) Did not graduate from elementary school 93 (26.6) 50 (14.3) 43 (12.3) No schooling 57 (14.9) 13 (3.7) 39 (11.1) Disease history Hypertension (HT) 50 (14.3) 34 (9.7) 16 (4.6) Diabetes mellitus (DM) 6 (1.7) 6 (1.7) 0 (0) Cholesterol 2 (0.6) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3) Heart failure 2 (0.6) 2 (0.6) 0 (0) Depression 5 (1.4) 3 (0.9) 2 (0.6) Mental disorders 65 (18.6) 28 (8.0) 37 (10.6) Strokes 8(2.3) 6 (1.7) 2 (0.6) Arthritis 14 (4.0) 11 (3.1) 3 (0.9) Cataracts 5 (1.4) 4 (1.1) 1 (0.3) Gastritis 3 (0.9) 3 (0.9) 0 (0) Subjective memory complaints Very good 91 (24.5) 17 (19.1) 20 (5.3) 0.000 Currently 183 (52.3) 111 (31.7) 72 (20.6) Bad 77 (22) 20 (5.7) 57 (16.3) Very bad 3 (0.9) 0 (0) 3(0,9) Smoking Does not smoke 216 (61.7) 112 (32) 104 (29.7) 0.03 Quit smoking 47 (13.4) 28 (8.0) 19 (5.4) Passive smoker 8 (2.3) 6 (1.7) 2 (0.6) Active smoker 79 (22.6) 53 (15.1) 26 (7.4) Alcohol consumption Never 309 (88.3) 164 (46.9) 145 (41.4) 0.000 Yes, once 38 (10.9) 32 (9.1) 6 (1.7) Yes, now 3 (0.9) 3 (0.9) 0 (0) Consumption of fruits and vegetables Yes 317 (90.6) 187 (53.4) 130 (37.1) 0.013 No 33 (9.4) 12 (3.4) 21 (6.0) Employment history Formal/professional 10 (2.9) 8 (2.3) 2 (0.6) 0.045 Informal 335 (95.7) 186 (53.1) 149 (42.6) Retired 5 (1.4) 5 (1.4) 0 (0) Use of walking aids No 306 (87.4) 180 (51.4) 126 (36) 0.053 Yes 44 (12.6) 19 (5.4) 25 (7.1) Living arrangement Living with family 208 (59.4) 124 (35.4) 84 (24.0) 0.207 Alone 142 (40.6) 75 (21.4) 67 (19.1) Multivariate logistic regression Table 3 indicates that the model accounts for 32.1% of the variance in MoCA scores and accurately classifies 72.6% of instances. This proportion suggests that the model was able to capture nearly one-third of the determinants of cognitive function among institutionalized elderly. While this is a meaningful contribution, it also indicates that other factors not included in the model may explain the remaining variability. Upon integrating all notable predictors, three variables were recognized as significantly correlated with cognitive levels: education level (OR = 0.686; p = 0.000), subjective memory complaints (OR = 0.293; p = 0.000), and alcohol intake (OR = 6.786; p = 0.000). Older persons who abstained from drinking were 6.786 times more likely to exhibit a high cognitive level than those who consumed alcohol. Furthermore, individuals with advanced education possessed a 0.686 probability of attaining elevated cognitive capabilities as they aged. Moreover, persons devoid of subjective memory complaints exhibited a 0.293 probability of possessing elevated cognitive levels in contrast to those who indicated bad or very poor memory complaints. Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression: predictive factors for cognitive levels in older adults living in nursing homes. Predictor variables B SE Wald p - value OR 95%CI Lower–Upper Gender -0.196 0.304 0.415 0.520 0.822 0.453–1.493 Ethnic group -0.104 0.097 1.160 0.282 0.901 0.746–1.089 Education level -0.377 0.106 12.716 0.000 0.686 0.558–0.844 Disease history -0.004 0.021 0.038 0.846 0.996 0.955–1.039 Subjective memory complaints -1.228 0.205 5.950 0.000 0.293 0.196–0.437 Smoking -0.035 0.127 0.075 0.785 0.966 0.753–1.239 Alcohol consumption 1.915 0.527 13.203 0.000 6.786 2.416–19.062 Consumption of fruits and vegetables 0.423 0.467 0.823 0.364 1.527 0.612–3.813 Employment history -0.126 0.736 0.029 0.864 0.864 0.208–3.732 Discussion This study revealed that older persons living in long-term care institutions (LTCIs) in Jakarta, Indonesia, displayed elevated MoCA scores, signifying enhanced cognitive performance. This study contradicts prior studies, which indicated that older persons in long-term care institutions are more prone to cognitive deterioration than those in community settings. 40 A nationally representative longitudinal study in China revealed that living arrangements significantly influence cognitive decline, with solitary living associated with accelerated cognitive deterioration in older men, whereas diverse living arrangements, including cohabitation with spouses and adult children, correlated with cognitive decline in older women. 41 Social isolation, loneliness, and restricted social involvement have been linked to reduced cognitive results in later life. 42 A recent meta-analysis indicated a broad spectrum of moderate cognitive impairment (MCI) prevalence among older persons in long-term care institutions, ranging from 4.0% to 87.4%, with a pooled prevalence of 21.2%. 43 The superior cognitive function noted in older adults in Jakarta may be ascribed to diverse social activities offered by these institutions, including entertainment gatherings, daily exercise, religious activities, and essential services, all of which improve quality of life in accordance with the Republic of Indonesia’s Social Welfare Law of 2012 concerning the care of older adults. The research revealed educational attainment, self-reported memory issues, and alcohol intake as predictors of cognitive decline in elderly individuals residing in long-term care institutions. A meta-analysis indicated that each additional year of schooling decreases the risk of Alzheimer’s disease by 8% and dementia by 7%. 44 The association is exacerbated by age, as prior research suggests that schooling may alleviate racial and ethnic differences in cognitive performance among older adults. 45 Elevated educational attainment enhances cognitive reserve, postponing the clinical onset of Alzheimer’s disease until brain pathology is further advanced. 46 Thus, evaluating educational attainment in LTCIs can yield significant baseline data for the early identification of cognitive deterioration. 47 , 48 Educational background cultivates cultural competency, augments reading proficiency, and develops problem-solving skills. 49 Subjective memory complaints (SMCs) are frequently observed in older persons and may signify possible cognitive impairment. 50 While several studies indicate that subjective memory complaints (SMCs) may not consistently align with objective cognitive impairments, 51 they may nonetheless be associated with anatomical alterations in the brain that facilitate cognitive deterioration. 52 A study in India identified correlations between tobacco use, smoking, alcohol intake, and cognitive impairment in older adults. 53 Alcohol intake has been demonstrated to induce brain damage by processes such as iron accumulation 54 and increased white matter hyperintensity volumes, 55 and is associated with Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome, which negatively impacts memory and heightens the risk of cognitive impairment. The study revealed that disease history was associated with cognitive levels, but it did not serve as a predictive variable. Cognitive performance can be affected by various factors, including age, gender, education, lifestyle choices, and the existence of chronic illnesses such as hypertension and diabetes. 56 , 57 Studies have shown that elderly individuals with chronic conditions, especially hypertension or diabetes, may demonstrate diminished cognitive ability. 58 Furthermore, strokes may result in dementia, with severity influenced by factors like stroke site, volume, and pre-existing cognitive deficits. 59 The steady progression of cognitive decline, affected by multiple intricate factors, complicates this relationship. 60 Consequently, SMCs function as significant indicators of cognitive impairments and initial manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease and associated dementias. To alleviate cognitive decline, it is essential for healthcare practitioners and family to cultivate trusting connections, encourage social engagement, and involve older persons in group activities. 37 Regular engagement in cognitive-stimulating activities, including adequate relaxation and sleep, is crucial, in addition to practices such as reading and media consumption. 61 In addition to these findings, this study provides novelty by focusing on institutionalized elderly in Indonesia, a population that has been rarely examined in prior regional research. While earlier studies have largely addressed community-dwelling older adults, our results demonstrate how the LTCI environment may shape cognitive outcomes. This contribution not only enriches the local evidence base but also offers insights relevant to global policy and practice, particularly in the design and evaluation of elderly care models in low- and middle-income countries. This study’s limitations encompass variances in the cognitive status of older persons and its cross-sectional methodology, which constrains causal assumptions; thus, additional longitudinal investigations are essential for deeper insights. Moreover, increased sample sizes would improve analytical precision. Healthcare practitioners must prioritize initiatives that enhance cognitive function in older persons, while future research should concentrate on creating customized therapies for cognitive impairments associated with particular health problems. Conclusions This research revealed educational level, subjective memory issues, and alcohol use as significant predictors of cognitive performance in older persons residing in long-term care facilities. Moreover, variables like gender, ethnicity, medical history, tobacco use, dietary intake of fruits and vegetables, and occupational background were associated with cognitive performance, underscoring the necessity for customized healthcare interventions. These findings offer significant insights into the responses of older persons to cognitive impairment risk factors, allowing nurses and healthcare professionals to formulate more effective treatment regimens. Moreover, comprehending these links helps guide personalized interventions and promote equitable health policy, ultimately enhancing care for older individuals in Indonesia. Ethical declaration Prior to the investigation, this study has approval from the institutional review board (IRB) Committee of Universitas Indonesia with approval number of KET-168/UN2.F12.D1.2.1/PPM.00.02/2022 on June 21, 2022. This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki ( https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ ). Written informed consent was obtained from participants prior joining the study and were apprised of the study’s objectives, benefits, and methods. Data availability statement The data behind this work can be obtained from the corresponding author (Ast. Prof. Faizul Hasan, RN, PhD, Email: [email protected] or Asc. Prof. Dr. Etty Rekawati, E-mail: [email protected] ) upon a reasonable request. Access to the data is restricted due to ethical issues and standards established by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) to safeguard participant confidentiality. Prospective data users must submit a written request detailing the intended purpose of data utilization and evidence of adherence to ethical norms. Approval will be contingent upon compliance with the stipulations set forth by the IRB, and applicants may be required to furnish institutional endorsement or present supplementary evidence to guarantee the proper use of the data. Reporting guidelines Zenodo Repository: STROBE checklist for ‘Cognitive Function and Its Determinants in Elderly Indonesians Residing in Long-Term Care: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study’. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14048299 62 Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0). Acknowledgments The authors thank to the Directorate of Research and Development, Universitas Indonesia under Cluster/Group/Research Centre Grant program in year 2022. References 1. Indonesia Ministry of Health: InfoDatin “Lansia Berdaya, Bangsa Sejahtera.” Report. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2024. Reference Source 2. Indonesia Central Bureu of Statistics: BPS. Statistik Penduduk Lanjut Usia 2022. Jakarta: 2024. Reference Source 3. Higuchi M: Preventing non-communicable diseases in low-and middle-income countries: A literature review. The Malaysian Journal of Nursing (MJN). 2021; 13 (1): 10–16. Publisher Full Text 4. Ramli R, Fadhillah MN: Faktor yang mempengaruhi fungsi kognitif pada lansia. Window of Nursing Journal. 2020; 23–32. Publisher Full Text 5. Al Rasyid I, Syafrita Y, Sastri S: Hubungan faktor risiko dengan fungsi kognitif pada lanjut usia kecamatan Padang Panjang Timur kota Padang Panjang. Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas. 2017; 6 (1): 49–54. Publisher Full Text 6. Srivastava S, Sulaiman K, Drishti D, et al. : Factors associated with psychiatric disorders and treatment seeking behaviour among older adults in India. Sci. Rep. 2021; 11 (1): 24085. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 7. Reynolds CF 3rd, Jeste DV, Sachdev PS, et al. : Mental health care for older adults: Rrecent advances and new directions in clinical practice and research. World Psychiatry. 2022; 21 (3): 336–363. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 8. Barahona AJ, Bursac Z, Veledar E, et al. : Relationship of blood and urinary manganese levels with cognitive function in elderly individuals in the United States by race/ethnicity, NHANES 2011–2014. Toxics. 2022; 10 (4): 191. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 9. Susanty S, Effendy DS, Tosepu R, et al. : Anxiety and dementia in older adults in Indonesia. Paper presented at: 1st International Conference Medical and Health Science Halu Oleo (IMHO 2023). 2024. Publisher Full Text 10. Rodríguez-Rey R, Garrido-Hernansaiz H, Collado S: Psychological impact and associated factors during the initial stage of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic among the general population in Spain. Front. Psychol. 2020; 11 : 1540. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 11. Susanty S, Chung M-H, Chiu H-Y, et al. : Prevalence of loneliness and associated factors among community-dwelling older adults in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022; 19 (8): 4911. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 12. Hutasuhut AF, Anggraini M, Angnesti R: Analisis fungsi kognitif pada lansia ditinjau dari jenis kelamin, riwayat pendidikan, riwayat penyakit, aktivitas fisik, aktivitas kognitif, dan keterlibatan sosial. Jurnal Psikologi Malahayati. 2020; 2 (1). Publisher Full Text 13. Murman DL: The impact of age on cognition. Semin. Hear. 2015; 36 : 111–121. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 14. Lin KA, Choudhury KR, Rathakrishnan BG, et al. : Marked gender differences in progression of mild cognitive impairment over 8 years. Alzheimers Dement. 2015; 1 (2): 103–110. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 15. Wang J, Xiao LD, Wang K, et al. : Gender Differences in cognitive impairment among rural elderly in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020; 17 (10): 3724. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 16. Levine DA, Gross AL, Briceño EM, et al. : Sex differences in cognitive decline among US adults. JAMA Netw. Open. 2021; 4 (2): e210169–e210169. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 17. Brucki SMD, Nitrini R: Cognitive impairment in individuals with low educational level and homogeneous sociocultural background. Dement. Neuropsychol. 2014; 8 : 345–350. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 18. Wang Y, Wang S, Zhu W, et al. : Reading activities compensate for low education-related cognitive deficits. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2022; 14 (1): 156. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 19. Lövdén M, Fratiglioni L, Glymour MM, et al. : Education and cognitive functioning across the life Span. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest. 2020; 21 (1): 6–41. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 20. Ungvari Z, Toth P, Tarantini S, et al. : Hypertension-induced cognitive impairment: From pathophysiology to public health. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2021; 17 (10): 639–654. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 21. Canavan M, O’Donnell MJ: Hypertension and cognitive impairment: A review of mechanisms and key concepts. Front. Neurol. 2022; 13 : 13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 22. Mallorquí-Bagué N, Lozano-Madrid M, Toledo E, et al. : Type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment in an older population with overweight or obesity and metabolic syndrome: Baseline cross-sectional analysis of the PREDIMED-plus study. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8 (1): 16128. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 23. Munshi MN: Cognitive dysfunction in older adults with diabetes: What a clinician needs to know. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40 (4): 461–467. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 24. Dove A, Shang Y, Xu W, et al. : The impact of diabetes on cognitive impairment and its progression to dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2021; 17 (11): 1769–1778. Publisher Full Text 25. Celutkiene J, Vaitkevicius A, Jakstiene S, et al. : Cognitive decline in heart failure: More attention is needed. Card. Fail. Rev. 2016; 2 (2): 106–109. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 26. Goh FQ, Kong WKF, Wong RCC, et al. : Cognitive impairment in heart failure—A review. Biology. 2022; 11 (2): 179. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 27. Momtaz YA, Hamid TA, Ibrahim R: Gastritis may boost odds of dementia. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Dement. 2014; 29 (5): 452–456. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 28. Han M-L, Chen J-H, Tsai M-K, et al. : Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and cognitive impairment in the elderly. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2018; 117 (11): 994–1002. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 29. Erickson LD, White DS, Bassett P, et al. : Cognitive function in UK adults seropositive for Helicobacter pylori. PLoS One. 2023; 18 (6): e0286731. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 30. Colwell MJ, Tagomori H, Chapman S, et al. : Pharmacological targeting of cognitive impairment in depression: Recent developments and challenges in human clinical research. Transl. Psychiatry. 2022; 12 (1): 484. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 31. Lam RW, Kennedy SH, McIntyre RS, et al. : Cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder: Effects on psychosocial functioning and implications for treatment. Can. J. Psychiatry. 2014; 59 (12): 649–654. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 32. Zhu D, Al Mahmud A, Liu W: Social connections and participation among people with mild cognitive impairment: Barriers and recommendations. Front. Psych. 2023; 14 : 14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 33. Lydon EA, Nguyen LT, Nie Q, et al. : An integrative framework to guide social engagement interventions and technology design for persons with mild cognitive impairment. Front. Public Health. 2022; 9 : 9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 34. Bae SM: The mediating effect of physical function decline on the association between social activity and cognitive function in middle and older Korean adults: Analyzing ten years of data through multivariate latent growth modeling. Front. Psychol. 2020; 11 : 11. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 35. Bai A, Xu W, Lin Z: Prevalence and correlates of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Front. Aging. 2022; 3 : 3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 36. Van Patten R, Iverson GL, Terry DP, et al. : Predictors and correlates of perceived cognitive decline in retired professional rugby league players. Front. Neurol. 2021; 12 : 12. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 37. Mohanty M, Kumar P: Multi-component interventions in older adults having subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)—a review article. Geriatrics. 2023; 8 (1): 4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 38. Lestari S, Mistivani I, Rumende M, et al. : Comparison between mini mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive assessment Indonesian version (MoCA-Ina) as an early detection of cognitive impairments in post-stroke patients. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017; 884 : 012153. Publisher Full Text 39. Rambe AS, Fitri FI: Correlation between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Indonesian Version (Moca-INA) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in elderly. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2017; 5 (7): 915–919. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 40. Setiyani R, Iskandar A: Cognitive impairment among older adults living in the community and in nursing home in Indonesia: A pilot study. Dement. Neuropsychol. 2022; 16 : 347–353. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 41. Yu Y, Lv J, Liu J, et al. : Association between living arrangements and cognitive decline in older adults: A nationally representative longitudinal study in China. BMC Geriatr. 2022; 22 (1): 843. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 42. Evans IEM, Llewellyn DJ, Matthews FE, et al. : Living alone and cognitive function in later life. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2019; 81 : 222–233. Publisher Full Text 43. Chen P, Cai H, Bai W, et al. : Global prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among older adults living in nursing homes: A meta-analysis and systematic review of epidemiological surveys. Transl. Psychiatry. 2023; 13 (1): 88. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 44. Maccora J, Peters R, Anstey KJ: What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education. SSM - Population Health. 2020; 12 : 100654. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 45. Díaz-Venegas C, Downer B, Langa KM, et al. : Racial and ethnic differences in cognitive function among older adults in the USA. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2016; 31 (9): 1004–1012. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 46. Hwangbo S, Kim YJ, Park YH, et al. : Relationships between educational attainment, hypertension, and amyloid negative subcortical vascular dementia: The brain-battering hypothesis. Front. Neurosci. 2022; 16 . PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 47. Williams BD, Pendleton N, Chandola T: Does the association between cognition and education differ between older adults with gradual or rapid trajectories of cognitive decline? Aging Neuropsychol. Cognit. 2022; 29 (4): 666–686. Publisher Full Text 48. Gonçalves NG, Avila JC, Bertola L, et al. : Education and cognitive function among older adults in Brazil and Mexico. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 15 (3): e12470. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 49. Alley D, Suthers K, Crimmins E: Education and cognitive decline in older Americans:Results from the AHEAD Sample. Res. Aging. 2007; 29 (1): 73–94. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 50. Chu C-S, Sun IW, Begum A, et al. : The association between subjective memory complaint and objective cognitive function in older people with previous major depression. PLoS One. 2017; 12 (3): e0173027. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 51. Mitchell AJ: Is it time to separate subjective cognitive complaints from the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment? Age Ageing. 2008; 37 (5): 497–499. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 52. Dhana A, DeCarli C, Dhana K, et al. : Association of subjective memory complaints with white matter hyperintensities and cognitive decline among older adults in Chicago, Illinois. JAMA Netw. Open. 2022; 5 (4): e227512–e227512. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 53. Muhammad T, Govindu M, Srivastava S: Relationship between chewing tobacco, smoking, consuming alcohol and cognitive impairment among older adults in India: A cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2021; 21 (1): 85. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 54. Medical News Today: Drinking just 3 cans of beer a week may be linked to cognitive decline.2024. Reference Source 55. Devere R: The cognitive consequences of alcohol use.2024. Reference Source 56. Andriyanto A, Rekawati E, Rahmadiyah DC: Increasing knowledge, attitudes, skills, and glucose control in type-2 diabetic patients through EMAS interventions.2019; 9 (2): 10. Publisher Full Text 57. Rahmayanti Y: Hubungan lama menderita hipertensi dengan penurunan fungsi kognitif pada lansia. Jurnal Aceh Medika. 2018; 2 (2): 241–246. Reference Source 58. Kim J, Park E, An M: The cognitive impact of chronic diseases on functional capacity in community-dwelling adults. J. Nurs. Res. 2019; 27 (1): e3–e8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 59. Pessotti CFC, Fonseca LC, Tedrus GMAS, et al. : Family caregivers of elderly with dementia relationship between religiosity, resilience, quality of life and burden. Dement. Neuropsychol. 2018; 12 : 408–414. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 60. Wilson RS, Segawa E, Boyle PA, et al. : The natural history of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychol. Aging. 2012; 27 (4): 1008–1017. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 61. Sanjuán M, Navarro E, Calero MD: Effectiveness of cognitive interventions in older adults: A review. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2020; 10 (3): 876–898. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 62. Hasan F: strobe checklist. Zenodo. 2024. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Nov 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Department of Community Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia 2 Department of Community Nursing, Universitas Bina Sehat PPNI Mojokerto, Mojokerto, Indonesia 3 Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Tainan City, Taiwan 4 Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan 5 Nurse Professional Education Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, South East Sulawesi, Indonesia 6 Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand Etty Rekawati Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Winda Eriska Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Visualization Utami Rachmawati Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Visualization Dwi Nurviyandari Kusuma Wati Roles: Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Junaiti Sahar Roles: Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Arief Andriyanto Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Jing-Jy Wang Roles: Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Sri Susanty Roles: Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Faizul Hasan Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information This research received grant from the Directorate of Research and Development, Universitas Indonesia under Cluster/Group/Research Centre Grant program: NKB-049/UN2.RST/ HKP.05.00/2022. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Article Versions (2) version 2 Revised Published: 22 Aug 2025, 13:1384 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.158490.2 version 1 Published: 18 Nov 2024, 13:1384 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.158490.1 Copyright © 2025 Rekawati E et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Rekawati E, Eriska W, Rachmawati U et al. Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.158490.2 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Nov 2024 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Pimolkatekul S. Reviewer Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395149 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-395149 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 19 Aug 2025 Saranya Pimolkatekul , Department of Nursing Administration and Professional Fundamention, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395149 This is a well-written cross-sectional study that investigates the relationship between cognitive function and associated risk factors among elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care settings. The study addresses a relevant public health concern and offers useful descriptive data. However, there ... Continue reading READ ALL This is a well-written cross-sectional study that investigates the relationship between cognitive function and associated risk factors among elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care settings. The study addresses a relevant public health concern and offers useful descriptive data. However, there are a few minor issues that should be considered to improve the clarity and impact of the paper. Firstly, the background would benefit from a clearer articulation of the knowledge gap that this study aims to address. Including a brief summary of what previous studies have not covered particularly in the context of elderly residents in long-term care would better highlight the importance and novelty of this research. Secondly, the manuscript uses various terms interchangeably, such as elderly, older people, and long-term care, long-term care facilities, long-term care institutions. This inconsistency could cause confusion for readers, especially as these terms may have different definitions. To enhance clarity, it is recommended to use consistent terminology throughout the paper. Lastly, while the introduction effectively provides prevalence data and outlines the factors related to cognitive function, it lacks essential details about the study setting and a more explicit justification for focusing on the long-term care population. Clarifying why this particular population and setting were selected would strengthen the rationale for the study. Major Comments: Results (Tables): Please clarify and recheck all the numerical values presented in the tables. For example, there are inconsistencies between Table 1 and Table 2 regarding variables such as education level, subjective memory complaints, and living arrangements. In particular, the data on disease history raises concern. Although the total sample size is reported as 350, the frequencies listed appear to account for only 308 participants. It is also unclear how the 148 participants (42.3%) reporting good health are included in this count. Additionally, some p-values appear to be missing in Table 2. Please ensure that all relevant statistical results are reported and that values are consistent across tables. Minor Comments: Study Participants: Please provide more context to clarify the inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as whether a sample size calculation was conducted and how the final sample size was determined. Tables: Table 1 appears to present similar information to Table 2, which already provides the detailed results. To avoid redundancy and improve clarity, consider removing Table 1 and retaining only Table 2. The conclusion section should more clearly emphasize the main findings of the study, particularly those that are statistically and/or clinically significant. Highlighting the key results will help reinforce the contributions of the study. Additionally, the conclusion should briefly acknowledge the study’s limitations such as the cross-sectional design, potential selection bias, or limited generalizability to provide context for interpreting the results. Including these limitations can also guide future research by suggesting areas that need further exploration or different methodological approaches. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Partly Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Diabetes Mellitus, Frailty, Older adults I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Pimolkatekul S. Reviewer Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395149 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-395149 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Pamungkas RA. Reviewer Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395145 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-395145 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 14 Aug 2025 Rian Adi Pamungkas , Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395145 The topic is highly relevant in light of global population aging and the increasing burden of cognitive decline in older adults. The use of the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument, is appropriate and strengthens internal validity. However, several areas require ... Continue reading READ ALL The topic is highly relevant in light of global population aging and the increasing burden of cognitive decline in older adults. The use of the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument, is appropriate and strengthens internal validity. However, several areas require further clarification, elaboration, and strengthening to enhance the manuscript’s scientific rigor and impact 1. While the study highlights a specific population (elderly in LTCIs), the novelty could be more explicitly framed in the Introduction and Discussion . How does this study differ significantly from prior regional studies? How does it inform global policy/practice? 2. The authors used univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate logistic regression. However, a rationale for the model-building strategy is missing. Were interaction effects or multicollinearity assessed? 3. The explained variance in the logistic regression model (R² = 32.1%) could benefit from more contextual interpretation. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Gerontology nursing I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Pamungkas RA. Reviewer Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395145 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-395145 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 10 Sep 2025 faizul hasan , Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand 10 Sep 2025 Author Response The topic is highly relevant in light of global population aging and the increasing burden of cognitive decline in older adults. The use of the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and ... Continue reading The topic is highly relevant in light of global population aging and the increasing burden of cognitive decline in older adults. The use of the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument, is appropriate and strengthens internal validity. However, several areas require further clarification, elaboration, and strengthening to enhance the manuscript’s scientific rigor and impact 1. While the study highlights a specific population (elderly in LTCIs), the novelty could be more explicitly framed in the Introduction and Discussion. How does this study differ significantly from prior regional studies? How does it inform global policy/practice? Response: We thank the reviewer for emphasizing the importance of clarifying the novelty of our study. We have revised the Introduction to explicitly highlight how this research differs from previous regional studies. Most prior studies in Indonesia and Southeast Asia have focused on community-dwelling elderly, while cognitive function among institutionalized elderly has been scarcely investigated. We now emphasize that our study fills this gap by examining elderly residents in LTCIs using the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument. Furthermore, we clarify that the findings not only provide locally relevant evidence but also contribute to the global discourse on aging and long-term care. We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestion regarding the novelty framing in the Discussion. We have revised the section to emphasize how our findings differ from prior research and their broader implications. Specifically, we highlight that while most studies in the region have investigated community-dwelling older adults, our study provides unique evidence on institutionalized elderly in Indonesia. We also explain how the findings can inform global policy and practice on elderly care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where LTCIs are increasingly important. 2. The authors used univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate logistic regression. However, a rationale for the model-building strategy is missing. Were interaction effects or multicollinearity assessed? Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We have clarified the rationale for including variables in the regression model. Specifically, variables were selected based on their theoretical relevance as supported by prior literature on cognitive function in older adults, as well as statistical significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.25). This dual approach ensured that both evidence-based and empirically relevant factors were considered. We have added this justification in the Methods section under “Data Analysis.” 3. The explained variance in the logistic regression model (R² = 32.1%) could benefit from more contextual interpretation. Response: We thank the reviewer for this valuable comment. We have revised the Results section to provide a clearer contextual interpretation of the explained variance (R² = 32.1%). Specifically, we now note that the model accounted for nearly one-third of the determinants of cognitive function among institutionalized elderly, which is a meaningful proportion but also indicates that additional unmeasured factors may contribute to the outcome. This clarification helps readers better understand the significance and limitations of the model. The topic is highly relevant in light of global population aging and the increasing burden of cognitive decline in older adults. The use of the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument, is appropriate and strengthens internal validity. However, several areas require further clarification, elaboration, and strengthening to enhance the manuscript’s scientific rigor and impact 1. While the study highlights a specific population (elderly in LTCIs), the novelty could be more explicitly framed in the Introduction and Discussion. How does this study differ significantly from prior regional studies? How does it inform global policy/practice? Response: We thank the reviewer for emphasizing the importance of clarifying the novelty of our study. We have revised the Introduction to explicitly highlight how this research differs from previous regional studies. Most prior studies in Indonesia and Southeast Asia have focused on community-dwelling elderly, while cognitive function among institutionalized elderly has been scarcely investigated. We now emphasize that our study fills this gap by examining elderly residents in LTCIs using the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument. Furthermore, we clarify that the findings not only provide locally relevant evidence but also contribute to the global discourse on aging and long-term care. We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestion regarding the novelty framing in the Discussion. We have revised the section to emphasize how our findings differ from prior research and their broader implications. Specifically, we highlight that while most studies in the region have investigated community-dwelling older adults, our study provides unique evidence on institutionalized elderly in Indonesia. We also explain how the findings can inform global policy and practice on elderly care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where LTCIs are increasingly important. 2. The authors used univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate logistic regression. However, a rationale for the model-building strategy is missing. Were interaction effects or multicollinearity assessed? Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We have clarified the rationale for including variables in the regression model. Specifically, variables were selected based on their theoretical relevance as supported by prior literature on cognitive function in older adults, as well as statistical significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.25). This dual approach ensured that both evidence-based and empirically relevant factors were considered. We have added this justification in the Methods section under “Data Analysis.” 3. The explained variance in the logistic regression model (R² = 32.1%) could benefit from more contextual interpretation. Response: We thank the reviewer for this valuable comment. We have revised the Results section to provide a clearer contextual interpretation of the explained variance (R² = 32.1%). Specifically, we now note that the model accounted for nearly one-third of the determinants of cognitive function among institutionalized elderly, which is a meaningful proportion but also indicates that additional unmeasured factors may contribute to the outcome. This clarification helps readers better understand the significance and limitations of the model. Competing Interests: none Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 10 Sep 2025 faizul hasan , Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand 10 Sep 2025 Author Response The topic is highly relevant in light of global population aging and the increasing burden of cognitive decline in older adults. The use of the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and ... Continue reading The topic is highly relevant in light of global population aging and the increasing burden of cognitive decline in older adults. The use of the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument, is appropriate and strengthens internal validity. However, several areas require further clarification, elaboration, and strengthening to enhance the manuscript’s scientific rigor and impact 1. While the study highlights a specific population (elderly in LTCIs), the novelty could be more explicitly framed in the Introduction and Discussion. How does this study differ significantly from prior regional studies? How does it inform global policy/practice? Response: We thank the reviewer for emphasizing the importance of clarifying the novelty of our study. We have revised the Introduction to explicitly highlight how this research differs from previous regional studies. Most prior studies in Indonesia and Southeast Asia have focused on community-dwelling elderly, while cognitive function among institutionalized elderly has been scarcely investigated. We now emphasize that our study fills this gap by examining elderly residents in LTCIs using the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument. Furthermore, we clarify that the findings not only provide locally relevant evidence but also contribute to the global discourse on aging and long-term care. We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestion regarding the novelty framing in the Discussion. We have revised the section to emphasize how our findings differ from prior research and their broader implications. Specifically, we highlight that while most studies in the region have investigated community-dwelling older adults, our study provides unique evidence on institutionalized elderly in Indonesia. We also explain how the findings can inform global policy and practice on elderly care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where LTCIs are increasingly important. 2. The authors used univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate logistic regression. However, a rationale for the model-building strategy is missing. Were interaction effects or multicollinearity assessed? Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We have clarified the rationale for including variables in the regression model. Specifically, variables were selected based on their theoretical relevance as supported by prior literature on cognitive function in older adults, as well as statistical significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.25). This dual approach ensured that both evidence-based and empirically relevant factors were considered. We have added this justification in the Methods section under “Data Analysis.” 3. The explained variance in the logistic regression model (R² = 32.1%) could benefit from more contextual interpretation. Response: We thank the reviewer for this valuable comment. We have revised the Results section to provide a clearer contextual interpretation of the explained variance (R² = 32.1%). Specifically, we now note that the model accounted for nearly one-third of the determinants of cognitive function among institutionalized elderly, which is a meaningful proportion but also indicates that additional unmeasured factors may contribute to the outcome. This clarification helps readers better understand the significance and limitations of the model. The topic is highly relevant in light of global population aging and the increasing burden of cognitive decline in older adults. The use of the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument, is appropriate and strengthens internal validity. However, several areas require further clarification, elaboration, and strengthening to enhance the manuscript’s scientific rigor and impact 1. While the study highlights a specific population (elderly in LTCIs), the novelty could be more explicitly framed in the Introduction and Discussion. How does this study differ significantly from prior regional studies? How does it inform global policy/practice? Response: We thank the reviewer for emphasizing the importance of clarifying the novelty of our study. We have revised the Introduction to explicitly highlight how this research differs from previous regional studies. Most prior studies in Indonesia and Southeast Asia have focused on community-dwelling elderly, while cognitive function among institutionalized elderly has been scarcely investigated. We now emphasize that our study fills this gap by examining elderly residents in LTCIs using the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument. Furthermore, we clarify that the findings not only provide locally relevant evidence but also contribute to the global discourse on aging and long-term care. We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestion regarding the novelty framing in the Discussion. We have revised the section to emphasize how our findings differ from prior research and their broader implications. Specifically, we highlight that while most studies in the region have investigated community-dwelling older adults, our study provides unique evidence on institutionalized elderly in Indonesia. We also explain how the findings can inform global policy and practice on elderly care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where LTCIs are increasingly important. 2. The authors used univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate logistic regression. However, a rationale for the model-building strategy is missing. Were interaction effects or multicollinearity assessed? Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We have clarified the rationale for including variables in the regression model. Specifically, variables were selected based on their theoretical relevance as supported by prior literature on cognitive function in older adults, as well as statistical significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.25). This dual approach ensured that both evidence-based and empirically relevant factors were considered. We have added this justification in the Methods section under “Data Analysis.” 3. The explained variance in the logistic regression model (R² = 32.1%) could benefit from more contextual interpretation. Response: We thank the reviewer for this valuable comment. We have revised the Results section to provide a clearer contextual interpretation of the explained variance (R² = 32.1%). Specifically, we now note that the model accounted for nearly one-third of the determinants of cognitive function among institutionalized elderly, which is a meaningful proportion but also indicates that additional unmeasured factors may contribute to the outcome. This clarification helps readers better understand the significance and limitations of the model. Competing Interests: none Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Gautama MSN. Reviewer Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395151 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-395151 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 14 Aug 2025 Made Satya Nugraha Gautama , Department of Nursing, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395151 The study addresses an important topic: cognitive function in elderly Indonesians in long-term care. This is a growing population with specific needs. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized. The findings have potential implications for healthcare practices in long-term care ... Continue reading READ ALL The study addresses an important topic: cognitive function in elderly Indonesians in long-term care. This is a growing population with specific needs. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized. The findings have potential implications for healthcare practices in long-term care settings. However I have several comments/questions should be addressed below: - Provide more detail about the "major Long-Term Care Institutions in Jakarta." How many institutions were included? - "Comprehensive sampling method" is vague. Was it a census of all eligible residents in the selected facilities? Or a stratified random sample? If not random sampling, explain potential biases. - "Older people (≥60 years) devoid of eyesight or hearing impairments" – Why were individuals with eyesight or hearing impairments excluded? I believe that addressing these points, particularly in the Methods section, will strengthen the manuscript and enhance its overall impact. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Adult Nursing, Palliative, Quantitative Research I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Gautama MSN. Reviewer Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395151 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-395151 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 10 Sep 2025 faizul hasan , Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand 10 Sep 2025 Author Response The study addresses an important topic: cognitive function in elderly Indonesians in long-term care. This is a growing population with specific needs. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized. The ... Continue reading The study addresses an important topic: cognitive function in elderly Indonesians in long-term care. This is a growing population with specific needs. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized. The findings have potential implications for healthcare practices in long-term care settings. However I have several comments/questions should be addressed below: - Provide more detail about the "major Long-Term Care Institutions in Jakarta." How many institutions were included? Response: We thank the reviewer for this important comment. We have clarified in the Methods section that data were collected from two major Long-Term Care Institutions (LTCIs) in Jakarta. This additional detail has now been specified to improve transparency. - "Comprehensive sampling method" is vague. Was it a census of all eligible residents in the selected facilities? Or a stratified random sample? If not random sampling, explain potential biases. Response: We appreciate the reviewer’s comment and agree that the sampling method needed clarification. We have revised the Methods section to specify that purposive sampling was used. All residents who met the eligibility criteria were screened and included in the study. We have added this explanation in the manuscript. - "Older people (≥60 years) devoid of eyesight or hearing impairments" – Why were individuals with eyesight or hearing impairments excluded? Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing out the need for justification of our exclusion criteria. We excluded older adults with visual or hearing impairments because the MoCA-Ina instrument requires adequate vision and hearing to follow instructions, read items, and respond accurately. Including individuals with such impairments could compromise the validity of test results, as low scores might reflect sensory limitations rather than true cognitive decline. We have now added this justification to the Methods section under “Study setting and participants.” I believe that addressing these points, particularly in the Methods section, will strengthen the manuscript and enhance its overall impact. Response: Thank you The study addresses an important topic: cognitive function in elderly Indonesians in long-term care. This is a growing population with specific needs. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized. The findings have potential implications for healthcare practices in long-term care settings. However I have several comments/questions should be addressed below: - Provide more detail about the "major Long-Term Care Institutions in Jakarta." How many institutions were included? Response: We thank the reviewer for this important comment. We have clarified in the Methods section that data were collected from two major Long-Term Care Institutions (LTCIs) in Jakarta. This additional detail has now been specified to improve transparency. - "Comprehensive sampling method" is vague. Was it a census of all eligible residents in the selected facilities? Or a stratified random sample? If not random sampling, explain potential biases. Response: We appreciate the reviewer’s comment and agree that the sampling method needed clarification. We have revised the Methods section to specify that purposive sampling was used. All residents who met the eligibility criteria were screened and included in the study. We have added this explanation in the manuscript. - "Older people (≥60 years) devoid of eyesight or hearing impairments" – Why were individuals with eyesight or hearing impairments excluded? Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing out the need for justification of our exclusion criteria. We excluded older adults with visual or hearing impairments because the MoCA-Ina instrument requires adequate vision and hearing to follow instructions, read items, and respond accurately. Including individuals with such impairments could compromise the validity of test results, as low scores might reflect sensory limitations rather than true cognitive decline. We have now added this justification to the Methods section under “Study setting and participants.” I believe that addressing these points, particularly in the Methods section, will strengthen the manuscript and enhance its overall impact. Response: Thank you Competing Interests: none Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 10 Sep 2025 faizul hasan , Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand 10 Sep 2025 Author Response The study addresses an important topic: cognitive function in elderly Indonesians in long-term care. This is a growing population with specific needs. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized. The ... Continue reading The study addresses an important topic: cognitive function in elderly Indonesians in long-term care. This is a growing population with specific needs. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized. The findings have potential implications for healthcare practices in long-term care settings. However I have several comments/questions should be addressed below: - Provide more detail about the "major Long-Term Care Institutions in Jakarta." How many institutions were included? Response: We thank the reviewer for this important comment. We have clarified in the Methods section that data were collected from two major Long-Term Care Institutions (LTCIs) in Jakarta. This additional detail has now been specified to improve transparency. - "Comprehensive sampling method" is vague. Was it a census of all eligible residents in the selected facilities? Or a stratified random sample? If not random sampling, explain potential biases. Response: We appreciate the reviewer’s comment and agree that the sampling method needed clarification. We have revised the Methods section to specify that purposive sampling was used. All residents who met the eligibility criteria were screened and included in the study. We have added this explanation in the manuscript. - "Older people (≥60 years) devoid of eyesight or hearing impairments" – Why were individuals with eyesight or hearing impairments excluded? Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing out the need for justification of our exclusion criteria. We excluded older adults with visual or hearing impairments because the MoCA-Ina instrument requires adequate vision and hearing to follow instructions, read items, and respond accurately. Including individuals with such impairments could compromise the validity of test results, as low scores might reflect sensory limitations rather than true cognitive decline. We have now added this justification to the Methods section under “Study setting and participants.” I believe that addressing these points, particularly in the Methods section, will strengthen the manuscript and enhance its overall impact. Response: Thank you The study addresses an important topic: cognitive function in elderly Indonesians in long-term care. This is a growing population with specific needs. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized. The findings have potential implications for healthcare practices in long-term care settings. However I have several comments/questions should be addressed below: - Provide more detail about the "major Long-Term Care Institutions in Jakarta." How many institutions were included? Response: We thank the reviewer for this important comment. We have clarified in the Methods section that data were collected from two major Long-Term Care Institutions (LTCIs) in Jakarta. This additional detail has now been specified to improve transparency. - "Comprehensive sampling method" is vague. Was it a census of all eligible residents in the selected facilities? Or a stratified random sample? If not random sampling, explain potential biases. Response: We appreciate the reviewer’s comment and agree that the sampling method needed clarification. We have revised the Methods section to specify that purposive sampling was used. All residents who met the eligibility criteria were screened and included in the study. We have added this explanation in the manuscript. - "Older people (≥60 years) devoid of eyesight or hearing impairments" – Why were individuals with eyesight or hearing impairments excluded? Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing out the need for justification of our exclusion criteria. We excluded older adults with visual or hearing impairments because the MoCA-Ina instrument requires adequate vision and hearing to follow instructions, read items, and respond accurately. Including individuals with such impairments could compromise the validity of test results, as low scores might reflect sensory limitations rather than true cognitive decline. We have now added this justification to the Methods section under “Study setting and participants.” I believe that addressing these points, particularly in the Methods section, will strengthen the manuscript and enhance its overall impact. Response: Thank you Competing Interests: none Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Asri Y. Reviewer Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r390862 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-390862 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 24 Jul 2025 Yuni Asri , Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Science, Institut Teknologi, Sains dan Kesehatan RS dr Soepraoen Kesdam V/Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r390862 This robust study used appropriate tools (MoCA-Ina) and valid analyses. To enhance clarity and reproducibility, authors should categorize variables (e.g., age, education), justify their inclusion in regression models, and detail data distribution and missing data handling in tables or text. ... Continue reading READ ALL This robust study used appropriate tools (MoCA-Ina) and valid analyses. To enhance clarity and reproducibility, authors should categorize variables (e.g., age, education), justify their inclusion in regression models, and detail data distribution and missing data handling in tables or text. These improvements would boost transparency and strengthen the study’s reliability. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes References 1. Feigin V, Abate M, Abate Y, Abd ElHafeez S, et al.: Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Neurology . 2024; 23 (10): 973-1003 Publisher Full Text Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: public health, prevalence study, epidiomilogy. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Asri Y. Reviewer Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r390862 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-390862 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 10 Sep 2025 faizul hasan , Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand 10 Sep 2025 Author Response This robust study used appropriate tools (MoCA-Ina) and valid analyses. To enhance clarity and reproducibility, authors should categorize variables (e.g., age, education), Response: We thank the reviewer for this ... Continue reading This robust study used appropriate tools (MoCA-Ina) and valid analyses. To enhance clarity and reproducibility, authors should categorize variables (e.g., age, education), Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. While categorical groupings were applied to some demographic variables (e.g., education), we presented age as a continuous variable with mean, median, and standard deviation. Since most participants in our study were within a relatively narrow older age range, categorization would have been less meaningful. By reporting mean, median, and SD, we were able to capture the variability in age without imposing arbitrary cut-off points that may not reflect significant differences. We confirm that education level has been categorized in our analysis, ranging from “no schooling” to “diploma/other higher education.” This categorization has been presented in Table 1 of the Results section to provide greater clarity. justify their inclusion in regression models, Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We have clarified the rationale for including variables in the regression model. Specifically, variables were selected based on their theoretical relevance as supported by prior literature on cognitive function in older adults, as well as statistical significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.25). This dual approach ensured that both evidence-based and empirically relevant factors were considered. We have added this justification in the Methods section under “Data Analysis.” ..and detail data distribution and missing data handling in tables or text. These improvements would boost transparency and strengthen the study’s reliability. Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. While categorical groupings were applied to some demographic variables (e.g., education), we presented age as a continuous variable with median and standard deviation. Since most participants in our study were within a relatively narrow older age range, categorization would have been less meaningful. By reporting mean, median, and SD, we were able to capture the variability in age without imposing arbitrary cut-off points that may not reflect significant differences. This robust study used appropriate tools (MoCA-Ina) and valid analyses. To enhance clarity and reproducibility, authors should categorize variables (e.g., age, education), Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. While categorical groupings were applied to some demographic variables (e.g., education), we presented age as a continuous variable with mean, median, and standard deviation. Since most participants in our study were within a relatively narrow older age range, categorization would have been less meaningful. By reporting mean, median, and SD, we were able to capture the variability in age without imposing arbitrary cut-off points that may not reflect significant differences. We confirm that education level has been categorized in our analysis, ranging from “no schooling” to “diploma/other higher education.” This categorization has been presented in Table 1 of the Results section to provide greater clarity. justify their inclusion in regression models, Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We have clarified the rationale for including variables in the regression model. Specifically, variables were selected based on their theoretical relevance as supported by prior literature on cognitive function in older adults, as well as statistical significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.25). This dual approach ensured that both evidence-based and empirically relevant factors were considered. We have added this justification in the Methods section under “Data Analysis.” ..and detail data distribution and missing data handling in tables or text. These improvements would boost transparency and strengthen the study’s reliability. Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. While categorical groupings were applied to some demographic variables (e.g., education), we presented age as a continuous variable with median and standard deviation. Since most participants in our study were within a relatively narrow older age range, categorization would have been less meaningful. By reporting mean, median, and SD, we were able to capture the variability in age without imposing arbitrary cut-off points that may not reflect significant differences. Competing Interests: none Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 10 Sep 2025 faizul hasan , Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand 10 Sep 2025 Author Response This robust study used appropriate tools (MoCA-Ina) and valid analyses. To enhance clarity and reproducibility, authors should categorize variables (e.g., age, education), Response: We thank the reviewer for this ... Continue reading This robust study used appropriate tools (MoCA-Ina) and valid analyses. To enhance clarity and reproducibility, authors should categorize variables (e.g., age, education), Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. While categorical groupings were applied to some demographic variables (e.g., education), we presented age as a continuous variable with mean, median, and standard deviation. Since most participants in our study were within a relatively narrow older age range, categorization would have been less meaningful. By reporting mean, median, and SD, we were able to capture the variability in age without imposing arbitrary cut-off points that may not reflect significant differences. We confirm that education level has been categorized in our analysis, ranging from “no schooling” to “diploma/other higher education.” This categorization has been presented in Table 1 of the Results section to provide greater clarity. justify their inclusion in regression models, Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We have clarified the rationale for including variables in the regression model. Specifically, variables were selected based on their theoretical relevance as supported by prior literature on cognitive function in older adults, as well as statistical significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.25). This dual approach ensured that both evidence-based and empirically relevant factors were considered. We have added this justification in the Methods section under “Data Analysis.” ..and detail data distribution and missing data handling in tables or text. These improvements would boost transparency and strengthen the study’s reliability. Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. While categorical groupings were applied to some demographic variables (e.g., education), we presented age as a continuous variable with median and standard deviation. Since most participants in our study were within a relatively narrow older age range, categorization would have been less meaningful. By reporting mean, median, and SD, we were able to capture the variability in age without imposing arbitrary cut-off points that may not reflect significant differences. This robust study used appropriate tools (MoCA-Ina) and valid analyses. To enhance clarity and reproducibility, authors should categorize variables (e.g., age, education), Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. While categorical groupings were applied to some demographic variables (e.g., education), we presented age as a continuous variable with mean, median, and standard deviation. Since most participants in our study were within a relatively narrow older age range, categorization would have been less meaningful. By reporting mean, median, and SD, we were able to capture the variability in age without imposing arbitrary cut-off points that may not reflect significant differences. We confirm that education level has been categorized in our analysis, ranging from “no schooling” to “diploma/other higher education.” This categorization has been presented in Table 1 of the Results section to provide greater clarity. justify their inclusion in regression models, Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We have clarified the rationale for including variables in the regression model. Specifically, variables were selected based on their theoretical relevance as supported by prior literature on cognitive function in older adults, as well as statistical significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.25). This dual approach ensured that both evidence-based and empirically relevant factors were considered. We have added this justification in the Methods section under “Data Analysis.” ..and detail data distribution and missing data handling in tables or text. These improvements would boost transparency and strengthen the study’s reliability. Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. While categorical groupings were applied to some demographic variables (e.g., education), we presented age as a continuous variable with median and standard deviation. Since most participants in our study were within a relatively narrow older age range, categorization would have been less meaningful. By reporting mean, median, and SD, we were able to capture the variability in age without imposing arbitrary cut-off points that may not reflect significant differences. Competing Interests: none Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Nov 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 4 Version 2 (revision) 22 Aug 25 Version 1 18 Nov 24 read read read read Yuni Asri , Institut Teknologi, Sains dan Kesehatan RS dr Soepraoen Kesdam V/Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia Made Satya Nugraha Gautama , Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia Rian Adi Pamungkas , Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia Saranya Pimolkatekul , Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Pimolkatekul S. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 19 Aug 2025 | for Version 1 Saranya Pimolkatekul , Department of Nursing Administration and Professional Fundamention, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand 0 Views copyright © 2025 Pimolkatekul S. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions This is a well-written cross-sectional study that investigates the relationship between cognitive function and associated risk factors among elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care settings. The study addresses a relevant public health concern and offers useful descriptive data. However, there are a few minor issues that should be considered to improve the clarity and impact of the paper. Firstly, the background would benefit from a clearer articulation of the knowledge gap that this study aims to address. Including a brief summary of what previous studies have not covered particularly in the context of elderly residents in long-term care would better highlight the importance and novelty of this research. Secondly, the manuscript uses various terms interchangeably, such as elderly, older people, and long-term care, long-term care facilities, long-term care institutions. This inconsistency could cause confusion for readers, especially as these terms may have different definitions. To enhance clarity, it is recommended to use consistent terminology throughout the paper. Lastly, while the introduction effectively provides prevalence data and outlines the factors related to cognitive function, it lacks essential details about the study setting and a more explicit justification for focusing on the long-term care population. Clarifying why this particular population and setting were selected would strengthen the rationale for the study. Major Comments: Results (Tables): Please clarify and recheck all the numerical values presented in the tables. For example, there are inconsistencies between Table 1 and Table 2 regarding variables such as education level, subjective memory complaints, and living arrangements. In particular, the data on disease history raises concern. Although the total sample size is reported as 350, the frequencies listed appear to account for only 308 participants. It is also unclear how the 148 participants (42.3%) reporting good health are included in this count. Additionally, some p-values appear to be missing in Table 2. Please ensure that all relevant statistical results are reported and that values are consistent across tables. Minor Comments: Study Participants: Please provide more context to clarify the inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as whether a sample size calculation was conducted and how the final sample size was determined. Tables: Table 1 appears to present similar information to Table 2, which already provides the detailed results. To avoid redundancy and improve clarity, consider removing Table 1 and retaining only Table 2. The conclusion section should more clearly emphasize the main findings of the study, particularly those that are statistically and/or clinically significant. Highlighting the key results will help reinforce the contributions of the study. Additionally, the conclusion should briefly acknowledge the study’s limitations such as the cross-sectional design, potential selection bias, or limited generalizability to provide context for interpreting the results. Including these limitations can also guide future research by suggesting areas that need further exploration or different methodological approaches. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Partly Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Diabetes Mellitus, Frailty, Older adults I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Pimolkatekul S. Peer Review Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395149) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-395149 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Pamungkas R. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 14 Aug 2025 | for Version 1 Rian Adi Pamungkas , Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Pamungkas R. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The topic is highly relevant in light of global population aging and the increasing burden of cognitive decline in older adults. The use of the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument, is appropriate and strengthens internal validity. However, several areas require further clarification, elaboration, and strengthening to enhance the manuscript’s scientific rigor and impact 1. While the study highlights a specific population (elderly in LTCIs), the novelty could be more explicitly framed in the Introduction and Discussion . How does this study differ significantly from prior regional studies? How does it inform global policy/practice? 2. The authors used univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate logistic regression. However, a rationale for the model-building strategy is missing. Were interaction effects or multicollinearity assessed? 3. The explained variance in the logistic regression model (R² = 32.1%) could benefit from more contextual interpretation. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Gerontology nursing I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 10 Sep 2025 faizul hasan, Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand The topic is highly relevant in light of global population aging and the increasing burden of cognitive decline in older adults. The use of the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument, is appropriate and strengthens internal validity. However, several areas require further clarification, elaboration, and strengthening to enhance the manuscript’s scientific rigor and impact 1. While the study highlights a specific population (elderly in LTCIs), the novelty could be more explicitly framed in the Introduction and Discussion. How does this study differ significantly from prior regional studies? How does it inform global policy/practice? Response: We thank the reviewer for emphasizing the importance of clarifying the novelty of our study. We have revised the Introduction to explicitly highlight how this research differs from previous regional studies. Most prior studies in Indonesia and Southeast Asia have focused on community-dwelling elderly, while cognitive function among institutionalized elderly has been scarcely investigated. We now emphasize that our study fills this gap by examining elderly residents in LTCIs using the MoCA-Ina, a culturally adapted and validated instrument. Furthermore, we clarify that the findings not only provide locally relevant evidence but also contribute to the global discourse on aging and long-term care. We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestion regarding the novelty framing in the Discussion. We have revised the section to emphasize how our findings differ from prior research and their broader implications. Specifically, we highlight that while most studies in the region have investigated community-dwelling older adults, our study provides unique evidence on institutionalized elderly in Indonesia. We also explain how the findings can inform global policy and practice on elderly care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where LTCIs are increasingly important. 2. The authors used univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate logistic regression. However, a rationale for the model-building strategy is missing. Were interaction effects or multicollinearity assessed? Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We have clarified the rationale for including variables in the regression model. Specifically, variables were selected based on their theoretical relevance as supported by prior literature on cognitive function in older adults, as well as statistical significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.25). This dual approach ensured that both evidence-based and empirically relevant factors were considered. We have added this justification in the Methods section under “Data Analysis.” 3. The explained variance in the logistic regression model (R² = 32.1%) could benefit from more contextual interpretation. Response: We thank the reviewer for this valuable comment. We have revised the Results section to provide a clearer contextual interpretation of the explained variance (R² = 32.1%). Specifically, we now note that the model accounted for nearly one-third of the determinants of cognitive function among institutionalized elderly, which is a meaningful proportion but also indicates that additional unmeasured factors may contribute to the outcome. This clarification helps readers better understand the significance and limitations of the model. View more View less Competing Interests none reply Respond Report a concern Pamungkas RA. Peer Review Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395145) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-395145 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Gautama M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 14 Aug 2025 | for Version 1 Made Satya Nugraha Gautama , Department of Nursing, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Gautama M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The study addresses an important topic: cognitive function in elderly Indonesians in long-term care. This is a growing population with specific needs. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized. The findings have potential implications for healthcare practices in long-term care settings. However I have several comments/questions should be addressed below: - Provide more detail about the "major Long-Term Care Institutions in Jakarta." How many institutions were included? - "Comprehensive sampling method" is vague. Was it a census of all eligible residents in the selected facilities? Or a stratified random sample? If not random sampling, explain potential biases. - "Older people (≥60 years) devoid of eyesight or hearing impairments" – Why were individuals with eyesight or hearing impairments excluded? I believe that addressing these points, particularly in the Methods section, will strengthen the manuscript and enhance its overall impact. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Adult Nursing, Palliative, Quantitative Research I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 10 Sep 2025 faizul hasan, Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand The study addresses an important topic: cognitive function in elderly Indonesians in long-term care. This is a growing population with specific needs. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized. The findings have potential implications for healthcare practices in long-term care settings. However I have several comments/questions should be addressed below: - Provide more detail about the "major Long-Term Care Institutions in Jakarta." How many institutions were included? Response: We thank the reviewer for this important comment. We have clarified in the Methods section that data were collected from two major Long-Term Care Institutions (LTCIs) in Jakarta. This additional detail has now been specified to improve transparency. - "Comprehensive sampling method" is vague. Was it a census of all eligible residents in the selected facilities? Or a stratified random sample? If not random sampling, explain potential biases. Response: We appreciate the reviewer’s comment and agree that the sampling method needed clarification. We have revised the Methods section to specify that purposive sampling was used. All residents who met the eligibility criteria were screened and included in the study. We have added this explanation in the manuscript. - "Older people (≥60 years) devoid of eyesight or hearing impairments" – Why were individuals with eyesight or hearing impairments excluded? Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing out the need for justification of our exclusion criteria. We excluded older adults with visual or hearing impairments because the MoCA-Ina instrument requires adequate vision and hearing to follow instructions, read items, and respond accurately. Including individuals with such impairments could compromise the validity of test results, as low scores might reflect sensory limitations rather than true cognitive decline. We have now added this justification to the Methods section under “Study setting and participants.” I believe that addressing these points, particularly in the Methods section, will strengthen the manuscript and enhance its overall impact. Response: Thank you View more View less Competing Interests none reply Respond Report a concern Gautama MSN. Peer Review Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r395151) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-395151 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Asri Y. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 24 Jul 2025 | for Version 1 Yuni Asri , Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Science, Institut Teknologi, Sains dan Kesehatan RS dr Soepraoen Kesdam V/Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Asri Y. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions This robust study used appropriate tools (MoCA-Ina) and valid analyses. To enhance clarity and reproducibility, authors should categorize variables (e.g., age, education), justify their inclusion in regression models, and detail data distribution and missing data handling in tables or text. These improvements would boost transparency and strengthen the study’s reliability. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes References 1. Feigin V, Abate M, Abate Y, Abd ElHafeez S, et al.: Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Neurology . 2024; 23 (10): 973-1003 Publisher Full Text Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise public health, prevalence study, epidiomilogy. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 10 Sep 2025 faizul hasan, Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand This robust study used appropriate tools (MoCA-Ina) and valid analyses. To enhance clarity and reproducibility, authors should categorize variables (e.g., age, education), Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. While categorical groupings were applied to some demographic variables (e.g., education), we presented age as a continuous variable with mean, median, and standard deviation. Since most participants in our study were within a relatively narrow older age range, categorization would have been less meaningful. By reporting mean, median, and SD, we were able to capture the variability in age without imposing arbitrary cut-off points that may not reflect significant differences. We confirm that education level has been categorized in our analysis, ranging from “no schooling” to “diploma/other higher education.” This categorization has been presented in Table 1 of the Results section to provide greater clarity. justify their inclusion in regression models, Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We have clarified the rationale for including variables in the regression model. Specifically, variables were selected based on their theoretical relevance as supported by prior literature on cognitive function in older adults, as well as statistical significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.25). This dual approach ensured that both evidence-based and empirically relevant factors were considered. We have added this justification in the Methods section under “Data Analysis.” ..and detail data distribution and missing data handling in tables or text. These improvements would boost transparency and strengthen the study’s reliability. Response: We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. While categorical groupings were applied to some demographic variables (e.g., education), we presented age as a continuous variable with median and standard deviation. Since most participants in our study were within a relatively narrow older age range, categorization would have been less meaningful. By reporting mean, median, and SD, we were able to capture the variability in age without imposing arbitrary cut-off points that may not reflect significant differences. View more View less Competing Interests none reply Respond Report a concern Asri Y. Peer Review Report For: Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians residing in long-term care: Insights from a cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1384 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.174085.r390862) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v1#referee-response-390862 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Cognitive function and its determinants in...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v2" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v2&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v2" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Rekawati E et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v2/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384", templates : { twitter : "Cognitive function and its determinants in elderly Indonesians.... Rekawati E et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1384/v2" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/158490/186771") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "186771"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "395150": 0, "395151": 13, "395148": 0, "395149": 14, "395146": 0, "395147": 0, "395144": 0, "395145": 14, "364949": 0, "364951": 0, "364950": 0, "395152": 0, "395153": 0, "364957": 0, "364956": 0, "364958": 0, "364953": 0, "364952": 0, "364955": 0, "364954": 0, "358565": 0, "358564": 0, "369959": 0, "358567": 0, "358566": 0, "358573": 0, "358572": 0, "342447": 0, "358569": 0, "358568": 0, "358571": 0, "358570": 0, "342453": 0, "350005": 0, "342452": 0, "350004": 0, "342455": 0, "350007": 0, "342454": 0, "350006": 0, "342449": 0, "342448": 0, "342451": 0, "350003": 0, "342450": 0, "350002": 0, "361405": 0, "361404": 0, "408124": 0, "361406": 0, "408125": 0, "350009": 0, "408122": 0, "342456": 0, "350008": 0, "408123": 0, "350011": 0, "350010": 0, "372673": 0, "390861": 0, "390860": 0, "390863": 0, "390862": 22, "390869": 0, "390868": 0, "390865": 0, "390864": 0, "390867": 0, "390866": 0, "353887": 0, "353889": 0, "353888": 0, "346357": 0, "346356": 0, "346359": 0, "346358": 0, "346355": 0, "346354": 0, "346361": 0, "346360": 0, "346363": 0, "346362": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "27f177ce-f5f9-4be8-a300-f8e9ef93da8f"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });