In vitro effects of endothelin-1 on the contractility of myometrium obtained from pre- and postmenopausal women
Endothelin-1 increased myometrial contractility and basal tone, with postmenopausal myometrium showing a stronger, sustained contraction than premenopausal myometrium.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This in vitro study examined how endothelin-1 (ET1) affects contractility of human nonpregnant myometrium obtained from hysterectomy patients in premenopausal follicular (n=14), premenopausal luteal (n=20), and postmenopausal (n=12) hormonal states, using isometric recording of uterine strips exposed to ET1 (10^-16 to 10^-10 M) and, in comparison, KCl (80 mM) alone or with ET1. ET1 at 10^-16 M induced weak, ripple-like contractions with longer duration and higher contractile measures in luteal vs follicular tissue, whereas in postmenopausal tissue ET1 produced sustained contractions with obliteration of spontaneous contractility and marked increases in amplitude and area under the contractility curve. Combining ET1 with KCl reproduced ET1-like contractility patterns but prolonged effects compared with KCl alone, and basal-tone changes differed between KCl and ET1 in postmenopausal tissue, supporting distinct mechanisms. A key limitation is that tissue viability and responsiveness were assessed mainly by immediate KCl responsiveness within a short post-hysterectomy window, and hormone groups were defined by measured peripheral estradiol/progesterone rather than detailed tissue-level receptor/ET pathway analysis. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (51)
- W193624571 via openalex
- W590561559 via openalex
- W1594282332 via openalex
- W1839587368 via openalex
- W1964273105 via openalex
- W1971003043 via openalex
- W1973076537 via openalex
- W1973600609 via openalex
- W1979504991 via openalex
- W1985501651 via openalex
- W2002532000 via openalex
- W2011314886 via openalex
- W2016422645 via openalex
- W2026485094 via openalex
- W2030678201 via openalex
- W2031751707 via openalex
- W2036090264 via openalex
- W2037881705 via openalex
- W2041435820 via openalex
- W2051768735 via openalex
- W2055776243 via openalex
- W2057134698 via openalex
- W2059369537 via openalex
- W2062175236 via openalex
- W2064550003 via openalex
- W2064862025 via openalex
- W2068290049 via openalex
- W2080781643 via openalex
- W2088866113 via openalex
- W2091576296 via openalex
- W2095891225 via openalex
- W2097209330 via openalex
- W2099332062 via openalex
- W2127037377 via openalex
- W2127155035 via openalex
- W2140973351 via openalex
- W2151869895 via openalex
- W2152588436 via openalex
- W2189213170 via openalex
- W2263824859 via openalex
- W2275308915 via openalex
- W2277970571 via openalex
- W2304131176 via openalex
- W2312447822 via openalex
- W2399430502 via openalex
- W4230832721 via openalex
- W4241398143 via openalex
- W4245478893 via openalex
- W4251507326 via openalex
- W4256151549 via openalex
- W6657030897 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00