Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas

Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228" }, "headline": "Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas", "datePublished": "2024-03-27T15:42:04", "dateModified": "2024-03-27T15:42:04", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Vageesh Neelavar Kelkar" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Jyothi Mallya" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Valsaraj Payini" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Vasanth Kamath" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background As wine has become more than just a drink, exploring wine consumer studies provides a better understanding of various factors that shape the wine industry. Therefore, this paper aims to review and map the landscape of wine consumer literature using bibliometric analysis and systematic review. It identifies the key areas, clusters, antecedents, mediators, moderators, and outcomes to propose the framework for future research directions. Methods This study adopts an integrative review approach: a bibliometric and systematic review. The data for this study were retrieved from the Scopus database. While the bibliometric analyses are conducted using VoSviewer software, a systematic review is conducted using a content analysis approach. Results Four main topics in the extant wine consumer literature are identified: sustainability and wine, wine preferences and choice, wine consumer behavior, and wine consumer insights. The five critical areas of wine consumers’ literature recognized are decision-making, consumer preferences, consumer behavior, segmentation, and consumer involvement. This study also recognizes theoretical and methodological advancements in the wine consumer literature. Conclusions The findings contribute to advancing knowledge development, identifying research gaps and shedding light on future research in the wine consumer domain. The results offer practical insight for wine industry stakeholders, researchers, and influencers. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1", "name": "Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas" } } ] } Home Browse Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Neelavar Kelkar V, Mallya J, Payini V and Kamath V. Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146631.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Systematic Review Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] Vageesh Neelavar Kelkar 1 , Jyothi Mallya https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-4680 2 , Valsaraj Payini 3 , Vasanth Kamath 4 Vageesh Neelavar Kelkar 1 , Jyothi Mallya https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-4680 2 , Valsaraj Payini 3 , Vasanth Kamath 4 PUBLISHED 27 Mar 2024 Author details Author details 1 Food and Beverage Services, Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 2 Library, Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 3 Food and Beverage Services, Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 4 Operations Management, T A Pai Management Institute , Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India, 576104, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Vageesh Neelavar Kelkar Roles: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Jyothi Mallya Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Valsaraj Payini Roles: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Vasanth Kamath Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway. Abstract Background As wine has become more than just a drink, exploring wine consumer studies provides a better understanding of various factors that shape the wine industry. Therefore, this paper aims to review and map the landscape of wine consumer literature using bibliometric analysis and systematic review. It identifies the key areas, clusters, antecedents, mediators, moderators, and outcomes to propose the framework for future research directions. Methods This study adopts an integrative review approach: a bibliometric and systematic review. The data for this study were retrieved from the Scopus database. While the bibliometric analyses are conducted using VoSviewer software, a systematic review is conducted using a content analysis approach. Results Four main topics in the extant wine consumer literature are identified: sustainability and wine, wine preferences and choice, wine consumer behavior, and wine consumer insights. The five critical areas of wine consumers’ literature recognized are decision-making, consumer preferences, consumer behavior, segmentation, and consumer involvement. This study also recognizes theoretical and methodological advancements in the wine consumer literature. Conclusions The findings contribute to advancing knowledge development, identifying research gaps and shedding light on future research in the wine consumer domain. The results offer practical insight for wine industry stakeholders, researchers, and influencers. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords bibliometrics, systematic review, integrative review, environmental, economic, sociocultural, sustainability Corresponding Author(s) Valsaraj Payini ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Valsaraj Payini Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2024 Neelavar Kelkar V et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Neelavar Kelkar V, Mallya J, Payini V and Kamath V. Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146631.1 ) First published: 27 Mar 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146631.1 ) Latest published: 27 Mar 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146631.1 ) 1. Introduction Since ancient times, wine has been admired as a cultural icon, a symbol of sophistication, and a source of enjoyment. Beyond its gastronomic appeal, the world of wine is a fascinating domain where science, culture, and consumer behaviour intertwine ( Mitchell et al. , 2009 ; Mouret et al. , 2013 ). Consequently, over the past two decades, wine consumers’ preferences and decision-making processes have attracted much interest from researchers and industry professionals alike ( Aqueveque, 2023 ; Moscovici et al. , 2022 ; Payini, 2021 ; Payini et al. , 2022 ; Vecchio et al. , 2023 ). Accordingly, much research has been done on how consumer choose wines ( Wright et al. , 2023 ). Therefore, it is essential to understand the factors that influence wine preferences, consumption patterns, and selections. Though traditional research methodologies, such as bibliometric analysis ( Martinho, 2021 ; Weatherbee et al. , 2019 ) and systematic reviews ( Campo et al. , 2022 ; Carollo et al. , 2022 ; Schäufele and Hamm, 2017 ), have long been employed to analyze and synthesize knowledge within wine business domains, an integrating these approaches offers a unique opportunity to gain comprehensive insights into wine consumers’ behavior. It is found that most of the reviews pertain to particular theme, such as wine tourism experience ( Gómez et al. , 2019 ; Kotur, 2023 ), wine consumption ( Wright et al. , 2023 ), sustainability in wine industry ( Nave et al. , 2021 ), sustainable wine ( Maesano et al. , 2019 ), and willingness to pay ( Schäufele and Hamm, 2017 ). Additionally, none of these reviews attempts to encompass the entirety of wine consumption. Further, there are no studies that examined the conceptual and intellectual configuration latent in this emergent research field. Such omissions motivated the researchers to combine quantitative and qualitative methods in order to consolidate the existing literature and provide a road map for future research. Therefore, this integrative review aims to provide the current state of knowledge of wine consumers’ behavior. The findings of this study are helpful for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. Bibliometrics, as a quantitative analysis of scientific publications, provides a valuable means to map and assess the existing body of research in a particular field ( Mukherjee et al. , 2022a ). By systematically identifying and analyzing relevant publications, bibliometrics enables researchers to uncover key trends, knowledge gaps, and emerging research areas. In the context of wine consumers’ behavior, bibliometric analyses can shed light on the evolution of wine consumer research, influential authors, and predominant themes or theories. It serves as a foundational step in understanding the overall landscape of research on wine consumers ( Donthu et al. , 2021 ). On the other hand, systematic reviews offer a rigorous and structured approach to identifying patterns, discrepancies, and evidence-based findings ( Mulrow, 1994 ). By employing predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, systematic reviews ensure objectivity and reproducibility in selecting relevant studies ( Moher et al. , 2009 ). In the context of wine consumers’ behavior, systematic reviews can help identify the factors influencing consumer choices, preferences, and decision-making processes. By combining the quantitative analysis of bibliometrics with the qualitative synthesis of systematic reviews, this study offers a holistic view of the existing body of wine consumer literature. It allows the identification of theoretical and methodological research gaps. This integrative review addresses several critical questions, such as the following: What are the publication trends of wine consumer literature? What is the performance of research constituents, such as authors, journals, and articles? What are the critical areas and clusters of wine consumer literature? What are the antecedents, mediators, and outcomes of wine consumption? Which theoretical frameworks have been most frequently employed to understand wine consumers? How can future research directions be shaped to enhance our understanding of wine consumers’ behavior? By combining bibliometric analysis and systematic review methodology, this study seeks to contribute to the wine consumer knowledge base by identifying research gaps and proposing potential areas for future investigation. The proposed framework helps to identify the underlying gaps in a research domain across theory development and methods. 2. Methods To achieve the objectives set in this research, a bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSViewer . In addition, a systematic literature review was conducted as the bibliometric analysis alone is considered insufficient to explore and further the research practices in the field ( Ali et al. , 2022 ). 2.1 Data source The Scopus database was the data source for this study. Scopus indexes content from over 25,000 active titles and 7,000 publishers—all rigorously vetted and selected by an independent review board. It is the largest database of peer-reviewed literature and is widely used for similar studies ( Donthu et al. , 2021 ). 2.2 Search criteria The keywords “wine” and “consum*” were searched in the article title head of the Scopus database. After restricting to the “Business, Management, and Accounting” subject area, 317 articles were obtained. After excluding editorials, book chapters, and non-English articles, the final dataset extracted was 262 articles (Mallya, Jyothi, et al ., 2024). The final query string is as follows: ((TITLE (consum*) AND TITLE (wine)) AND (LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, “BUSI”)) AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, “ar”)) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”)) AND (LIMIT-TO (SRCTYPE, “j”)). 2.3 Software used for the analysis VoSviewer , a free software available is used to conduct various analyses. It is a popular and frequently used software by researchers for constructing and visualizing bibliometric networks. These networks may include journals, contributors, or individual publications, and they can be built based on citation, bibliographic coupling, cocitation, or coauthorship relations. This software also offers text mining functionality that can be used to construct and visualize co-occurrence networks of important terms extracted from a body of scientific literature ( van Eck and Waltman, 2010 ). 2.4 Types of analyses Bibliometrics analyses, a branch of library science, have been used in various disciplines, including consumer behavior research ( Baber et al ., 2023 ; Haba et al ., 2023 ). Utilizing quantitative methods, it analyses bibliographic information to derive insightful conclusions ( Mukherjee et al ., 2022b ). This approach is more advantageous ( Mukherjee et al ., 2022a ), making it more appropriate for the current study. It supports a huge corpus of data and involves a variety of bibliographic metrics. Its quantitative character of analyses yields impartial results. Additionally, the networks and graphs produced by this program allow users higher visibility of the data points ( Donthu et al ., 2021 ). However, bibliometric approaches have certain limitations, such as making qualitative claims about research based on quantitative data ( Wallin, 2005 ). Quantitative metrics such as citation counts, h-indexes, and journal impact factors are typically utilized in bibliometric analyses. Although these metrics provide a quantitative evaluation of research output, they may not capture the complexity and quality of scientific work. Advancing theory and methodology frequently requires a deeper understanding of research content, context, and impact, which bibliometric indicators may not adequately reflect. This dependency may hinder the study’s findings. Therefore, to fill this gap, the current study also systematically reviews selected articles to support a few qualitative assumptions. 2.4.1 Bibliometric analyses 2.4.1.1 Descriptive analysis The descriptive analysis includes the number of publications in a given dataset over a specific period. It provides an overview of the volume of research output in a particular field or topic. The annual and last four decades of publication growth were analyzed. 2.4.1.2 Performance analyses In bibliometric studies, performance analysis refers to assessing the research output of people (for example, authors), organizations (institutions and funding agencies), nations, sources, and documents using bibliometric data. It includes information about the quantity and quality of research constituents, such as the number of publications, citations, impact factor of journals, and H-index. Thus, the pattern in the research constituents (journals, articles, and authors) was also explored as recommended ( Donthu et al. , 2021 ). The performance of the various research constituents, such as journals, authors, articles, and countries, was assessed regarding productivity, influence, and authorship structure. The multiple matrices used are total publications (TP), total citations (TC), number of cited publications (NCP), total citations per publication (TC/TP), number of active years (NAY), productivity per active year (PAY), number of contributing authors (NCA) and h and g indexes ( Ali et al ., 2022 ). These analyses were conducted using MS Excel software. 2.4.1.3 Science mapping Science mapping is a bibliometric technique that uses patterns of citation, cocitation, and coauthorship in the scientific literature to visually demonstrate subjects’ structure and evolution. It provides a thorough overview of the research landscape within a specific field by enabling researchers to spot clusters of linked research, notable authors, and important research subjects. This analysis includes cocitation mapping, bibliographic coupling analysis, and keyword co-occurrence. The current study uses keyword-cooccurrence and bibliographic coupling analysis to uncover the domains and themes of the wine consumption literature landscape. While keyword co-occurrence analysis examines the frequency of keywords or terms within a set of documents and identifies co-occurrence patterns, bibliographic coupling analysis identifies relationships between documents based on shared references. Both of these methods help identify clusters of related documents, identify central or influential documents, and analyze the relationships between studies in a given field. 2.4.2 Systematic review Despite the clear advantages of bibliometric analyses, it is important to remember that bibliometric techniques alone are insufficient for advancing theory and practice ( Ali et al. , 2022 ). Each review method contributes to the overall body of knowledge and comprehension, provided that they form knowledge theoretically ( Donthu et al. , 2021 ; Fan et al. , 2022 ). Content analysis has been successfully used in wine research as a research method ( Bonn et al. , 2018 ; Carollo et al. , 2022 ; Nave et al. , 2021 ; Weatherbee et al. , 2019 ). The primary purpose of the content analysis was to synthesize the extant wine consumer literature to gain a comprehensive understanding of it. Furthermore, the content analysis aims to understand the wine consumption literature’s theoretical and methodological advancement and propose research frameworks for future studies. 3. Results and discussion 3.1 Descriptive statistics The first research question was to understand the research publication trends. To this effect, descriptive analysis was conducted ( Figures 1 and 2 ). While Figure 1 presents the direction of wine consumption literature for the last four decades, Figure 2 reveals the annual growth of publications and citations. According to Moed et al. (2004) , the count of publications’ productivity and the citation counts represent academic influence and impacts ( Meyer et al. , 2018 ). Figure 1. Number of documents and citations for four different periods. Source: Authors own. Figure 2. Yearwise number of documents and citations. Source: Authors own. The data presented in Figure 1 highlight a significant increase in research activity over approximately four decades within this subject area. Specifically, the number of documents produced has notably increased, from only six in the earliest period (1985-1994) to 149 in the most recent period (2015-2023). These data suggest a growing interest and investment in this field, potentially due to the wine consumer study’s increasing importance and relevance for the hospitality industry. However, there have been fluctuations between different periods regarding citation trends. For example, the average number of citations in the third period was significantly more (51 citations per document) than in the fourth period (13 citations per document). It is also worth noting that the most recent period (2015-2023) shows a high volume of document production (149) but a relatively low citation count (1986), which may be attributed to the recency of the research and its ongoing evaluation by the wine consumers’ research community. Figure 2 , the year wise distribution of the publications, shows somewhat inconsistent growth regarding the number of articles. For example, 2020 witnessed the highest number of publications (31 articles), followed by 2019 and 2012, with 21 articles each. However, the articles published in 2009 received the highest number of citations, nearly 15% of the total citations across 15 documents. Thus, it can be inferred that 2020 and 2009 are the most productive and impactful years in wine consumers’ literature. 3.2 Performance analysis The second research objective was to analyze the performance of various research constituents, such as authors, journals, articles, and countries. For this, citation analysis was used. 3.2.1 Most productive authors The top ten most productive authors were identified based on the number of publications (at least five articles) and citations (a minimum of 75 citations). Table 1 demonstrates that Johan Bruwer, with 27 papers and 1417 citations, is the most prolific author, followed by Nelson Barber and Tim H. Dodd, who have eight articles. Tim H. Dodd and Nelson Barber received 492 and 314 citations, respectively. Bruwer Johan has been active in the wine consumer subject domain for 12 years (NAY=12) and has the highest h-index of 19. At the same time, Anthony Saliba J. emerged as one of the most prolific authors, receiving 320 citations across five documents. Steve Goodman has the highest TC/CP ratio, indicating that the four cited publications contributed by the author carry an average of 73.50 citations. Table 1. Top ten productive authors. TP SOA COA CP TC TC/TP TC/CP NAY PAY H Bruwer J 27 0 27 26 1417 52.48 54.50 12 118.08 19 Barber N. 8 0 8 8 314 39.25 39.25 4 78.50 7 Dodd T H 8 0 8 8 492 61.50 61.50 6 82.00 7 Agnoli 6 0 6 6 113 18.83 18.83 5 22.60 4 Kelly 6 0 6 6 86 14.33 14.33 5 17.20 5 Agnoli L 5 0 5 5 113 22.60 22.60 5 22.60 4 Begalli 5 0 5 5 108 21.60 21.60 5 21.60 4 Capatillo 5 0 5 5 108 21.60 21.60 5 21.60 4 Corsi A M 5 0 5 4 175 35.00 43.75 4 43.75 4 Goodman 5 1 4 4 294 58.80 73.50 3 98.00 5 Saliba J 5 0 5 5 320 64.00 64.00 3 106.67 5 3.2.2 Most influential articles An analysis of the top 15 most cited articles in wine consumer studies based on the number of citations was conducted. Table 2 provides the total number of citations and average citations per year of the top 15 articles in the domain of wine consumption literature. As evident, the article “The Hedonic Nature Of Wine Tourism Consumption: An Experiential View” ( Bruwer and Alant, 2009 ) was an influential publication with 252 citations. Bruwer and Alant used the experiential view of consumption to better understand wine tourists’ motivation. The other most cited works include articles titled “Consumer Attitudes Regarding Environmentally Sustainable Wine: An Exploratory Study of The New Zealand Marketplace” ( Forbes et al. , 2009 ). and “Differential Effects of Experience, Subjective Knowledge, And Objective Knowledge on Sources of Information Used in Consumer Wine Purchasing” ( Dodd et al. , 2005 ). However, the articles titled “Millennial Generation Attitudes toward Sustainable Wine: An Exploratory Study on Italian Consumers” ( Pomarici and Vecchio, 2014 ) and “Exploring Environmental Consciousness and Consumer Preferences for Organic Wines Without Sulfites” ( D’Amico et al. , 2016 ) are the fastest growing articles in terms of influence, with an average of 21 and 19 citations per year, respectively. Table 2. Most cited articles. Authors Title Year Source Title Citations 1 ( Cortez et al. , 2009 ) Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties 2009 Decision Support Systems 784 2 ( Lynch Jr and Ariely, 2000 ) Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality, and distribution 2000 Marketing Science 641 3 ( Getz and Brown, 2006 ) Critical success factors for wine tourism regions: A demand analysis 2006 Tourism Management 498 4 ( Charters and Ali-Knight, 2002 ) Who is the wine tourist? 2002 Tourism Management 426 5 ( Orth and Malkewitz, 2008 ) Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions 2008 Journal of Marketing 419 6 ( Beverland, 2006 ) The 'real thing': Branding authenticity in the luxury wine trade 2006 Journal of Business Research 388 7 ( Ariely and Levav, 2000 ) Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed 2000 Journal of Consumer Research 337 8 ( Mason and Paggiaro, 2012 ) Investigating the role of festivalscape in culinary tourism: The case of food and wine events 2012 Tourism Management 262 9 ( Bruwer and Alant, 2009a ) The hedonic nature of wine tourism consumption: An experiential view 2009 International Journal of Wine Business Research 259 10 ( Landon and Smith, 1997 ) The use of quality and reputation indicators by consumers: The case of Bordeaux wine 1997 Journal of Consumer Policy 244 11 ( Gupta et al. , 2004 , p. 200) An empirical study of consumer switching from traditional to electronic channels: A purchase-decision process perspective 2004 International Journal of Electronic Commerce 234 12 ( Yuan and Jang, 2008 ) The effects of quality and satisfaction on awareness and behavioral intentions: Exploring the role of a wine festival 2008 Journal of Travel Research 230 13 ( Forbes et al. , 2009 ) Consumer attitudes regarding environmentally sustainable wine: an exploratory study of the New Zealand marketplace 2009 Journal of Cleaner Production 226 14 ( Labroo et al. , 2008 ) Of frog wines and frowning watches: Semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation 2008 Journal of Consumer Research 214 15 ( Quester and Smart, 1998 ) The influence of consumption situation and product involvement over consumers' use of product attribute 1998 Journal of Consumer Marketing 208 16 ( Dodd et al. , 2005 ) Differential Effects of Experience, Subjective Knowledge, and Objective Knowledge on Sources of Information used in Consumer Wine Purchasing 2005 Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 205 17 ( Johnson and Bruwer, 2007 ) Regional brand image and perceived wine quality: The consumer perspective 2007 International Journal of Wine Business Research 200 3.2.3 Journal impact The most influential journal was identified based on a number of publications and citations. The journals published at least five articles, and 100 citations were included in the analysis. The source impact (productivity and influence) analysis helps understand the distribution of core journals in the research area. Table 4 shows the top seven journals in the research area sorted by the number of publications and citations. The h-index 26 for the International Journal of Wine Business Research (IJWBR) indicates that IJWBR has at least 26 documents, each receiving at least 26 citations. IJWBR is the only journal that comprehensively covers business disciplines, continents, and countries on all topics connected to wine consumer literature, such as perspectives on alcoholic beverages such as beer, craft beer, and spirits. Thus, it can be concluded that wine consumption is widely acknowledged in wine business research literature. Following IJWBR, the British Food Journal (BFJ), the Journal of Food Products Marketing (JFPM), and the Journal of Cleaner Production (JCP) are positioned as the second and the third most impactful journals in this domain ( Tables 3 and 4 ). These results also indicate that wine consumption is well documented in food science, food product marketing, and environmental/sustainability research literature. Table 3. Source productivity. Source title TP NPC NAY PAY IJWBR 73 66 17 4 BFJ 53 51 18 3 JFPM 16 16 9 2 JCP 13 13 8 2 APJML 6 6 6 1 IJHM 6 6 5 1 CHQ 5 4 3 2 Table 4. Source influence. Source title TC TC/TP TC/NPC TC/NAY H-Index IJWBR 2264 31 34 133 26 BFJ 1482 28 29 82 20 JFPM 325 20 20 36 10 JCP 1157 89 89 145 10 APJML 246 41 41 41 6 IJHM 119 20 20 24 5 CHQ 136 27 34 45 2 3.2.4 Top contributing countries The following is a list of the top ten countries according to the nationality of the corresponding author. Table 5 presents the total publications, total cited publications, total citations (TC), average citations per publication, average citations per cited publication, number of active years, productivity per active year, and H-index for the ten leading countries in the wine consumption literature. According to this table, the most influential country is the United States of America, with 21 active years, 67 publications, and 2376 citations. However, in terms of the H-index, Australia topped the list with an H-index of 27. Additionally, the highest number of publications are also from the United States of America. Interestingly, despite having eight active years and an H-index, Canada topped the list regarding average citations per publication and cited publications, followed by New Zealand. Table 5. Top 10 countries. No. Country TP TCP TC TC/TP TC/TCP NAY PAY H 1 United States 67 64 2376 35 37 21 3 26 2 Australia 57 56 2335 41 42 17 3 27 3 Italy 47 43 1186 25 28 15 3 19 4 France 26 24 570 22 24 12 2 12 5 Spain 19 18 390 21 22 12 2 10 6 United Kingdom 15 15 650 43 43 12 1 12 7 South Africa 13 11 185 14 17 8 2 6 8 Canada 10 10 558 56 56 8 1 7 9 Germany 9 8 244 27 31 6 2 7 10 New Zealand 9 9 450 50 50 7 1 9 3.3 Science mapping The third objective of this study was to identify the critical areas and distinct clusters of wine consumption literature. The study uses keyword co-occurrence analysis and bibliometric coupling analysis to achieve this. 3.3.1 Keyword co-occurrence analysis Keyword co-occurrence analysis refers to examining the co-occurrence of keywords in scientific publications and constructing a network of keywords based on their relationships. Identifying the frequency of keywords could uncover potential future research opportunities. Therefore, the current study conducts keyword co-occurrence analysis using VoSviewer software. The minimum number of occurrences was set to five. VOSviewer provides various visualization techniques to represent coword networks, such as network and overlay visualization ( Figure 3 ). The keyword co-occurrence analysis resulted in six clusters. The keyword co-occurrence analysis resulted in five critical areas of wine consumer literature: decision making, consumer preferences, consumer behavior, segmentation, and consumer involvement. The clusters and items are presented in Table 6 . Figure 3. Overlay visualization of the most frequent keywords where the score of the item is the time since publication. Source: Generated by the authors using VOS-viewer software. Table 6. Clusters based on keyword co-occurrence analysis. Decision-making (15 items) Consumer preferences (13 items) Consumer behavior (12 items) Segmentation (10 items) Consumer involvement (3 items) human wine consumer behavior consumer behavior China marketing wine consumption wines segmentation consumption consumer Italy market segmentation organic wine involvement consumer attitude wine marketing survey research Perception gender consumer preferences Australia price adult packaging consumers wine consumers purchasing sustainability surveys wine industry decision making alcoholic drinks united states of America consumer perception female environment country of origin consumption behavior human experiment sustainable development marketing strategy organic food male willingness to pay regression preferences consumer choice subjective knowledge quality wtp questionnaire sparkling wine The size of the nodes in Figure 3 reflects the occurrence of using the terms. Overlay visualization, a feature in VOSviewer that allows the classification of keywords based on a time scale, is conducted. It is evident that the word “wine/wines” is the most used keyword (145 occurrences), followed by consumer behavior/behavior (96 occurrences). The other keywords are market segmentation (23 occurrences), human (21 occurrences), wine consumption (21 occurrences), and marketing (16 occurrences). Keywords that appeared more than 10 times are consumers, segmentation, United States of America, China, consumer attitude, consumption, gender, and Italy. The items are colored differently according to publishing year (average for the cluster). This study highlights phrases that debuted recently (the average publication year was 2020) in a brighter yellow. A color bar displayed at the corner has the same explanation; the scores of the items are decided by the publishing date ( Figure 3 ). According to Figure 3 , the most recent topics studied were sustainable development, sustainability, willingness to pay, organic wine, and price. 3.3.2 Bibliographic coupling analysis Bibliographic coupling is a measure of similarity that employs citation analysis to build a relationship of similarity between documents. It occurs when two works’ bibliographies reference the same third work. This indicates that there is a possibility that the two works address a similar topic ( Weinberg, 1974 ). It is helpful in various fields since it helps researchers find related past research. Bibliographic coupling uniquely contributes to the measurement of centeredness, with increasing coupling between the precenter and postcenter periods ( Youtie et al. , 2013 ). Bibliographic coupling analysis is also helpful in identifying clusters of related articles. Therefore, this study embraces bibliographic coupling analysis to identify the different clusters of wine consumption literature based on a minimum of 50 citations per document. This analysis resulted in four clusters of 41 documents, represented in four colors ( Figure 4 ). The total number of citations across these 41 articles is 4422 (approximately 56%). Figure 4. Clusters of wine consumer literature. Source: Generated by the authors using VOS-viewer software. Cluster one, represented in red, has 13 articles named Sustainability and Wine, published between 2009 and 2016. The most cited article in this cluster was “Consumer attitudes regarding environmentally sustainable wine: an exploratory study of the New Zealand market place.” ( Forbes et al. , 2009 ), followed by “Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers” ( Pomarici and Vecchio, 2014 ). The other articles in this cluster discuss environmental impacts ( Amienyo et al. , 2015 ; Point et al. , 2012 ), the carbon intensity of wine distribution ( Cholette and Venkat, 2009 ), wine labeling and packaging ( Barber, 2010 ; Galati et al. , 2019 ) and environmental consciousness ( D’Amico et al. , 2016 ). Interestingly, a majority of studies have explored consumers’ attitudes toward sustainable/green/organic wines ( Forbes et al. , 2009 ; Mann et al. , 2012 ; Pomarici and Vecchio, 2014 ; Sogari et al. , 2015 ; Tait et al. , 2019 ; Wiedmann et al. , 2014 ). Cluster two, represented in green has 11 “Wine Preferences and Choice” articles. The articles in this cluster were published between 2007 and 2012. The most cited article in this cluster is “A regional brand image and perceived wine quality: the consumer perspective ( Johnson and Bruwer, 2007 ). This cluster’s second most cited article compares international wine consumer choice ( Goodman, 2009 ). Few studies have investigated the reasons ( Charters and Pettigrew, 2008 ; Ritchie, 2007 ), perception ( Liu and Murphy, 2007 ), motivation ( Somogyi et al. , 2011 ), preferences ( Casini et al. , 2009 ), and determinants ( Camillo, 2012 ; Hussain et al. , 2007 ; Yu et al. , 2009 ) of wine consumption. Studies have also investigated the role of brand image ( Johnson and Bruwer, 2007 ) and country of origin ( McCutcheon et al. , 2009 ) in wine choice. The third cluster, represented in blue, is named “Wine Consumer Behavior” and has nine articles. The articles in this cluster were published between 1997 and 2012. The most cited in this cluster is “The use of quality and reputation indicators by consumers: the case of Bordeaux wine” ( Landon and Smith, 1997 ). Studies in this cluster have investigated wine consumer behavior using different factors, such as country of origin ( Balestrini and Gamble, 2006 ; Bruwer and Buller, 2012 ; Dimara and Skuras, 2005 ; Orth et al. , 2005 ), information search ( Atkin et al. , 2007 ), wine involvement ( Barber et al. , 2007 ), grape vintage year ( Gil and Sánchez, 1997 ), and functional and production aspects ( Vrontis et al. , 2011 ). The fourth cluster, represented in yellow is “Wine Consumer Insights: Tourism, Generations, and Preferences.” This cluster has eight articles on diverse aspects, such as wine tourists’ consumption behavior ( Bruwer et al. , 2013 ; Bruwer and Alant, 2009 ; Carlsen and Boksberger, 2015 ), sensory preferences ( Bruwer et al. , 2011 ), general differences ( Agnoli et al. , 2011 ; Mueller et al. , 2011 ), the role of demographics ( Bruwer et al. , 2012 ) and product involvement ( Bruwer and Huang, 2012 ). The most cited article in this cluster is “the hedonic nature of wine tourism consumption: an experiential view” ( Bruwer and Alant, 2009 ), followed by the article “consumer behavior and sensory preference differences: implications for wine product marketing” ( Bruwer et al. , 2011 ). The articles published in this cluster were published between 2009 and 2015. 3.4 Systematic review The fourth objective of the study was to develop a conceptual framework based on the antecedents, mediators, and outcomes reported in the wine consumer literature. As mentioned in the methodology section, the documents forming bibliographical coupling were systematically reviewed to gain comprehensive insight into wine consumers’ literature. Three articles were excluded from this review because they did not pertain to wine consumer behavior. Figure 5 illustrates the framework developed by integrating the antecedents, mediators, and outcomes reported in the wine consumer literature. Figure 5. Antecedent outcome framework. Source: Author’s own. 3.4.1 Antecedents of wine consumer research All the antecedents that predominantly influence wine consumer behavior are further categorized into five subcategories: Personal, Social, Extrinsic, Intrinsic, and Environmental. Personal factors comprised variables related to the individual, such as wine knowledge, environmental orientation, experience, enjoyment, cognitive dimensions, involvement, habits, preferences, brand familiarity, consumption frequency, and purchase frequency. These factors can vary from person to person and can influence their preferences, choices, and decision-making processes when purchasing and consuming wine. For example, consumers with higher levels of objective wine knowledge are likelier to use intrinsic cues during wine purchase than extrinsic cues, such as country of origin ( Bruwer and Buller, 2012 ). Similarly, it is found that wine-tasting experience significantly correlated with attitude toward brand loyalty. Consumers having an enjoyable and memorable experience are more likely to repurchase and promote the wine brand to others ( Bruwer et al. , 2013 ). Additionally, enjoyment, situational and lifestyle-related factors are found to be crucial ( Charters and Pettigrew, 2008 ). Specifically, enjoyment was critical across groups, irrespective of age and gender ( Charters and Pettigrew, 2008 ). Other personal factors that impact consumers’ consumption or purchase behaviors are consumption frequency, curiosity, purchase frequency, habits, and brand familiarity ( Balestrini and Gamble, 2006 ; D’Amico et al. , 2016 ; McCutcheon et al. , 2009 ). A systematic review revealed that social factors, such as consumers’ living environment, situational factors, social image, social acceptance, and social context, were also found to be antecedents to wine consumption and purchase ( Agnoli et al. , 2011 ; Charters and Pettigrew, 2008 ; Iazzi et al. , 2019 ; Liu and Murphy, 2007 ; Orth et al. , 2005 ). For example, a study conducted among millennials revealed that consumers living in urban areas, being female and older, are likely to buy sustainable wine ( Iazzi et al. , 2019 ). The literature shows that wine consumption’s second most important factor is the situational factor ( Charters and Pettigrew, 2008 ). While social image impacted wine consumption ( Liu and Murphy, 2007 ), social context and acceptance were found to have an impact on wine preference ( Agnoli et al. , 2011 ; Orth et al. , 2005 ). The third antecedent identified through the systematic review was extrinsic factors comprising variables such as country of origin, price, labeling, brand, vintage year, certification, food pairing, bottle design, wine types, medal won, advertising, purchasing channels, and packaging. Price is the most studied extrinsic variable by researchers ( Agnoli et al. , 2011 ; Atkin and Sutanonpaiboon, 2007 ; Balestrini and Gamble, 2006 ; Bonn et al. , 2016 ; Bruwer and Buller, 2012 ; Forbes et al. , 2009 ; Galati et al. , 2019 ; Gil and Sánchez, 1997 ; Johnson and Bruwer, 2007 ; Liu and Murphy, 2007 ; McCutcheon et al. , 2009 ; Orth et al. , 2005 ; Somogyi et al. , 2011 ; Tait et al. , 2019 ), followed by labeling ( Barber et al ., 2007 ; Bruwer et al ., 2011 ; Bruwer & Buller, 2012 ; Casini et al ., 2009 ; D’Amico et al ., 2016 ; Forbes et al ., 2009 , p. 200; McCutcheon et al ., 2009 ; Sogari et al ., 2015 ; Somogyi et al ., 2011 ; Yu et al ., 2009 ) and country of origin ( Atkin and Sutanonpaiboon, 2007 ; Bruwer and Buller, 2012 ; Gil and Sánchez, 1997 ; Johnson and Bruwer, 2007 ; Liu and Murphy, 2007 ; McCutcheon et al. , 2009 , 2009). The other popular extrinsic variables studied were wine brands ( Casini et al. , 2009 ; D’Amico et al. , 2016 ; Johnson and Bruwer, 2007 ; Liu and Murphy, 2007 ; McCutcheon et al. , 2009 ; Yu et al. , 2009 ), bottle design, including packaging and wine stopper design ( Atkin and Sutanonpaiboon, 2007 ; Barber et al. , 2007 ; Bruwer and Buller, 2012 ; D’Amico et al. , 2016 ), wine types ( Atkin and Sutanonpaiboon, 2007 ; Bruwer and Li, 2007 ; Johnson and Bruwer, 2007 ; Somogyi et al. , 2011 ), and recommendation by peers and sales assistance ( Bruwer et al. , 2011 ; Bruwer and Buller, 2012 ; Casini et al. , 2009 ; McCutcheon et al. , 2009 ; Somogyi et al. , 2011 ; Yu et al. , 2009 ). Researchers have also explored the role of food pairing ( Casini et al. , 2009 ; Somogyi et al. , 2011 ; Yu et al. , 2009 ) and wine consumption in a few instances. The impact of medals won ( Casini et al. , 2009 ; Yu et al. , 2009 ), certification ( Sogari et al. , 2015 ), aesthetics ( Charters and Pettigrew, 2008 ), and purchasing channels ( Johnson and Bruwer, 2007 ) were also studied by researchers. The fourth antecedent is identified as an intrinsic factor. It included characteristics that are inherent to the wine itself. Examples include quality ( McCutcheon et al. , 2009 ; Sogari et al. , 2015 , p. 201; Tait et al. , 2019 ), taste ( Bruwer and Buller, 2012 ; D’Amico et al. , 2016 ), naturalness ( D’Amico et al. , 2016 ; Galati et al. , 2019 ), sensory attributes ( Bonn et al. , 2016 ; Galati et al. , 2019 ), color ( Bruwer and Buller, 2012 ; Mann et al. , 2012 ), vintage year ( Bruwer and Buller, 2012 ; Gil and Sánchez, 1997 ; McCutcheon et al. , 2009 ), alcohol level ( McCutcheon et al. , 2009 ; yu et al. , 2009 ), and grape variety ( Casini et al. , 2009 ; Goodman, 2009 ; McCutcheon et al. , 2009 ; yu et al. , 2009 ). Additionally, studies have also investigated the impact of environmental factors as the fifth antecedent comprising sustainability ( Tait et al. , 2019 ), organic supply ( Bonn et al. , 2016 ; D’Amico et al. , 2016 ; Galati et al. , 2019 ; Mann et al. , 2012 ; Wiedmann et al. , 2014 ), environmental protection, benefits, and values. 3.4.2 Mediators The systematic review suggests that wine consumer researchers have rarely used any mediators. For example, the only study that used an exploratory approach to investigate wine consumers’ attitudes toward sustainable-labeled wine adopts an attitude that mediates the relationship between consumers’ beliefs about the wine and their wine consumption ( Sogari et al. , 2015 ). Furthermore, the findings of this study revealed that attitude toward sustainable-labeled wine is shaped by both environmental and quality beliefs about sustainable wine. 3.4.3 Moderators Similar to mediators, wine consumer research studies have rarely adopted any moderators. Trust was the only moderator used in the study ( Bonn et al. , 2016 ). It is suggested that consumer perceptions of suppliers are the basis for deciding whether to believe a winemaker’s claim that their products and operations are sustainable ( Bonn et al. , 2016 ). 3.4.4.Demographic moderating variables In addition to the moderating variable mentioned above, studies have examined the moderating role of demographic variables, such as age ( Sogari et al. , 2015 ), income, education ( Barber, 2010 ), and gender ( Atkin and Sutanonpaiboon, 2007 ; Barber, 2010 ). 3.4.5 Outcomes The systematic review identifies several outcome variables discussed in the extant literature, namely, willingness to pay ( Barber, 2010 ; D’Amico et al. , 2016 ; Forbes et al. , 2009 ; Galati et al. , 2019 ; Pomarici and Vecchio, 2014 ; Skuras and Vakrou, 2002 ; Tait et al. , 2019 ), purchase intention, behavioral intention, wine selection ( Agnoli et al. , 2011 ; Bonn et al. , 2016 ; Bruwer et al. , 2011 ; Bruwer and Buller, 2012 ; Camillo, 2012 ; Casini et al. , 2009 ; Gil and Sánchez, 1997 ; Goodman, 2009 ; Liu et al. , 2017 ; McCutcheon et al. , 2009 ; Ritchie, 2007 ; Sogari et al. , 2015 ), wine consumption ( Balestrini and Gamble, 2006 ; Bruwer et al. , 2012 ; Charters and Pettigrew, 2008 ; Hussain et al. , 2007 ; Mann et al. , 2012 ; Mueller et al. , 2011 ; Somogyi et al. , 2011 ; Yu et al. , 2009 ), consumer wine quality perception ( Johnson and Bruwer, 2007 ), tasting experience ( Bruwer et al. , 2013 ), and wine tourists’ motivation ( Bruwer and Alant, 2009a ). 3.4.6 Theoretical and methodological advancement The fifth objective of the study was to explore the theoretical and methodological advancement in a wine consumer study. All 39 articles were subjected to systematic review, and the findings are discussed in the following section. Wine consumer scholars have used many theories, such as McFaden’s random utility theory ( Tait et al. , 2019 ), Lancasters’ characteristics theory ( Mann et al. , 2012 ; Tait et al. , 2019 ), and the theory of consumer behavior ( Camillo, 2012 ). Ego-involvement and Persuasion theory ( Bruwer and Huang, 2012 ), Age-Generational Cohort theory ( Bruwer et al. , 2011 ; Bruwer and Alant, 2009 ), VBA theory ( Sogari et al. , 2015 ), Brand loyalty ( Bruwer et al. , 2013 ), and Reputation model ( Landon and Smith, 1997 ). However, a majority of studies remain atheoretical. The systematic review suggests that the majority of the researchers contributed to the wine consumer literature through quantitative studies (N=30), followed by mixed methods (N=5) and qualitative methods (N=4). Only one case study was found. 3.5 Future research directions This study’s sixth and final objective is to recommend future research directions in wine consumer research. Although the previous wine literature sheds light on some of the critical areas related to consumers, it is found that there is a scope for future research related to environmental, economic, and sociocultural issues. Some crucial areas within these issues are identified ( Figure 6 ), and future directions are discussed in the following section. Figure 6. Proposed theoretical framework. Source: Author’s own. 3.5.1 Antecedents Environmental aspects By addressing environmental issues related to wine consumption, producers can contribute to the industry’s overall sustainability, minimize ecological impacts, and meet the growing demand for environmentally friendly products. Additionally, taking proactive measures to address these issues helps ensure wine-producing regions’ long-term viability and resilience in the face of climate change and environmental challenges. Therefore, future studies should focus on some environmental aspects, such as wine consumers’ environmental knowledge, education, consciousness, and impact on their purchase intention, preference, and willingness to pay for sustainable wine. Researchers can also focus on the role of sustainability attributes on wine consumption preferences, choices, and consumption. Another potential area of research is the role of certification and its impact on wine-purchasing behavior. Future studies can also measure the role of environmental attributes on actual wine consumption. Economic aspects The economic attributes of wine consumer behavior refer to the factors and considerations influencing consumers’ choices and behaviors about purchasing and consuming wine. Future researchers can consider key economic attributes: price, brand image, brand communication, advertising, brand promotion, and sales channels. For example, a recent study conducted to understand the impact of brand communication and brand image on brand preference revealed that both variables positively affected brand preferences ( Gómez-Rico et al. , 2023 ). Wine sales channels are another critical variable to consider in future studies. There is a correlation between the usage of sales channels and per capita consumption and wine preferences ( Szolnoki and Hoffmann, 2014 ). Sociocultural aspects Sociocultural aspects play a significant role in wine consumption. For example, wine is often deeply rooted in cultural traditions and heritage ( Black and Ulin, 2013 ). It is associated with specific regions, countries, and communities, reflecting their history, customs, and social identity ( Trivellato et al. , 2014 ). Wine consumption is also linked to social and emotional well-being ( Bauer and Mills, 2021 ). It is also associated with special occasions, rituals, and ceremonies, adding to its sociocultural significance. Therefore, future research can focus on the sociocultural aspects of wine, such as cultural diversity, rituals, consumption practice, cultural value, consumption traditions, social norms, social gathering, celebrations, status, lifestyle choices, ceremonial practice and cultural symbolism, and its impact on consumer preference and choices. Future research can also focus on the impact of sociocultural aspects on the emotional and social well-being of wine consumers. 3.5.2 Mediators Future studies can also focus on mediating variables such as attitude, motivation, trust, and satisfaction. For example, attitudes can mediate the relationship between wine-related stimuli (e.g., marketing messages, product attributes) and consumer behavior (e.g., purchase intentions, consumption, willingness to pay, wine preferences, and brand loyalty). Similarly, wine consumers’ motivation can also be important in determining wine consumption behavior. It can influence wine consumption occasions, preferences for certain types of lifestyles, and engagement in wine activities, such as wine tourism. Trust is another important factor in consumer behavior. behavior Trust in wine brands, producers, or retailers can mediate the relationship between wine-related stimuli and consumers. Trustworthy wine-related information and certifications can enhance purchase intentions. Future studies can also examine the mediating role of consumer satisfaction. Consumer satisfaction can mediate the relationship between brand image and brand loyalty. Satisfied consumers are likelier to exhibit repeat purchases, positive word-of-mouth, and brand loyalty. 3.5.3 Moderators Moderator variables play a crucial role in understanding the nuances of wine consumption and how it varies across different individuals and contexts. Some moderators that can be considered in future studies are age, income, gender, generation, culture, personality traits, and country. Age can moderate wine consumption patterns, preferences, and behaviors. For example, younger consumers may be more experimental and open to trying different wine styles, while older consumers might have more established choices and seek specific wine characteristics. Furthermore, age can also influence the context in which wine is consumed, such as social occasions or personal relaxation. Another significant moderator is income. Higher-income individuals may be more likely to purchase premium/luxury/sustainable wines. Income can also impact the frequency and occasions of wine consumption. Gender is another critical moderator that can be considered in future studies. Research suggests that gender differences exist in wine choice, with variations in the preference for specific wine styles, labeling aesthetics, or marketing messages ( Alpeza et al. , 2023 ). Additionally, gender can influence the social context of wine consumption and the roles individuals play in wine-related activities. Future research can also focus on the generational differences in values, wine knowledge, consumption preferences, habits, and frequency by their respective social and historical contexts. The moderating role of personality traits can also be investigated in future studies. For example, individuals with higher innovativeness may be more inclined to try different wine varieties. The cultural context of the country can moderate wine consumption practices. For example, a comparative study between new and old wine countries can be considered. Each country has its unique wine culture and consumption norms. Factors such as wine availability, legal regulations, and historical wine traditions can shape consumer behavior within a country. 3.5.4 Outcomes Despite the extensive focus of researchers on various outcomes, including willingness to pay, behavioral intention, wine consumption, quality perception, and tourists’ experience, this research suggests that there remains ample opportunity for further investigation. Examples include wine choice, preferences, sustainable wine consumption, brand loyalty, and emotional/social well-being. Furthermore, future studies can also focus on actual wine consumption. For example, research on well-being can include the role of wine consumption across different social occasions/gatherings. Understanding wine consumption’s emotional and social dimensions can provide insights into its broader impact on individuals’ well-being. 3.5.5 Theoretical directions It is recommended that future studies use the consumer decision-making process (CDMP) model, which provides an understanding of wine consumers’ various decision-making stages, such as problem recognition, information search, evaluation of alternatives, purchase, and postpurchase evaluation. These models can also be applied to investigate consumers’ choice of wine products, considering price, brand, taste, labeling, and recommendations. In addition, this research explores several theories that can be adopted in the future and are discussed below. Experiential consumption theory ( Holbrook and Hirschman, 1982 ) emphasizes the significance of experiential aspects, such as sensory pleasure, emotions, and fantasies, in consumer behavior and can also be considered by wine consumer scholars. This theory argues that experiential or hedonic dimensions shape consumer preferences and satisfaction. Since its inception, experiential consumption theory has been widely adopted and expanded upon by scholars in consumer behavior. However, this theory is sparingly adopted in wine consumer studies ( Bruwer and Alant, 2009 ). Another theory that can be considered in wine consumer studies is the diffusion of innovation theory ( Rogers, 2010 ). This theory describes how new products, ideas, and behaviors gradually spread among the population. It contends that adoption starts with innovators and early adopters and then spreads through the people to the early and late majority. In wine consumer studies, this theory can be adopted to examine the adoption of new wine products, profiling wine consumers based on the adoption of new wine products and the acceptance of new wine products, practices, or technologies among consumers. This theory can also be adopted to investigate the role of opinion leaders in adopting new wine products. This review identifies the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as a valuable framework for assessing the behavioral antecedents of wine consumption. It is found that TPB better predicts wine consumption in restaurants than Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) ( Agnoli et al. , 2016 ; Agnoli and Outreville, 2023 ). The TPB ( Ajzen, 1987 ) is a psychological theory that explains and predicts human behavior in various social contexts. This theory suggests that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence people’s actions. Cognitive dissonance theory ( Festinger, 1957 ) is a social psychology theory that seeks to explain the psychological discomfort (cognitive dissonance) that arises when individuals hold conflicting beliefs, attitudes, or values. This theory has been used in the consumer behavior literature to measure the cognitive dissonance of medical tourists ( Majeed et al. , 2022 ) and travel behavior ( Kah and Lee, 2016 ). In a wine consumer study, this theory is used to understand how tensions may arise for individuals approaching each experience and where to avert perceived risks ( d’Ament et al. , 2022 ). However, this theory can be used in other areas of wine consumption, such as dissonance between price and quality, brand loyalty and consumer preference, wine recommendations and consumption experience. According to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs ( Maslow, 1943 ), individuals are motivated to fulfill their needs sequentially, from the most basic to higher-order psychological needs. This theory was used to segment wine consumers ( Divine and Lepisto, 2005 ) and understand wine tourists’ motivation ( Park et al. , 2008 ). Future studies can use this theory to understand the relationship between psychological needs, safety, emotional experience, social status, and wine consumption behavior. Self-determination theory (SDT) ( Deci and Ryan, 1985 ) is one of the psychological theories of motivation that can be considered in future wine consumption studies. The theory focuses on the innate psychological needs that drive human behavior and the conditions that foster personal growth and well-being. This theory is used to understand the relationship between motivation and wine club attributes ( White and Thompson, 2009 ) and attitude toward domestic wine ( Ye et al. , 2017 ). However, future wine consumer studies can further explore this theory to understand the role of intrinsic/extrinsic factors on consumer behavior. For example, how can social interactions, such as wine festivals or wine-tasting events, enhance wine consumers’ experience? How can wine education contribute to wine consumers’ competence and overall experience? Expectancy-value theory (EVT) ( Atkinson, 1957 ) is another motivational theory that wine researchers can use to understand how expectancies and values about different antecedents, such as environmental, economic, and sociocultural attributes. For example, how consumers’ expectations and values regarding the health benefits of wine shape their purchase and consumption frequency. Wine consumer scholars have adopted this theory to explore the relationship between experience and current consumption behavior ( Melo et al. , 2010 , p. 202) and to predict wine consumption ( Cox, 2009 ). 3.5.6 Methodological directions Longitudinal studies play a crucial role in enhancing the wine consumer literature by providing valuable insights into consumer behavior and its evolution. It helps in pursuing consumers’ preferences and consumption trends and changes in the decision-making process. Therefore, future studies can adopt a longitudinal study approach to investigate how consumers’ preferences for different types of wines evolve. Studies can also explore the long-term impact of wine education on consumers’ knowledge and competence in wine selection. Other research approaches recommended are experimental (for example, wine label information and purchase intention), cross-cultural (between new world wine and old wine countries), mixed method, case studies, such as the impact of wine tourism on local wineries’ business, and ethnographical studies. 4. Implications This integrative review yields several noteworthy implications for future research and practical applications. First, the publication trends reveal the growth trajectory of wine consumer literature from 1985 to 2023. Second, the performance analyses reveal the most influential authors regarding the number of publications, citations, active years, and H-index. Third, this study also identifies the most influential works in the wine consumer literature. This finding serves as a reading list for future researchers to understand the studies’ theories, methods, research context, findings, and implications. Fourth, this study contributes to the literature by identifying the most influential journals and productive countries. Fifth, the science mapping techniques (keyword co-occurrence and bibliographic coupling analysis) used in this study provide a holistic knowledge map of wine consumer literature. This visualization helps future researchers identify the topics and areas of wine consumer literature that have already received much attention. Similarly, the systematic review also has several implications. First, it summarizes the literature on wine consumers regarding antecedents, mediators, moderators, and outcomes integrated in the extant literature. Based on the systematic review, this study classifies antecedents of previous studies into five subcategories and provides an integrative framework. Second, it also summarizes the extant literature in terms of theoretical and methodological advancement. Second, this study also highlights the theoretical and methodological advancements in the wine consumer literature. This helps future researchers identify the knowledge gaps in terms of theory and research methods adopted by wine consumer scholars. Third, based on the identification of antecedents, mediators, moderators, and outcomes, this study proposes a framework for future directions. The framework also provides theoretical and methodological recommendations for future study. 5. Conclusions and limitations Integrating bibliometric analysis and systematic review in the wine consumer literature has provided insights into the present state of research and highlighted critical trends, knowledge gaps, and significant clusters. The bibliometric analysis demonstrated the expansion of research on wine consumer behavior, demonstrating a growing scholarly interest in the preferences, behavioral intention, willingness to pay, wine quality perception, and decision-making processes of wine consumers. It highlighted the areas of emphasis and the intellectual network within the subject by identifying important authors, influential publications, the most contributing countries, and the most impactful journals. It also identifies critical areas of wine consumer research. Thus, these analyses not only give a picture of the current state of the literature but also lay the groundwork for future research endeavors. In contrast, the systematic review provided a comprehensive analysis of the content and findings of the selected papers. It identified the antecedents, mediators, moderators, and outcomes of the wine consumer literature by synthesizing current research. In addition, the article discusses the methodology and theoretical frameworks utilized in the wine consumer literature. This combination helped to uncover knowledge gaps and inconsistencies, paving the way for future research endeavors. Furthermore, it provided insights into the personal, social, extrinsic, intrinsic, and environmental factors that influence wine consumption behavior. Combining quantitative analysis of publication trends and citation metrics with qualitative synthesis of study findings, this multidisciplinary strategy has comprehensively examined the current literature. By expanding upon the results of this study, researchers can continue to contribute to the growth of wine consumer behavior knowledge, which will ultimately help the wine business and wine consumers. This study is based on referred English articles from the Scopus data collection. Therefore, the findings may not reflect papers in other databases, such as the Web of Science of Google Scholars. Thus, future research may consider data from multiple sources to provide comprehensive insight into the wine consumer literature. Since the inclusion of articles in the systematic review is based on the bibliographic coupling analysis, it is challenging to claim absolute inclusion of all articles related to wine consumption. Data availability Underlying data Figshare: Wine consumer behavior New, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25157096.v3 ( Mallya et al ., 2024a ). This project contains the following underlying data: • scopus (3).csv Reporting guidelines Figshare: PRISMA checklist and flowchart for: ‘Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas’. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25200755.v1 ( Mallya et al ., 2024b ) Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication). Software availability The VOSviewer software is available freely. References Agnoli L, Begalli D, Capitello R: Generation Y’s perception of wine and consumption situations in a traditional wine-producing region. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2011; 23 (2): 176–192. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. Publisher Full Text Agnoli L, Capitello R, Begalli D: Behind intention and behaviour: factors influencing wine consumption in a novice market. Br. Food J. 2016; 118 (3): 660–678. Publisher Full Text Agnoli L, Outreville JF: The role of behavioural antecedents in driving wine consumption in Taiwan restaurants. Appl. Econ. 2023; 1–14. Taylor & Francis. Publisher Full Text Ajzen I: Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1987; 20 : 1–63. Academic Press. Publisher Full Text Ali F, Kumar S, Sureka R, et al. : Editorial: The Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology (JHTT): a retrospective review using bibliometric analysis. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2022; 13 (5): 781–800. Emerald Publishing. Publisher Full Text Alpeza I, Nižić I, Lukač Z: What Influences Croatian Consumers’ Wine Choice? Market-Tržište. 2023; 35 (1): 41–56. Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Ekonomski fakultet Zagreb. Publisher Full Text d’Ament G, Nayeem T, Saliba AJ: Convivial Connection between Staff and Customer Is Key to Maximising Profitable Experiences: An Australian Cellar Door Perspective. Foods. 2022; 11 (19): 3112. MDPI. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Amienyo D, Camilleri C, Azapagi A: Environmental Impacts of Consumption of Australian Red Wine in The Uk. Toward a Sustainable Wine Industry: Green Enology Research. 2015; 25–51. Publisher Full Text Aqueveque C: Consumers’ preferences for low-priced wines’ packaging alternatives: the influence of consumption occasion, gender, and age. Br. Food J. 2023; 125 (3): 781–793. Publisher Full Text Ariely D, Levav J: Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. J. Consum. Res. 2000; 27 (3):279–290. Publisher Full Text Atkin T, Sutanonpaiboon J: A Multinational Study of Gender Wine Preferences. Proceedings of the International DSI/Asia and Pacific DSI. 2007; August 2007. Atkin T, Nowak L, Garcia R: Women wine consumers: information search and retailing implications. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2007; 19 (4):327–339. Publisher Full Text Atkinson JW: Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychol. Rev. 1957; 64 (6p1): 359–372. American Psychological Association. Publisher Full Text Balestrini P, Gamble P: Country-of-origin effects on Chinese wine consumers. Br. Food J. 2006; 108 (5): 396–412. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Publisher Full Text Barber N: ‘Green’ wine packaging: targeting environmental consumers. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2010; 22 (4): 423–444. Publisher Full Text Baber R, Baber P: Influence of social media marketing efforts, e-reputation and destination image on intention to visit among tourists: application of SOR model. J. Hospitality Tour. Insights. 2023; 6 (5):2298–2316. Publisher Full Text Barber N, Ismail J, Dodd T: Purchase attributes of wine consumers with low involvement. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2007; 14 (1): 69–86. Taylor & Francis Group. Publisher Full Text Bauer BC, Mills AJ: The communal consumption experience: sharing, rituals, & socialization. J. Wine Res. 2021; 32 : 135–137. Taylor & Francis. Publisher Full Text Beverland M: The ‘real thing’: Branding authenticity in the luxury wine trade. J. Bus. Res. 2006; 59 (2):251–258. Publisher Full Text Black RE, Ulin RC: Wine and Culture: Vineyard to Glass. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2013. Publisher Full Text Bonn MA, Cho M, Um H: The evolution of wine research: A 26 year historical examination of topics, trends and future direction. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018; 30 (1): 286–312. Publisher Full Text Bonn MA, Cronin JJ, Cho M: Do Environmental Sustainable Practices of Organic Wine Suppliers Affect Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions? The Moderating Role of Trust. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2016; 57 (1): 21–37. SAGE Publications Inc. Publisher Full Text Bruwer J, Alant K: The hedonic nature of wine tourism consumption: An experiential view. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2009; 21 (3): 235–257. Publisher Full Text Bruwer J, Buller C: Country-of-origin (COO) brand preferences and associated knowledge levels of Japanese wine consumers. J. Prod. Brand. Manag. 2012; 21 (5): 307–316. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Publisher Full Text Bruwer J, Coode M, Saliba A, et al. : Wine tourism experience effects of the tasting room on consumer brand loyalty. Tour. Anal. 2013; 18 (4): 399–414. Publisher Full Text Bruwer J, Huang J: Wine product involvement and consumers’ BYOB behaviour in the South Australian on premise market. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2012; 24 (3): 461–481. Publisher Full Text Bruwer J, Lesschaeve I; Consumer, B.C.-J. of R et al. : Consumption dynamics and demographics of Canadian wine consumers: Retailing insights from the tasting room channel. Elsevier; 2012; Vol. 19 (1): pp. 45–58. Publisher Full Text Bruwer J, Li E: Wine-related lifestyle (WRL) Market segmentation: Demographic and behavioural factors. J. Wine Res. 2007; 18 (1): 19–34. Publisher Full Text Bruwer J, Saliba A, Miller B: Consumer behaviour and sensory preference differences: implications for wine product marketing. J. Consum. Mark. 2011; 28 (1): 5–18. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Publisher Full Text Camillo AA: A strategic investigation of the determinants of wine consumption in China. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2012; 24 (1): 68–92. Publisher Full Text Campo R, Rosato P, Battisti E: Multisensory analysis and wine marketing: systematic review and perspectives. Br. Food J. 2022; 124 (10): 3274–3292. Publisher Full Text Carlsen J, Boksberger P: Enhancing consumer value in wine tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2015; 39 (1):132–144. Publisher Full Text Carollo A, Fong S, Gabrieli G, et al. : To wine or not to wine? A scientometric approach to 65+ years of wine preference and selection studies. Br. Food J. 2022; 124 : 409–431. Publisher Full Text Casini L, Corsi AM, Goodman S: Consumer preferences of wine in Italy applying best-worst scaling. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2009; 21 (1): 64–78. Publisher Full Text Charters S, Ali-Knight J: Who is the wine tourist? Tour. Manag. 2002; 23 (3):311–319. Publisher Full Text Charters S, Pettigrew S: Why do people drink wine? A consumer-Focused exploration. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2008; 14 (3): 13–32. Publisher Full Text Cholette S, Venkat K: The energy and carbon intensity of wine distribution: A study of logistical options for delivering wine to consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 2009; 17 (16): 1401–1413. Publisher Full Text Cortez P, Cerdeira A, Almeida F, et al. : Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties. Decis. Support Syst. 2009; 47 (4):547–553. Publisher Full Text Cox D: Predicting Consumption, Wine Involvement and Perceived Quality of Australian Red Wine. J. Wine Res. 2009; 20 (3): 209–229. Routledge. Publisher Full Text D’Amico M, Di Vita G, Monaco L: Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites. J. Clean. Prod. 2016; 120 : 64–71. Publisher Full Text Deci E, Ryan R: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer US; 1985. Publisher Full Text Dimara E, Skuras D: Consumer demand for informative labeling of quality food and drink products: a European Union case study. J. Consum. Mark. 2005; 22 (2):90–100. Publisher Full Text Divine RL, Lepisto L: Analysis of the healthy lifestyle consumer. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2005; 22 (5):275–283. Publisher Full Text Dodd TH, Laverie DA, Wilcox JF, Duhan DF: Differential effects of experience, subjective knowledge, and objective knowledge on sources of information used in consumer wine purchasing. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2005; 29 (1): 3–19. Sage Publications Sage CA. Thousand Oaks, CA. Publisher Full Text Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, et al. : How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021; 133 : 285–296. Elsevier. Publisher Full Text van Eck NJ , Waltman L: Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010; 84 (2): 523–538. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Fan D, Breslin D, Callahan JL, et al. : Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2022; 24 (2): 171–180. John Wiley and Sons Inc. Publisher Full Text Festinger L: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson; 1957. Publisher Full Text Forbes SL, Cohen DA, Cullen R, et al. : Consumer attitudes regarding environmentally sustainable wine: an exploratory study of the New Zealand marketplace. J. Clean. Prod. 2009; 17 (13): 1195–1199. Publisher Full Text Galati A, Schifani G, Crescimanno M, et al. : ‘Natural wine’ consumers and interest in label information: An analysis of willingness to pay in a new Italian wine market segment. J. Clean. Prod. 2019; 227 : 405–413. Publisher Full Text Getz D, Brown G: Critical success factors for wine tourism regions: a demand analysis. Tourism management. 2006; 27 (1):146–158. Publisher Full Text Gil JM, Sánchez M: Consumer preferences for wine attributes: A conjoint approach. Br. Food J. 1997; 99 (1): 3–11. Publisher Full Text Gómez M, Pratt MA, Molina A: Wine tourism research: a systematic review of 20 vintages from 1995 to 2014. Curr. Issue Tour. 2019; 22 (18): 2211–2249. Publisher Full Text Gómez-Rico M, Molina-Collado A, Santos-Vijande ML, et al. : The role of novel instruments of brand communication and brand image in building consumers’ brand preference and intention to visit wineries. Curr. Psychol. 2023; 42 (15): 12711–12727. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Goodman S: An international comparison of retail consumer wine choice. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2009; 21 (1): 41–49. Publisher Full Text Gupta A, Su BC, Walter Z: An empirical study of consumer switching from traditional to electronic channels: A purchase-decision process perspective. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2004; 8 (3):131–161. Publisher Full Text Haba HF, Bredillet C, Dastane O: Green consumer research: Trends and way forward based on bibliometric analysis. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption. 2023; 8 : 100089. Publisher Full Text Holbrook MB, Hirschman EC: The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun. J. Consum. Res. 1982; 9 (2): 132. Publisher Full Text Hussain M, Cholette S, Castaldi R: Determinants of wine consumption of US consumers: An econometric analysis. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2007; 19 (1): 49–62. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. Publisher Full Text Iazzi A, Scorrano P, Rosato P, et al. : Millennial generation preferences for rosé wine: An exploratory study of the Italian and French markets. Br. Food J. 2019; 122 (8): 2443–2461. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. Publisher Full Text Johnson R, Bruwer J: Regional brand image and perceived wine quality: The consumer perspective. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2007; 19 (4): 276–297. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. Publisher Full Text Kah JA, Lee S-H: A new approach to travel information sources and travel behaviour based on cognitive dissonance theory. Curr. Issue Tour. 2016; 19 (4): 373–393. Taylor & Francis. Publisher Full Text Kotur AS: A bibliometric review of research in wine tourism experiences: insights and future research directions. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2023; 35 (2): 278–297. Publisher Full Text Labroo AA, Dhar R, Schwarz N: Of frog wines and frowning watches: Semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. J. Consum. Res. 2008; 34 (6):819–831. Publisher Full Text Landon S, Smith CE: The use of quality and reputation indicators by consumers: The case of Bordeaux wine. J. Consum. Policy. 1997; 20 (3): 289–323. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Publisher Full Text Liu CH, Horng JS, Chou SF, et al. : Analysis of tourism and hospitality sustainability education with co-competition creativity course planning. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 2017; 21 : 88–100. Publisher Full Text Liu F, Murphy J: A qualitative study of Chinese wine consumption and purchasing: Implications for Australian wines. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2007; 19 (2): 98–113. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. Publisher Full Text Lynch JG Jr, Ariely D: Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality, and distribution. Mark. Sci. 2000; 19 (1):83–103. Publisher Full Text Maesano G, Carra G, Peri I: How do consumers perceive sustainable wine? A review. Quality - Access to Success. 2019; 20 (S2): 351–357. Majeed S, Kim WG, Ryu K: Medical tourism and cognitive dissonance: exploring tourist choice behavior, post-choice pre-outcome regret, and visit intention. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2022; 1–31. Taylor & Francis. Publisher Full Text Mallya J, Neelavar Kelkar V, Payini V, et al. : Wine consumer behavior New. Dataset. figshare. 2024a. Publisher Full Text Mallya J, Neelavar Kelkar V, Payini V, et al. : PRISMA checklist for Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas. figshare. 2024b. Publisher Full Text Mann S, Ferjani A, Reissig L: What matters to consumers of organic wine? Br. Food J. 2012; 114 (2): 272–284. Publisher Full Text Martinho VJPD: Contributions from literature for understanding wine marketing. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021; 13 (13). Publisher Full Text Maslow AH: Theory of Motivation. Psychol. Rev. 1943; 50 (4): 370–396. Publisher Full Text Mason MC, Paggiaro A: Investigating the role of festivalscape in culinary tourism: The case of food and wine events. Tour. Manag. 2012; 33 (6):1329–1336. Publisher Full Text McCutcheon E, Bruwer J, Li E: Region of origin and its importance among choice factors in the wine-buying decision making of consumers. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2009; 21 (3): 212–234. Publisher Full Text Melo L, Delahunty C, Forde C, et al. : Development and validation of a tool to recall alcoholic beverage and wine consumption over consumers’ lifetimes. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010; 21 (7): 697–704. Publisher Full Text Meyer M, Waldkirch RW, Duscher I, et al. : Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in ‘top’ accounting journals. Crit. Perspect. Account. 2018; 51 : 24–46. Publisher Full Text Mitchell R, Hall CM, McIntosh A: Wine tourism and consumer behaviour. Wine Tourism around the World. Routledge; 2009; pp. 115–135. Publisher Full Text Moed HF, Glänzel W, Schmoch U: Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The Use of Publications and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 2004. Publisher Full Text Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. : Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). J. Chin. Integr. Med. 2009; 7 (9): 889–896. Science Press (China). Publisher Full Text Moscovici D, Gow J, Alonso Ugaglia A, et al. : Consumer preferences for organic wine - Global analysis of people and place. J. Clean. Prod. 2022; 368 : 133215. Publisher Full Text Mouret M, Monaco GL, Urdapilleta I, et al. : Social representations of wine and culture: A comparison between France and New Zealand. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013; 30 (2): 102–107. Elsevier. Publisher Full Text Mueller S, Fountain J, Lamb C: Generation Y as young wine consumers in New Zealand: How do they differ from Generation X? Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2011; 23 (2): 107–124. Publisher Full Text Mukherjee D, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, et al. : Mapping five decades of international business and management research on India: A bibliometric analysis and future directions. J. Bus. Res. 2022a; 145 : 864–891. Elsevier. Publisher Full Text Mukherjee D, Lim WM, Kumar S, et al. : Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. J. Bus. Res. 2022b; 148 : 101–115. Publisher Full Text Mulrow CD: Systematic reviews: rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994; 309 (6954): 597–599. British Medical Journal Publishing Group. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Nave A, do Paço A , Duarte P: A systematic literature review on sustainability in the wine tourism industry: insights and perspectives. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2021; 33 (4): 457–480. Publisher Full Text Orth UR, Malkewitz K: Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. J. Mark. 2008; 72 (3):64–81. Publisher Full Text Orth UR, Wolf MMG, Dodd TH: Dimensions of wine region equity and their impact on consumer preferences. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2005; 14 (2): 88–97. Publisher Full Text Park KS, Reisinger Y, Kang HJ: Visitors’ motivation for attending the South Beach Wine and Food Festival, Miami beach, Florida. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2008; 25 (2): 161–181. The Haworth Press. All rights reserved. Publisher Full Text Payini V: Modeling hedonic motive – based segments of wine festival visitors using decision tree approach visitors.2021. Publisher Full Text Payini V, Mallya J, Piramanayagam S: Indian women consumers’ wine choice: A study based on conjoint analysis. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2022; 34 (4): 469–494. Emerald Publishing Limited. Publisher Full Text Point E, Tyedmers P, Naugler C: Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada. J. Clean. Prod. 2012; 27 : 11–20. Publisher Full Text Pomarici E, Vecchio R: Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: An exploratory study on Italian consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 2014; 66 : 537–545. Publisher Full Text Quester PG, Smart J: The influence of consumption situation and product involvement over consumers’ use of product attribute. J. Consum. Mark. 1998; 15 (3):220–238. Publisher Full Text Ritchie C: Beyond drinking: The role of wine in the life of the UK consumer. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2007; 31 (5): 534–540. Publisher Full Text Rogers EM: Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed.Simon and Schuster; 2010. Schäufele I, Hamm U: Consumers’ perceptions, preferences and willingness-to-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2017; 147 : 379–394. Elsevier Ltd. Publisher Full Text Skuras D, Vakrou A: Consumers’ willingness to pay for origin labelled wine: A Greek case study. Br. Food J. 2002; 104 (11): 898–912. Publisher Full Text Sogari G, Corbo C, Macconi M, et al. : Consumer attitude towards sustainable-labelled wine: an exploratory approach. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2015; 27 (4): 312–328. Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. Publisher Full Text Somogyi S, Li E, Johnson T, et al. : The underlying motivations of Chinese wine consumer behaviour. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2011; 23 (4): 473–485. Publisher Full Text Szolnoki G, Hoffmann D: Consumer segmentation based on usage of sales channels in the German wine market. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2014; 26 (1): 27–44. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. Publisher Full Text Tait P, Saunders C, Dalziel P, et al. : Estimating wine consumer preferences for sustainability attributes: A discrete choice experiment of Californian Sauvignon blanc purchasers. J. Clean. Prod. 2019; 233 : 412–420. Elsevier Ltd. Publisher Full Text Trivellato F, Halevi L, Antunes C: Religion and Trade: Cross-Cultural Exchanges in World History, 1000-1900. Oxford University Press; 2014. Publisher Full Text Vecchio R, Toccaceli D, Pacciani A, et al. : Shrinking the market space: consumer (overlapping) preferences for organic wines and three alternative competitors. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2023; 35 (3): 467–486. Publisher Full Text Vrontis D, Thrassou A, Czinkota MR: Wine marketing: A framework for consumer-centred planning. J. Brand Manag. 2011; 18 (4–5): 245–263. Publisher Full Text Wallin JA: Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005; 97 (5):261–275. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Weatherbee TG, Sears D, MacNeil R: Mapping wine business research in the International Journal of Wine Business Research: 2007-2017. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2019; 31 (4): 591–601. Publisher Full Text Weinberg BH: Bibliographic coupling: A review. Information Storage and Retrieva. 1974; 10 : 189–196. Publisher Full Text White CJ, Thompson M: SELF DETERMINATION THEORY AND THE WINE CLUB ATTRIBUTE FORMATION PROCESS. Ann. Tour. Res. 2009; 36 (4): 561–586. Publisher Full Text Wiedmann KP, Hennigs N, Behrens SH, et al. : Tasting green: An experimental design for investigating consumer perception of organic wine. Br. Food J. 2014; 116 (2): 197–211. Publisher Full Text Wright DK, Yoon H, Morrison AM, et al. : Drinking in style? Literature review of luxury wine consumption. Br. Food J. 2023; 125 (2): 679–695. Emerald Publishing Limited. Publisher Full Text Youtie J, Kay L, Melkers J: Bibliographic coupling and network analysis to assess knowledge coalescence in a research center environment. Res. Eval. 2013; 22 (3):145–156. Publisher Full Text Yuan J, Jang S: The effects of quality and satisfaction on awareness and behavioral intentions: Exploring the role of a wine festival. J. Travel Res. 2008; 46 (3):279–288. Publisher Full Text Ye BH, Zhang HQ, Yuan J, et al. : Intentions to Participate in Wine Tourism in an Emerging Market: Theorization and Implications. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2017; 41 (8): 1007–1031. Publisher Full Text Yu Y, Sun H, Goodman S, et al. : Chinese choices: A survey of wine consumers in Beijing. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2009; 21 (2): 155–168. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 27 Mar 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Food and Beverage Services, Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 2 Library, Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 3 Food and Beverage Services, Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 4 Operations Management, T A Pai Management Institute , Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India, 576104, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Vageesh Neelavar Kelkar Roles: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Jyothi Mallya Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Valsaraj Payini Roles: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Vasanth Kamath Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (1) version 1 Published: 27 Mar 2024, 13:228 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146631.1 Copyright © 2024 Neelavar Kelkar V et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Neelavar Kelkar V, Mallya J, Payini V and Kamath V. Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146631.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 27 Mar 2024 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Gaur J. Reviewer Report For: Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.160735.r354257 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1#referee-response-354257 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 11 Jan 2025 Jighyasu Gaur , Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.160735.r354257 The research conducted by the authors is timely and relevant. The authors have done a decent job and identified critical areas. Please find below my detailed review report. - The research conducted by the authors ... Continue reading READ ALL The research conducted by the authors is timely and relevant. The authors have done a decent job and identified critical areas. Please find below my detailed review report. - The research conducted by the authors is both timely and relevant, addressing an important topic that holds significance in the current academic or professional landscape. - The authors have identified critical areas that contribute meaningfully to the ongoing discourse in their field of study. - Their efforts demonstrate a good understanding of the subject matter and a commendable ability to pinpoint issues that require attention or further exploration. - However, I would like to draw attention to a few grammatical errors present in the manuscript, which should be corrected to enhance the overall readability and professionalism of the work. - These minor issues, once addressed, will ensure that the research is presented in the best possible manner. I recommend the authors carefully proofread the document or use professional editing tools or services to rectify these errors. Overall, the paper is well-structured and presents valuable insights. I wish the authors all the best in revising their work and look forward to seeing the final version published. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Supply chain, consumer research I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Gaur J. Reviewer Report For: Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.160735.r354257 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1#referee-response-354257 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Dhaigude A. Reviewer Report For: Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.160735.r354256 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1#referee-response-354256 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 09 Jan 2025 Amol Dhaigude , Department of Operations Supply Chain Management, S P Jain Institute of Management and Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.160735.r354256 The manuscript presents an integrative review of the literature on wine consumers' behavior, employing bibliometric analysis and systematic review methodologies. The manuscript is structured into sections covering the introduction, methods, results and discussion, and conclusions, which aim to map the ... Continue reading READ ALL The manuscript presents an integrative review of the literature on wine consumers' behavior, employing bibliometric analysis and systematic review methodologies. The manuscript is structured into sections covering the introduction, methods, results and discussion, and conclusions, which aim to map the existing body of research, identify gaps, and propose future research directions. While the effort to provide a comprehensive overview is evident, there are several areas where improvements could significantly enhance clarity, coherence, logical progression, flow, and organization. First, the flow of information. The transition from introducing wine as a cultural icon to the specifics of consumer behavior research feels abrupt. There is a leap from general admiration of wine to detailed methodologies without a smooth transition that guides the reader through the rationale behind the chosen methods. For example, "Since ancient times, wine has been admired as a cultural icon... Therefore, this integrative review aims to provide the current state of knowledge of wine consumers' behavior." Second, Coherence between paragraphs. The coherence between sections is weakened by the jump from discussing the motivation behind the review to detailed methodological descriptions. A brief overview of the study's structure could enhance coherence. Examples: "Such omissions motivated the researchers... ….. Methods." Third, the logical progression: The logical progression from identifying research gaps to proposing a methodological approach is somewhat obscured by dense paragraphs and a lack of clear signposting. Examples: "Such omissions motivated the researchers... an integrating these approaches offers a unique opportunity..." Fourth, regarding the clarity of information, some sections are overloaded with details that could be streamlined for clarity, especially the methods and results sections. Fifth, some inconsistencies are found. For example, different forms of this word have been used in the text. For example, 'co-occurrence' and 'cooccurrence', 're-visit' and 'revisit'. Please pick one style and use it consistently throughout the text. The above feedback could significantly improve its readability and impact. All the best. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Partly Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Bibliometric analysis, SLRs, Case Method, SCM, PLS-SEM I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Dhaigude A. Reviewer Report For: Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.160735.r354256 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1#referee-response-354256 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 27 Mar 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 Version 1 27 Mar 24 read read Amol Dhaigude , S P Jain Institute of Management and Research, Mumbai, India Jighyasu Gaur , Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Raipur, India Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Gaur J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 11 Jan 2025 | for Version 1 Jighyasu Gaur , Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India 0 Views copyright © 2025 Gaur J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The research conducted by the authors is timely and relevant. The authors have done a decent job and identified critical areas. Please find below my detailed review report. - The research conducted by the authors is both timely and relevant, addressing an important topic that holds significance in the current academic or professional landscape. - The authors have identified critical areas that contribute meaningfully to the ongoing discourse in their field of study. - Their efforts demonstrate a good understanding of the subject matter and a commendable ability to pinpoint issues that require attention or further exploration. - However, I would like to draw attention to a few grammatical errors present in the manuscript, which should be corrected to enhance the overall readability and professionalism of the work. - These minor issues, once addressed, will ensure that the research is presented in the best possible manner. I recommend the authors carefully proofread the document or use professional editing tools or services to rectify these errors. Overall, the paper is well-structured and presents valuable insights. I wish the authors all the best in revising their work and look forward to seeing the final version published. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Supply chain, consumer research I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Gaur J. Peer Review Report For: Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.160735.r354257) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1#referee-response-354257 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Dhaigude A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 09 Jan 2025 | for Version 1 Amol Dhaigude , Department of Operations Supply Chain Management, S P Jain Institute of Management and Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India 0 Views copyright © 2025 Dhaigude A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The manuscript presents an integrative review of the literature on wine consumers' behavior, employing bibliometric analysis and systematic review methodologies. The manuscript is structured into sections covering the introduction, methods, results and discussion, and conclusions, which aim to map the existing body of research, identify gaps, and propose future research directions. While the effort to provide a comprehensive overview is evident, there are several areas where improvements could significantly enhance clarity, coherence, logical progression, flow, and organization. First, the flow of information. The transition from introducing wine as a cultural icon to the specifics of consumer behavior research feels abrupt. There is a leap from general admiration of wine to detailed methodologies without a smooth transition that guides the reader through the rationale behind the chosen methods. For example, "Since ancient times, wine has been admired as a cultural icon... Therefore, this integrative review aims to provide the current state of knowledge of wine consumers' behavior." Second, Coherence between paragraphs. The coherence between sections is weakened by the jump from discussing the motivation behind the review to detailed methodological descriptions. A brief overview of the study's structure could enhance coherence. Examples: "Such omissions motivated the researchers... ….. Methods." Third, the logical progression: The logical progression from identifying research gaps to proposing a methodological approach is somewhat obscured by dense paragraphs and a lack of clear signposting. Examples: "Such omissions motivated the researchers... an integrating these approaches offers a unique opportunity..." Fourth, regarding the clarity of information, some sections are overloaded with details that could be streamlined for clarity, especially the methods and results sections. Fifth, some inconsistencies are found. For example, different forms of this word have been used in the text. For example, 'co-occurrence' and 'cooccurrence', 're-visit' and 'revisit'. Please pick one style and use it consistently throughout the text. The above feedback could significantly improve its readability and impact. All the best. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Partly Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Bibliometric analysis, SLRs, Case Method, SCM, PLS-SEM I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Dhaigude A. Peer Review Report For: Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :228 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.160735.r354256) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1#referee-response-354256 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Neelavar Kelkar V et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228", templates : { twitter : "Wine Consumer Studies: Current Status and Future Agendas. Neelavar Kelkar V et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/13-228/v1" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/146631/160735") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "160735"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "272396": 0, "272397": 0, "272398": 0, "272399": 0, "309770": 0, "272404": 0, "272405": 0, "272400": 0, "272401": 0, "272402": 0, "272403": 0, "282268": 0, "282269": 0, "282270": 0, "282271": 0, "282267": 0, "282276": 0, "277668": 0, "277669": 0, "277670": 0, "277671": 0, "282272": 0, "282273": 0, "282274": 0, "282275": 0, "277667": 0, "277676": 0, "277672": 0, "277673": 0, "277674": 0, "277675": 0, "291900": 0, "291901": 0, "291902": 0, "291903": 0, "291899": 0, "291904": 0, "291905": 0, "328397": 0, "328399": 0, "328398": 0, "338901": 0, "328405": 0, "338900": 0, "328404": 0, "328406": 0, "328401": 0, "354257": 6, "328400": 0, "354256": 12, "338899": 0, "328403": 0, "328402": 0, "305757": 0, "305758": 0, "305759": 0, "261599": 0, "261603": 0, "261602": 0, "261601": 0, "261600": 0, "261607": 0, "305760": 0, "261606": 0, "261605": 0, "261604": 0, "287084": 0, "287085": 0, "261609": 0, "287086": 0, "287087": 0, "287080": 0, "287081": 0, "287082": 0, "287083": 0, "309748": 0, "287088": 0, "287089": 0, "309747": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "fd71ee27-aca0-4bdf-996a-0330dd2adce2"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });