Dose-sparing self-amplifying RNA vaccine induces high functional antibodies to blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum malaria

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,757 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Introduction Next-generation malaria vaccines are urgently needed to provide greater efficacy and longevity. Antibodies targeting blood-stage merozoites can confer protection against clinical malaria through multiple Fc-mediated functions. In particular, merozoite surface protein 2 (PfMSP2), is a known target of protective antibodies that can clear merozoites via multiple antibody Fc-mediated functions, making is a highly promising vaccine candidate.

Methods

We developed PfMSP2 as a self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccine, which was successfully validated for in vitro expression in mammalian cells. Subsequently, the PfMSP2-saRNA was formulated as lipid nanoparticles (LNP) and evaluated for immunogenicity in mice in a 3-dose regimen comparing 1 μg and 10 μg doses. We evaluated the induction of antibodies with functional activities relevant to protective immunity.

Results

Our PfMSP2-saRNA vaccine induced antigen-specific IgG responses that recognised the surface of whole merozoites. Both 1 μg and 10 μg dosing induced comparable antibodies to PfMSP2, and responses were predominantly murine cytophilic IgG subclasses. These vaccine-induced antibodies demonstrated potent Fc-mediated functions, including complement fixation and binding of human Fcγ-receptor I (FcγRI), after only two doses, which remained consistent after the third dose.

Conclusions

PfMSP2 is highly immunogenic using the saRNA vaccine platform in a dose-sparing regimen, and induces antibodies with multiple Fc-mediated functions associated with protective immunity in humans. This saRNA platform is a promising strategy to develop highly efficacious vaccines requiring lower and fewer doses. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00