Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol for Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial comparing Outcomes between Metatarsal Methods of Transection (MetaMet)

Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray... | HRB Open Research dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); const cookieDomain = window.location.hostname; const tld = buildTLD(); function buildTLD() { const domainParts = cookieDomain.split('.'); while (domainParts.length > 2) { domainParts.shift(); } return domainParts.join('.'); } function deleteCookie(cookieName) { if (!cookieName) { return; } const cookiePath = (cookieName.startsWith('retraction_warning_') || cookieName.startsWith('version_warning_')) ? '/articles/' + cookieName : '/'; // Yes, these three slightly different ways to try and remove cookies are necessary document.cookie = cookieName + '=; path=' + cookiePath + '; domain=' + cookieDomain + '; expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:01 GMT;'; document.cookie = cookieName + '=; path=' + cookiePath + '; domain=.' + tld + '; expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:01 GMT;'; document.cookie = cookieName + '=; path=' + cookiePath + '; expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:01 GMT;'; } function deleteGroupCookies(group) { if (!group) { return; } const domainData = OneTrust.GetDomainData(), cookies = domainData.Groups.filter(cookieGroup => cookieGroup.OptanonGroupId === group)[0].Cookies; cookies.forEach(cookie => deleteCookie(cookie.Name)); } function OptanonWrapper() { const cookieConsentGroups = []; for (group of OneTrust.GetDomainData().Groups) { cookieConsentGroups.push(group.OptanonGroupId); } OneTrust.OnConsentChanged(function(e) { const cookieConsentActiveGroups = OnetrustActiveGroups.split(',').filter(activeGroup => activeGroup); cookieConsentGroups.forEach(group => { if (!cookieConsentActiveGroups.includes(group)) { deleteGroupCookies(group); }; }); }); } window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://hrbopenresearch.org/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'HRB'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); Skip to content HRB Open Research file_upload Submit your research search clear search menu close clear Search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Data Guidelines Prepublication Checks Production Process Article Processing Charges Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers National Steering Group Policies Glossary FAQs Contact Blog My Account Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61" }, "headline": "Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol for Randomised Controlled Feasibility...", "datePublished": "2024-10-04T12:57:44", "dateModified": "2024-10-04T12:57:44", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Megan Power Foley" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Daniel Westby" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Tom Aherne" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Stewart Walsh" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "HRB Open Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/img/AMP/HRB_image.png", "height": 566, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/img/AMP/HRB_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 127 }, "description": " Background Ray amputation is commonly performed for irretrievable digital infections and/or ischemia, particularly in diabetic foot disease. Re-ulceration and reoperation rates after toe amputation range from 43-65%. Numerous studies have investigated patient-dependent factors of wound healing, including diabetes, malnutrition, smoking, and renal failure. However, there has been minimal research on the impact of technical surgical factors on patient outcomes. Methods This protocol describes a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled, assessor-blinded feasibility study comparing outcomes after ray amputation between two accepted methods: metatarsal transection, manual bone cutter (BC), or an oscillating microsaw (OS). The inclusion criteria were adults undergoing toe amputation via metatarsal transection capable of providing informed consent. The exclusion criteria were significant peripheral arterial disease (ABPI <0.4) and en bloc resection of three or more toes. Participants will be allocated to one of two parallel groups in a 1:1 fashion using randomization by minimization, stratifying for chronic kidney disease (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and palpable pulses. The primary objective was to gather sufficient data to accurately power a future definitive trial. Secondary outcomes included differences between the two trial arms in re-operation and readmission rates at six months, time to wound healing post-index procedure, and patient-reported postoperative pain scores. Ethical approval was granted for recruitment in January, 2023. Discussion We hypothesized that an OS reproducibly achieves a smoother and more precise cut and produces less bony debris to act as an infective nidus with minimal inter-surgeon variation. Due to a lack of guiding evidence, surgeon preference for ray amputation technique evolves from the ‘apprenticeship’ training model, personal experience, and local equipment availability. We aimed to provide robust data to guide decision-making as the incidence of diabetes increases and the number of minor amputations increases. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials. gov registration NCT05804565 on 26/03/2023 " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61", "name": "Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol..." } } ] } Home Browse Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Power Foley M, Westby D, Aherne T and Walsh S. Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol for Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial comparing Outcomes between Metatarsal Methods of Transection (MetaMet) [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :61 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13910.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Study Protocol Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol for Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial comparing Outcomes between Metatarsal Methods of Transection (MetaMet) [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations] Megan Power Foley 1,2 , Daniel Westby 1 , Tom Aherne 1 , Stewart Walsh 1,3,4 Megan Power Foley 1,2 , Daniel Westby 1 , Tom Aherne 1 , Stewart Walsh 1,3,4 PUBLISHED 04 Oct 2024 Author details Author details 1 Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospitals Galway, Galway, Ireland 2 Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland 3 Lambe Institute for Translational Research, Discipline of Surgery,, University of Galway, Galway, County Galway, Ireland 4 National Surgical Research Support Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland Megan Power Foley Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Daniel Westby Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Writing – Review & Editing Tom Aherne Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Stewart Walsh Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS Abstract Background Ray amputation is commonly performed for irretrievable digital infections and/or ischemia, particularly in diabetic foot disease. Re-ulceration and reoperation rates after toe amputation range from 43-65%. Numerous studies have investigated patient-dependent factors of wound healing, including diabetes, malnutrition, smoking, and renal failure. However, there has been minimal research on the impact of technical surgical factors on patient outcomes. Methods This protocol describes a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled, assessor-blinded feasibility study comparing outcomes after ray amputation between two accepted methods: metatarsal transection, manual bone cutter (BC), or an oscillating microsaw (OS). The inclusion criteria were adults undergoing toe amputation via metatarsal transection capable of providing informed consent. The exclusion criteria were significant peripheral arterial disease (ABPI <0.4) and en bloc resection of three or more toes. Participants will be allocated to one of two parallel groups in a 1:1 fashion using randomization by minimization, stratifying for chronic kidney disease (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and palpable pulses. The primary objective was to gather sufficient data to accurately power a future definitive trial. Secondary outcomes included differences between the two trial arms in re-operation and readmission rates at six months, time to wound healing post-index procedure, and patient-reported postoperative pain scores. Ethical approval was granted for recruitment in January, 2023. Discussion We hypothesized that an OS reproducibly achieves a smoother and more precise cut and produces less bony debris to act as an infective nidus with minimal inter-surgeon variation. Due to a lack of guiding evidence, surgeon preference for ray amputation technique evolves from the ‘apprenticeship’ training model, personal experience, and local equipment availability. We aimed to provide robust data to guide decision-making as the incidence of diabetes increases and the number of minor amputations increases. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials. gov registration NCT05804565 on 26/03/2023 READ ALL READ LESS Keywords minor amputation; bone cutter; oscillating microsaw; outcomes research; reintervention after toe amputation Corresponding Author(s) Megan Power Foley ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Megan Power Foley Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: Funding for open-access publication was provided by the National Surgical Research Support Centre at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Copyright: © 2024 Power Foley M et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Power Foley M, Westby D, Aherne T and Walsh S. Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol for Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial comparing Outcomes between Metatarsal Methods of Transection (MetaMet) [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :61 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13910.1 ) First published: 04 Oct 2024, 7 :61 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13910.1 ) Latest published: 04 Oct 2024, 7 :61 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13910.1 ) Background Ray amputation is a common minor operation performed by vascular, orthopaedic, and pediatric surgeons. It is increasingly required for the management of irretrievable diabetic foot infections with or without concurrent ischemia. The intersection between diabetes mellitus, neuroischemic foot ulceration, and lower limb amputation is well established 1 . As the incidence of diabetes and diabetes-related complications increases globally, the volume of lower extremity amputations (LEAs) has correspondingly risen, particularly minor amputations 2 – 4 . This increase in minor LEAs without a corresponding increase in major amputations may represent an earlier therapeutic intervention and successful limb salvage efforts. However, ‘minor’ amputations are associated with prolonged hospital admissions and significant financial costs; they negatively impact patients’ quality of life, mobility, and independence and may be a harbinger of subsequent major amputation 5 – 7 . High rates of re-ulceration, re-infection, readmission to hospital, and re-amputation after partial foot resection for digital gangrene are described in both diabetic and PAD cohorts 8 . According to the literature, rates of re-amputation at five years post-index surgery for diabetic foot complications ranged from 45–65% 8 – 11 . One year after toe amputation, Littman et al . reported that 34% of 17,786 patients underwent re-amputation, with 10% going on to have a major LEA 12 . Healthcare resource utilisation notwithstanding, the financial costs of managing diabetic foot complications are estimated to outstrip some cancers 13 , 14 . As the prevalence of diabetes mellitus increases among the aging population, achieving durable functional outcomes after partial foot amputation is paramount. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare outcomes between two different methods of transecting the metatarsal shaft, a critical step in performing toe amputation. If a surgical technique produces superior wound-healing rates, it should be adopted by the surgical community. Trial rationale Numerous studies have investigated patient-dependent factors predictive of amputation failure and various postoperative adjuncts to wound healing, such as negative pressure wound therapy and topical oxygen therapy 15 , 16 . Chronic kidney disease, diabetes with or without poor glycemic control, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral arterial disease, continued tobacco smoking, obesity, and sepsis at the time of index operation have all been identified as independent risk factors for amputation failure and need for revision 7 , 17 , 18 . However, there is a dearth of evidence on the impact of technical surgical factors on the outcomes of this commonly performed procedure. Although there are numerous facets of perioperative care that could be analyzed, we decided to focus this study on the impact of the metatarsal transection method on outcomes after ray amputation, specifically comparing a manual bone cutter or an oscillating microsaw. We hypothesized that utilizing a manual bone cutter is subject to more inter-user variability, as it depends on the physical strength of the operating surgeon. Improperly applied forces are liable to fracture the remaining bone, leaving small comminuted fragments that may become necrotic and act as nidus for further infection within the wound bed. Conversely, an oscillating microsaw has the advantage of providing clean bony transection regardless of the physical strength of the operator; however, it may cause more damage to the surrounding connective tissues and disturb the microvascular periosteal supply, which could also lead to osteonecrosis. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the impact of surgical techniques on wound healing and reoperation rates after toe amputation. Objectives The principal research question for this feasibility study was to collect sufficient data to enable an accurate power calculation for a future randomized controlled trial. The secondary objectives are the following: 1. To determine the effect of the metatarsal transection method on rates of surgical re-intervention to the index wound and adjacent tissues at six months; 2. To determine the effect of the metatarsal transection method on rates of hospital readmission for complications secondary to index procedures at six months; 3. To determine the effect of the metatarsal transection method on rates of surgical re-infection in the index surgical wound at six months; 4. To determine the effect of the metatarsal transection method on the median time from surgery to the healing of the index wound. 5. To determine the impact of the metatarsal transection method on the quality of the proximal bony specimen sent for microbial culture from the index procedure. 6. To assess the impact of the metatarsal transection method on patient-reported postoperative pain, as measured by the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) at twenty-four hours after the surgical procedure 19 , 20 . 7. To assess the impact of the metatarsal transection method on patient-reported health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) at six weeks and six months post-operatively, as measured using the EQ-5D-5L tool 21 Trial design and endpoints State of design This trial was designed in accordance with the SPIRIT reporting guidelines for trial protocols 22 . This was a prospective, randomized controlled, assessor-blinded, feasibility study with participants allocated to one of the two parallel groups in a 1:1 fashion using randomization by minimization. The operating surgeon is aware of the type of surgery performed. The nature of the intervention (metatarsal amputation using either a bone saw or a bone cutter) ensures that both the patient and assessor can be blinded, so long as the assessor is not the operating surgeon. Patients undergoing toe amputation via spinal or local anesthesia will be provided with headphones to ensure that they do not overhear what equipment is requested. Evaluation of postoperative X-rays will be performed by a designated trial radiologist who will be blinded to the intervention. All statistical analyses were blinded. The primary trial center will be the University Hospital Galway, Ireland, with other centers also evaluated for inclusion. Appropriate patients should be recruited from both the outpatient and inpatient settings. Procedures may be classified as Emergent, Urgent or Elective. Outcomes The primary efficacy outcome will be the number of patients in each group who underwent surgical reintervention six months postoperatively. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of vascular-related postoperative complications. The secondary outcome will be to compare the effect of oscillating microsaw to bone cutters on metatarsal shaft transection during toe amputation for the following outcomes: 1. Rate of surgical reintervention on the ipsilateral foot at six months; 2. Rate of hospital readmission for complications secondary to the index procedures at six months; 3. Rate of re-infection in the index surgical wound at six months; 4. Median time from surgery to healing of the index surgical wound; 5. Rate of ulcer recurrence on the ipsilateral foot at six months; 6. Rate of recurrence of osteomyelitis in the ipsilateral foot at six months; 7. Rate of positive microbial culture from the most proximal bone specimen from surgical resection; 8. Patient-reported postoperative pain, as measured by the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) at twenty-four hours after the surgical procedure 19 , 20 . 9. Patient-reported health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) at six weeks and six months post-operatively, as measured using the EQ-5D-5L tool 21 Trial protocol The flow of the study is outlined in Figure 1 . Figure 1. Flow chart of the study. Inclusion criteria Consenting patients aged 18 years and over undergoing transmetatarsal amputation of a single toe or two adjacent toes. Patients will be stratified by pulse status (at least one pedal palpable vs. both pedal pulses impalpable) and chronic kidney disease (eGFR >60 and eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), considering both are significant factors in predicting wound healing. Exclusion criteria 1. Patients with significant peripheral arterial disease, as defined by an ABPI <0.4 or digital pressures of < 50 mmHg, not undergoing concurrent revascularisation. 2. Patients unfit for surgery; 3. Patients unable to provide informed consent; 4. Patients undergoing en-bloc resection of three or more toes; 5. Patients undergoing partial toe amputation without transection of the metatarsal shaft. Informed consent of the inpatient Informed consent will be obtained in compliance with the principles of good clinical practice and within the rules set down by the Research Ethics Committee. Prior to consenting to the study, each participant was provided with a full written and verbal explanation, and sufficient time was provided for full consideration. Any queries that they have answered. If they agree, the participant will sign the consent form and a copy of this will be given to them. At any time, the participant may withdraw from the study without prejudice or any effect on their treatment. Informed consent of the outpatient The study will be discussed verbally with eligible patients seen in the outpatient setting, and documentation will be provided. At that time, they will be asked to give their consent, and they will be asked again on the day of surgery. Randomisation Considering the myriad of factors impacting healing after toe amputation, randomization by minimization will be generated centrally using third-party computer software ( Sealed Envelope ) to ensure equal distribution of patients in each cohort after the consent process. A unique trial number was assigned to each individual at the time of randomization. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into one of the two groups. - Group 1: Metatarsal shaft will be transected using a Bone Cutter - Group 2: Metatarsal shaft will be transected using an Oscillating Microsaw On the day of surgery, a nominated independent member of the surgical team will access the randomization software and show the operating surgeon. Randomization will be performed per patient and not per toe amputation; as such, a single patient undergoing two or more toe amputations simultaneously will only be randomized once. There will be no sham intervention. Baseline medical data Patients will have a complete medical history and clinical examination as part of their standard care. The following are recorded: 1. Weight; 2. Height; 3. Gender; 4. Ethnicity; 5. Date of Birth; 6. Diabetes mellitus and glycaemic control, defined as the most recent HbA1c; 7. Insulin requirement for diabetic patients; 8. Hypercholesterolaemia; 9. Hypertension; 10. Previous myocardial infarction; 11. Previous coronary revascularisation; 12. Previous stroke; 13. Atrial fibrillation; 14. Peripheral arterial disease; 15. Smoking history; 16. Recent ipsilateral lower limb revascularisation; 17. ABPI +/- TPI in the index limb; 18. Chronic kidney disease, as defined by eGFR; 19. Baseline blood at hospital admission, including white blood cell count, neutrophil count, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, CRP, creatinine, urea, albumin, and total protein. 20. Medications at index admission; 21. Baseline radiographic findings, including degree of osteomyelitis, osteopenia, and soft tissue gas 22. Baseline microbiology findings, from wound swab and/or bone specimen The data collection protocol outlined the variables collected at baseline and at each follow-up interval to define variations among and within groups. Ulcer assessment Any ulcer present on the toe to be amputated at the time of consent and prior to randomization will be evaluated by an experienced assessor and documented in the patient’s medical notes, as is standard practice. Wound assessment will be performed using the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) score, which has been validated for digital ulcers in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and diabetes 23 . Ankle brachial pressure indices All patients in whom pedal pulses are impalpable will have an ankle-brachial pressure index (or toe pressure index for diabetics or patients with chronic kidney disease) recorded for the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs by a trained vascular technologist. Plain film radiographs (X-Ray) As is standard practice, radiography of the ipsilateral foot will be performed on admission for all patients. This will assess the loss of the bony cortex or bony erosion, typical of osteomyelitis or osteonecrosis, and the presence of soft tissue gas suggestive of acute infection with a gas-producing organism, indicating that the patient requires emergent debridement. Furthermore, an inconclusive X-ray can indicate whether the patient may benefit from further imaging, such as MRI. The results from this scan will be used as baseline for pre-intervention radiographs. Feasibility data 1. The number of eligible patients 2. The number of consenting patients 3. The number of patients declining participation 4. Assessment of the number of patients who attend or miss scheduled follow-up 5. Reasons for missed follow-up appointments 6. Barriers to timely scheduling of interventions and follow-up Interventions All procedures will be performed by a consultant vascular surgeon or surgical registrar with significant experience. With the exception of the metatarsal transection method selected by randomization, each procedure will be performed as per standard practice. As both the methods being compared in this study are part of routine practice, surgeons will be familiar with their use, and a learning curve is not anticipated. Procedures may be performed under general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, or regional anesthesia, as determined by the supervising consultant anesthetist. All patients will receive saline wound lavage and wounds with extensive contamination will receive washout with 50% hydrogen peroxide solution, which is the standard of care. The most proximal specimen of the bony resection will be sent for culture and sensitivity to the microbiology laboratory. The use of the drain and closure material was left to the discretion of the operating surgeon. Continuation of antibiotics will be as per local microbiology guidelines and tailored to culture and sensitivity results from intraoperative bone specimens. The use of VAC or wound adjuncts will also be documented. Bone cutter After the metatarsophalangeal joint is disarticulated, connective tissues and periosteum are stripped off the metatarsal shaft to allow the insertion of the jaws of the bone cutter. A manual force was applied to cut the bones. In circumstances where the bone is not transected cleanly, smoothening the residual sharp edges with a bone rasp or nibbler may be required. Oscillating microsaw After the metatarsophalangeal joint was disarticulated, the connective tissues and periosteum were stripped off the metatarsal shaft to allow direct opposition of the saw blade to the cortex. Schedule of events Follow-up All patients will be fully assessed at 48 hours postoperatively and again at six weeks. A final assessment will take place at six months. Follow-up will be performed by assessors who are blinded to the intervention. X-ray All patients will have a baseline foot radiograph performed preoperatively, as is the standard of care when determining whether a ray amputation is necessary. As part of the trial follow-up, the patients underwent two follow-up X-rays of the ipsilateral foot. The first within 48 hours of surgery to assess bony fragments and a second at six months post-operatively to assess bony healing, as is common practice in orthopaedic surgery. All X-rays will be reported by a consultant radiologist blinded to the intervention. Patient-reported post-operative pain Patient-reported postoperative pain will be evaluated within 48 h of surgery using the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Patient-reported quality of life (EQ5D questionnaire) Patient-reported health-related quality of life will be evaluated by the completion of the EQ5D form at six weeks and six months. These data will be further utilized to generate health economic data. Wound care and recurrence of ulceration or infection Any recurrence of symptoms, postoperative complications, or concerns were recorded. As per the usual vascular practice, patients will be followed up in the community post-discharge and receive regular wound care from public health nurses. To determine the approximate time from surgery to wound healing, sequential wound pictures will be sent on a fortnightly basis by the PHN to a secure HSE email account used by trial investigators. Crossovers We expect a certain degree of crossover from the bone cutter trial arm to the bone saw trial arm, as reflected in daily surgical practice. The availability of surgical instruments shared among multiple surgical services is anticipated to be a factor. Furthermore, patient and operator characteristics, such as the density of the metatarsal shaft bone and operator strength, may also necessitate a crossover between groups. Withdrawals during follow-up At any time, the participant may withdraw from the trial without bearing on any further management or intervention. The principal investigator may also decide to remove anyone at any time if this is in the best interest of the patient or if they meet the exclusion criteria. Loss to follow-up During the consent process, the participants will be educated regarding the importance and timing of the follow-up protocol. Regular post-intervention patient contact in the community through public health nurses and vascular clinical nurse specialists working in the wound clinic in Roscommon Hospital will allow for continued patient dialogue regarding follow-up. Should follow-up appointments be missed, investigators will endeavor to contact patients by phone or via community liaisons to ensure timely follow-up within the trial protocol. Any loss to follow-up will be documented and explained in the trial data to the best ability of the investigator. Any reasons for not being able to attend were recorded. Protocol violations The following will be deemed a protocol violation and the participant will be removed from the trial: 1. Withdrawal of consent for procedure or inclusion in study. Premature termination of the study The trial may be temporarily suspended or terminated prematurely if there is a sufficiently reasonable cause. Written notifications documenting the reason for trial suspension or termination will be provided to the regional ethical committee and all trial investigators by the principal investigator. Circumstances that may warrant termination or suspension include, but are not limited to: Determination of unexpected, significant, or unacceptable risk to participants Demonstration of efficacy that would warrant stopping Insufficient compliance to protocol requirements Data that are not sufficiently complete and/or evaluable Determination of futility Schedule of events Figure 2 shows the schedule of events. Figure 2. SPIRIT Table outlining sequence of events. Safety parameters Potential adverse events related to intervention The risk of any significant adverse events was deemed unlikely. All reasonable measures were undertaken to avoid these events. Notably, this trial compared two accepted methods of performing a common operation and did not involve any experimental procedures; therefore, attributing adverse events to the trial intervention rather than patient comorbidities will be challenging. Any adverse events (as described below) that occur will be recorded and reported in any trial. 1. Bleeding requiring takeback to theatre for hemostasis or requiring transfusion of >1 unit packed red cells with corresponding drop in Hb >1 g/dl ; 2. Surgical site infection 3. Venous thromboembolism; 4. Myocardial infarction; 5. Adverse reaction to local or general anaesthetic; 6. Major ipsilateral amputation, either below-knee amputation or above-knee amputation Definition of an adverse event An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical event related directly or indirectly to an intervention as a result of participation in the trial. Definition of a serious adverse event Any unexpected event that results in death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is deemed a serious adverse event. Event reporting All adverse events will be reported directly to either the site or principal investigator. Recurrent adverse events or serious adverse events in isolation will be reported to the local Ethical Committee and risk assessment department for risk analysis. Indications for premature trial cessation are discussed in the ‘Protocol Violations’ section. Trial audit A regular audit of trial conduct was conducted throughout the study period. The project management group (MPF, DW, SRW) shall convene tri-monthly to review trial proceedings internally and address methodological, clinical, and ethical concerns. External review shall be undertaken every 12 months by the local research ethics committee, with further data monitoring from an independent research advisor from the National University of Ireland, Galway. Statistical considerations Once randomization and intervention are complete, patient outcomes will be assessed using intention-to-treat analysis. We expect a certain degree of crossover from the bone cutter trial arm to the bone saw trial arm, as reflected in daily surgical practice. Furthermore, we expect that a small number of patients will ultimately not undergo treatment as initially planned. All loss to follow-up at any time point was recorded and reported. A blinded research statistician will conduct all the statistical analyses using SPSS Version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive data will be provided at baseline and at each follow-up interval to define variations among and within groups, as per the data collection sheet. Continuous data are presented as means and standard deviations with 95% confidence intervals. Categorical data will be reported as frequencies, with the chi-square or Fischer’s exact t-test used for comparative data. Where data are not normally distributed, non-parametric tests will be utilized as applicable. The time between surgery and measurable endpoints was compared using Kaplan-Meier Survival curves. Statistical significance was set at p value <0.05. There are no studies investigating this particular trial question; as such, there are no data on which to base a power calculation. For this pilot trial, we aimed to recruit 20 patients into each arm, for a total of 40 patients. The primary aim of this study was to collect sufficient data to generate a sample size calculation for an appropriately powered study that would allow for the control of confounding factors that impact ulcer healing. As the sample size was small, there was no need for interim analysis. Study status This study is currently actively recruiting in University Hospital Galway. Ethical considerations Ethical approval Ethical approval was granted by the Galway Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Galway, Ireland). The ethics committee reference number was C.A. 122/12. Recruitment shall not commence at any other centre until full ethical approval has been confirmed by the local ethics committee. Data protection All data shall be managed with the strictest confidence by approved trial investigators in accordance with the Irish data protection law. Datasets will be anonymous, encrypted, and stored on-site. Discussion Significant efforts have been made to identify patient factors that influence the progression from minor to major LEA. Chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, smoking, obesity and malnutrition all impact wound healing 7 , 17 , 18 . Although helpful from a risk stratification viewpoint, such factors are largely unmodifiable by the time a patient requires a minor LEA. There is a need to switch focus from characterising the patients who progress to limb loss and instead engage in the task of identifying the optimal surgical techniques for these challenging patients. concurrent revascularisation for wounds with an ischemic component is recommended 24 . Numerous intra- and post-operative therapeutic adjuncts have also been studied. The supporting evidence for local antibiotic delivery devices, such as impregnated sponges, beads, and cement, intended to deliver a high concentration of antibiotics into the wound bed has been inconclusive 25 . Postoperatively, vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has demonstrated variable success with improved healing and reduced healing time in diabetic foot ulcers 15 . However, wound adjuncts such as topical oxygen therapy have reported less consistent outcomes 26 . To date, minimal research has focused on surgical techniques and their impact on wound healing and reulceration. As part of the development process for this study, we performed a systematic review of the existing literature investigating surgical techniques, such as methods of bony resection, management of articular cartilage, and wound closure, on outcomes after toe amputation. After an exhaustive search, we identified several papers reporting on the technical aspects of utilizing various soft tissue flaps for covering wound defects and a case series reporting the outcomes of primary closure in semi-elective diabetic minor amputations. To the best of our knowledge, no single trial or case-control study has compared methods of bony transection. Although other aspects of vascular surgical practice have been rigorously investigated and guidelines reflect evidence-based medicine, there is minimal supporting data on how digital amputation is performed. Bone nibblers, cutters, or a saw may be used to transect the metatarsal shaft, depending on the institutional convention, equipment availability, and surgeon preference. The apprenticeship model of surgical training may have contributed to variation in practice. We contend that using an oscillating microsaw to transect the metatarsal shaft should produce a cleaner bone end with less soft tissue damage and bony debris than a manual bone cutter, thereby reducing the risk of recurrent infection within the wound bed and subsequent wound breakdown. This randomized controlled feasibility study aimed to provisionally compare the value and safety profiles of two different surgical techniques. An initial feasibility study was selected because a significant number of patients are needed to power a full study. We planned to recruit patients from multiple sites after the initial cohort was selected. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Ethical approval for trial recruitment was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee for the Soalta Hopsital Group on 12 th May 2022 (reference CA 122/22 Galway Clinical Research Ethics Committee). The study will be conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration for research on human participants. Consent for publication Written patient consent for publication and dispersal of anonymized data was acquired at the time of trial recruitment and included in the consent form, patient information leaflet, and ethics committee submission. Availability of data and materials study results will be published upon the completion of recruitment and data analysis. Pseudoanonymized data will be available upon reasonable request from the chief investigator (SRW) for third-party validation. Status of Trial Protocol: 1. V2 Recruitment: commenced February 2023 Estimated Completion Date: December 2024 Data availability statement No data are associated with this article Extended data Extended data, including Data Collection Sheet and SPIRIT checklist, are available through the BioStudies online repository at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-BSST1448 Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication). Authors’ contributions MPF was responsible for study design, ethics application, patient recruitment, and manuscript production; DW was responsible for study design, patient recruitment, and manuscript editing; TA was responsible for study design and manuscript editing; SRW was responsible for study design, ethics application, patient recruitment, and manuscript editing. Acknowledgements Not applicable Faculty Opinions recommended References 1. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, et al. : Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010; 375 (9733): 2215–22. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 2. Geiss LS, Li Y, Hora I, et al. : Resurgence of diabetes-related Nontraumatic Lower-Extremity Amputation in the young and middle-aged adult U.S. population. Diabetes Care. 2019; 42 (1): 50–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 3. Buckley CM, O'Farrell A, Canavan RJ, et al. : Trends in the incidence of lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes over a five-year period in the republic of Ireland. PLoS One. 2012; 7 (7): e41492. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 4. Carinci F, Uccioli L, Massi Benedetti M, et al. : An in-depth assessment of diabetes-related lower extremity amputation rates 2000-2013 delivered by twenty-one countries for the data collection 2015 of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Acta Diabetol. 2020; 57 (3): 347–57. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 5. Cheng SW, Wang CY, Ko Y: Costs and length of stay of hospitalizations due to diabetes-related complications. J Diabetes Res. 2019; 2019 : 2363292. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 6. Barg FK, Cronholm PF, Easley EE, et al. : A qualitative study of the experience of lower extremity wounds and amputations among people with diabetes in Philadelphia. Wound Repair Regen. 2017; 25 (5): 864–70. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 7. Liu R, Petersen BJ, Rothenberg GM, et al. : Lower extremity reamputation in people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021; 9 (1): e002325. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 8. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB, et al. : Amputation and reamputation of the diabetic foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1997; 87 (6): 255–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 9. Rathnayake A, Saboo A, Malabu UH, et al. : Lower extremity amputations and long-term outcomes in diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review. World J Diabetes. 2020; 11 (9): 391–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 10. Collins PM, Joyce DP, O'Beirn ES, et al. : Re-amputation and survival following toe amputation: outcome data from a tertiary referral centre. Ir J Med Sci. 2022; 191 (3): 193–1199. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 11. Speer CG, Rendos NK, Davis CE, et al. : Reoperation, reamputation, and new ulceration following complete or partial toe amputation among diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021; 179 : 109008. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 12. Littman AJ, Tseng CL, Timmons A, et al. : Risk of ipsilateral reamputation following an incident toe amputation among U.S. military veterans with diabetes, 2005-2016. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43 (5): 1033–40. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 13. Skrepnek GH, Mills JL Sr, Lavery LA, et al. : Health care service and outcomes among an estimated 6.7 million ambulatory care diabetic foot cases in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40 (7): 936–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 14. O'Neill KN, McHugh SM, Tracey ML, et al. : Health service utilization and related costs attributable to diabetes. Diabet Med. 2018; 35 (12): 1727–34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 15. Liu Z, Dumville JC, Hinchliffe RJ, et al. : Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 10 (10): CD010318. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 16. Tang TY, Mak MYQ, Yap CJQ, et al. : An observational clinical trial examining the effect of topical Oxygen therapy (Natrox™) on the rates of healing of chronic DiAbetic foot ulcers (OTONAL Trial). Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2024; 23 (2): 15347346211053694. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 17. Acar E, Kacira BK: Predictors of lower extremity amputation and reamputation associated with the diabetic foot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 56 (6): 1218–22. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 18. Norvell DC, Czerniecki JM: Risks and risk factors for ipsilateral Re-Amputation in the first year following first major unilateral dysvascular amputation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020; 60 (4): 614–21. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 19. Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, et al. : Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013; 22 (7): 1717–27. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 20. Pesonen A, Kauppila T, Tarkkila P, et al. : Evaluation of easily applicable pain measurement tools for the assessment of pain in demented patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009; 53 (5): 657–64. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 21. Pran L, Baijoo S, Harnanan D, et al. : Quality of life experienced by major lower extremity amputees. Cureus. 2021; 13 (8): e17440. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 22. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, et al. : SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013; 346 : e7586. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 23. Mills JL Sr, Conte MS, Armstrong DG, et al. : The society for vascular surgery lower extremity threatened limb classification system: risk stratification based on Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59 (1): 220–34.e1–2. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 24. Hingorani A, LaMuraglia GM, Henke P, et al. : The management of diabetic foot: a clinical practice guideline by the society for vascular surgery in collaboration with the American podiatric Medical Association and the Society for vascular medicine. J Vasc Surg. 2016; 63 (2 Suppl): 3S–21S. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 25. Chatzipapas C, Karaglani M, Papanas N, et al. : Local antibiotic delivery systems in diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a brief review. Rev Diabet Stud. 2021; 17 (2): 75–81. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text 26. Wenhui L, Changgeng F, Lei X, et al. : Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic diabetic foot ulcers: an overview of systematic reviews. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021; 176 : 108862. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 04 Oct 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospitals Galway, Galway, Ireland 2 Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland 3 Lambe Institute for Translational Research, Discipline of Surgery,, University of Galway, Galway, County Galway, Ireland 4 National Surgical Research Support Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland Megan Power Foley Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Daniel Westby Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Writing – Review & Editing Tom Aherne Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Stewart Walsh Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information Funding for open-access publication was provided by the National Surgical Research Support Centre at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Article Versions (1) version 1 Published: 04 Oct 2024, 7:61 https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13910.1 Copyright © 2024 Power Foley M et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics VIEWS $counts.viewCount downloads Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Power Foley M, Westby D, Aherne T and Walsh S. Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol for Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial comparing Outcomes between Metatarsal Methods of Transection (MetaMet) [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :61 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13910.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 04 Oct 2024 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Kochhar K. Reviewer Report For: Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol for Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial comparing Outcomes between Metatarsal Methods of Transection (MetaMet) [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :61 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15256.r43893 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61/v1#referee-response-43893 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 19 Dec 2024 Kanika Kochhar , University of Michigan Michigan Medicine (Ringgold ID: 21614), Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15256.r43893 The study design appears appropriate and has academic merit. However, several aspects need clarification and standardization to improve the study's reproducibility: Postoperative Weight-Bearing Status Is the postoperative weight-bearing status standardized among all patients? ... Continue reading READ ALL The study design appears appropriate and has academic merit. However, several aspects need clarification and standardization to improve the study's reproducibility: Postoperative Weight-Bearing Status Is the postoperative weight-bearing status standardized among all patients? Variations in weight-bearing protocols can affect outcomes and should be controlled. Standardization of Shoe Gear. Is the postoperative shoe gear consistent across patients? For example, are diabetic shoes, postoperative/surgical shoes, or CAM boots uniformly prescribed? Additionally, is the duration of weight-bearing restrictions and the use of alternative shoe gear standardized? Biomechanical Considerations Are patients' pre-existing biomechanical deformities accounted for? Biomechanical abnormalities can influence gait patterns and pressure points, potentially contributing to re-ulceration. Surgeon Heterogeneity The study involves more than one type of surgeon completing the procedures. Vascular surgeons and podiatrists may employ differing surgical techniques, which could introduce heterogeneity. Addressing this variability is critical for consistent outcomes. Definitions and Terminology Please provide a clear and specific definition of ulcer recurrence, as this varies throughout the literature. Ensure consistent use of terminology, such as "ulcer recurrence" versus "re-ulceration," throughout the paper. Consider accounting for the incidence of re-ulceration on the contralateral foot to provide a comprehensive evaluation. This will help assess the impact of postoperative gait changes on overall outcomes. If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable. This is a prospective study with a goal to collect sufficient data for a future randomized control trail. Outcomes will be assessed with ITT analysis Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? N/A Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? No conclusions yet drawn - hypothesis is clearly stated Additional Considerations First sentence of background sentence says "pediatric surgeons" Is there a defined cut-off for surgical intervention based on patients' A1c levels? Specifying this inclusion criterion would be helpful. Follow-up care is performed by public health nurses in this study. However, the ideal standard of care would involve follow-up evaluations conducted by the operating surgeon to ensure consistency and accuracy. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? No Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: diabetic foot ulcers, limb salvage, wound care I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Kochhar K. Reviewer Report For: Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol for Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial comparing Outcomes between Metatarsal Methods of Transection (MetaMet) [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :61 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15256.r43893 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61/v1#referee-response-43893 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 04 Oct 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 Version 1 04 Oct 24 read Kanika Kochhar , University of Michigan Michigan Medicine (Ringgold ID: 21614), Ann Arbor, USA Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Kochhar K. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 19 Dec 2024 | for Version 1 Kanika Kochhar , University of Michigan Michigan Medicine (Ringgold ID: 21614), Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 0 Views copyright © 2024 Kochhar K. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The study design appears appropriate and has academic merit. However, several aspects need clarification and standardization to improve the study's reproducibility: Postoperative Weight-Bearing Status Is the postoperative weight-bearing status standardized among all patients? Variations in weight-bearing protocols can affect outcomes and should be controlled. Standardization of Shoe Gear. Is the postoperative shoe gear consistent across patients? For example, are diabetic shoes, postoperative/surgical shoes, or CAM boots uniformly prescribed? Additionally, is the duration of weight-bearing restrictions and the use of alternative shoe gear standardized? Biomechanical Considerations Are patients' pre-existing biomechanical deformities accounted for? Biomechanical abnormalities can influence gait patterns and pressure points, potentially contributing to re-ulceration. Surgeon Heterogeneity The study involves more than one type of surgeon completing the procedures. Vascular surgeons and podiatrists may employ differing surgical techniques, which could introduce heterogeneity. Addressing this variability is critical for consistent outcomes. Definitions and Terminology Please provide a clear and specific definition of ulcer recurrence, as this varies throughout the literature. Ensure consistent use of terminology, such as "ulcer recurrence" versus "re-ulceration," throughout the paper. Consider accounting for the incidence of re-ulceration on the contralateral foot to provide a comprehensive evaluation. This will help assess the impact of postoperative gait changes on overall outcomes. If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable. This is a prospective study with a goal to collect sufficient data for a future randomized control trail. Outcomes will be assessed with ITT analysis Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? N/A Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? No conclusions yet drawn - hypothesis is clearly stated Additional Considerations First sentence of background sentence says "pediatric surgeons" Is there a defined cut-off for surgical intervention based on patients' A1c levels? Specifying this inclusion criterion would be helpful. Follow-up care is performed by public health nurses in this study. However, the ideal standard of care would involve follow-up evaluations conducted by the operating surgeon to ensure consistency and accuracy. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? No Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise diabetic foot ulcers, limb salvage, wound care I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Kochhar K. Peer Review Report For: Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol for Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial comparing Outcomes between Metatarsal Methods of Transection (MetaMet) [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :61 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15256.r43893) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61/v1#referee-response-43893 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with HRB Open Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61/v1&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Power Foley M et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61/v1/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61", templates : { twitter : "Bone Cutter versus Oscillating Saw for Ray Amputation: A Protocol.... Power Foley M et al., published by " + "@HRBOpenRes" + ", https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-61/v1" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/13910/15256") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "15256"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "43140": 0, "43141": 0, "43142": 0, "43143": 0, "43144": 0, "43145": 0, "43146": 0, "43147": 0, "43148": 0, "43149": 0, "46755": 0, "42681": 0, "42682": 0, "42683": 0, "42939": 0, "42684": 0, "42940": 0, "42685": 0, "42941": 0, "42686": 0, "42942": 0, "42687": 0, "42943": 0, "42688": 0, "42944": 0, "42689": 0, "42945": 0, "42690": 0, "42946": 0, "42947": 0, "42948": 0, "48197": 0, "43348": 0, "43349": 0, "43350": 0, "43351": 0, "43352": 0, "43353": 0, "43354": 0, "43355": 0, "43356": 0, "43357": 0, "48094": 0, "43888": 0, "43889": 0, "43890": 0, "49906": 0, "43891": 0, "49907": 0, "43892": 0, "49908": 0, "43893": 8, "49909": 0, "43894": 0, "49910": 0, "43895": 0, "47223": 0, "49911": 0, "43896": 0, "49912": 0, "43897": 0, "49913": 0, "49914": 0, "49915": 0, "47102": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "909a1b82-ed4e-4bff-91b7-7675788143a3"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); Are you a HRB-funded researcher? Submission to HRB Open Research is open to all HRB grantholders or people working on a HRB-funded/co-funded grant on or since 1 January 2017. Sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from HRB Open Research. First Name * You must provide your first name Last Name * You must provide your last name Email * You must provide a valid email address Institution You must provide an institution. Submit Thank you! We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to HRB Open Research HRB Open Research Browse How to Publish About Contact RSS Cookie Notice Privacy Notice Legal Submit Your Research © F1000 Research Limited and its licensors ISSN 2515-4826 | Legal background var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "hrb", displayName: "HRB Open Research", hostName: "hrbopenresearch.org", id: "5", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]" }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); }); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a03668464f42df88',t:'MTc4MDA2NzIzMQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();