Taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched benchmarking of phase-separating protein predictors

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background Biomolecular condensates formed via liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) play vital roles in cellular organization and function. Computational prediction of phase-separating proteins (PSPs) is increasingly used to prioritize candidates at proteome scale, making robust, well-designed benchmarks essential for fair evaluation and iterative improvement of PSP predictors. Results We first show that a recently released PSP benchmark is substantially confounded by the imbalances in taxonomic origin and intrinsic-disorder compositions between positive and negative sets, allowing predictors to achieve high apparent performance by exploiting non-LLPS shortcuts and obscuring their true ability to distinguish PSPs. To minimize these effects, we construct a taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched PSP benchmark. Using this benchmark, we find that absolute sequence and biophysical feature values of PSPs differ markedly across taxa, whereas LLPS-associated feature shifts relative to taxon-specific proteome backgrounds are comparatively conserved. Benchmarking twenty PSP predictors under this framework reveals pronounced taxon-dependent variation in performance. Moreover, PSPs lacking IDRs consistently constitute a more challenging regime across methods, motivating routine disorder-stratified evaluation. Conclusions Our taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched benchmarking framework reduces shortcut-driven biases, enables more interpretable evaluation of PSP predictors, and provides guidance for developing models that capture transferable LLPS-associated signals rather than dataset- or taxon-specific shortcuts.
Full text 1,705 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Biomolecular condensates formed via liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) play vital roles in cellular organization and function. Computational prediction of phase-separating proteins (PSPs) is increasingly used to prioritize candidates at proteome scale, making robust, well-designed benchmarks essential for fair evaluation and iterative improvement of PSP predictors.

Results

We first show that a recently released PSP benchmark is substantially confounded by the imbalances in taxonomic origin and intrinsic-disorder compositions between positive and negative sets, allowing predictors to achieve high apparent performance by exploiting non-LLPS shortcuts and obscuring their true ability to distinguish PSPs. To minimize these effects, we construct a taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched PSP benchmark. Using this benchmark, we find that absolute sequence and biophysical feature values of PSPs differ markedly across taxa, whereas LLPS-associated feature shifts relative to taxon-specific proteome backgrounds are comparatively conserved. Benchmarking twenty PSP predictors under this framework reveals pronounced taxon-dependent variation in performance. Moreover, PSPs lacking IDRs consistently constitute a more challenging regime across methods, motivating routine disorder-stratified evaluation.

Conclusions

Our taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched benchmarking framework reduces shortcut-driven biases, enables more interpretable evaluation of PSP predictors, and provides guidance for developing models that capture transferable LLPS-associated signals rather than dataset- or taxon-specific shortcuts. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00