Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Evaluation of Infertile Women
This study evaluated pelvic pathologies in 900 infertile women using laparoscopy, finding ovarian pathology in 41%, tubal pathology in 36%, and uterine pathology in 32%.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study examined 900 infertile women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy at a private infertility clinic in Dhaka (Jan 2002–Oct 2004) to characterize pelvic pathologies contributing to infertility, using pre-laparoscopic history and clinical examinations followed by laparoscopy under general anesthesia. Laparoscopic findings showed the most frequent abnormalities were ovarian (41% with polycystic ovaries), followed by tubal pathology (36%, including tubal block and peritubal adhesions) and uterine pathology (32%, including uterine myomas), with pelvic peritoneal adhesions and frank endometriosis identified in 16.44% and 9.45%, respectively, including endometriotic “chocolate” cysts in 2.11%. The limitation explicitly implied by the description is that this is a single-clinic observational cohort focused on laparoscopy-detected findings without further analytic detail on causes beyond lesion classification. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper reports laparoscopic identification of frank endometriosis (9.45%) and endometriotic (chocolate) cysts (2.11%) among infertile women, though its main focus is the overall role of diagnostic laparoscopy in evaluating pelvic pathology in infertility rather than endometriosis specifically.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,959 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 3 sections
· click to expand
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
References (4)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00