Long-term prognostic value of staging surgery for high-intermediate-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer
article
OA: hybrid
CC0
Abstract
The prognostic relevance of surgical staging in patients with high-intermediate-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer remains uncertain. In this cohort study, we investigated the prognostic role of robot-assisted laparoscopic staging surgery among patients with clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma at a high-intermediate-risk or high-risk for recurrence. Clinical data of women with clinically International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage I–II, grade 3 endometrioid or non-endometrioid EC who were intended to undergo robot-assisted laparoscopic staging surgery were retrospectively collected from a single tertiary referral center. The procedure consisted of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and, when feasible, para-aortic lymphadenectomy, with additional omentectomy and peritoneal biopsies performed in a subset of cases. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis, with additional subgroup analyses by histological subtype. A total of 166 patients, of which 154 patients (92.8%) with FIGO 2009 stage I and 12 patients (7.2%) with FIGO 2009 stage II were included, comprising various histological subtypes, including 64 (38.6%) with endometrioid carcinoma, 52 (31.3%) with serous carcinoma, 11 (6.6%) with clear cell carcinoma, and 27 (16.3%) with carcinosarcoma. Thirty-two patients (19.3%) were reclassified as having FIGO stage disease III–IV based on final pathology. The 5-year disease-specific survival was 25.5% for upstaged patients compared with 73.1% for those who were not upstaged. Robot-assisted laparoscopic staging provides valuable prognostic information in clinically early-stage endometrial cancer with a high-intermediate-risk or high-risk of recurrence. These findings underscore the value of surgical staging in informing prognosis and guiding adjuvant treatment decisions.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (31)
- W2182443159 via openalex
- W2555513349 via openalex
- W2571636321 via openalex
- W2765952964 via openalex
- W2785389296 via openalex
- W2901445090 via openalex
- W2934930954 via openalex
- W2953561265 via openalex
- W2963015093 via openalex
- W3026175819 via openalex
- W3106384415 via openalex
- W3108330857 via openalex
- W3114074286 via openalex
- W3114479587 via openalex
- W3114790727 via openalex
- W3120688625 via openalex
- W3131758164 via openalex
- W3155384082 via openalex
- W4206901134 via openalex
- W4210861501 via openalex
- W4223523934 via openalex
- W4241264858 via openalex
- W4281678049 via openalex
- W4283204101 via openalex
- W4293825784 via openalex
- W4318947532 via openalex
- W4381309093 via openalex
- W4390483209 via openalex
- W4391708112 via openalex
- W4393935425 via openalex
- W4400641281 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-30T06:04:46.332736+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK