Characterising and Minimising Step and Filtering Artifacts in TMS-EEG Recordings

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,636 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) enables direct measurement of cortical reactivity via TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). Interpretation of early TEP components however, is highly sensitive to stimulation and hardware-related artifacts. We identified and characterised a persistent, non-neural ‘step-drift’ artifact unexpectedly present in recent TMS-EEG recordings from our group. We show that the artifact is distinct from previously described TMS pulse and discharge/decay artifacts and likely reflects a hardware interaction phenomenon. We demonstrated that amplifier settings, but not TMS pulse shape, substantially influenced artifact expression, with DC-coupled recordings with no online high-pass filter reducing step amplitude compared with AC-coupled recordings with a high-pass filter. Simulations additionally revealed that filtering over the step-drift artifact introduced pronounced ringing and edge artifacts, highlighting the need to address this artifact prior to data processing. We propose a processing pipeline incorporating robust polynomial detrending and a modified Butterworth filter with autoregressive extrapolation that minimised TEP distortion in both simulated and real data containing the step-drift artifact. Together, these findings provide practical recommendations for both preventing and correcting step-drift artifacts and underscore the need for formal definition and routine recognition of this artifact to improve reproducibility and data quality in TMS-EEG research. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00