OC11.06: Indirect MUSA features of adenomyosis are associated with reduced chances of live birth after first in vitro fertilization treatment
Women undergoing their first IVF treatment with indirect adenomyosis features on ultrasound had significantly reduced chances of live birth compared to those without.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study evaluated the impact of indirect Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment features on cumulative live birth rates following initial in vitro fertilization cycles. Researchers analyzed data from 935 women aged 25 to 39, adjusting for factors such as age, BMI, and the presence of endometriosis to isolate the effect of adenomyosis indicators. The results demonstrated that women exhibiting these indirect features had significantly lower live birth rates compared to those without them, with an adjusted relative risk of 0.64. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — specifically focusing on how its indirect sonographic features negatively influence reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing assisted reproduction.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,165 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00