Molecular interactions underlying selective partitioning of clients into MED1 and FUS condensates

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,692 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Biomolecular condensates selectively recruit and exclude proteins, and this partitioning is sometimes dictated by their intrinsically disordered regions. Factors that determine partitioning include client–scaffold interactions and stabilisation of the scaffold network within the condensate, yet a molecular and predictive understanding has not been fully achieved. Here, we used coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations to elucidate molecular interactions between two types of nuclear proteins as scaffolds: the charge-rich disordered region of Mediator 1 (MED1) and the aromaticrich disordered region of Fused in sarcoma (FUS), in mixtures with client intrinsically disordered regions from six different proteins. We show distinct partitioning into the MED1 and FUS condensates, while enrichment of RNA in the dilute phase modulated partitioning in FUS condensates. Favourable client–scaffold interaction energies within condensates were associated with client partitioning, while client–scaffold interactions competed with scaffold self-interactions. Analysis of interaction energies of individual residues revealed that the interactions were localised to specific sequence regions: charged blocks for interactions with MED1, and dispersed aromatic residues for interactions with FUS. Based on these molecular insights, we developed a sequence-based predictor of partitioning trends and applied it to a set of 243 sequences. Our prediction approach for partitioning can be extended to other biomolecules, offering a framework to analyse their partitioning in cellular environments. Competing Interest Statement KL-L holds stock options in and is a consultant for Peptone Ltd.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00