Comparative evaluation of genomic footprinting algorithms for predicting transcription factor binding sites in single-cell data

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,164 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
SUMMARY Transcription factors (TFs) have millions of potential binding sites across the human genome, but only a fraction are bound in a given context. Genomic footprinting aims to identify context-specific binding sites by detecting patterns in open chromatin data. While powerful, these approaches face technical challenges, especially in single-cell applications. We developed a benchmarking framework for cell-type specific footprinting and used it to evaluate the consistency, reproducibility, and equivalency of three leading methods across data quality scenarios and as a function of cell-type similarity. Peak-level read coverage emerged as the strongest predictor of stable footprints. Motivated by limited reproducibility across tools, we built an ensemble model that improved concordance with ChIP-seq. To encourage broader adoption and continued tool development, we provide practical guidelines for robust genomic footprinting in single-cell datasets and a roadmap for extracting deeper insights about how gene regulatory networks vary across cell types in complex tissues. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00