High prevalence of bilateral varicoceles confirmed with ultrasonography
Observational
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
Color Doppler ultrasonography revealed a 77.5% incidence of bilateral varicoceles in infertile men, indicating that clinical examination alone may overlook significant contralateral disease requiring further investigation.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of bilateral varicoceles in men presenting to a single infertility clinic.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From March 1999 to March 2000, 60 men presenting with an inability to initiate pregnancy (consecutive and unselected), were determined by clinical exam to have varicoceles. These men were sent for color Doppler ultrasound to evaluate the incidence of varicocele bilaterality. Two men with a solitary testis were excluded from the study.
RESULTS: Of the 58 men, 45 (77.5%) had ultrasound verified bilateral varicoceles. In the 13 remaining patients, 8 (13.8%) had a unilateral left varicocele, 4 (6.9%) had no varicoceles demonstrated by ultrasound, and a single patient (1.7%) was reported to have a unilateral right varicocele.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine scrotal ultrasound provides valuable information in the diagnostic evaluation of infertile men. Based on advancements in diagnostic techniques, investigators have recently observed that the incidence of bilateral varicoceles to be significantly greater than the previously reported. Our study demonstrated the incidence of bilaterality in infertile men to be a substantial 77.5%. An overlooked right varicocele (whether subclinical or not) may be detrimental to future fertility and needs further investigation.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (29)
- New insights into the etiology and treatment of male infertility via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00452-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45827-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.147.2.6836122 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00066.x via openalex
- W70301419 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57306-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80385-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019362 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55089-4 via openalex
- W2413966814 via openalex
- W2416038167 via openalex
- W4298228160 via openalex
- W4301248045 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47530-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(22)02723-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60080-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45626-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35713-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38451-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)34872-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57531-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0094-0143(21)01025-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67327-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)38400-x via openalex
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5913-5_29 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38450-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66245-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54970-x via openalex
SciLite annotations
organisms 2
men 2004071
men 2004071
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:22:51.059792+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:02:12.072533+00:00
- scilite
- last seen: 2026-05-18T04:26:01.642840+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK