Insect hosts are nutritional landscapes navigated by fungal pathogens

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,889 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Nutrition can mediate host-pathogen interactions indirectly when specific deficiencies (e.g. iron or glutamine) constrain host immune performance. Nutrition can also directly govern these interactions since invading pathogens colonize finite landscapes of nutritionally variable host tissues that must be optimally foraged during pathogen development. We first used a conceptual framework of nutritional niches to show that insect-pathogenic Metarhizium fungi navigate host landscapes where different tissues vary widely in (protein (P) and carbohydrates (C)). We next tested whether host-specific Metarhizium species have narrower fundamental nutritional niches (FNN) than host-generalists by measuring pathogen performance across an in vitro nutritional landscape simulating a within-host foraging environment. We then tested how developing pathogens navigate nutritional landscapes by developing a liquid-media approach to track pathogen intake of P and C over time. Host-specificity did not govern FNN dimensions as three tested Metarhizium species: 1) grew maximally across C treatments assuming P was present above a lower threshold, and 2) similarly initiated dispersal behaviors and sporulated when either C or P became depleted. However, specialist and generalist pathogens navigated nutritional landscapes differently. The host specialist (M. acridum) first prioritized C intake, but generalists (M. anisopliae, M. robertsii) prioritized P and C according to their availability. Numbers of known hosts may be insufficient to delimit pathogens as specialists or generalists since diverse hosts do not necessarily comprise diverse nutritional landscapes. Instead, immune responses of hosts and nutritional niche breadth of pathogens are likely co-equal evolutionary drivers of host specificity. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00