Full text
60,241 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Proteolytic cleavage of G3BP1 by calpain 1 couples NMDAR activation to mTOR-dependent local translation | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Proteolytic cleavage of G3BP1 by calpain 1 couples NMDAR activation to mTOR-dependent local translation Da-ha Park , View ORCID Profile So-Young Ahn , Jungho Kim , View ORCID Profile Jiwoo Choi , Seungha Lee , Minji Kang , Jae-man Song , View ORCID Profile Young Ho Suh doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.25.678501 Da-ha Park 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul 03080, South Korea 2 Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea 3 Transplantation Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site So-Young Ahn 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul 03080, South Korea 2 Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea 3 Transplantation Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for So-Young Ahn Jungho Kim 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul 03080, South Korea 2 Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea 3 Transplantation Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jiwoo Choi 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul 03080, South Korea 2 Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea 3 Transplantation Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Jiwoo Choi Seungha Lee 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul 03080, South Korea 2 Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea 3 Transplantation Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Minji Kang 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul 03080, South Korea 2 Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea 3 Transplantation Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jae-man Song 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul 03080, South Korea 2 Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea 3 Transplantation Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Young Ho Suh 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul 03080, South Korea 2 Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea 3 Transplantation Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University , Seoul 03080, South Korea Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Young Ho Suh For correspondence: suhyho{at}snu.ac.kr Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) granules are dynamic, membraneless organelles that sequester translationally repressed mRNAs and RNA-binding proteins, playing a pivotal role in the regulation of localized protein synthesis. While disassembly of RNP granules is essential for reactivating translation, the mechanisms by which neuronal activity regulates this process remain poorly understood. In this study, we show that stimulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (NMDAR) triggers calcium influx, leading to activation of calpain 1 and subsequent proteolytic cleavage of Ras-GTPase-activating protein binding protein 1 (G3BP1), a core component of stress granules. This cleavage results in the disassembly of G3BP1 granules in the neurites and promotes mTOR-dependent local translation, thereby linking synaptic activity to spatially restricted protein synthesis. Finally, we demonstrate that the NMDAR–calpain 1–G3BP1–mTOR signaling axis contributes to axonal regeneration, establishing proteolytic remodeling of RNP granules as a key mechanism of activity-dependent neural repair, with potential implications for therapeutic intervention in brain injury. Introduction Local protein synthesis plays a pivotal role in establishing and maintaining synaptic plasticity, axonal regeneration, and neuronal circuit remodeling. Translationally repressed mRNAs are packaged into ribonucleoprotein (RNP) granules (also called RNA granules) and transported to distal neuronal compartments such as dendrites and axons, where they can be locally translated in response to specific environmental stimuli ( Broix et al , 2021 ; Krichevsky & Kosik, 2001 ). The spatiotemporal regulation of RNP granules enables highly precise control of protein synthesis in both time and space, supporting activity-dependent synaptic remodeling that is essential for neurodevelopment and synaptic plasticity ( Bauer et al , 2023 ; Hafner et al , 2019 ; Kiebler & Bauer, 2024 ). RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which comprise heterogeneous protein constituents within RNP granules such as stress granules (SGs), specifically interact with their target mRNAs with high affinity and regulate mRNA localization and metabolism ( Formicola et al , 2019 ; Hentze et al , 2018 ). Among neuronal RBPs, Ras-GTPase-activating protein binding protein 1 (G3BP1) plays a central role in the dynamic assembly and disassembly of SGs and is increasingly being recognized for its functions beyond the classical stress response, particularly within neuronal compartments ( Sidibé et al , 2021 ). G3BP1 contains five distinct domains, including three intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) ( Kang et al , 2021 ). The N-terminal nuclear transport factor-like (NTF2L) domain mediates homodimerization, which is essential for liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and SG assembly, as well as protein– protein interactions required for subcellular localization ( Yang et al , 2020 ). The acidic-rich IDR1 negatively regulates LLPS and modulates G3BP1 conformation ( Guillén-Boixet et al , 2020 ). Under stress conditions, conformational changes in the IDRs expose the RNA-binding domain (RBD), facilitating G3BP1 binding to RNA and promoting SG formation ( Guillén-Boixet et al ., 2020 ; Yang et al ., 2020 ). The proline-rich IDR2 (PxxP) contains SH3 domain-binding motifs that potentially provide interaction sites for various signaling partners ( Sidibé et al ., 2021 ). The C-terminal RBD comprises an RNA recognition motif (RRM) and an arginine-glycine-rich (RG-rich) IDR3. While the RRM confers RNA-binding specificity and initiates SG formation, the RG-rich IDR3 enhances the affinity of G3BP1 for RNA and stabilizes the G3BP1-RNA complex ( Guillén-Boixet et al ., 2020 ). N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (NMDARs) are glutamate-gated ion channels that permit calcium influx into neurons, generating intracellular calcium transients. NMDAR-mediated calcium entry plays a central role in numerous physiological processes, including neuronal development, synaptogenesis, synapse-to-nucleus signaling, synaptic plasticity, and higher-order functions, such as learning, memory, and cognition ( Lau et al , 2009 ). Notably, NMDAR stimulation triggers the activation of calpain, a calcium-dependent cysteine protease. Particularly, calpain 1 activation downstream of NMDARs contributes to long-term potentiation (LTP) in the hippocampus through the proteolytic modification of synaptic scaffolding proteins and key signaling molecules ( Baudry & Bi, 2016 , 2025 ; Liu et al , 2008 ; Vinade et al , 2001 ). Additionally, under physiological conditions or during the early phases of excitotoxicity, calpain 1 has been shown to confer neuroprotection through pathways involving synaptic NMDARs ( Chiu et al , 2005 ; Hardingham, 2009; Lankiewicz et al , 2000 ; Wang et al , 2013 ; Xu et al , 2009 ). Despite these advances, the mechanism by which calpain 1 regulates RNP granules to support site-specific proteome remodeling in response to neuronal activity remains largely unclear. In this study, we demonstrated that activation of the NMDAR-calpain 1 axis leads to the proteolytic cleavage of G3BP1, specifically at the proline-rich IDR2. We found that calpain 1-induced G3BP1 cleavage disassembles G3BP1-positive granules and promotes mTOR-dependent local translation in neurites. This NMDAR–calpain 1–G3BP1–mTOR signaling axis contributes to axonal regeneration in an injury model. Our findings provide mechanistic insights into the neuroprotective roles of NMDAR-calpain signaling by linking local RNP granule dynamics to activity-dependent translational control. Results Glutamate stimulation induces G3BP1 truncation and disassembly of G3BP1 granules To investigate the activity-dependent dynamics of G3BP1-positive RNP granules, we stimulated day in vitro (DIV) 16 rat primary hippocampal neurons with potassium chloride (KCl)-induced depolarization, L-glutamate, or sodium arsenite-induced oxidative stress for 2 h. We found that both KCl and L-glutamate treatments produced approximately 50 kDa truncated form of G3BP1 in the Triton X-100-soluble (Tx-sol) fraction; however, this truncated G3BP1 fragment was barely detectable in the Triton X-100-insoluble (Tx-insol) fraction ( Fig. 1A ). In contrast, sodium arsenite treatment did not affect G3BP1 truncation in either fraction ( Fig. 1A ). Notably, L-glutamate treatment markedly reduced the expression level of full-length G3BP1 in the Tx-insol fraction ( Fig. 1A ). These findings suggest that the truncated form of G3BP1 becomes detergent-soluble and is redistributed into the Tx-sol fraction. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Glutamate induces G3BP1 truncation and granule disassembly. (A) Western blot showing G3BP1 truncation in Triton X-100 soluble (Tx-sol) and insoluble soluble (Tx-insol) fractions from DIV 16 primary hippocampal neurons after 2 h treatment with KCl (50 mM), L-glutamate (100 μM), or sodium arsenite (200 μM). (B) Confocal images of the soma of DIV 16 primary hippocampal neurons. Neurons were immunostained for G3BP1 and MAP2 after treatment with L-glutamate or sodium arsenite. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C-E) G3BP1 granule disassembly in axons and dendrites after L-glutamate treatment. MAP2 and Tau denote dendrites and axons, respectively. Inset images are taken from the box (dendrite) or dotted box (axon) in panel C. Scale bars: 30 μm (C), 5 μm (D, E). Immunostaining of G3BP1 in neurons revealed that L-glutamate treatment did not cause notable changes in G3BP1 signals in the soma, whereas sodium arsenite strongly induced SG formation ( Fig. 1B ). In contrast, L-glutamate treatment significantly reduced the intensity of G3BP1-positive puncta in both dendrites and axons ( Fig. 1C-E ), suggesting that neuronal activation promotes G3BP1 truncation and disassembly of G3BP1 granules. NMDAR activation induces truncation and disassembly of G3BP1-positive granules Since both depolarization and glutamate receptor stimulation induced G3BP1 truncation, we hypothesized that ionotropic glutamate receptors might mediate G3BP1 truncation. To test this hypothesis, we first examined whether selective agonists of NMDARs, AMPA receptors, or group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) induce G3BP1 truncation. Among these agonists, 50 μM NMDA treatment for 2 h robustly induced truncation of G3BP1 in DIV 16 primary hippocampal neurons, whereas AMPA or DHPG treatment had no obvious effect ( Fig. 2A ). Next, to investigate whether other mGluRs contribute to G3BP1 truncation, we applied a panel of pharmacological inhibitors targeting specific mGluR subtypes: MCPG (group I and II), CPCCOEt (mGluR1), LY367385 (mGluR1), MPEP (mGluR5), LY341495 (group II), MMPIP (mGluR7), and MSOP (group III). None of these antagonists prevented G3BP1 truncation ( Fig. 2B ), further confirming that G3BP1 truncation specifically occurs upon NMDAR activation. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. NMDAR activation and calcium influx induce G3BP1 truncation and granule disassembly. (A) G3BP1 truncation after 2 h treatment with NMDA (50 μM), AMPA (100 μM), DHPG (100 μM), or L-glutamate (100 μM). (B) Effect of mGluR inhibitors on L-glutamate-induced G3BP1 truncation. (C) G3BP1 truncation after co-treatment with D-AP5 (100 μM) or MK-801 (10 μM) and NMDA. (D) Redistribution of G3BP1 into the Tx-sol fraction following NMDA treatment. (E) G3BP1 truncation after brief (3-min pulse + 2 h) or prolonged (2 h) NMDA exposure. (F) Effect of calcium chelator EGTA (50 mM) on NMDA-induced G3BP1 truncation. (G and H) Confocal images showing granule disassembly in axons after NMDA treatment. DIV 16 primary hippocampal neurons were immunostained for G3BP1, MAP2, and Tau. Inset images are taken from the box in panel G. Scale bars, 30 μm (G), 5 μm (H). (I and J) Western blot analysis of NMDA-induced G3BP1 truncation in the presence of translation inhibitors (I) or proteasome/autophagolysosome inhibitors (J). To determine whether the effect of NMDA treatment is directly dependent on NMDAR channel activity, we treated primary hippocampal neurons with D-AP5, a competitive NMDAR antagonist, or MK-801, an open-channel blocker. Both inhibitors completely abolished NMDA-induced G3BP1 truncation ( Fig. 2C ), indicating that NMDAR signaling through activated NMDAR channels is essential for G3BP1 truncation. Additionally, NMDA treatment resulted in the redistribution of truncated G3BP1 into the Tx-sol fraction, accompanied by a decrease in the Tx-insol fraction ( Fig. 2D ), suggesting the disassembly of G3BP1-positive granules, which is consistent with the truncation effects observed following L-glutamate stimulation. We next asked whether G3BP1 truncation could be observed in neurons stimulated with a protocol known to induce AMPA receptor endocytosis and chemical long-term depression without causing excitotoxicity ( Beattie et al , 2000 ). When primary hippocampal neurons were exposed to a 3-min NMDA pulse, G3BP1 was truncated after 2 h, at levels comparable to those induced by 2 h of NMDA treatment ( Fig. 2E ). Furthermore, co-treatment with the extracellular calcium chelator EGTA prevented NMDA-induced G3BP1 truncation ( Fig. 2F ). These results indicate that transient calcium influx through NMDAR channels is sufficient to trigger G3BP1 truncation. Similar to L-glutamate treatment, NMDA stimulation reduced the intensity of G3BP1-positive puncta in Tau-positive axons ( Fig. 2G, H ), suggesting that G3BP1 truncation is accompanied by disassembly of G3BP1 granules. To exclude the possibility that the truncated form of G3BP1 might arise from de novo synthesis via alternative splicing following NMDA stimulation, we treated neurons with translation inhibitors, including cycloheximide (CHX), emetine, and puromycin. None of these inhibitors prevented G3BP1 truncation ( Fig. 2I ), supporting that the truncated form is not a product of translation but rather of proteolytic cleavage. Finally, we evaluated whether degradation pathways contribute to G3BP1 cleavage. Treatment with the proteasome-specific inhibitor epoxomicin or the autophagolysosome inhibitor bafilomycin A1 (Baf-A1) did not prevent NMDA-induced G3BP1 truncation ( Fig. 2J ). However, treatment with MG-132, a proteasome inhibitor that also exhibits inhibitory activity against cysteine proteases such as calpains and cathepsins ( Kisselev & Goldberg, 2001 ; Tsubuki et al , 1996 ), robustly suppressed the production of truncated G3BP1 ( Fig. 2J ). These results suggest that the truncated form is generated by specific proteolytic cleavage, rather than by partial degradation. NMDA stimulation cleaves G3BP1 through the action of calcium-activated calpain 1 Given that G3BP1 cleavage depends on intracellular calcium and occurs via proteolytic cleavage, we focused on calpain, a well-characterized calcium-activated cysteine protease. Indeed, treatment with MDL-28170, a selective calpain inhibitor, completely blocked NMDA-induced G3BP1 cleavage in DIV 16 primary hippocampal neurons ( Fig. 3A ). To further investigate the role of calpain in G3BP1 cleavage, we performed the calpain cleavage assay. Following co-transfection of HEK 293T cells with G3BP1 and calpain constructs, cell lysates were prepared and incubated with 2 mM CaCl 2 to activate calpains. We found that calpain 1 cleaved endogenous G3BP1, whereas calpain 2 had little effect ( Fig. 3B ). A similar pattern was observed upon G3BP1 overexpression (EGFP-G3BP1), with calpain 1 promoting cleavage while calpain 2 showed minimal activity ( Fig. 3C ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Calpain 1 cleaves G3BP1 following NMDAR stimulation. (A) Western blot analysis of G3BP1 cleavage after NMDA treatment with or without the calpain inhibitor MDL-28170 (5 μM) for 2 h. (B and C) In vitro calpain cleavage assay using HEK 293T cell lysates expressing FLAG-calpain 1 or 2 with or without calcium chloride (50 μM). The expression of endogenous G3BP1 (B) or exogenous EGFP-tagged G3BP1 (C) was analyzed by western blotting. (D) Western blot showing calpain 1-generated cleavage fragments. Arrow, full-length G3BP1; arrowheads, N-terminal (left) and C-terminal (right) fragments. (E) Western blot showing G3BP1 cleavage following calcium-ionomycin treatment (5 mM CaCl 2 , 1 μM ionomycin, 30 min) in HEK 293T cells co-transfected with FLAG-calpain 1 and EGFP-G3BP-Myc. To determine calpain 1 cleavage sites in G3BP1, we generated a dual-tagged G3BP1 construct containing EGFP at the N-terminus and a Myc epitope at the C-terminus. In the in vitro cleavage assay, two distinct bands as N-terminal fragments were detected at approximately 65-70 kDa, and the C-terminal fragment appeared at approximately 25 kDa ( Fig. 3D ). The presence of multiple truncated bands suggests that G3BP1 may expose additional calpain cleavage sites under in vitro assay conditions. To confirm that calpain-mediated cleavage occurs in cells, we co-transfected HEK 293T cells with EGFP-G3BP1-Myc and FLAG-calpain 1, and then treated the cells with 1 μM ionomycin, a calcium ionophore, in the presence of 5 mM CaCl 2 for 30 min. Under these conditions, we observed robust G3BP1 cleavage specifically mediated by calpain 1 expression ( Fig. 3E ). Calpain 1 constitutively binds to G3BP1 and cleaves it at the proline-rich IDR2 To identify the calpain-sensitive region within G3BP1, we generated a series of deletion mutants lacking one of the four major domains: the NTF2L domain, acidic IDR1, proline-rich IDR2 (PxxP), or RBD ( Fig. 4A ). Using these mutants, we found that calpain 1 cleaved G3BP1 within the proline-rich IDR2 (PxxP) domain in both the in vitro calpain cleavage assay ( Fig. 4B ) and the calcium-ionomycin assay ( Fig. 4C ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Calpain 1 cleaves the PxxP domain of G3BP1 and constitutively interacts with the NTF2L and acidic domains. (A) Schematic diagram of EGFP-G3BP1-Myc mutant constructs lacking the indicated domains. FL, full-length. The numbers represent the number of amino acids. (B) Western blot showing in vitro calpain cleavage assay in G3BP1 mutants lacking the indicated domain. (C) Western blot analysis of G3BP1 mutant cleavage by calpain 1 following calcium– ionomycin treatment. (D) HEK 293T cell lysates, co-expressing EGFP-G3BP1-Myc and FLAG-calpain 1, with or without EDTA and EGTA, were used to perform co-immunoprecipitation using anti-Myc antibody. (E and F) Domain-specific interactions between G3BP1 mutants and calpain 1 were analyzed by co-immunoprecipitation using anti-Myc antibody. (G) In vitro calpain cleavage assay in G3BP1 mutants lacking the indicated domain. (H) Model depicting the proteolytic cleavage of G3BP1 by basal and activated calpain 1. Next, we examined whether calpain 1 interacts with G3BP1. Co-transfection of HEK 293T cells with G3BP1 and calpain 1 followed by co-immunoprecipitation revealed robust binding between the two proteins ( Fig. 4D ). Notably, their interaction was unaffected under calcium-chelated conditions with EDTA and EGTA ( Fig. 4D ), indicating that calpain 1-G3BP1 binding is constitutive and calcium independent. To identify G3BP1 domains required for interaction with calpain 1, we analyzed a series of domain-deletion mutants. We found that calpain 1 binding was reduced in G3BP1 mutants lacking either the NTF2L domain or the acidic IDR1 region ( Fig. 4E ). We further generated G3BP1 constructs lacking either the NTF2L-acidic domains or the PxxP-RBD domains ( Fig. 4A ) and confirmed that calpain 1 interacted with the NTF2L and acidic domains ( Fig. 4F ). In vitro calpain cleavage assay revealed reduced cleavage in the mutant lacking the NTF2L-acidic domains and no detectable cleavage in the mutant lacking the PxxP-RBD domains ( Fig. 4G ). These results suggest that constitutive docking of calpain 1 to the NTF2L and acidic regions facilitates activity-dependent cleavage of G3BP1 at the proline-rich IDR2 domain. Under basal conditions, calpain 1 constitutively associates with the NTF2L and acidic regions of G3BP1 without exhibiting proteolytic activity. Upon NMDAR-mediated calcium influx, calpain 1 undergoes a conformational change that activates its proteolytic triad, enabling the cleavage of G3BP1 at the proline-rich IDR2. This cleavage event separates the NTF2L and RBD domains of G3BP1 ( Fig. 4H ). Calpain 1-mediated G3BP1 cleavage promotes disassembly of G3BP1 granules and enhances local translation G3BP1 functions as a SG nucleator and translational repressor ( Ivanov et al , 2019 ; Panas et al , 2016 ; Sahoo et al , 2018 ; Yang et al ., 2020 ). Given that NMDA stimulation led to a reduction in full-length G3BP1 levels within the Tx-insol fraction and promoted the redistribution of truncated G3BP1 into the Tx-sol fraction ( Fig. 2D ), we examined whether calpain 1 activity regulates these changes and consequently disrupts G3BP1 function. We found that treatment with MDL-28170 prevented NMDA-induced G3BP1 truncation and redistribution in primary hippocampal neurons, thereby blocking NMDA-induced decrease in full-length G3BP1 levels in the Tx-insol fraction ( Fig. 5A ). In contrast, NMDA treatment increased TDP43 levels in the Tx-insol fraction, and this effect was unaffected by calpain 1 inhibition ( Fig. 5A ). We next examined activity-dependent changes in G3BP1-positive granules following NMDA stimulation. NMDA treatment led to a marked reduction in the intensity of G3BP1-positive puncta in axons of primary hippocampal neurons, and this effect was blocked upon co-treatment with the calpain inhibitor MDL-28170 ( Fig. 5B ). These results indicate that calpain 1 activity promotes the disassembly of G3BP1-positive granules, including SGs. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Calpain 1-mediated G3BP1 cleavage and granule disassembly promote local translation. (A) Western blot showing that MDL-28170 prevents NMDA-induced redistribution of G3BP1 into the Tx-sol fraction. (B) Confocal images showing the effect of MDL-28170 on G3BP1 granules in Tau-positive, MAP2-negative axons of DIV 14 primary hippocampal neurons. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) Western blot analysis of puromycin-labeled nascent polypeptide synthesis following NMDA and/or MDL-28170 treatment. (D) Confocal images of ribopuromycylation (RPM) assay showing active translation near G3BP1 granules in axons. Scale bar, 30 μm; inset region, 5 μm. (E) Quantification of RPM signal intensity under each treatment condition in panel C. (F) In situ puromycin proximity ligation assay (puro-PLA) to detect nascent mTOR translation (mTOR-puro-PLA) in Tau-positive axons. Scale bar, 30 μm; inset region, 10 μm. (G) Quantification of mTOR-puro-PLA signal intensity in axons under the indicated conditions in panel F. The NMDAR-calpain 1 pathway regulates G3BP1 granule-associated local translation via mTOR Since G3BP1-positive SGs contain translationally repressed transcripts and associated ribosomes, we investigated whether calpain 1-mediated disassembly of G3BP1 granules regulates protein synthesis. To address this, primary hippocampal neurons were incubated with 10 μM puromycin for 30 min to perform puromycin-based surface sensing of translation (SUnSET) assay ( Schmidt et al , 2009 ). Puromycin is a tyrosyl-tRNA analog that is incorporated into nascent peptides, enabling the detection of newly synthesized proteins. The puromycin labeling assay showed that NMDA stimulation markedly reduced global protein synthesis; however, this reduction was not reversed by MDL-28170 treatment ( Fig. 5C ). These findings suggest that global translation is independent of the NMDAR-calpain signaling pathway and likely occurs primarily in the soma. To determine whether the NMDAR-calpain pathway regulates local translation in neurites, we performed the ribopuromycylation (RPM) assay. In this assay, emetine prevents the release of puromycylated nascent peptides from translating ribosomes, thereby allowing the detection of actively translating mRNAs within ribosomal complexes. NMDA stimulation significantly increased puromycin incorporation near G3BP1 granules in the axons, indicating derepression of local protein synthesis in G3BP1-positive granules ( Fig. 5D, E ). This NMDA-induced increase in local translation was abolished by MDL-28170 treatment ( Fig. 5D, E ), supporting a model in which calpain 1-mediated G3BP1 cleavage relieves translational repression and disrupts the function of G3BP1 as a local translational repressor. We next investigated the molecular mechanism by which the NMDAR–calpain 1– G3BP1 signaling axis regulates local translation. It has been well established that the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) phosphorylates eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs), thereby preventing their association with eIF4E and facilitating the assembly of translation initiation complex on dendritic and axonal mRNAs ( Panas et al ., 2016 ; Wolozin & Ivanov, 2019 ). Notably, mTOR has been shown to interact with G3BP1 ( Prentzell et al , 2021 ; Schwarz et al , 2015 ) and is activated downstream of NMDAR signaling to promote dendritic protein synthesis ( Gong et al , 2006 ). Thus, we investigated whether mTOR is involved in local translation regulated by the NMDAR–calpain 1–G3BP1 axis. Towards this, we used in situ puromycin proximity ligation assay (puro-PLA), a technique that visualizes nascent protein synthesis at subcellular resolution ( De Pace et al , 2025 ; tom Dieck et al , 2015). We observed an increase in mTOR translation in the axons of primary hippocampal neurons following NMDA stimulation. This NMDA-induced axonal mTOR translation was diminished by MDL-28170 treatment ( Fig. 5F, G ), indicating a critical role for calpain 1 in activity-dependent local translation through mTOR. The NMDAR–calpain 1–G3BP1–mTOR axis regulates axonal regeneration It has been reported that locally translated mTOR regulates axonal local translation following nerve injury ( Terenzio et al , 2018 ). Therefore, we investigated whether calpain 1-mediated upregulation of mTOR contributes to axonal regeneration. To test this hypothesis, we performed the scrape-induced axonal regeneration assay using primary hippocampal neurons. Following mechanical injury generated by 40 intersecting scratches with a sterile 10 μL micropipette tip, we observed a gradual increase in G3BP1 cleavage beginning at 1 h post-injury ( Fig. 6A ). These results suggest that the scrape assay could be a suitable model for evaluating calpain 1-mediated G3BP1 cleavage characterized in this study. Moreover, we found that blocking NMDARs with MK-801 or D-AP5 suppressed G3BP1 cleavage in the scrape injury model ( Fig. 6B, C ). Furthermore, treatment with MDL-28170 prevented G3BP1 cleavage ( Fig. 6D ), suggesting that the NMDAR-calpain 1 signaling axis mediates G3BP1 cleavage in this injury context. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6. NMDAR-calpain 1 signaling supports axonal regeneration after injury. (A) Western blot showing time-course of G3BP1 cleavage after scrape injury of DIV 10-14 primary hippocampal neurons. (B and C) Inhibition of G3BP1 cleavage by NMDAR antagonists MK-801 (B) and D-AP5 (C) following injury. (D) Effect of calpain inhibitor MDL-28170 on G3BP1 cleavage in the scrape injury model. (E) Confocal images showing axon regeneration by SMI-312 immunostaining under the indicated treatment conditions. Scale bar, 100 μm. To evaluate axonal regeneration, we immunostained the neurons with SMI-312 antibody 16 h after scraping ( Fig. 6E ). Axonal regrowth into the scraped area was markedly inhibited upon treatment with MDL-28170, Torin 1, or the calcium chelator EGTA. These results indicate that calcium-activated calpain 1 and mTOR signaling are essential for axonal regeneration ( Fig. 6E ). Taken together, these findings support a model in which the NMDAR–calpain 1–G3BP1–mTOR axis plays a critical role in promoting axonal regeneration following injury ( Fig. 6F ). Discussion In this study, we demonstrated that neuronal activity, specifically through NMDAR activation, triggers calcium-dependent activation of calpain 1 and induces calpain-mediated proteolytic cleavage of G3BP1, leading to the disassembly of G3BP1-containing RNP granules. This process enhances local translation and provides the proteome necessary for axonal regeneration in an mTOR-dependent manner. In contrast to oxidative stress, NMDAR stimulation induces calpain 1-dependent truncation of G3BP1 and its redistribution into the Tx-sol fraction. This selective proteolytic event does not affect global translation, but instead modulates local translation in neurites, revealing a calcium-dependent mechanism that supports activity-dependent, spatially restricted protein synthesis at the subcellular level. Furthermore, we uncovered a previously unrecognized post-translational regulatory mechanism that links neuronal activity to proteolytic remodeling of RNP granules. Our findings establish G3BP1 as a proteolytic substrate of calpain 1, with its proline-rich IDR2 domain serving as the cleavage site. Previous studies have shown that the positively charged RG-rich IDR3 is critical for LLPS and SG formation through RNA binding, whereas the negatively charged acidic-rich IDR1 functions as an autoinhibitory domain that suppresses granule assembly ( Guillén-Boixet et al ., 2020 ; Yang et al ., 2020 ). Under basal conditions, G3BP1 adopts a closed conformation through intramolecular interactions between IDR1 and IDR3. Upon binding of RNA to IDR3, the G3BP1 homodimer undergoes a conformational transition to an open state, facilitating its assembly into SG condensates. Importantly, the positively charged IDR2 interacts with the negatively charged IDR1 in a charge-dependent manner, thereby interfering with the formation of the IDR1-IDR3 interface. Therefore, calpain 1-mediated cleavage within IDR2 possibly reinforces the closed conformation of G3BP1 by promoting the engagement of IDR1 with IDR3, ultimately preventing granule assembly. Moreover, cleavage of IDR2 separates the NTF2L domain from the RBD region, which likely destabilizes the overall structural integrity of G3BP1 granules. Notably, this proteolytic event does not appear to be stochastic, but rather represents a programmed and tightly regulated mechanism. We found that calpain 1 constitutively binds to the NTF2L and acidic domains of G3BP1 under resting conditions and remains inactive. Upon calcium influx through NMDAR activation, calpain 1 becomes catalytically active and cleaves G3BP1 at IDR2 ( Fig. 4H ). These observations support a model in which G3BP1 is pre-configured for rapid, stimulus-responsive cleavage via a calcium-dependent mechanism. Such spatially and temporally gated proteolysis enables the dynamic regulation of G3BP1 granules and facilitates local translation in response to synaptic activity. We observed NMDA-induced G3BP1 cleavage in both the axons and dendrites. While classical NMDARs are predominantly localized to postsynaptic dendrites, presynaptic NMDARs are also expressed in axons, particularly during the early stages of synaptic development in the central nervous system (CNS) ( Banerjee et al , 2016 ; Bouvier et al , 2015 ). These presynaptic NMDARs play important roles in synapse formation, neurotransmitter release, and synaptic plasticity. Their synaptogenic nature may be linked to the local synthesis of proteomes via mTOR signaling and may contribute to neuronal regeneration following injury. While tightly regulated NMDAR activity supports neuroprotection and cellular resilience, excessive or dysregulated calcium influx can lead to neuronal damage and cell death during brain injury and neurodegenerative disorders. Consequently, pharmacological blockade of NMDARs often exacerbates neuronal vulnerability, impairs recovery following injury, or renders neurons more susceptible to secondary insults (Hardingham, 2009). Indeed, clinical trials using NMDAR antagonists for traumatic brain injury and stroke have largely failed or produced detrimental outcomes. These observations have led to the proposal that the activation, rather than inhibition, of NMDARs during the subacute phase post-injury may be more beneficial ( Ikonomidou & Turski, 2002 ; Shohami & Biegon, 2014 ). Notably, the two major calpain isoforms, calpain 1 and calpain 2, have been shown to play opposing roles in the brain. Calpain 1, which is activated via synaptic NMDARs, mediates neuroprotective signaling, whereas calpain 2, which is activated through extrasynaptic NMDARs, contributes to axonal degeneration and neuronal death ( Adamec et al , 1998 ; Baudry, 2019 ; Baudry & Bi, 2016 , 2025 ; Wang et al ., 2013 ). These reports align with our findings that selective activation of calpain 1 through NMDARs cleaves G3BP1, but not calpain 2, resulting in axonal regeneration and neuroprotective effects. Isoform-specific outcomes may arise from differences in calcium sensitivity (EC 50 ), subcellular localization, scaffold associations, substrate preferences, and downstream signaling pathways ( Averna et al , 2015 ; Baudry & Bi, 2016 ; Doshi & Lynch, 2009 ; Metwally et al , 2023 ; Xu et al ., 2009 ). Furthermore, given that the NMDAR subunits, GluN2A and GluN2B, are calpain substrates ( Bi et al , 1998 ; Guttmann et al , 2001 ; Monnerie et al , 2010 ; Simpkins et al , 2003 ; Tompa et al , 2004 ; Vinade et al ., 2001 ; Wu et al , 2005 ), a negative feedback regulatory loop may exist within the NMDAR-calpain signaling axis. Taken together, our findings provide mechanistic insights into a model in which the NMDAR–calpain 1–G3BP1–mTOR axis functions as a pathway that supplies locally synthesized proteomes to support synaptic transmission and neuronal regeneration. We demonstrated that NMDARs specifically activate calpain 1 via calcium influx. Since depolarization by potassium chloride or calcium-ionophore treatment in heterologous systems can also activate calpain 1, we cannot rule out the possibility that other calcium-permeable channels, such as transient receptor potential (TRP) channels or voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs), may contribute to calpain activation under certain conditions ( Kanamori et al , 2013 ; Kerstein et al , 2013 ). Nonetheless, our findings support a model wherein the NMDAR–calpain 1–G3BP1–mTOR signaling axis constitutes a key activity-dependent mechanism that promotes axonal regeneration, thereby offering a promising therapeutic target for CNS repair. Methods Primary neuron culture Primary hippocampal neurons were isolated from embryonic day 18 (E18) Sprague-Dawley rats obtained from OrientBio. All animal care and use procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the Seoul National University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol no. SNU-161222-2-4). To minimize suffering, pregnant rats were euthanized by CO 2 asphyxiation followed by decapitation. Embryos were delivered via Cesarean section and immediately decapitated. Hippocampi were dissected and incubated in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution containing 0.05% trypsin, 10 mM HEPES, 0.137 mg/mL deoxyribonuclease I, and penicillin-streptomycin at 37℃ for 12 min. Tissues were mechanically dissociated by trituration using a fire-polished Pasteur pipette. Cells were plated on poly-D-lysine-coated culture plates in serum-free Neurobasal medium supplemented with B-27 and 1% GlutaMAX TM . Cultures were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37℃ and 5% CO₂, with half-medium changes every 2-3 days. Drug treatments and calcium modulation To stimulate neuronal activity and intracellular calcium influx, neurons were treated for 2 h with 50 μM KCl, 100 μM L-glutamate, 200 μM sodium arsenite, 50 μM NMDA, 100 μM AMPA, or 100 μM DHPG. For receptor blockade experiments, mGluR antagonists (MCPG, 1 mM; CPCCOEt, 100 μM; Ly367385, 10 μM; MPEP, 10 μM; Ly341495, 5 nM; MMPIP, 1 μM; MSOP, 100 μM) or NMDAR antagonist (D-AP5, 50 μM; MK-801, 10 μM) were administered 5 min prior to NMDA treatment. Calcium chelation was achieved by adding 50 mM EGTA for 30 min prior to stimulation. Calpain activity was inhibited using 5 μM MDL-28170. Western blot analysis and subcellular fractionation Cells were lysed in ice-cold TNE buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, and 1% Triton X-100) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails. Lysates were incubated on ice for 20 min and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 15 min at 4℃ to separate Triton X-100-soluble and -insoluble fractions. The insoluble pellets were resuspended in the same lysis buffer and sonicated. Western blotting was performed using antibodies against G3BP1, α-tubulin, FLAG, GFP, Myc, TDP-43, and puromycin, as appropriate. Protein bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence, exposed to X-ray film, and developed in a dark room using standard chemical developers and fixatives. Immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy Neurons were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde containing 4% sucrose, and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100. After blocking, the neurons were incubated with primary antibodies against G3BP1, MAP2, Tau, and puromycin. Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for detection. Confocal images were captured using the Leica STELLARIS 5 system. In vitro cleavage assay HEK 293T cells were transfected with EGFP-G3BP1-Myc and/or FLAG-calpain 1 or 2 using the jetOPTIMUS transfection reagent. Cleavage reactions were performed by mixing cell lysates with 50 μM CaCl 2 for 45 min at room temperature. The reactions were stopped by adding 6x Laemmli buffer and boiling prior to western blot analysis. Immunoprecipitation For co-immunoprecipitation analysis, HEK293T cells were lysed in TNE buffer. Lysates were incubated with anti-Myc antibody and Protein G Sepharose beads overnight at 4℃. For calcium-sensitive interaction studies, 2 mM EDTA and 2.5 mM EGTA were added to the lysis and wash buffers. The bound proteins were eluted and analyzed by western blotting. SUnSET assay To assess nascent protein synthesis ( Schmidt et al ., 2009 ), DIV 17 primary hippocampal neurons were treated with NMDA (50 μM) and/or MDL-28170 (5 μM), followed by a 30-min incubation with 10 μM puromycin at 37℃. The cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS, lysed in TNE buffer supplemented with 0.2% SDS, and analyzed by western blotting using anti-puromycin antibody. RPM assay To label actively translating ribosomes, neurons were treated with 200 μM emetine for 15 min to arrest ribosomal protein synthesis, and then exposed to 100 μM puromycin for 10 min. After fixation, the cells were immunostained with anti-puromycin and anti-G3BP1 antibodies to visualize translating ribosomes in proximity to G3BP1 granules in the axons. mTOR-puro-PLA To visualize nascent mTOR translation in situ , DIV 14 primary hippocampal neurons were incubated with 5 μM puromycin for 2 h. Where indicated, inhibitors were added 5 min prior to NMDA stimulation. Puro-PLA was performed using the Duolink® In Situ Red Starter Kit (Mouse/Rabbit) using anti-puromycin and anti-mTOR antibodies, according to the manufacturer’s instructions with minor optimizations, including blocking with 10% normal goat serum to optimize conditions for primary neurons. Mechanical injury model of neurons Neurons were mechanically scraped as described previously ( Mukhin et al , 1997 ; Tecoma et al , 1989 ). For biochemical analyses, DIV 10-14 primary hippocampal neurons were manually scraped using a sterile 10 μL micropipette tip to create intersecting horizontal and vertical lines across the culture dish, forming a grid with approximately 5 mm spacing between parallel lines. For immunostaining, single horizontal and vertical scratches were made across the culture dish. Quantification and statistical analysis Quantitative image analysis (e.g., RPM intensity) was performed using ImageJ. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism or Microsoft Excel. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, unless otherwise stated. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Author contributions D-h.P. and Y.H.S. designed the study; D-h.P. performed the experiments with the assistance of S-Y.A., J.K., J.C., S.L., M.K., and J-m.S.; D-h.P. analyzed the data; Y.H.S. supervised the study; D-h.P. and Y.H.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript. Disclosure and competing interests The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Data Availability This study includes no data deposited in external repositories. Acknowledgements This work was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (NRF-2020R1A5A1019023) and Korea Dementia Research Project through the Korea Dementia Research Center (KDRC) (RS-2024-00332875). References ↵ Adamec E , Beermann ML , Nixon RA ( 1998 ) Calpain I activation in rat hippocampal neurons in culture is NMDA receptor selective and not essential for excitotoxic cell death . Molecular Brain Research 54 : 35 – 48 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Averna M , Pellegrini M , Cervetto C , Pedrazzi M , Bavestrello M , De Tullio R , Salamino F , Pontremoli S , Melloni E ( 2015 ) Physiological Roles of Calpain 1 Associated to Multiprotein NMDA Receptor Complex . PLoS One 10 : e0139750 OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Banerjee A , Larsen RS , Philpot BD , Paulsen O ( 2016 ) Roles of Presynaptic NMDA Receptors in Neurotransmission and Plasticity . Trends in Neurosciences 39 : 26 – 39 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Baudry M ( 2019 ) Calpain-1 and Calpain-2 in the Brain: Dr. Jekill and Mr Hyde? Curr Neuropharmacol 17 : 823 – 829 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Baudry M , Bi X ( 2016 ) Calpain-1 and Calpain-2: The Yin and Yang of Synaptic Plasticity and Neurodegeneration . Trends in Neurosciences 39 : 235 – 245 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Baudry M , Bi X ( 2025 ) Calpain-1 and Calpain-2 in the Brain: What Have We Learned from 45 Years of Research? Cells doi: 10.3390/cells14171301 [PREPRINT] OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Bauer KE , de Queiroz BR , Kiebler MA , Besse F ( 2023 ) RNA granules in neuronal plasticity and disease . Trends Neurosci 46 : 525 – 538 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Beattie EC , Carroll RC , Yu X , Morishita W , Yasuda H , von Zastrow M , Malenka RC ( 2000 ) Regulation of AMPA receptor endocytosis by a signaling mechanism shared with LTD . Nat Neurosci 3 : 1291 – 1300 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Bi X , Rong Y , Chen J , Dang S , Wang Z , Baudry M ( 1998 ) Calpain-mediated regulation of NMDA receptor structure and function . Brain Res 790 : 245 – 253 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Bouvier G , Bidoret C , Casado M , Paoletti P ( 2015 ) Presynaptic NMDA receptors: Roles and rules . Neuroscience 311 : 322 – 340 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Broix L , Turchetto S , Nguyen L ( 2021 ) Coordination between Transport and Local Translation in Neurons . Trends in Cell Biology 31 : 372 – 386 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Chiu K , Lam TT , Ying Li WW , Caprioli J , Kwong Kwong JM ( 2005 ) Calpain and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-induced excitotoxicity in rat retinas . Brain Research 1046 : 207 – 215 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ De Pace R , Bonifacino JS , Ghosh S ( 2025 ) Puromycin Proximity Ligation Assay (Puro-PLA) to Assess Local Translation in Axons From Human Neurons . Bio Protoc 15 : e5224 OpenUrl ↵ Doshi S , Lynch DR ( 2009 ) Calpain and the glutamatergic synapse . Front Biosci (Schol Ed ) 1 : 466 – 476 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Formicola N , Vijayakumar J , Besse F ( 2019 ) Neuronal ribonucleoprotein granules: Dynamic sensors of localized signals . Traffic 20 : 639 – 649 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gong R , Park CS , Abbassi NR , Tang S-J ( 2006 ) Roles of Glutamate Receptors and the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Signaling Pathway in Activity-dependent Dendritic Protein Synthesis in Hippocampal Neurons* . Journal of Biological Chemistry 281 : 18802 – 18815 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Guillén-Boixet J , Kopach A , Holehouse AS , Wittmann S , Jahnel M , Schlüßler R , Kim K , Trussina IREA , Wang J , Mateju D et al. ( 2020 ) RNA-Induced Conformational Switching and Clustering of G3BP Drive Stress Granule Assembly by Condensation . Cell 181 : 346 – 361 .e317 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Guttmann RP , Baker DL , Seifert KM , Cohen AS , Coulter DA , Lynch DR ( 2001 ) Specific proteolysis of the NR2 subunit at multiple sites by calpain . J Neurochem 78 : 1083 – 1093 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Hafner AS , Donlin-Asp PG , Leitch B , Herzog E , Schuman EM ( 2019 ) Local protein synthesis is a ubiquitous feature of neuronal pre- and postsynaptic compartments . Science 364 Hardingham Giles E ( 2009 ) Coupling of the NMDA receptor to neuroprotective and neurodestructive events . Biochemical Society Transactions 37 : 1147 – 1160 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Hentze MW , Castello A , Schwarzl T , Preiss T ( 2018 ) A brave new world of RNA-binding proteins . Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 19 : 327 – 341 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Ikonomidou C , Turski L ( 2002 ) Why did NMDA receptor antagonists fail clinical trials for stroke and traumatic brain injury? The Lancet Neurology 1 : 383 – 386 OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Ivanov P , Kedersha N , Anderson P ( 2019 ) Stress Granules and Processing Bodies in Translational Control . Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 11 ↵ Kanamori T , Kanai MI , Dairyo Y , Yasunaga K-i , Morikawa RK , Emoto K ( 2013 ) Compartmentalized Calcium Transients Trigger Dendrite Pruning in Drosophila Sensory Neurons . Science 340 : 1475 – 1478 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Kang W , Wang Y , Yang W , Zhang J , Zheng H , Li D ( 2021 ) Research Progress on the Structure and Function of G3BP . Front Immunol 12 : 718548 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kerstein PC , Jacques-Fricke BT , Rengifo J , Mogen BJ , Williams JC , Gottlieb PA , Sachs F , Gomez TM ( 2013 ) Mechanosensitive TRPC1 Channels Promote Calpain Proteolysis of Talin to Regulate Spinal Axon Outgrowth . The Journal of Neuroscience 33 : 273 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Kiebler MA , Bauer KE ( 2024 ) RNA granules in flux: dynamics to balance physiology and pathology . Nature Reviews Neuroscience 25 : 711 – 725 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kisselev AF , Goldberg AL ( 2001 ) Proteasome inhibitors: from research tools to drug candidates . Chem Biol 8 : 739 – 758 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Krichevsky AM , Kosik KS ( 2001 ) Neuronal RNA Granules: A Link between RNA Localization and Stimulation-Dependent Translation . Neuron 32 : 683 – 696 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Lankiewicz S , Marc Luetjens C , Truc Bui N , Krohn AJ , Poppe M , Cole GM , Saido TC , Prehn JHM ( 2000 ) Activation of Calpain I Converts Excitotoxic Neuron Death into a Caspase-independent Cell Death* . Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 : 17064 – 17071 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Lau CG , Takeuchi K , Rodenas-Ruano A , Takayasu Y , Murphy J , Bennett MV , Zukin RS ( 2009 ) Regulation of NMDA receptor Ca2+ signalling and synaptic plasticity . Biochem Soc Trans 37 : 1369 – 1374 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Liu J , Liu MC , Wang KKW ( 2008 ) Calpain in the CNS: From Synaptic Function to Neurotoxicity . Science Signaling 1 : re1-re1 ↵ Metwally E , Al-Abbadi HA , Hussain T , Murtaza G , Abdellatif AM , Ahmed MF ( 2023 ) Calpain signaling: from biology to therapeutic opportunities in neurodegenerative disorders . Front Vet Sci 10 : 1235163 OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Monnerie H , Hsu FC , Coulter DA , Le Roux PD ( 2010 ) Role of the NR2A/2B subunits of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor in glutamate-induced glutamic acid decarboxylase alteration in cortical GABAergic neurons in vitro . Neuroscience 171 : 1075 – 1090 OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Mukhin AG , Ivanova SA , Knoblach SM , Faden AI ( 1997 ) New in vitro model of traumatic neuronal injury: evaluation of secondary injury and glutamate receptor-mediated neurotoxicity . J Neurotrauma 14 : 651 – 663 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Panas MD , Ivanov P , Anderson P ( 2016 ) Mechanistic insights into mammalian stress granule dynamics . Journal of Cell Biology 215 : 313 – 323 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Prentzell MT , Rehbein U , Cadena Sandoval M , De Meulemeester AS , Baumeister R , Brohée L , Berdel B , Bockwoldt M , Carroll B , Chowdhury SR et al. ( 2021 ) G3BPs tether the TSC complex to lysosomes and suppress mTORC1 signaling . Cell ↵ Sahoo PK , Lee SJ , Jaiswal PB , Alber S , Kar AN , Miller-Randolph S , Taylor EE , Smith T , Singh B , Ho TS-Y et al. ( 2018 ) Axonal G3BP1 stress granule protein limits axonal mRNA translation and nerve regeneration . Nat Commun 9 : 3358 – 3358 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Schmidt EK , Clavarino G , Ceppi M , Pierre P ( 2009 ) SUnSET, a nonradioactive method to monitor protein synthesis . Nat Methods 6 : 275 – 277 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Schwarz JJ , Wiese H , Tölle RC , Zarei M , Dengjel J , Warscheid B , Thedieck K ( 2015 ) Functional Proteomics Identifies Acinus L as a Direct Insulin- and Amino Acid-Dependent Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1) Substrate . Mol Cell Proteomics 14 : 2042 – 2055 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Shohami E , Biegon A ( 2014 ) Novel approach to the role of NMDA receptors in traumatic brain injury . CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 13 : 567 – 573 OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Sidibé H , Dubinski A , Vande Velde C ( 2021 ) The multi-functional RNA-binding protein G3BP1 and its potential implication in neurodegenerative disease . J Neurochem 157 : 944 – 962 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Simpkins KL , Guttmann RP , Dong Y , Chen Z , Sokol S , Neumar RW , Lynch DR ( 2003 ) Selective activation induced cleavage of the NR2B subunit by calpain . J Neurosci 23 : 11322 – 11331 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Tecoma ES , Monyer H , Goldberg MP , Choi DW ( 1989 ) Traumatic neuronal injury in vitro is attenuated by NMDA antagonists . Neuron 2 : 1541 – 1545 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Terenzio M , Koley S , Samra N , Rishal I , Zhao Q , Sahoo PK , Urisman A , Marvaldi L , Oses-Prieto JA , Forester C et al. ( 2018 ) Locally translated mTOR controls axonal local translation in nerve injury . Science 359 : 1416 – 1421 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text tom Dieck S , Kochen L , Hanus C , Heumüller M , Bartnik I , Nassim-Assir B , Merk K , Mosler T , Garg S , Bunse S et al. ( 2015 ) Direct visualization of newly synthesized target proteins in situ . Nat Methods 12 : 411 – 414 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Tompa P , Buzder-Lantos P , Tantos A , Farkas A , Szilágyi A , Bánóczi Z , Hudecz F , Friedrich P ( 2004 ) On the sequential determinants of calpain cleavage . J Biol Chem 279 : 20775 – 20785 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Tsubuki S , Saito Y , Tomioka M , Ito H , Kawashima S ( 1996 ) Differential inhibition of calpain and proteasome activities by peptidyl aldehydes of di-leucine and tri-leucine . J Biochem 119 : 572 – 576 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Vinade L , Petersen JD , Do K , Dosemeci A , Reese TS ( 2001 ) Activation of calpain may alter the postsynaptic density structure and modulate anchoring of NMDA receptors . Synapse 40 : 302 – 309 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Wang Y , Briz V , Chishti A , Bi X , Baudry M ( 2013 ) Distinct roles for μ-calpain and m-calpain in synaptic NMDAR-mediated neuroprotection and extrasynaptic NMDAR-mediated neurodegeneration . J Neurosci 33 : 18880 – 18892 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Wolozin B , Ivanov P ( 2019 ) Stress granules and neurodegeneration . Nature reviews Neuroscience 20 : 649 – 666 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wu H-Y , Yuen EY , Lu Y-F , Matsushita M , Matsui H , Yan Z , Tomizawa K ( 2005 ) Regulation of N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptors by Calpain in Cortical Neurons . Journal of Biological Chemistry 280 : 21588 – 21593 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Xu J , Kurup P , Zhang Y , Goebel-Goody SM , Wu PH , Hawasli AH , Baum ML , Bibb JA , Lombroso PJ ( 2009 ) Extrasynaptic NMDA receptors couple preferentially to excitotoxicity via calpain-mediated cleavage of STEP . J Neurosci 29 : 9330 – 9343 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Yang P , Mathieu C , Kolaitis RM , Zhang P , Messing J , Yurtsever U , Yang Z , Wu J , Li Y , Pan Q et al. ( 2020 ) G3BP1 Is a Tunable Switch that Triggers Phase Separation to Assemble Stress Granules . Cell 181 : 325 – 345 .e328 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted September 25, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Proteolytic cleavage of G3BP1 by calpain 1 couples NMDAR activation to mTOR-dependent local translation Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Proteolytic cleavage of G3BP1 by calpain 1 couples NMDAR activation to mTOR-dependent local translation Da-ha Park , So-Young Ahn , Jungho Kim , Jiwoo Choi , Seungha Lee , Minji Kang , Jae-man Song , Young Ho Suh bioRxiv 2025.09.25.678501; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.25.678501 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Proteolytic cleavage of G3BP1 by calpain 1 couples NMDAR activation to mTOR-dependent local translation Da-ha Park , So-Young Ahn , Jungho Kim , Jiwoo Choi , Seungha Lee , Minji Kang , Jae-man Song , Young Ho Suh bioRxiv 2025.09.25.678501; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.25.678501 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Neuroscience Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7629) Biochemistry (17660) Bioengineering (13881) Bioinformatics (41911) Biophysics (21436) Cancer Biology (18578) Cell Biology (25482) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13371) Ecology (19887) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24302) Genetics (15599) Genomics (22482) Immunology (17728) Microbiology (40363) Molecular Biology (17163) Neuroscience (88536) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2830) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4821) Physiology (7637) Plant Biology (15129) Scientific Communication and Education (2045) Synthetic Biology (4290) Systems Biology (9817) Zoology (2269)
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.