ER-phagy Receptor’s Intrinsically Disordered Modules Drive ER Fragmentation and ER-phagy

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,895 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Membrane remodeling leading to fragmentation is crucial for autophagy programs that control capture by phagophores or endolysosomes of portions of organelles to be removed from cells. It is driven by membrane-bound autophagy receptors that display cytoplasmic intrinsically disordered modules (IDRs) engaging Atg8/LC3/GABARAP (LC3). Studies on endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-phagy receptors of the FAM134 family revealed the importance of sequential FAM134 proteins phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and clustering for execution of the ER-phagy programs. In this model, ER fragmentation is promoted/facilitated by the membrane-remodeling function of FAM134 reticulon homology domains (RHDs). However, RHDs are not conserved in ER-phagy receptors. The question that we tackle in this work is if activation of ER-phagy receptors anchored at the ER membrane with conventional membrane spanning domains, i.e., most of the ER-phagy receptors known to date, eventually trigger ER remodeling and fragmentation, and how. Here, we show that the membrane-tethering modules of ER-phagy receptors (RHDs for FAM134B, single/multi spanning transmembrane domains for TEX264 and SEC62) determine the sub-compartmental distribution of the receptors but are dispensable for ER fragmentation, regardless of their propensity to remodel the ER membrane. Rather, ER fragmentation is promoted by the ER-phagy receptors intrinsically disordered region (IDR) modules that are a conserved feature of all ER-phagy receptors exposed at the cytoplasmic face of the ER membrane. Since cytoplasmic IDRs with net negative charge are conserved in autophagy receptors at the limiting membrane of other organelles, we anticipate that conserved mechanisms of organelle fragmentaVon driven by cytoplasmic exposed IDRs could operate in eukaryoVc cells. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0