Diagnosing protein sequence search in the era of language models

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,231 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Protein language model (PLM) based search is rapidly emerging as a successor to classical sequence alignment, with recent high-profile studies reporting substantial improvements in speed and remote homology detection. However, success on standard benchmarks does not guarantee that similarity derived from PLM embeddings constitutes reliable biological evidence. Here, we introduce PLM-GUARD, a diagnostic framework designed to interrogate the underlying meaning of protein search scores and assess their biological trustworthiness. PLM-GUARD comprises six sanity checks spanning biological fidelity, semantic validity, and manipulation safety. Across eight representative search methods, classical alignment-based systems demonstrate remarkable robustness, whereas current PLM-based methods fail broadly across all three dimensions. Notably, hybrid methods show intermediate results, indicating that alignment is still critical for ensuring biologically grounded correspondence. Our findings provide a timely clarification for the field and underscore the necessity of diagnostic evaluation as protein search enters the era of language models. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00