Impact of hypertension in diabetes on surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty - a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 1002 patients

In: European Spine Journal · 2025 · vol. 34(4) , pp. 1301–1308 · doi:10.1007/s00586-025-08673-8 · PMID:39909892 · W4407165306
article OA: closed CC0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12 · read from full text

This retrospective, multi-institutional study of 1002 patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty (2008–2017) examined whether medically treated hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus (HT in DM) was associated with postoperative neurological recovery and in-hospital complications. The primary outcome was JOA score recovery rate, with secondary outcomes including postoperative complications, and analyses compared four groups defined by presence of HT and/or DM. Patients with HT in DM had worse postoperative JOA scores and JOA-RR, with HT in DM emerging as an independent risk factor for failing to achieve the MCID for JOA-RR (OR 3.6), alongside a higher observed rate of in-hospital complications including C5 palsy (though some complication comparisons were borderline). Limitations included the retrospective design and reliance on in-hospital outcomes rather than longer-term follow-up. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 10,720 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 6 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to elucidate the association between comorbid hypertension (HT) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (HT in DM) and clinical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty.

Methods

This retrospective multi-institutional study enrolled patients who underwent laminoplasty between 2008 and 2017. The primary outcome was the recovery rate of JOA score. The secondary outcome was in-hospital all-cause postoperative complications.

Results

This study included 1002 patients (mean age, 66 years; 30% women) who were divided into 4 groups based on the presence of medically-treated HT and/or DM. The overall incidence of DM was 17%, and the prevalence of HT was 47% in diabetic patients. Patients with HT in DM showed similar preoperative JOA scores compared to those without both HT and DM. However, patients with HT in DM showed poorer postoperative JOA scores and worse JOA-RR (non-HT/DM, 48%; DM, 43%; HT, 37%; HT in DM, 28%; p < 0.05). Patients with HT in DM tended to have a higher risk of postoperative complications (2.5%, 5.4%, 3.0%, and 7.4%; p = 0.09), especially C5 palsy (0.8%, 3.0%, 1.7%, and 4.9%; p = 0.04). After adjusting confounders, the presence of HT in DM was an independent risk factor for failure to achieve the JOA-RR MCID (JOA-RR < 42%) (OR = 3.6).

Conclusions

Approximately half of patients with DM had HT. HT in DM was closely associated with unfavorable surgical outcomes, including an increased incidence of in-hospital postoperative complications and an elevated risk of C5 palsy. In contrast, patients with DM alone demonstrated relatively favorable outcomes. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Kimura A, Takeshita T, Yoshii K et al (2021) Impact of diabetes Mellitus on cervical spine surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Clin Med 10(15):3375. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153375. Published 2021 Jul 29 Rodrigues-Pinto R, Montenegro TS, Davies BM et al (2022) Optimizing the application of surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 10]. Global Spine J 12(1suppl):147S–158S. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682211062494 Nagoshi N, Watanabe K, Nakamura M et al (2023) Does Diabetes affect the Surgical outcomes in cases with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament? A Multicenter Study from Asia Pacific Spine Study Group. Global Spine J 13(2):353–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568221996300 Partha Sarathi CI, Sinha A, Rafati Fard A et al (2024) The significance of metabolic disease in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review. Front Neurol 15:1301003 Published 2024 Feb 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1301003 Liu Y, Ban DX, Kan SL, Cao TW, Feng SQ (2017) The impact of diabetes Mellitus on patients undergoing cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a Meta-analysis. Eur Neurol 77(1–2):105–112. https://doi.org/10.1159/000453547 Kalb S, Zaidi HA, Ribas-Nijkerk JC et al (2015) Persistent outpatient hypertension is independently Associated with spinal cord dysfunction and imaging characteristics of spinal cord damage among patients with cervical spondylosis. World Neurosurg 84(2):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.030 Nagata K, Miyahara J, Nakamoto H et al (2022) Effect of diabetes on patient-reported outcome measures at one year after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Sci Rep 12(1):9684 Published 2022 Jun 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13838-2 Takasawa E, Sorimachi Y, Iizuka Y et al (2019) Risk factors for Rapidly Progressive Neurological Deterioration in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(12):E723–E730. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002969 Perdomo-Pantoja A, Chara A, Kalb S et al (2020) The effect of renin-angiotensin system blockers on spinal cord dysfunction and imaging features of spinal cord compression in patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis. Spine J 20(4):519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.12.002 Chiang TY, Wang YK, Huang WC, Huang SS, Chu YC (2022) Intraoperative hypotension in non-emergency decompression surgery for cervical spondylosis: The role of chronic arterial hypertension. Front Med (Lausanne). 9:943596. Published 2022 Oct 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.943596 Davies BM, Mowforth O, Gharooni AA et al (2022) A New Framework for investigating the Biological basis of degenerative cervical myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 5]: mechanical stress, vulnerability and time. Global Spine J 12(1suppl):78S–96S. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682211057546 Hu FB, Stampfer MJ (2005) Insulin resistance and hypertension: the chicken-egg question revisited. Circulation 112(12):1678–1680. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.568055 Cheung BM, Li C (2012) Diabetes and hypertension: is there a common metabolic pathway? Curr Atheroscler Rep 14(2):160–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-012-0227-2 Wei GS, Coady SA, Goff DC Jr et al (2011) Blood pressure and the risk of developing diabetes in African americans and whites: ARIC, CARDIA, and the framingham heart study. Diabetes Care 34(4):873–879. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1786 Jia G, Sowers JR (2021) Hypertension in diabetes: an update of Basic mechanisms and Clinical Disease. Hypertension 78(5):1197–1205. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17981 Oshima Y, Takeshita K, Kato S et al (2022) Comparison between the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and patient-reported JOA (PRO-JOA) score to Evaluate Surgical outcomes of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Global Spine J 12(5):795–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220964167 Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl 48(3):452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244 Magliano DJ, Boyko EJ, IDF Diabetes Atlas (2021) 10th edition scientific committee. IDF DIABETES ATLAS. 10th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators (2023) Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2021 [published correction appears in Lancet. 2023;402(10408):1132. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02044-5]. Lancet 402(10397):203–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6 Jiang S, Yu T, Di D, Wang Y, Li W (2024) Worldwide burden and trends of diabetes among people aged 70 years and older, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 40(3):e3745. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3745 Tu J, Vargas Castillo J, Das A, Diwan AD (2021) Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Insights into Its Pathobiology and Molecular Mechanisms. J Clin Med.;10(6):1214. Published 2021 Mar 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061214 Wang M, Liu Y, Liang Y, Naruse K, Takahashi K (2021) Systematic understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms of oxidative stress-related conditions-diabetes Mellitus, Cardiovascular diseases, and Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Front Cardiovasc Med 8:649785 Published 2021 Apr 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.649785 American Diabetes Association. 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020 [published correction appears in Diabetes Care (2020);43(8):1977–1978. doi: 10.2337/dc20-ad08]. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl 1):S111-S134. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-S010 Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS et al (2018) 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice guidelines [published correction appears in hypertension. 2018;71(6):e140-e144. Doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000076]. Hypertension 71(6):e13–e115. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065 Leung AA, Daskalopoulou SS, Dasgupta K et al (2017) Hypertension Canada’s 2017 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults [published correction appears in Can J Cardiol. 33(12):1733–1734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.09.006]. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(5):557–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.03.005 Umemura S, Arima H, Arima S et al (2019) The Japanese Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2019). Hypertens Res 42(9):1235–1481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-019-0284-9 Gupta R, Chanbour H, Roth SG et al (2023) The Ideal threshold of Hemoglobin A1C in Diabetic patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery. Clin Spine Surg 36(6):E226–E233. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001399 Roth SG, Chanbour H, Gupta R et al (2022) Optimal hemoglobin A1C target in diabetics undergoing elective cervical spine surgery [published correction appears in Spine J.;22(9):1589–1592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.005]. Spine J. 2022;22(7):1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.02.014 Telemi E, Mansour TR, Brennan M et al (2024) Does Tighter Glycemic Control Beyond Hemoglobin A1c of 8% Improve Outcome for Lumbar Spine Surgery? A MSSIC Study. Neurosurgery. Published online January 19. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002838

Acknowledgements

N/A. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Ethical approval The research protocol was approved by our institutional review board (approval number: HS2019−117), and informed consent was obtained from all of the patients. Permission to reproduce copyrighted materials or signed patient consent forms N/A. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Tomomatsu, Y., Takasawa, E., Iizuka, Y. et al. Impact of hypertension in diabetes on surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty - a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 1002 patients. Eur Spine J 34, 1301–1308 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08673-8 Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08673-8

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

References (28)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-13T19:18:34.726495+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK