Acute appendicitis: does removal of a normal appendix matter, what is the value of diagnostic accuracy and is surgical delay important?

Other OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-11 ⓘ

A prospective study of 248 patients found that surgical delay did not increase perforation or complications, but removal of a normal appendix was significantly associated with persistent pain at long-term follow-up.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

A prospective study with long-term follow-up was undertaken of 248 patients (137 males, median age 18 years (range 6-81 years), undergoing emergency appendicectomy during a 12-month period. Acute inflammation was present in 182 patients (73.4%) (males 86.1%, females 57.8%; P < 0.001). Before surgery, the positive predictive value of diagnostic accuracy was 82.0% (males 91.2%, females 67.7%). Delaying surgery did not significantly increase the proportion of perforated appendices (22.0%), hospital stay, or frequency of postoperative complications (overall 49.6%). Hospital complications were significantly more common among patients with a perforated appendix. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between patients with or without appendicitis while in hospital, during the first 18 months after operation or 8 years after operation. At 18 months, 17 of 238 patients (7.1%) continued to experience their original pain. After 8 years the original pain was still present in 10 of 155 patients (6.5%). Continued pain was more likely in patients having undergone removal of a normal appendix (P < 0.001)

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Appendectomy Appendicitis Postoperative Complications Abdominal Pain Acute Disease Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Appendicitis Appendicitis Child Diagnostic Errors Emergencies Female Follow-Up Studies Humans In Vitro Techniques Length of Stay Male

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-25T09:32:14.900964+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:58:49.153990+00:00