An insight into the associated factors with recurrent endometriomas after surgical excision

In: Middle East Fertility Society Journal · 2024 · vol. 29(1) · doi:10.1186/s43043-023-00163-5 · W4390502319
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study identified factors associated with recurrent endometriomas after surgical excision but excluded open surgery patients, suggesting future research should include both approaches for a comprehensive assessment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This correspondence comments on a previously published study (Atwa et al.) examining factors associated with recurrent endometriomas after surgical excision, highlighting that laparoscopic surgery may act as a confounder. The authors list associated factors for recurrence including incomplete excision, advanced disease stage, hormonal imbalance, endometriosis-related inflammation, genetic predisposition, surgical technique, and postoperative management. A key limitation they emphasize in the referenced study is that it included only patients undergoing laparoscopic excision, while open ovarian surgery patients were excluded, potentially biasing interpretation given laparoscopic impacts on ovarian reserve and outcomes and possible links to prior pelvic surgery via hypothesized inflammatory or anatomical mechanisms. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it discusses recurrence of endometriomas after surgical excision and specifically addresses factors, including surgical approach, related to endometriosis-associated ovarian disease.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Atwa et al.’s study shed light on endometrioma management and factors affecting recurrence. However, the exclusion of open ovarian surgery patients and the potential impact of laparoscopic surgery on ovarian reserve and outcomes warrant consideration. Including both surgical approaches in future studies would enable a comprehensive assessment of their effectiveness and influence on endometrioma recurrence, enhancing our understanding of surgical excision outcomes.
Full text 6,002 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Atwa et al.’s study shed light on endometrioma management and factors affecting recurrence. However, the exclusion of open ovarian surgery patients and the potential impact of laparoscopic surgery on ovarian reserve and outcomes warrant consideration. Including both surgical approaches in future studies would enable a comprehensive assess- ment of their effectiveness and influence on endometrioma recurrence, enhancing our understanding of surgical excision outcomes. Dear Editor, A recent study by Atwa et  al. [1] provides valuable insights into managing endometriomas and the factors influencing their recurrence. It significantly contributes to the existing literature in the field. This letter highlights the importance of considering laparoscopic surgery as a potential confounder. Factors associated with recurrent endometriomas after surgical excision include incom - plete excision, advanced disease stage, hormonal imbal - ance, endometriosis-associated inflammation, genetic predisposition, surgical technique, and postoperative management. Furthermore, individualized treatment and close monitoring are important for minimizing the risk of recurrence [2]. While acknowledging the significance of the study, I would like to add some suggestions. Only those patients undergoing laparoscopic surgical excision of endometri - oma were included in the study. Considering the poten - tial impact of laparoscopic surgery on ovarian reserve and patient outcomes is crucial in assessing the factors contributing to endometrioma recurrence. Laparoscopic surgical interventions have gained wide acceptance and are commonly employed in managing endometriomas. However, laparoscopic procedures, although minimally invasive, can still affect ovarian reserve and subsequent fertility outcomes [3]. These effects may include altera - tions in ovarian blood supply, unintentional damage to ovarian tissue, or adhesion formation, which may influ - ence the risk of endometrioma recurrence [4]. Moreo - ver, a history of pelvic surgeries may be associated with an increased risk of endometrioma recurrence. In this regard, it might be helpful for a better understanding of endometrioma recurrence. The underlying mechanisms behind this association are not yet fully understood, but it is hypothesized that surgical trauma, alterations in pel - vic anatomy, and potential activation of inflammatory processes could contribute to the recurrence. Including patients who underwent both open ovarian surgery and laparoscopic surgery in future studies would make a better assessment of the comparative effective - ness of different surgical approaches and their impact on endometrioma recurrence possible. The comprehensive approach would provide a more robust understanding of the factors influencing the outcomes of surgical excision for endometriomas. Open Access © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Middle East Fertility Society Journal *Correspondence: Ali Beykian [email protected] 1 Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Page 2 of 2Fashkhami and Beykian Middle East Fertility Society Journal (2024) 29:3

Acknowledgements

We use ChatGPT to improve the language of the manuscript. Authors’ contributions Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. Funding No funding. Availability of data and materials Not applicable. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Received: 22 August 2023 Accepted: 17 December 2023

References

1. Atwa KA, Ibrahim ZM, El Bassuony EM, Taha OT (2023) Factors associated with recurrent endometriomas after surgical excision. Middle East Fertil Soc J 6.https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s43043- 023- 00146-6 2. Li X-Y, Chao X-P , Leng J-H, Zhang W, Zhang J-J, Dai Y, Shi J-H, Jia S-Z, Xu X-X, Chen S-K, Wu Y-S (2019) Risk factors for postoperative recurrence of ovarian endometriosis: long-term follow-up of 358 women. J Ovarian Res 12:79. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13048- 019- 0552-y 3. Mansouri G, Safinataj M, Shahesmaeili A, Allahqoli L, Salehiniya H, Alkatout I (2022 Effect of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve in patients with ovarian cyst. Front. Endocrinol 13. https:// www. front iersin. org/ artic les/ 10. 3389/ fendo. 2022. 964229 4. Samartzis K, Kathopoulis N, Loutradis D, Protopapas A (2022) Do tech- niques of surgical management of ovarian endometrioma affect ovarian reserve? A narrative review. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore) 42:778–784. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 01443 615. 2021. 19628 17 Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub- lished maps and institutional affiliations.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometrioma

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

References (4)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK