⚙AI-generated summary
by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-15
ⓘ
This study found a 28% increased risk of hyperlipidemia in women with endometriosis compared to those without, based on a large Utah population database.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it.
No clinical advice. How this works
⚙AI-generated deep summary
by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25
· read from full text
ⓘ
The provided text consists of metadata, copyright information, and journal guidelines for submitting comments rather than the actual research abstract or full paper content. Consequently, no specific study population, methodology, key findings, or limitations can be identified from the available material. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for
reading the paper. No clinical advice.
How this works
Abstract
Background: Endometriosis affects 11% of reproductive-aged women in the US. Endometriosis has been associated with increased risk of hypercholesterolemia (>240 mg/dL total cholesterol) in the Nurses’ Health Study II (NHS II). Limited research has investigated this finding in a US population-based sample, and expanded beyond total cholesterol to include elevated triglycerides. Methods: We leveraged the Utah Population Database to perform a 25-year retrospective study (1996–2021) of 2,939,380 among reproductive-aged women. Endometriosis cases were identified using electronic health records (ICD 9: 617* and ICD 10: N80*). Using Cox proportional hazard models and generalized linear models, we estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs), risk ratios (aRR), risk differences (aRD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for hyperlipidemia (ICD 9: 272.4* and ICD 10: E78*), comparing women with versus without endometriosis. Results: Among our study cohort, 99,978 (3.4%) were diagnosed with endometriosis; 2,839,402 (96.6%) were without an endometriosis diagnosis over the study period. Hyperlipidemia was more than twice as common in women with endometriosis than those without (12.8% vs 5.1%). Women with endometriosis had a 50% higher aHR (95% CI: 51%, 57%) and a 28% higher aRR (95% CI: 1.26, 1.30) of hyperlipidemia after adjusting for birth year, race/ethnicity, and baseline parity and body mass index. In absolute terms, endometriosis was associated with an additional 3.6 cases (95% CI: 3.4, 3.9) of hyperlipidemia per 100 women after adjustment for important confounding factors. Conclusion: We found a 28% increased risk of hyperlipidemia among women with, versus without, endometriosis. Our results are in line with the NHS II, which found a 22% higher aRR (95% CI: 1.15, 1.31) of hypercholesteremia. Direct comparison of the results is difficult given the use of self-report of hypercholesterolemia in the NHS II versus our use of ICD-codes of hyperlipidemia; and the ability of the NHS II to adjust for additional lifestyle factors, which we were limited in assessing. Given prior evidence that chronic disease risk varies by endometriosis typology (e.g., superficial, deep infiltrating, ovarian endometriomas, and adenomyosis), future research should investigate associations between endometriosis subtypes and hyperlipidemia, in addition to assessing differing risks for the spectrum of lipid abnormalities and considering other important confounding and mediating factors.
Full text
1,404 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 3 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
TH983: Endometriosis and Subsequeent Risk of Hyperlipidemia
Abstract
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
History
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
View Options
View options
PDF and All Supplements
Download PDF and All SupplementsLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
⚙Ask this paper
AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text
· source: oa-doi-fallbackⓘ
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text.
Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage
answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
endometriosisadenomyosis
Citation neighborhood
(no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet.
This is a recent paper (2026) — citers
typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference
graph may still be filling in.