DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CHALLENGES IN ENDOMETRIOSIS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW

In: International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science · 2026 · vol. 4(3(51)) · doi:10.31435/ijitss.3(51).2026.5926 · W7213548504
review OA: gold CC0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-19 ⓘ

This narrative review addresses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in endometriosis, highlighting the shift from invasive laparoscopy to non-invasive multimodal imaging and discussing strategies to improve symptom control and treatment outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-19 · read from full text ⓘ

This narrative review examines the significant diagnostic and therapeutic hurdles associated with endometriosis, a prevalent inflammatory condition affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. The authors highlight that heterogeneous symptoms often lead to substantial delays in diagnosis, necessitating a shift from invasive laparoscopy toward non-invasive multimodal imaging techniques such as transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. The paper further outlines current medical, surgical, and fertility-preservation strategies aimed at improving symptom control and long-term clinical outcomes through early detection and multidisciplinary care. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically focusing on diagnostic challenges, non-invasive imaging modalities, and therapeutic management strategies for the disease.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is a multifactorial inflammatory disease associated with altered estrogen signaling, immune dysregulation, and the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. It affects nearly 10% of women of reproductive age and can substantially reduce quality of life through chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility. Despite its prevalence, diagnosis and treatment remain difficult because symptoms are heterogeneous and frequently nonspecific, contributing to an average diagnostic delay of seven to ten years. This review summarizes the shift from invasive diagnostic laparoscopy toward non-invasive multimodal imaging, particularly transvaginal sonography (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for disease assessment. It also discusses current medical, surgical, and fertility-preservation strategies aimed at improving symptom control and treatment outcomes in affected patients. Early diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach may help reduce delays in treatment and improve long-term clinical outcomes.
Full text 4,872 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CHALLENGES IN ENDOMETRIOSIS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW DOI: https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(51).2026.5926Keywords: Endometriosis, Chronic Pelvic Pain, Non-Invasive Diagnostics, FertilityAbstract Endometriosis is a multifactorial inflammatory disease associated with altered estrogen signaling, immune dysregulation, and the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. It affects nearly 10% of women of reproductive age and can substantially reduce quality of life through chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility. Despite its prevalence, diagnosis and treatment remain difficult because symptoms are heterogeneous and frequently nonspecific, contributing to an average diagnostic delay of seven to ten years. This review summarizes the shift from invasive diagnostic laparoscopy toward non-invasive multimodal imaging, particularly transvaginal sonography (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for disease assessment. It also discusses current medical, surgical, and fertility-preservation strategies aimed at improving symptom control and treatment outcomes in affected patients. Early diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach may help reduce delays in treatment and improve long-term clinical outcomes. References Becker, C. M., Bokor, A., Heikinheimo, O., Horne, A., Jansen, F., Kiesel, L., King, K., Kvaskoff, M., Nap, A., Petersen, K., Saridogan, E., Tomassetti, C., van Hanegem, N., Vulliemoz, N., Vermeulen, N., Altmäe, S., Ata, B., Ball, E., Barra, F., ... ESHRE Guideline Group. (2022). ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Human Reproduction Open, 2022(2), hoac009. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac009 Bulun, S. E., Yilmaz, B. D., Sison, C., Miyazaki, K., Bernardi, L., Liu, S., Kohlmeier, A., Yin, P., Milad, M., & Wei, J. (2019). Endometriosis. Endocrine Reviews, 40(4), 1048–1079. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00242 Bazot, M., & Daraï, E. (2017). Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: Clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques. Fertility and Sterility, 108(6), 886–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.026 Culley, L., Law, C., Hudson, N., Denny, E., Mitchell, H., Baumgarten, M., & Raine-Fenning, N. (2013). The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women's lives: A critical narrative review. Human Reproduction Update, 19(6), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt027 Bafort, C., Beebeejaun, Y., Tomassetti, C., Bosteels, J., & Duffy, J. M. N. (2020). Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020(10), CD011031. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011031.pub3 Guerriero, S., Condous, G., van den Bosch, T., Valentin, L., Leone, F. P. G., Van Schoubroeck, D., Exacoustos, C., Installé, A. J. F., Martins, W. P., Abrao, M. S., Hudelist, G., Bazot, M., Alcazar, J. L., Gonçalves, M. O., Pascual, M. A., Ajossa, S., Savelli, L., Dunham, R., Reid, S., ... Bourne, T. (2016). Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: A consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 48(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15955 Nisenblat, V., Bossuyt, P. M., Shaikh, R., Farquhar, C., Jordan, V., Scheffers, C. S., Crawford, R., & Hull, M. L. (2016). Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(5), CD012179. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012179 Taylor, H. S., Giudice, L. C., Lessey, B. A., Abrao, M. S., Kotarski, J., Archer, D. F., Diamond, M. P., Surrey, E., Johnson, N. P., Watts, N. B., Gallagher, J. C., Simon, J. A., Carr, B. R., Dmowski, W. P., Leyland, N., Rowan, J. P., Duan, W. R., Ng, J., Schwefel, B., ... Jain, R. I. (2017). Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700089 Zondervan, K. T., Becker, C. M., & Missmer, S. A. (2018). Endometriosis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 4(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0008-5 Downloads Published Issue Section License Copyright (c) 2026 Adrianna Krupska, Karina Kinga Brzózka, Katarzyna Ledwożyw, Alicja Piełuć, Zuzanna Pyrka, Weronika Elżbieta Cionżyńska This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles. CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (9)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-10-08T06:07:16.286025+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK