Abstract
Attention allows individuals to prioritize and effectively process relevant information while ignoring task-irrelevant distractions. It plays a critical role in task performance, learning and creativity. This study examines how varying levels of workload influence auditory attention, cognitive resource allocation, and the experience of flow. Thirteen participants engaged in a game-based electroencephalographic study designed to induce states of mental underload, overload and flow. To assess available attentional resources, an implicit auditory oddball task was integrated as a secondary task. Spatiotemporal cluster analyses revealed significant differences in event-related potentials when comparing flow and overload to underload. Multivariate pattern analysis successfully decoded all three conditions above chance level, particularly in centroparietal regions. Subjective measures, including the NASA Task Load Index and Flow Short Scale, along with behavioral performance metrics, confirmed the effective induction of flow and distinct levels of workload. Notably, participants demonstrated significantly higher performance and subjectively perceived valence during the flow condition compared to the overload condition, albeit with similar levels of neural engagement. Our results support the notion that experiencing flow may act as a "shielding mechanism," enhancing the effective allocation of attentional resources to the game and improving task engagement and performance efficiency.
Supplementary Material
File (manuscript.pdf)
- Download
- 1.10 MB
Information & Authors
Information
Version history
Peer review timeline
Published
European Journal of Neuroscience
Version of Record20 Oct 2025Published
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
87views
113downloads
Citations
Download citation
Katharina Lingelbach, Anna Vorreuther, Elias Moll, et al.
Shielding the Mind with Flow: Attention Allocation and Auditory Event-related Potentials under Varying Mental Workload. Authorea. 03 September 2025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175692143.32698528/v1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175692143.32698528/v1
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.