Synergizing social education and soft skills for sustainable development and for addressing emerging challenges in natural resource conservation

Synergizing social education and soft skills for sustainable development and for addressing emerging challenges in natural resource conservation | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review Synergizing social education and soft skills for sustainable development and for addressing emerging challenges in natural resource conservation parvin tarhani, maryam This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8757586/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The accelerating degradation of natural resources under the combined pressures of climate change, environmental pollution, and unsustainable human activities has intensified calls for more integrative approaches to sustainable development and conservation. In recent years, social education and soft-skills development have been increasingly recognized as critical, yet underexplored, components of sustainability-oriented responses to these emerging challenges. This narrative review examines the theoretical and empirical literature at the intersection of social education, soft skills, sustainable development, and natural resource conservation. Drawing on peer-reviewed journal articles, conceptual frameworks, and review studies published across education, sustainability, and environmental governance disciplines, the review synthesizes current knowledge on how social education and soft skills—such as communication, ethical reasoning, emotional awareness, and social–environmental responsibility—are conceptualized, implemented, and evaluated in sustainability-related contexts. The analysis identifies key themes, including the growing emphasis on transversal competencies for sustainability, the predominance of higher-education-focused interventions, and the increasing advocacy for experiential and community-based learning approaches. However, the review also reveals critical gaps, notably the scarcity of longitudinal and outcome-oriented empirical studies, limited attention to informal and non-formal learning settings, and the absence of standardized, transferable frameworks linking soft-skills development to measurable conservation outcomes. Overall, the reviewed literature suggests that synergizing social education and soft skills holds considerable potential for fostering pro-environmental behaviors, strengthening conservation practices, and supporting resilient and equitable resource governance. Nevertheless, realizing this potential requires more robust empirical evidence, cross-contextual research, and theoretically coherent models to guide implementation and evaluation. The review concludes by recommending future research priorities, including longitudinal and mixed-methods studies, broader cultural and educational scope, and the development of integrated frameworks capable of translating educational interventions into tangible sustainability and conservation impacts. Special Education Social education Soft skills Sustainable development Natural resource conservation Environmental stewardship Civic engagement Behavioral competencies Figures Figure 1 Introduction I. Introduction Background and Context Define sustainable development, social education, and soft skills. Explain the growing need to address emerging challenges in natural resource conservation. Highlight global trends in environmental degradation, resource depletion, and the role of education. Significance of the Study Link between social education, soft skills, and sustainable development outcomes. Relevance to policy, education, and environmental management. Objective and Scope of the Review Identify gaps in the current literature. Outline the paper’s focus on integrating social education and soft skills to promote sustainable development and resource conservation. II. Theoretical Background Conceptual Frameworks Definitions and key theories of social education (civic engagement, values formation, social responsibility). Definitions and typologies of soft skills (communication, collaboration, critical thinking, emotional intelligence). Sustainable development theories and natural resource management principles. Linkages Between Concepts How social education and soft skills can influence pro-environmental behaviors and resource conservation. Theoretical models explaining human behavior change in sustainability contexts. III. Key Themes in the Literature Integration of Social Education and Soft Skills Existing educational programs and interventions. Core competencies targeted and pedagogical strategies. Impact on Sustainable Development Evidence of behavioral, social, and environmental outcomes. Case studies linking education, skills development, and sustainability. Addressing Emerging Challenges in Resource Conservation Climate change adaptation, biodiversity protection, water and forest management. Role of community engagement and participatory approaches. IV. Methodological Approaches Research Designs in Existing Studies Qualitative (interviews, case studies, ethnography). Quantitative (surveys, longitudinal tracking, experiments). Mixed methods. Evaluation of Effectiveness Measurement of soft skills acquisition. Assessment of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and pro-conservation behaviors. Geographical and Contextual Scope Focus on higher education, secondary education, informal/community learning. Regional differences and cultural contexts. V. Research Gaps Empirical Gaps Lack of longitudinal studies linking soft skills and social education to real-world conservation outcomes. Limited studies in non-formal education and community-based initiatives. Theoretical and Conceptual Gaps Fragmented frameworks; absence of integrated models combining social education, soft skills, and sustainability. Insufficient attention to cultural, socio-economic, and institutional variations. Methodological Gaps Limited use of mixed-method or comparative studies. Few validated tools for measuring both soft skills and conservation behavior outcomes. VI. Conclusion Summary of Main Findings Synthesize key insights from the literature. Reiterate the potential of synergizing social education and soft skills for sustainable development. Implications for Future Research Highlight the need for empirical, cross-contextual, and longitudinal studies. Suggest development of standardized frameworks and assessment tools. Practical Implications Policy recommendations for integrating social education and soft skills into environmental education programs. Potential impact on resource conservation, sustainability education, and community engagement. Introduction Sustainable development necessitates more than mere technological advancements or regulatory frameworks; it fundamentally relies on the cultivation of human capacities, values, and behaviors that advocate for long-term ecological equilibrium. Recently, scholars and educators have posited that the integration of social education with soft-skills training presents a promising avenue for cultivating pro-environmental attitudes and sustainable practices[1]. Soft skills, encompassing communication, collaboration, ethical reasoning, and emotional intelligence — when incorporated into both formal and informal educational contexts — have the potential to develop individuals who not only grasp the tenets of sustainability but are also adept at engaging in collective action, participatory governance, and adaptive resource management[2].Empirical evidence substantiates this promise: for example, a recent investigation revealed that the enhancement of soft skills within university curricula significantly augmented student engagement and fostered dispositions congruent with sustainable development[3] Concurrently, macro-level analyses indicate that elevated educational attainment within societies serves to moderate the environmental repercussions of industrialization and urbanization — implying that education may assume a mediating function in reconciling development with ecological conservation[4]. In light of escalating global pressures on natural resources — encompassing climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion — examining the synergistic potential of social education and soft skills to bolster resource conservation is not only timely but imperative[1, 5]. This review therefore aims to scrutinize the extant literature concerning this synergistic approach, to delineate key concepts and empirical findings, and to underscore the gaps that future inquiry should endeavor to address. integrating social education with soft skills pertains to the amalgamation of educational methodologies aimed at fostering social consciousness, civic participation, and ethical value development (social education) alongside the enhancement of non-technical personal and interpersonal abilities — encompassing communication, teamwork, emotional regulation, and critical analysis — collectively referred to as soft skills. Historically, social education has prioritized the cultivation of individuals’ sense of social obligation, empathy, cultural sensibility, and active involvement in community affairs; when synergistically combined with soft skills training, this integrative strategy has the potential to significantly augment individuals’ capabilities to confront intricate, real-world dilemmas[6].The importance of this integration has garnered increasing acknowledgment within sustainability and educational research, as soft skills are perceived not solely as facilitators of employability[7] but as fundamental competencies vital for enduring social advancement and adaptive responses to societal challenges [8]. For example, Bassi Costa and Cipolla (2025)[8] delineate four principal dimensions of soft skills pivotal for sustainability: (1) Communication, Collaboration, and Diversity Management; (2) Self-Awareness and Emotional Regulation; (3) Environmental, Cultural, and Social Sensitivity[8]; and (4) Ethical Principles and Spiritual Awareness[9]. Concurrently, constructivist pedagogical frameworks have been underscored as effective methodologies for fostering soft skills within social education paradigms, thereby empowering learners through active, participatory, and contextually pertinent educational environments[10]. Moreover, empirical research indicates that soft-skills training is correlated with enhanced personal resilience, improved stress management, and increased preparedness to engage in socially and environmentally responsible actions — findings that imply the integration of social education and soft skills may play a significant role in advancing sustainable development objectives[11]. Nevertheless, despite these advancements, literature reviews reveal a lack of consensus regarding standardized curricula or models for the systematic integration of social education and soft skills — highlighting the necessity for further theoretical and empirical investigation across diverse socio-cultural context . Sustainable development is comprehensively articulated as “development that addresses the needs of the present without jeopardizing the capacity of future generations to fulfill their own needs,” a definition first posited by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED, 1987). This concept signifies a transformative shift away from growth-centric development that prioritizes economic profits towards a more integrative framework that harmonizes economic viability, social equity, and environmental integrity. Rooted in historical appeals for responsible management of natural resources and global intergenerational equity, sustainable development has emerged as a fundamental tenet of international policy subsequent to the 1972 Stockholm Conference and was further institutionalized by the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Rio Earth Summit, 1992) alongside the endorsement of Agenda 21[12].Academic discourse frequently delineates sustainable development with respect to three interconnected dimensions (or “pillars”): environmental protection, social inclusion, and economic growth. The environmental dimension : underscores the importance of conserving ecosystems, safeguarding biodiversity, managing natural resources in a sustainable manner, and mitigating pollution and climate change effects. the social dimension : pertains to issues of equity, access to vital services (including health, education, and housing), social justice, and inclusive human development. Concurrently. the economic dimension : concentrates on fostering economic systems that are both productive and resource-efficient, promoting decent livelihoods, and ensuring long-term prosperity without compromising ecological or social welfare[13]. More recently, certain scholars and policy frameworks have introduced a fourth dimension : — governance or institutional sustainability — highlighting the significance of transparent institutions, participatory decision-making, policy coherence, and long-term planning in realizing sustainable outcomes[13]. Empirical and theoretical investigations underscore the critical importance of sustainable development not solely for the preservation of the environment but also for the promotion of social equity and economic robustness[14]. For instance, research conducted at the organizational level indicates that institutions which effectively balance these three (or more) dimensions tend to achieve superior performance over time regarding social sustainability, economic viability, and environmental accountability[15]. Similarly, educational initiatives focused on sustainability have been posited to foster a holistic awareness that advocates for enduring ecological stewardship, social justice, and ethical economic practices. However, criticisms persist: certain scholars contend that the three-pillar framework may be excessively reductionist, inadequately addressing power dynamics, intergenerational equity, and institutional governance — thereby eliciting demands for more expansive frameworks that integrate rights, justice, democracy, and long-term systemic transformation[16]. In conclusion, sustainable development emerges as a pivotal concept within contemporary environmental, social, and economic theory and policy, providing a comprehensive paradigm for confronting the interconnected challenges posed by global change, inequality, and resource depletion[17]. Emerging challenges in natural resource conservation : Addressing emerging challenges in the conservation of natural resources encompasses a broad set of strategies, policy frameworks, and scientific interventions designed to safeguard and maintain ecosystems and vital resources such as forests, freshwater systems, and biodiversity amid escalating threats, including climate change, habitat degradation, pollution, unsustainable exploitation, and intensifying human activities. The importance of this focus has increased substantially as population growth, rapid urban expansion, and global environmental change accelerate resource depletion and erode ecosystem integrity[18].Core components of contemporary conservation efforts include the protection and restoration of habitats, the sustainable management of natural resources (e.g., forestry, water, and mineral resources), biodiversity preservation, pollution mitigation, and the development of governance systems that enhance ecosystem resilience to climate change[19]. Existing research highlights both the urgency and the complexity of these challenges. For instance, recent syntheses demonstrate that climate change poses substantial obstacles to biodiversity conservation by reshaping species distributions, altering phenological patterns, and facilitating biological invasions, thereby complicating conventional conservation approaches [20].Studies of freshwater ecosystems further indicate that approximately half of the world’s freshwater fish species are currently threatened by the cumulative effects of climate change, pollution, habitat deterioration, and emerging stressors such as engineered nanomaterials, underscoring the need for innovative and adaptive conservation strategies[21] . In parallel, assessments of natural resource depletion—particularly in relation to mineral extraction and deforestation—suggest that without robust conservation policies and sustainable management practices, resource scarcity and environmental degradation will intensify, with adverse consequences for both ecological integrity and human well-being[22].From a theoretical standpoint, contemporary conservation biology increasingly advocates integrated, cross-sectoral approaches that link ecological science with socio-economic considerations, governance structures, and community participation in order to more effectively address interconnected and emerging environmental pressures[23, 24]. Overall, responding to emerging challenges in natural resource conservation extends beyond the prevention of further environmental harm and instead requires the design of resilient, equitable, and sustainable systems capable of securing both ecological and human futures in the context of ongoing global change[19]. Research gaps and purpose of the present study: Despite increasing scholarly attention to soft skills and social sustainability education, substantial gaps persist within the literature—particularly with respect to the systematic integration of social education and soft-skills development, the availability of empirical evidence linking these constructs to tangible conservation outcomes, and the existence of coherent models applicable across diverse contexts. For example, while recent studies have delineated key categories of soft skills relevant to sustainability (such as interpersonal and intrapersonal competencies, ethical reasoning, and environmental–social awareness) and have advocated their incorporation into higher education curricula, there remains a notable shortage of longitudinal and outcome-focused research examining whether the cultivation of such skills leads to observable pro-environmental behaviors or effective natural resource conservation practices (Bassi Costa & Cipolla, 2025; sustainability education framework studies, 2024)Furthermore, much of the existing scholarship concentrates on higher education and formal schooling environments, leaving informal learning contexts, community-based initiatives, and culturally or socio-economically diverse settings insufficiently examined . In addition, there is little agreement on a comprehensive and transferable theoretical or pedagogical framework that meaningfully integrates social education, soft-skills training, and conservation-oriented sustainability, thereby limiting opportunities for comparative analysis and the formulation of broader policy implications . In response to these gaps, the present review seeks to critically analyze and synthesize the existing literature on the integration of social education and soft skills for sustainability and natural resource conservation. Specifically, it aims to map prevailing theoretical perspectives, document dominant methodological approaches, and identify recurring trends, limitations, and avenues for future research. Through this synthesis, the paper contributes to theoretical clarification, elucidates the current state of empirical evidence, and offers guidance for the development of more robust and context-sensitive educational interventions. Materials & Methods – Introductory Paragraph (Life Sciences Focus) In this narrative review, I explore how Social Education and the Development of 'soft skills' may be utilized to increase sustainable development, while simultaneously addressing Newly Created Complexities associated with the Conservation of Natural Resources in Life Sciences. This review utilized a narrative review approach due to the inherently cross-disciplinary nature of Life Sciences (e.g., Ecological, Biological, and Human), therefore providing an opportunity for a comprehensive integration of various Theoretical Models and Empirical Findings related to Social Education and Development of Soft Skills in support of Ecological Stewardship and Sustainability of Natural Systems. Different from a systematic review, this form of review provides a flavour of established literature and allows for free-flowing exploration of various styles of Evidence across an array of sources. Literature was identified through a purposeful iterative Search of Peer Reviewed Journals, Texts on Environmental Education, Conservation Reports and other Grey Literature to capture both Foundational Perspectives on Social Education/Development of Soft Skills in Support of Ecological Stewardship, as well as More Current Research. Attention was given to those pieces which provide information on Human Behaviours, Communication Skills, Community Engagement and Educational Interventions in the development of Ecological Stewards and to support Ecological Sustainability.. Although this was a narrative review, the sources chosen were not limited by a predetermined process; however, we used guiding criteria that allowed us to include only those sources that had a relationship to our topic. We included only peer-reviewed articles and books, policy and other forms of grey literature, that discussed educational approaches, human behaviour in conservation, or skill-building approaches related to sustainability. Where possible, we included only materials published in the English language that were published since the early 2000s. However, since this segment of the literature review is a broad overview of all literature currently available and many publications address issues that may not yet have been considered in this context. Selection Criteria To ensure that the narrative review captured a broad yet thematically coherent range of scholarship on synergizing social education and soft skills for sustainable development and for addressing emerging challenges in natural resource conservation, the following selection criteria were applied: 1. Types of Studies Considered The review included a diverse range of literature to reflect the interdisciplinary nature of the topic: Empirical studies Quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method research examining educational interventions, soft-skill development, human behavior in conservation, or sustainability practices. Theoretical and conceptual papers Works offering frameworks, models, or conceptual discussions relevant to social education, environmental ethics, human dimensions of conservation, or sustainability competencies. Review studies Narrative reviews, integrative reviews, and relevant systematic reviews that provided broader insights into education, sustainability, or natural resource management. Applied and practice-based reports Policy documents, case studies, institutional reports, and credible grey literature focusing on community engagement, conservation education, or skill-based training programs. Interdisciplinary studies Research bridging life sciences with social sciences, education, environmental psychology, or sustainability science. 2. Time Frame The review primarily considered literature published from 2000 to the present, reflecting contemporary approaches to environmental education, sustainability competencies, and conservation challenges in the 21st century. Seminal earlier works were included when foundational to understanding key concepts, theories, or historical development of social or environmental education. 3. Topical Relevance Studies were included if they addressed one or more of the following themes: Social or environmental education Soft skills (e.g., communication, collaboration, critical thinking, leadership) Sustainable development practices Human behavior, community engagement, or capacity-building in conservation Intersections between education, skill development, and natural resource management Emerging conservation challenges influenced by socio-environmental factors 4. Exclusion Criteria Studies were excluded if they: Focused solely on technical or ecological data without human, educational, or skill-development dimensions Were highly specialized biophysical research unrelated to sustainability education Lacked credible sources or did not undergo any form of scholarly review Provided theoretical discussions with no connection to environmental or educational contexts Results The current body of literature reflects a growing recognition that there is a need to integrate the teaching of social education along with the development of soft skills for the purpose of promoting sustainable development and conserving the Earth's natural resources. The body of literature on environmental education, sustainability science, and human dimensions of conservation now emphasises that technical knowledge alone is not enough to produce sustainable ecological outcomes; example behaviours, community involvement, and collaboration are a result of the individual's development of social and non-technical abilities. Since the year 2010, there has been a marked shift from content-focused environmental education to a more holistic approach that is centred on the learner, and promotes development of one's ability to communicate effectively, develop emotional intelligence, take civic responsibility, and make ethical decisions when thinking about and acting on environmental issues. Although this change has occurred, the existing body of literature remains disorganised and fragmented, with the presence of numerous different theoretical approaches and interpretations as to which "soft" skills are most important for achieving sustainability through promoting environmentally friendly behaviours, etc. Paragraph Two - Key Ideas And Trends Of the Integration Of Soft Skills In Education The most frequently studied theme in current literature is the design and delivery of educational programs that combine social learning, through collaborative approaches, together with targeted soft skills training. All empirical research, in the areas of formal education, vocational training, and community-based conservation initiatives, has found the consistent result that the use of cooperative learning, conflict resolution, and participatory methods during delivery of education, will lead to increased levels of environmental awareness and stewardship among learners. Qualitative case studies have shown significant successes related to experiential and community-based education approaches in leading to individual level civic engagement and collective action in relation to resource management issues. Quantitative survey data and mixed method evaluation research show marginally moderate correlation between soft skill development and pro-environmental attitudes. However, establishing causal relationships has not been an area of significant research. Overall, the research suggests that education delivered in an integrated manner can lead to both personal competencies and enhancement of the sustainability of the community through improved levels of civic engagement and participatory action related to resource management issues. Paragraph 3 – Methodological Approaches and Study Outcomes There is much variation in the types of methodologies employed in the studies of sustainability. Many small-scale qualitative studies were conducted using qualitative approaches, such as interviews and ethnographic fieldwork, which produced an understanding of how people and communities create values around sustainability through social learning processes. Quantitative studies used more general approaches to measuring i.e. actions/attitudes towards the environment. However, the overwhelming number of quantitative studies measured these attitudes using many different tools. Hybrid qualitative and quantitative methodologies often studied the interactions between an individual's competencies and other people's conservation behaviours. The research shows that communication skills, emotional intelligence, and collaborative problem-solving are linked to increased environmental involvement and in some situation demonstrable improvements in the local conservation activity. Paragraph 4 – Gaps, Limitations, and Inconsistencies Despite significant promise, there are several critical shortcomings and inconsistencies within the existing literature. First, only a few longitudinal studies measure long-term behavioural and/or ecological effects of soft skill development on continued conservation behaviour. Second, much of the current research is focused primarily within the higher education setting, with very little emphasis placed on secondary education, informal education, and community-based conservation education programs. Third, there is no established framework for integrating soft skill development and social education within sustainability curricula, leading to inconsistencies in terminology, metrics, and methodologies used across studies. Finally, very few studies have attempted to compare across socio-economic/cultural contexts to determine how different socio-economic/cultural contexts shape the effectiveness of integrated education interventions. Overall, the aforementioned limitations highlight the need for additional well-controlled longitudinal studies to create clearer pathways for understanding the links between social education, soft skill development, and subsequent conservation outcomes )Fig. 1–1(. Discussion Paragraph 1 – Synthesis of Key Findings A trend is emerging from the research in this area. More researchers are becoming aware of the synergistic effects that can occur by integrating social education with the development of soft skills and that this combination offers not only environmental sustainability but also conservation of natural resources. Many studies found that when civic engagement, ethical reasoning, communication, collaboration, and emotional intelligence are integrated into interventions, they had positive impacts on attitudes towards the environment, participatory behaviour, and community-based conservation efforts. In both qualitative and quantitative studies, soft skills have been shown to enhance a learner's ability to collaboratively resolve problems, adapt to the complexity of environmental problems, and foster a sense of social responsibility. In contrast, social education provides a foundation for a learner's value system, social norm, and civic engagement. There is a growing agreement that educational programs designed to address sustainability will yield better outcomes when they are designed to address cognitive knowledge, social consciousness, and interpersonal competencies. However, the specific processes and mechanisms involved are still undergoing further investigation. Paragraph 2 – Implications and Gaps The theoretical, practical and policy ramifications of these findings are substantial. From a theoretical standpoint, they support integrated models of sustainability education, which integrate socio-emotional and behavioural competencies into sustainability education in conjunction with technical knowledge. Practically, this study indicates that incorporating soft skills into conservation education can improve learner involvement, community engagement and adaptive management of natural resources. In terms of policy, these findings provide rationale for curriculum reform, building capacity and supporting an integrated approach to higher education and sustainability. Even though these findings reflect progress, there are substantial gaps. There are few longitudinal studies that demonstrate a relationship between soft skill development and measurable conservation outcomes. The majority of the existing literature has focused on higher education contexts; therefore, these findings may not be generalisable to the broader community. Furthermore, there are methodological discrepancies and fragmented frameworks empirically examined, as well as limited cross-cultural studies, indicating the need for more integrated, contextually relevant approaches to research. Paragraph 3 – Directions for Future Research Future research should bridge these existing gaps by using longitudinal mixed-method cross-contextual designs that effectively and robustly evaluate the effects of integrating social education with soft skills on sustainability/conservation results over a long-term period. Researches should also include early education, informal learning environments and community initiatives so as to include many more social/economic and environmental contexts. Moreover, the development of standardized frameworks, assessment tools and theoretical models that link soft skills, social learning, and environmental stewardship is required to truly understand the relationships between these areas of focus. Comparative studies conducted across various cultures, socioeconomic and institutional settings will identify contextual factors that will improve the understanding of scalability of educational strategies. By identifying these research priorities, future work can enhance the evidence base to better support the design, implementation and evaluation of educational interventions that develop human capacity in alignment with sustainable resource management. Conclusion This study has noted an increasing awareness within the research community that social education and soft skill development can be combined to support sustainable development and enhance natural resource conservation. Studies employing qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods demonstrate that through the incorporation of social awareness, civic engagement, communication and collaboration, as well as emotional intelligence, in educational programs, learners have increased pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors, as well as community-based conservation. Furthermore, this body of literature appears to be shifting towards holistic, learner-centered approaches, which integrate technical knowledge along with socio-emotional and behavioral competencies to create sustainable outcomes. Overall, although the types of research methods used may differ and conceptual frameworks may vary, there is broad agreement within this area of research that to be able to address the growing number of ecological issues and develop adaptive and resilient systems of resource management, it is essential to promote the combined development of both social and soft skills. Based on this study’s results, we can conclude that the way we approach developing soft skills and social education should be through a systematic integration of both areas within educational settings. There remains an abundance of research gaps, ranging from the absence of longitudinal studies that demonstrate how soft skills relate to environmental outcome measures to the overwhelming majority of research conducted in higher education contexts, along with the lack of a standardised framework or assessment instrument. Future research should focus on developing longitudinal and cross-contextual studies of educational interventions; evaluating how to develop soft skills and social education in earlier educational stages and/or in informal or community-based learning contexts; and finally, developing unified models to integrate social learning, soft skills and sustainability together. Once these gaps are filled, policymakers, education strategists and practitioners will have access to a strong empirical base from which to build new educational strategies for developing human capabilities necessary for sustainable management of natural resources. References Barbosa AE (2025) Pathways to Sustainability Require Collaboration and Innovation. Arguments for the Inclusion of Communication Competences in Environmental Sciences and Related Higher Education. Open Environ Res J, 18(1) Nurizinova M et al (2025) STEM-based approaches to soft skills development: a synthesis of meta-analytic findings and empirical evidence. Frontiers in Education. Frontiers Molendijk L, Taplin RH, Brennan AJ (2025) Empirical Evidence of Factors to Improve Student Engagement from Experiential Learning Activities. Issues Acc Educ 40(2):67–82 Zhang H, Zhan Y, Chen K (2025) Do education, urbanization, and green growth promote life expectancy? Front Public Health 12:1517716 Brieven G et al (2025) Integrating Soft Skills Training into your Course through a Collaborative Activity . in Proceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 Wang X et al (2025) Fostering academic engagement through soft skills and positive emotions: a sustainable development perspective on university education. Front Psychol 16:1622327 Gerasimova IG, Oblova IS (2025) Dev Soft Skills Purpose Enhancing Employab Eng Students Costa MFB, Cipolla CM (2025) Critical soft skills for sustainability in higher education: A multi-phase qualitative study. Sustainability 17(2):377 Gupta K, Agrawal R, Sharma V (2016) Sustainability from the lenses of spirituality: a new perspective. Int J Intell Enterp 3(3–4):297–310 De Carlo E et al (2025) Soft Skills as a Tool for Post-Pandemic Sustainability: A University-Based Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 22(11):1752 Libertson F (2023) Inner transitions in higher education in Sweden: incorporating intra-personal skills in education for sustainable development. Int J Sustain High Educ 24(9):213–230 Whitfield K (2015) Quick guide to sustainable development: history and concepts. Retrieved November, 10: p. 2019 Bosselmann K, Engel R, Taylor P (2008) Governance for sustainability: Issues, challenges, successes. IUCN Kumar P, Sharma L, Sharma NC (2024) Sustainable development balancing economic viability, environmental protection, and social equity , in Sustainable partnership and investment strategies for startups and SMEs . IGI Global Scientific Publishing. pp. 212–234 Kocmanová A, Dočekalová M (2011) Corporate sustainability: environmental, social, economic and corporate performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 59(7):203–208 Grossman D (2012) The Three Pillars of Sustainable Development: Critical Issues and Perspectives. Comparative Education Society of Asia (CESA), Bangkok, Thailand Assembly G (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 11 September 2015. United Nations, New York, p 14 Action UC (2022) Biodiversity—Our Strongest Natural Defense Against Climate Change. United Nations Climate Action, available at: Shahzad A (2025) Climate Change and Its Impact on Global Biodiversity. Prem J Environ Sci 3:100013 Dong X et al (2025) Future climate change increase species vulnerability and present new opportunities for biodiversity conservation in China. J Environ Manage 385:125652 Sayer CA et al (2025) One-quarter of freshwater fauna threatened with extinction. Nature 638(8049):138–145 Magurran AE (2009) Threats to freshwater fish. Science 325(5945):1215–1216 Banks J (2004) Divided culture: integrating and conservation biology agriculture. Front Ecol Environ 2(10):537 Palardy J (2024) Emerging issues for global conservation in 2024 Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8757586","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":583841230,"identity":"cd494820-7ace-48e6-8321-7d14b1709e0e","order_by":0,"name":"parvin tarhani","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shahid Beheshti University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"parvin","middleName":"","lastName":"tarhani","suffix":""},{"id":583841231,"identity":"d1c3af2f-7e24-4645-85f4-b85e563e96d6","order_by":1,"name":"maryam","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"AbharIslamic Azad university","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"","middleName":"","lastName":"maryam","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-02-01 16:22:31","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":true,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8757586/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8757586/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":101842475,"identity":"8a2754c2-e39c-495c-81f7-5d43fc69d264","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 08:48:09","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":105592,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e-1:Integrating social learning and soft skills: A review summary\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1000112679.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8757586/v1/f1fa81a472f4732f3c623c07.jpg"},{"id":101881743,"identity":"78450093-2aa6-43b2-8614-3c792a36feec","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 15:15:49","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":845919,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8757586/v1/af8e2174-70d8-4031-8fc8-00e7bf5700a2.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSynergizing social education and soft skills for sustainable development and for addressing emerging challenges in natural resource conservation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eI. Introduction\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground and Context\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefine sustainable development, social education, and soft skills.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eExplain the growing need to address emerging challenges in natural resource conservation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHighlight global trends in environmental degradation, resource depletion, and the role of education.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSignificance of the Study\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLink between social education, soft skills, and sustainable development outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRelevance to policy, education, and environmental management.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObjective and Scope of the Review\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIdentify gaps in the current literature.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutline the paper\u0026rsquo;s focus on integrating social education and soft skills to promote sustainable development and resource conservation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eII. Theoretical Background\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConceptual Frameworks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefinitions and key theories of social education (civic engagement, values formation, social responsibility).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefinitions and typologies of soft skills (communication, collaboration, critical thinking, emotional intelligence).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSustainable development theories and natural resource management principles.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinkages Between Concepts\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHow social education and soft skills can influence pro-environmental behaviors and resource conservation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTheoretical models explaining human behavior change in sustainability contexts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIII. Key Themes in the Literature\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIntegration of Social Education and Soft Skills\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eExisting educational programs and interventions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCore competencies targeted and pedagogical strategies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eImpact on Sustainable Development\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEvidence of behavioral, social, and environmental outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCase studies linking education, skills development, and sustainability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAddressing Emerging Challenges in Resource Conservation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClimate change adaptation, biodiversity protection, water and forest management.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRole of community engagement and participatory approaches.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIV. Methodological Approaches\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eResearch Designs in Existing Studies\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQualitative (interviews, case studies, ethnography).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuantitative (surveys, longitudinal tracking, experiments).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMixed methods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEvaluation of Effectiveness\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMeasurement of soft skills acquisition.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAssessment of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and pro-conservation behaviors.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGeographical and Contextual Scope\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFocus on higher education, secondary education, informal/community learning.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRegional differences and cultural contexts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eV. Research Gaps\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmpirical Gaps\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLack of longitudinal studies linking soft skills and social education to real-world conservation outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLimited studies in non-formal education and community-based initiatives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTheoretical and Conceptual Gaps\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFragmented frameworks; absence of integrated models combining social education, soft skills, and sustainability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInsufficient attention to cultural, socio-economic, and institutional variations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethodological Gaps\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLimited use of mixed-method or comparative studies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFew validated tools for measuring both soft skills and conservation behavior outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVI. Conclusion\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSummary of Main Findings\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSynthesize key insights from the literature.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eReiterate the potential of synergizing social education and soft skills for sustainable development.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eImplications for Future Research\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHighlight the need for empirical, cross-contextual, and longitudinal studies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSuggest development of standardized frameworks and assessment tools.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePractical Implications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePolicy recommendations for integrating social education and soft skills into environmental education programs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePotential impact on resource conservation, sustainability education, and community engagement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eIntroduction\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSustainable development necessitates more than mere technological advancements or regulatory frameworks; it fundamentally relies on the cultivation of human capacities, values, and behaviors that advocate for long-term ecological equilibrium. Recently, scholars and educators have posited that the integration of social education with soft-skills training presents a promising avenue for cultivating pro-environmental attitudes and sustainable practices[1]. Soft skills, encompassing communication, collaboration, ethical reasoning, and emotional intelligence — when incorporated into both formal and informal educational contexts — have the potential to develop individuals who not only grasp the tenets of sustainability but are also adept at engaging in collective action, participatory governance, and adaptive resource management[2].Empirical evidence substantiates this promise: for example, a recent investigation revealed that the enhancement of soft skills within university curricula significantly augmented student engagement and fostered dispositions congruent with sustainable development[3] Concurrently, macro-level analyses indicate that elevated educational attainment within societies serves to moderate the environmental repercussions of industrialization and urbanization — implying that education may assume a mediating function in reconciling development with ecological conservation[4]. In light of escalating global pressures on natural resources — encompassing climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion — examining the synergistic potential of social education and soft skills to bolster resource conservation is not only timely but imperative[1, 5]. This review therefore aims to scrutinize the extant literature concerning this synergistic approach, to delineate key concepts and empirical findings, and to underscore the gaps that future inquiry should endeavor to address.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eintegrating social education with soft skills\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;pertains to the amalgamation of educational methodologies aimed at fostering social consciousness, civic participation, and ethical value development (social education) alongside the enhancement of non-technical personal and interpersonal abilities — encompassing communication, teamwork, emotional regulation, and critical analysis — collectively referred to as soft skills. Historically, social education has prioritized the cultivation of individuals’ sense of social obligation, empathy, cultural sensibility, and active involvement in community affairs; when synergistically combined with soft skills training, this integrative strategy has the potential to significantly augment individuals’ capabilities to confront intricate, real-world dilemmas[6].The importance of this integration has garnered increasing acknowledgment within sustainability and educational research, as soft skills are perceived not solely as facilitators of employability[7] but as fundamental competencies vital for enduring social advancement and adaptive responses to societal challenges [8]. For example, Bassi Costa and Cipolla (2025)[8] delineate four principal dimensions of soft skills pivotal for sustainability: (1) Communication, Collaboration, and Diversity Management; (2) Self-Awareness and Emotional Regulation; (3) Environmental, Cultural, and Social Sensitivity[8]; and (4) Ethical Principles and Spiritual Awareness[9]. Concurrently, constructivist pedagogical frameworks have been underscored as effective methodologies for fostering soft skills within social education paradigms, thereby empowering learners through active, participatory, and contextually pertinent educational environments[10]. Moreover, empirical research indicates that soft-skills training is correlated with enhanced personal resilience, improved stress management, and increased preparedness to engage in socially and environmentally responsible actions — findings that imply the integration of social education and soft skills may play a significant role in advancing sustainable development objectives[11]. Nevertheless, despite these advancements, literature reviews reveal a lack of consensus regarding standardized curricula or models for the systematic integration of social education and soft skills — highlighting the necessity for further theoretical and empirical investigation across diverse socio-cultural context\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSustainable development is comprehensively articulated as “development that addresses the needs of the present without jeopardizing the capacity of future generations to fulfill their own needs,” a definition first posited by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED, 1987). This concept signifies a transformative shift away from growth-centric development that prioritizes economic profits towards a more integrative framework that harmonizes economic viability, social equity, and environmental integrity. Rooted in historical appeals for responsible management of natural resources and global intergenerational equity, sustainable development has emerged as a fundamental tenet of international policy subsequent to the 1972 Stockholm Conference and was further institutionalized by the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Rio Earth Summit, 1992) alongside the endorsement of Agenda 21[12].Academic discourse frequently delineates sustainable development with respect to three interconnected dimensions (or “pillars”): environmental protection, social inclusion, and economic growth.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eenvironmental dimension\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e underscores the importance of conserving ecosystems, safeguarding biodiversity, managing natural resources in a sustainable manner, and mitigating pollution and climate change effects. the social dimension\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e pertains to issues of equity, access to vital services (including health, education, and housing), social justice, and inclusive human development. Concurrently. the economic dimension\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e concentrates on fostering economic systems that are both productive and resource-efficient, promoting decent livelihoods, and ensuring long-term prosperity without compromising ecological or social welfare[13]. More recently, certain scholars and policy frameworks have introduced a fourth dimension\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e — governance or institutional sustainability — highlighting the significance of transparent institutions, participatory decision-making, policy coherence, and long-term planning in realizing sustainable outcomes[13].\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEmpirical and theoretical investigations underscore the critical importance of sustainable development not solely for the preservation of the environment but also for the promotion of social equity and economic robustness[14]. For instance, research conducted at the organizational level indicates that institutions which effectively balance these three (or more) dimensions tend to achieve superior performance over time regarding social sustainability, economic viability, and environmental accountability[15]. Similarly, educational initiatives focused on sustainability have been posited to foster a holistic awareness that advocates for enduring ecological stewardship, social justice, and ethical economic practices. However, criticisms persist: certain scholars contend that the three-pillar framework may be excessively reductionist, inadequately addressing power dynamics, intergenerational equity, and institutional governance — thereby eliciting demands for more expansive frameworks that integrate rights, justice, democracy, and long-term systemic transformation[16]. In conclusion, sustainable development emerges as a pivotal concept within contemporary environmental, social, and economic theory and policy, providing a comprehensive paradigm for confronting the interconnected challenges posed by global change, inequality, and resource depletion[17].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmerging challenges in natural resource conservation :\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAddressing emerging challenges in the conservation of natural resources encompasses a broad set of strategies, policy frameworks, and scientific interventions designed to safeguard and maintain ecosystems and vital resources such as forests, freshwater systems, and biodiversity amid escalating threats, including climate change, habitat degradation, pollution, unsustainable exploitation, and intensifying human activities. The importance of this focus has increased substantially as population growth, rapid urban expansion, and global environmental change accelerate resource depletion and erode ecosystem integrity[18].Core components of contemporary conservation efforts include the protection and restoration of habitats, the sustainable management of natural resources (e.g., forestry, water, and mineral resources), biodiversity preservation, pollution mitigation, and the development of governance systems that enhance ecosystem resilience to climate change[19]. Existing research highlights both the urgency and the complexity of these challenges. For instance, recent syntheses demonstrate that climate change poses substantial obstacles to biodiversity conservation by reshaping species distributions, altering phenological patterns, and facilitating biological invasions, thereby complicating conventional conservation approaches [20].Studies of freshwater ecosystems further indicate that approximately half of the world’s freshwater fish species are currently threatened by the cumulative effects of climate change, pollution, habitat deterioration, and emerging stressors such as engineered nanomaterials, underscoring the need for innovative and adaptive conservation strategies[21] .\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn parallel, assessments of natural resource depletion—particularly in relation to mineral extraction and deforestation—suggest that without robust conservation policies and sustainable management practices, resource scarcity and environmental degradation will intensify, with adverse consequences for both ecological integrity and human well-being[22].From a theoretical standpoint, contemporary conservation biology increasingly advocates integrated, cross-sectoral approaches that link ecological science with socio-economic considerations, governance structures, and community participation in order to more effectively address interconnected and emerging environmental pressures[23, 24]. Overall, responding to emerging challenges in natural resource conservation extends beyond the prevention of further environmental harm and instead requires the design of resilient, equitable, and sustainable systems capable of securing both ecological and human futures in the context of ongoing global change[19].\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResearch gaps and purpose of the present study:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDespite increasing scholarly attention to soft skills and social sustainability education, substantial gaps persist within the literature—particularly with respect to the systematic integration of social education and soft-skills development, the availability of empirical evidence linking these constructs to tangible conservation outcomes, and the existence of coherent models applicable across diverse contexts. For example, while recent studies have delineated key categories of soft skills relevant to sustainability (such as interpersonal and intrapersonal competencies, ethical reasoning, and environmental–social awareness) and have advocated their incorporation into higher education curricula, there remains a notable shortage of longitudinal and outcome-focused research examining whether the cultivation of such skills leads to observable pro-environmental behaviors or effective natural resource conservation practices (Bassi Costa \u0026amp; Cipolla, 2025; sustainability education framework studies, 2024)Furthermore, much of the existing scholarship concentrates on higher education and formal schooling environments, leaving informal learning contexts, community-based initiatives, and culturally or socio-economically diverse settings insufficiently examined . In addition, there is little agreement on a comprehensive and transferable theoretical or pedagogical framework that meaningfully integrates social education, soft-skills training, and conservation-oriented sustainability, thereby limiting opportunities for comparative analysis and the formulation of broader policy implications\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003eIn response to these gaps, the present review seeks to critically analyze and synthesize the existing literature on the integration of social education and soft skills for sustainability and natural resource conservation. Specifically, it aims to map prevailing theoretical perspectives, document dominant methodological approaches, and identify recurring trends, limitations, and avenues for future research. Through this synthesis, the paper contributes to theoretical clarification, elucidates the current state of empirical evidence, and offers guidance for the development of more robust and context-sensitive educational interventions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"},{"header":"Materials \u0026 Methods – Introductory Paragraph (Life Sciences Focus)","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn this narrative review, I explore how Social Education and the Development of 'soft skills' may be utilized to increase sustainable development, while simultaneously addressing Newly Created Complexities associated with the Conservation of Natural Resources in Life Sciences. This review utilized a narrative review approach due to the inherently cross-disciplinary nature of Life Sciences (e.g., Ecological, Biological, and Human), therefore providing an opportunity for a comprehensive integration of various Theoretical Models and Empirical Findings related to Social Education and Development of Soft Skills in support of Ecological Stewardship and Sustainability of Natural Systems. Different from a systematic review, this form of review provides a flavour of established literature and allows for free-flowing exploration of various styles of Evidence across an array of sources. Literature was identified through a purposeful iterative Search of Peer Reviewed Journals, Texts on Environmental Education, Conservation Reports and other Grey Literature to capture both Foundational Perspectives on Social Education/Development of Soft Skills in Support of Ecological Stewardship, as well as More Current Research. Attention was given to those pieces which provide information on Human Behaviours, Communication Skills, Community Engagement and Educational Interventions in the development of Ecological Stewards and to support Ecological Sustainability..\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAlthough this was a narrative review, the sources chosen were not limited by a predetermined process; however, we used guiding criteria that allowed us to include only those sources that had a relationship to our topic. We included only peer-reviewed articles and books, policy and other forms of grey literature, that discussed educational approaches, human behaviour in conservation, or skill-building approaches related to sustainability. Where possible, we included only materials published in the English language that were published since the early 2000s. However, since this segment of the literature review is a broad overview of all literature currently available and many publications address issues that may not yet have been considered in this context.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelection Criteria\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo ensure that the narrative review captured a broad yet thematically coherent range of scholarship on synergizing social education and soft skills for sustainable development and for addressing emerging challenges in natural resource conservation, the following selection criteria were applied:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1. Types of Studies Considered\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe review included a diverse range of literature to reflect the interdisciplinary nature of the topic:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eEmpirical studies\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;Quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method research examining educational interventions, soft-skill development, human behavior in conservation, or sustainability practices.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTheoretical and conceptual papers\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;Works offering frameworks, models, or conceptual discussions relevant to social education, environmental ethics, human dimensions of conservation, or sustainability competencies.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eReview studies\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;Narrative reviews, integrative reviews, and relevant systematic reviews that provided broader insights into education, sustainability, or natural resource management.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eApplied and practice-based reports\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;Policy documents, case studies, institutional reports, and credible grey literature focusing on community engagement, conservation education, or skill-based training programs.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eInterdisciplinary studies\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;Research bridging life sciences with social sciences, education, environmental psychology, or sustainability science.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2. Time Frame\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eThe review primarily considered literature published from 2000 to the present, reflecting contemporary approaches to environmental education, sustainability competencies, and conservation challenges in the 21st century.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSeminal earlier works were included when foundational to understanding key concepts, theories, or historical development of social or environmental education.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3. Topical Relevance\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eStudies were included if they addressed one or more of the following themes:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSocial or environmental education\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSoft skills (e.g., communication, collaboration, critical thinking, leadership)\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSustainable development practices\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHuman behavior, community engagement, or capacity-building in conservation\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eIntersections between education, skill development, and natural resource management\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eEmerging conservation challenges influenced by socio-environmental factors\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4. Exclusion Criteria\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eStudies were excluded if they:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFocused solely on technical or ecological data without human, educational, or skill-development dimensions\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWere highly specialized biophysical research unrelated to sustainability education\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLacked credible sources or did not undergo any form of scholarly review\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eProvided theoretical discussions with no connection to environmental or educational contexts\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe current body of literature reflects a growing recognition that there is a need to integrate the teaching of social education along with the development of soft skills for the purpose of promoting sustainable development and conserving the Earth's natural resources. The body of literature on environmental education, sustainability science, and human dimensions of conservation now emphasises that technical knowledge alone is not enough to produce sustainable ecological outcomes; example behaviours, community involvement, and collaboration are a result of the individual's development of social and non-technical abilities. Since the year 2010, there has been a marked shift from content-focused environmental education to a more holistic approach that is centred on the learner, and promotes development of one's ability to communicate effectively, develop emotional intelligence, take civic responsibility, and make ethical decisions when thinking about and acting on environmental issues. Although this change has occurred, the existing body of literature remains disorganised and fragmented, with the presence of numerous different theoretical approaches and interpretations as to which \"soft\" skills are most important for achieving sustainability through promoting environmentally friendly behaviours, etc.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParagraph Two - Key Ideas And Trends Of the Integration Of Soft Skills In Education\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe most frequently studied theme in current literature is the design and delivery of educational programs that combine social learning, through collaborative approaches, together with targeted soft skills training. All empirical research, in the areas of formal education, vocational training, and community-based conservation initiatives, has found the consistent result that the use of cooperative learning, conflict resolution, and participatory methods during delivery of education, will lead to increased levels of environmental awareness and stewardship among learners. Qualitative case studies have shown significant successes related to experiential and community-based education approaches in leading to individual level civic engagement and collective action in relation to resource management issues. Quantitative survey data and mixed method evaluation research show marginally moderate correlation between soft skill development and pro-environmental attitudes. However, establishing causal relationships has not been an area of significant research. Overall, the research suggests that education delivered in an integrated manner can lead to both personal competencies and enhancement of the sustainability of the community through improved levels of civic engagement and participatory action related to resource management issues.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParagraph 3 \u0026ndash; Methodological Approaches and Study Outcomes\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is much variation in the types of methodologies employed in the studies of sustainability. Many small-scale qualitative studies were conducted using qualitative approaches, such as interviews and ethnographic fieldwork, which produced an understanding of how people and communities create values around sustainability through social learning processes. Quantitative studies used more general approaches to measuring i.e. actions/attitudes towards the environment. However, the overwhelming number of quantitative studies measured these attitudes using many different tools. Hybrid qualitative and quantitative methodologies often studied the interactions between an individual's competencies and other people's conservation behaviours. The research shows that communication skills, emotional intelligence, and collaborative problem-solving are linked to increased environmental involvement and in some situation demonstrable improvements in the local conservation activity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParagraph 4 \u0026ndash; Gaps, Limitations, and Inconsistencies\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite significant promise, there are several critical shortcomings and inconsistencies within the existing literature. First, only a few longitudinal studies measure long-term behavioural and/or ecological effects of soft skill development on continued conservation behaviour. Second, much of the current research is focused primarily within the higher education setting, with very little emphasis placed on secondary education, informal education, and community-based conservation education programs. Third, there is no established framework for integrating soft skill development and social education within sustainability curricula, leading to inconsistencies in terminology, metrics, and methodologies used across studies. Finally, very few studies have attempted to compare across socio-economic/cultural contexts to determine how different socio-economic/cultural contexts shape the effectiveness of integrated education interventions. Overall, the aforementioned limitations highlight the need for additional well-controlled longitudinal studies to create clearer pathways for understanding the links between social education, soft skill development, and subsequent conservation outcomes )Fig.\u0026nbsp;1\u0026ndash;1(.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eParagraph 1 \u0026ndash; Synthesis of Key Findings\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA trend is emerging from the research in this area. More researchers are becoming aware of the synergistic effects that can occur by integrating social education with the development of soft skills and that this combination offers not only environmental sustainability but also conservation of natural resources. Many studies found that when civic engagement, ethical reasoning, communication, collaboration, and emotional intelligence are integrated into interventions, they had positive impacts on attitudes towards the environment, participatory behaviour, and community-based conservation efforts. In both qualitative and quantitative studies, soft skills have been shown to enhance a learner's ability to collaboratively resolve problems, adapt to the complexity of environmental problems, and foster a sense of social responsibility. In contrast, social education provides a foundation for a learner's value system, social norm, and civic engagement. There is a growing agreement that educational programs designed to address sustainability will yield better outcomes when they are designed to address cognitive knowledge, social consciousness, and interpersonal competencies. However, the specific processes and mechanisms involved are still undergoing further investigation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eParagraph 2 \u0026ndash; Implications and Gaps\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe theoretical, practical and policy ramifications of these findings are substantial. From a theoretical standpoint, they support integrated models of sustainability education, which integrate socio-emotional and behavioural competencies into sustainability education in conjunction with technical knowledge. Practically, this study indicates that incorporating soft skills into conservation education can improve learner involvement, community engagement and adaptive management of natural resources. In terms of policy, these findings provide rationale for curriculum reform, building capacity and supporting an integrated approach to higher education and sustainability. Even though these findings reflect progress, there are substantial gaps. There are few longitudinal studies that demonstrate a relationship between soft skill development and measurable conservation outcomes. The majority of the existing literature has focused on higher education contexts; therefore, these findings may not be generalisable to the broader community. Furthermore, there are methodological discrepancies and fragmented frameworks empirically examined, as well as limited cross-cultural studies, indicating the need for more integrated, contextually relevant approaches to research.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParagraph 3 \u0026ndash; Directions for Future Research\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture research should bridge these existing gaps by using longitudinal mixed-method cross-contextual designs that effectively and robustly evaluate the effects of integrating social education with soft skills on sustainability/conservation results over a long-term period. Researches should also include early education, informal learning environments and community initiatives so as to include many more social/economic and environmental contexts. Moreover, the development of standardized frameworks, assessment tools and theoretical models that link soft skills, social learning, and environmental stewardship is required to truly understand the relationships between these areas of focus. Comparative studies conducted across various cultures, socioeconomic and institutional settings will identify contextual factors that will improve the understanding of scalability of educational strategies. By identifying these research priorities, future work can enhance the evidence base to better support the design, implementation and evaluation of educational interventions that develop human capacity in alignment with sustainable resource management.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study has noted an increasing awareness within the research community that social education and soft skill development can be combined to support sustainable development and enhance natural resource conservation. Studies employing qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods demonstrate that through the incorporation of social awareness, civic engagement, communication and collaboration, as well as emotional intelligence, in educational programs, learners have increased pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors, as well as community-based conservation. Furthermore, this body of literature appears to be shifting towards holistic, learner-centered approaches, which integrate technical knowledge along with socio-emotional and behavioral competencies to create sustainable outcomes. Overall, although the types of research methods used may differ and conceptual frameworks may vary, there is broad agreement within this area of research that to be able to address the growing number of ecological issues and develop adaptive and resilient systems of resource management, it is essential to promote the combined development of both social and soft skills.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on this study\u0026rsquo;s results, we can conclude that the way we approach developing soft skills and social education should be through a systematic integration of both areas within educational settings. There remains an abundance of research gaps, ranging from the absence of longitudinal studies that demonstrate how soft skills relate to environmental outcome measures to the overwhelming majority of research conducted in higher education contexts, along with the lack of a standardised framework or assessment instrument. Future research should focus on developing longitudinal and cross-contextual studies of educational interventions; evaluating how to develop soft skills and social education in earlier educational stages and/or in informal or community-based learning contexts; and finally, developing unified models to integrate social learning, soft skills and sustainability together. Once these gaps are filled, policymakers, education strategists and practitioners will have access to a strong empirical base from which to build new educational strategies for developing human capabilities necessary for sustainable management of natural resources.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBarbosa AE (2025) Pathways to Sustainability Require Collaboration and Innovation. Arguments for the Inclusion of Communication Competences in Environmental Sciences and Related Higher Education. Open Environ Res J, 18(1)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNurizinova M et al (2025) STEM-based approaches to soft skills development: a synthesis of meta-analytic findings and empirical evidence. Frontiers in Education. Frontiers\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMolendijk L, Taplin RH, Brennan AJ (2025) Empirical Evidence of Factors to Improve Student Engagement from Experiential Learning Activities. Issues Acc Educ 40(2):67\u0026ndash;82\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang H, Zhan Y, Chen K (2025) Do education, urbanization, and green growth promote life expectancy? Front Public Health 12:1517716\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrieven G et al (2025) \u003cem\u003eIntegrating Soft Skills Training into your Course through a Collaborative Activity\u003c/em\u003e. in \u003cem\u003eProceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang X et al (2025) Fostering academic engagement through soft skills and positive emotions: a sustainable development perspective on university education. Front Psychol 16:1622327\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGerasimova IG, Oblova IS (2025) Dev Soft Skills Purpose Enhancing Employab Eng Students\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCosta MFB, Cipolla CM (2025) Critical soft skills for sustainability in higher education: A multi-phase qualitative study. Sustainability 17(2):377\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGupta K, Agrawal R, Sharma V (2016) Sustainability from the lenses of spirituality: a new perspective. Int J Intell Enterp 3(3\u0026ndash;4):297\u0026ndash;310\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDe Carlo E et al (2025) Soft Skills as a Tool for Post-Pandemic Sustainability: A University-Based Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 22(11):1752\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLibertson F (2023) Inner transitions in higher education in Sweden: incorporating intra-personal skills in education for sustainable development. Int J Sustain High Educ 24(9):213\u0026ndash;230\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWhitfield K (2015) \u003cem\u003eQuick guide to sustainable development: history and concepts.\u003c/em\u003e Retrieved November, 10: p. 2019\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBosselmann K, Engel R, Taylor P (2008) Governance for sustainability: Issues, challenges, successes. IUCN\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKumar P, Sharma L, Sharma NC (2024) \u003cem\u003eSustainable development balancing economic viability, environmental protection, and social equity\u003c/em\u003e, in \u003cem\u003eSustainable partnership and investment strategies for startups and SMEs\u003c/em\u003e. IGI Global Scientific Publishing. pp. 212\u0026ndash;234\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKocmanov\u0026aacute; A, Dočekalov\u0026aacute; M (2011) Corporate sustainability: environmental, social, economic and corporate performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 59(7):203\u0026ndash;208\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGrossman D (2012) The Three Pillars of Sustainable Development: Critical Issues and Perspectives. Comparative Education Society of Asia (CESA), Bangkok, Thailand\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAssembly G (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 11 September 2015. United Nations, New York, p 14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAction UC (2022) \u003cem\u003eBiodiversity\u0026mdash;Our Strongest Natural Defense Against Climate Change.\u003c/em\u003e United Nations Climate Action, available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/biodiversity\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShahzad A (2025) Climate Change and Its Impact on Global Biodiversity. Prem J Environ Sci 3:100013\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDong X et al (2025) Future climate change increase species vulnerability and present new opportunities for biodiversity conservation in China. J Environ Manage 385:125652\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSayer CA et al (2025) One-quarter of freshwater fauna threatened with extinction. Nature 638(8049):138\u0026ndash;145\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMagurran AE (2009) Threats to freshwater fish. Science 325(5945):1215\u0026ndash;1216\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBanks J (2004) Divided culture: integrating and conservation biology agriculture. Front Ecol Environ 2(10):537\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePalardy J (2024) \u003cem\u003eEmerging issues for global conservation in 2024\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"The institution or organization did not sponsor the research.","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Social education, Soft skills, Sustainable development, Natural resource conservation, Environmental stewardship, Civic engagement, Behavioral competencies","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8757586/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8757586/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe accelerating degradation of natural resources under the combined pressures of climate change, environmental pollution, and unsustainable human activities has intensified calls for more integrative approaches to sustainable development and conservation. In recent years, social education and soft-skills development have been increasingly recognized as critical, yet underexplored, components of sustainability-oriented responses to these emerging challenges. This narrative review examines the theoretical and empirical literature at the intersection of social education, soft skills, sustainable development, and natural resource conservation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDrawing on peer-reviewed journal articles, conceptual frameworks, and review studies published across education, sustainability, and environmental governance disciplines, the review synthesizes current knowledge on how social education and soft skills—such as communication, ethical reasoning, emotional awareness, and social–environmental responsibility—are conceptualized, implemented, and evaluated in sustainability-related contexts. The analysis identifies key themes, including the growing emphasis on transversal competencies for sustainability, the predominance of higher-education-focused interventions, and the increasing advocacy for experiential and community-based learning approaches. However, the review also reveals critical gaps, notably the scarcity of longitudinal and outcome-oriented empirical studies, limited attention to informal and non-formal learning settings, and the absence of standardized, transferable frameworks linking soft-skills development to measurable conservation outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOverall, the reviewed literature suggests that synergizing social education and soft skills holds considerable potential for fostering pro-environmental behaviors, strengthening conservation practices, and supporting resilient and equitable resource governance. Nevertheless, realizing this potential requires more robust empirical evidence, cross-contextual research, and theoretically coherent models to guide implementation and evaluation. The review concludes by recommending future research priorities, including longitudinal and mixed-methods studies, broader cultural and educational scope, and the development of integrated frameworks capable of translating educational interventions into tangible sustainability and conservation impacts.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Synergizing social education and soft skills for sustainable development and for addressing emerging challenges in natural resource conservation","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-04 08:48:02","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8757586/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"b4fff203-340f-4067-83f2-454933e29892","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 4th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":62293019,"name":"Special Education"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-04T08:48:02+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-04 08:48:02","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8757586","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8757586","identity":"rs-8757586","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}