Is cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia symptomatic?

In: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2008 · vol. 28(3) , pp. 336–337 · doi:10.1080/01443610802045053 · PMID:18569482 · W2160923492
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-13

This case-control study found no evidence that cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia is associated with post-coital bleeding, intermenstrual bleeding, or discharge.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Very little is known about cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) and associated symptomatology. It is often quoted that that CIN is asymptomatic. We wanted to look at whether women with CIN were symptomatic or not. We are not aware of a similar study. We performed a case control study. Our cases were 22 women with abnormal cytology and histology results and our controls were 56 women who had been treated in the recent past and whose smears had returned to normal and those women whose smears had returned to normal spontaneously. Our study shows that there is no evidence that CIN is associated with post-coital bleeding, intermenstrual bleeding or discharge. Women with post-coital bleeding (PCB) are often fast tracked to the colposcopy clinic and women awaiting colposcopy suffer high levels of anxiety. There is no evidence for such practice.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (5)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK