Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pelvic Endometriosis: Imaging Characteristics and Anatomical Distribution at a Tertiary Care Study

Observational OA: closed CC0
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-12 ⓘ

This study evaluated MRI characteristics and anatomical distribution of pelvic endometriosis in 25 patients, finding ovarian involvement most frequent and MRI reliable for diagnosis and mapping, especially for deep infiltrating disease.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text ⓘ

This retrospective observational study evaluated the magnetic resonance imaging characteristics and anatomical distribution of pelvic endometriosis in 25 female patients referred to a tertiary care center. The research analyzed MRI findings alongside clinical symptoms, identifying pelvic pain with dysmenorrhea as the most common presentation and ovarian involvement as the most frequent site of disease. Key results highlighted that deep infiltrating endometriosis was present in 32% of cases, demonstrating MRI's utility in delineating lesion distribution for preoperative planning. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically focusing on the diagnostic imaging features and anatomical spread of the condition using MRI technology.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

CONTEXT: Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological disorder, characterized by the presence of functional endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. It commonly presents with pelvic pain and infertility and may involve ovarian, peritoneal, and deep pelvic structures. Although laparoscopy remains the gold standard for diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a valuable noninvasive modality for detection and preoperative mapping, particularly in deep infiltrating disease. AIMS: To evaluate the characteristic MRI features of pelvic endometriosis and to analyze the anatomical distribution and imaging spectrum of lesions in affected patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included 25 female patients clinically or sonographically suspected of endometriosis who were referred to the department of radiodiagnosis at a tertiary care center between May 2023 and April 2024. All the patients underwent pelvic ultrasound followed by MRI on a 3.0-T system using sequences. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mean ± standard deviation, frequency, and percentages. RESULTS: The mean age was 32 ± 5 years, with 44% of patients in the 26-30 years' age group. The most common symptom was pelvic pain with dysmenorrhea (44%), followed by infertility (20%). Ovarian involvement was most frequent site, identified in 56% of patients (36% unilateral and 20% bilateral). Deep infiltrating endometriosis was seen in 32% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is a reliable and comprehensive imaging modality for diagnosing and mapping pelvic endometriosis. It is particularly valuable in detecting deep infiltrating disease and in guiding preoperative assessment by accurately delineating lesion distribution and signal characteristics.
Full text 1,951 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Results

The mean age was 32 ± 5 years, with 44% of patients in the 26–30 years’ age group. The most common symptom was pelvic pain with dysmenorrhea (44%), followed by infertility (20%). Ovarian involvement was most frequent site, identified in 56% of patients (36% unilateral and 20% bilateral). Deep infiltrating endometriosis was seen in 32% of cases.

Conclusions

MRI is a reliable and comprehensive imaging modality for diagnosing and mapping pelvic endometriosis. It is particularly valuable in detecting deep infiltrating disease and in guiding preoperative assessment by accurately delineating lesion distribution and signal characteristics.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-09-07T06:04:16.255793+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-11T06:08:00.338175+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK