Repeatable phenotypic but not genetic response to selection on body size in the black soldier fly

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,358 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Polygenic traits are expected to show high genetic redundancy and therefore low repeatability in the genomic response to selection. We tested this prediction by selecting for large body size in the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens). Over three replicate experiments selected for large body size, we found a strong and repeatable phenotypic response, with a mean 15% increase in body size. Selected lines also increased in larval growth rate (+19%) and average protein content (+14%), suggesting that selection on large body size does not result in strong trade-offs. In contrast to the predictability of the phenotypic response across replicates, whole genome sequencing identified a highly polygenic and non-repeatable genomic response. We identified 120, 301 and 157 outlier genomic regions in the three replicates, but high redundancy with only four shared regions. Among 12 candidate genes found in these regions, the insulin-like receptor gene (HiInR) was confirmed as regulating larval growth using a CRISPR knockout experiment. In summary, polygenic quantitative traits show high genetic redundancy, even where the phenotypic response to selection is highly repeatable. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* Tomas N. Generalovic and Wenjun Zhou should be considered joint first author.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00