Reference
for clinical research, this paper compared
the pregnancy outcomes of IVF treatment in patients
with endometriosis and infertility by three ovulation
induction regimens: modified long protocol, ultra-long
protocol and antagonist protocol.
Materials and methods
General information:
From December 2016 to December 2019, 324 patients
with endometriosis and infertility were selected as
subjects. The age was (32.46±3.32) y, the duration of
infertility was (4.24±3.07) y and the body mass index
(BMI) was (22.20±3.35).
Inclusion criteria-In line with the EMT diagnostic criteria
of the Chinese Medical Association of Obstetrics and
Gynecology; patients and their families are informed
and voluntarily sign the research consent; whether the
woman’s uterus can bear pregnancy; Age 22-45 y; those
who have fertility needs and have not been pregnant for
at least one year without contraceptive measures.
Exclusion criteria-Either male or female suffered from
serious mental illness; either male or female suffered
from acute infection of urogenital system and sexually
transmitted diseases; poor compliance, unable to
receive IVF treatment and timely review; hydrosalpinx
with impact on IVF pregnancy outcome, ≥4 cm
uterine leiomyoma, severe adenomyosis; spouse with
infertility; parallel participants in other clinical studies.
In this study, patients were divided into three groups
according to different ovulation induction protocols,
including super long protocol group, modified long
protocol group and antagonist protocol group. This
study met the requirements of medical ethics and was
www.ijpsonline.com
Special Issue 3, 2021 Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
141
compared among the three groups: total gonadotropin
(Gn) dosage, Gn days, luteinizing hormone (LH)
level (U/L), progesterone (P) level (mg/L) and follicle
stimulating hormone (FSH) level (U/L). The number
of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, normal cleavage
and high-quality embryos were compared among the
three groups. Pregnancy diagnosis-blood was drawn
14 d after transplantation, and 30 d after transplantation,
B-ultrasound was used to determine whether clinical
pregnancy, intrauterine and extrauterine conditions,
germ and heart tube pulsation were detected, and
clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and abortion rate
were calculated.
Statistical analysis:
All data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software.
Continuous variables pass the normality test to express.
The count variables were expressed by the number of
cases and percentage, and the comparison between
groups was performed by chi square test; the test
level was bilateral α=0.05. p<0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
Results
AND DISCUSSION
The average age, infertility years, BMI and embryo
transfer number of the three groups were not statistically
significant (p>0.05), indicating that the three groups
were comparable, as shown in Table 1.
According to the statistics of IVF of three groups, we
found that the total number of GN days and the total
number of GN in the super long protocol group were
lower than those in the modified long protocol group
and the antagonist group (p0.05). For p level before oocyte retrieval, the
modified long protocol group was the lowest, followed
by the super long protocol group, and the antagonist
group was the highest (p<0.05), as shown in Table 2.
The number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes and
normal cleavage in the modified long protocol group
were significantly higher than those in the super long
protocol group (p<0.05). The number of retrieved
oocytes, mature oocytes, normal cleavage and excellent
embryos in the modified long protocol group were
higher than those in the antagonist protocol group
(p<0.05); the number of retrieved oocytes, mature
oocytes and normal cleavage in the super long protocol
injected intramuscularly that night. After 36-38 h, the
oocytes were removed by vaginal ultrasound. According
to hormone level, embryo condition, endometrium
condition and patient’s will, ovum freezing or
transplantation is decided. Vitrification was used for
freezing. The ovums were treated with cryoprotectant
and stored in liquid nitrogen. The ovums waiting for
transplantation were placed in a 5 % CO 2 incubator at
37°.
IVF:
IVF was performed according to the technical
specification for human assisted reproduction[8]. On the
day of in vitro fertilization, the semen of the man was
fully liquefied, and the semen was treated by density
gradient centrifugation. After 5 h of oocytes retrieval,
sperm was added into the micro drop of the fertilization
dish, and the final concentration of sperm was
250 000 pieces of PR grade sperm/ovums, which were
cultured overnight in a 5 % CO2 incubator at 37°.
The fertilization was observed 16-20 h after
insemination, and the embryo quality was scored
according to the consensus of Istanbul experts in 2001.
The evaluation criteria of high-quality embryos were as
follows: normal fertilization on the first day, division
into 3-5 cells on the second day, more than 7 embryo
cells on the third day, and the fragmentation rate was
less than 20 %. The blastomeres were homogeneous,
without vacuoles and multi-nucleation.
Fresh embryos were taken from all the above
programs, and all available embryos were preserved by
vitrification. According to the patient’s menstrual cycle,
the endometrial preparation scheme was selected:
the natural cycle was selected for those with regular
menstruation and normal ovulation; the hormone
replacement cycle was selected for those with irregular
menstruation or ovulation disorder. Embryo transfer
was performed according to the routine freezing and
resuscitation in our center. 14 d after transplantation,
blood samples were taken to check the level of
human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Ultrasound
examination was performed 4-5 w after transplantation.
If the gestational sac and heart tube pulsation were
found in the uterine cavity, it was confirmed as clinical
pregnancy.
Observation index:
The general conditions of the three groups were
compared: age, infertility years, BMI, and embryo
transfer number. Ovulation induction indexes were
www.ijpsonline.com
Special Issue 3, 2021Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences142
will not only bring physical and mental damage to
women, affect family harmony and happiness, but
also increase the econom ic burden of patients. The
pathological and physiological process of endometriosis
is complex and changeable, which may be the result of
the synergistic effect of pelvic microenvironment and
anatomical structure changes, oxidative stress injury,
immune inflammatory response, genetic factors and
endocrine dysfunction. The method to improve the
pregnancy outcome of EMT with infertility has been
a hot and difficult point in clinical research. IVF has
become an important treatment method to improve
the pregnancy outcome of EMT patients. One of the
key factors for successful pregnancy is the quality of
oocytes obtained by ovulation induction, in which
pituitary down regulation is the key process to ensure
the quality of oocytes
[11]
.
In this study, a retrospective analysis was used
to compare the embryo and pregnancy status of
324 patients with endometriosis and infertility. Our
group were higher than those in the antagonist protocol
group (p<0.05), as shown in Table 3.
Statistics of pregnancy outcomes of the three groups
showed that the pregnancy rate and live birth rate of
the super long protocol group were significantly higher
than those of the modified long protocol group and the
antagonist protocol group (p<0.05), and the abortion
rate was significantly lower than that of the other two
groups (p<0.05). The pregnancy rate and live birth rate
of the modified long protocol group were higher than
those of the antagonist protocol group, and the abortion
rate was lower (p<0.05), as shown in Table 4.
Endometriosis is a common clinical gynecological
disease in young and middle-aged women. It means
that the active endometrial tissue (glands and stroma)
is implanted outside the uterus and invades other
normal tissues. Its main symptoms and consequences
are abdominal pain and infertility. EMT combined with
infertility has gradually become an important cause of
infertility in women of childbearing age. This disease
Groups Average age Years of infertility BMI Number of embryo transfer
Modified long protocol 34.63±2.86 4.24±3.07 22.43±3.12 1.84±0.52
Ultra-long protocol 33.41±3.09 4.17±3.14 22.06±3.32 1.79±0.43
Antagonist regimen 32.48±3.30 4.25±3.1
7
22.45±3.52 1.86±0.58
TABLE 1: COMPARISON OF BASIC DATA OF THREE GROUPS OF PATIENTS (x̄ ±S)
Groups Total Gn days Total Gn
LH level before
oocyte retrieval
(U/L)
P level before
oocyte retrieval
(mg/L)
FSH level before
oocyte retrieval
(U/L)
Modified long protocol 9.98±3.12
$
2384.40±961.33 4.52±1.32 0.52±0.15
#$
9.83±4.40
Ultra-long protocol 7.13±2.08
*#
2060.83±733.89 4.31±2.67 0.73±0.18*
#
10.24±4.12
Antagonist regimen 9.55±2.22
$
2349.40±949.26 4.09±2.11 0.84±0.27
$
* 9.31±3.45
TABLE 2: COMPARISON OF IVF OUTCOMES AMONG THE THREE GROUPS (X̄ ±S)
Note:
*
means p<0.05 vs. Modified long protocol;
#
means p<0.05 vs. Antagonist regimem;
$
means p<0.05 vs. Ultra long protocol
Groups N Number of
oocytes
Number of mature
oocytes
Normal oocytes
division number
Number of excellent
embryos
Modified long protocol 105 11.55±8.25
#$
10.26±7.29
#$
6.42±5.43
#$
3.23±3.19
#
Antagonist regimen 62 7.21±5.35$* 6.07±4.83$* 3.92±3.01$* 2.19±2.09*
Ultra-long protocol 157 9.04±5.80
*#
8.31±5.67
*#
5.11±4.08
*#
2.62±2.63
TABLE 3: COMPARISON OF OOCYTE RETRIEVAL AND EMBRYO RETRIEVAL AMONG THREE GROUPS
(X̄ ±S)
Note: *means p<0.05 vs. Modified long protocol;
#
means p<0.05 vs. Antagonist regimem;
$
means p<0.05 vs. Ultra long protocol
Groups N Gestation Live birth Abortion
Modified long protocol 105 76 (72.4 %)
#$
56 (53.3 %)
#$
20 (19.0 %)
#$
Antagonist regimen 62 42 (67.7 %)*
$
25 (40.3 %)*
$
17 (27.4 %)*
$
Ultra long protocol 157 116 (73.9 %)
#
* 103 (65.6 %)
#
* 13 (8.3 %)
#
*
TABLE 4: COMPARISON OF PREGNANCY OUTCOMES AMONG THE THREE GROUPS [N (%)]
Note: *means p<0.05 vs. Modified long protocol;
#
means p<0.05 vs. Antagonist regimem;
$
means p<0.05 vs. Ultra long protocol
www.ijpsonline.com
Special Issue 3, 2021 Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
143
total number of GN days and the total amount of GN
in the super long protocol group were lower than those
in the modified long protocol group and the antagonist
group, which had the advantage of clinical significance.
It was a worthy ovulation induction program for patients
with endometriosis and infertility.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the General Hospital of
NorthernTheater Command.
Conflicts of interest:
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Zuberi NF, Rehman R. Endometriosis and subfertility.
Subfertility 2021;135-46.
2. Tan J, Cerrillo M, Cruz M, Cecchino GN, Garcia-Velasco JA.
Early Pregnancy Outcomes in Fresh Versus Deferred Embryo
Transfer Cycles for Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: A
Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2021;10(2):344.
3. Shebl O, Sifferlinger I, Habelsberger A, Oppelt P, Mayer RB,
Petek E, et al. Oocyte competence in in vitro fertilization
and intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients suffering from
endometriosis and its possible association with subsequent
treatment outcome: a matched case–control study. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand 2017;96(6):736-44.
4. Mosbrucker C, Somani A, Dulemba J. Visualization of
endometriosis: comparative study of 3-dimensional robotic
and 2-dimensional laparoscopic endoscopes. J Robot Surg
2018;12(1):59-66.
5. Haiyu T, Tianmin G. Diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis:
Interpretation of the new guidelines of the European Society
of human reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Chin J
Reproduct Health 2015;26(2):176-80.
6. Ylmaz N, Ceran MU, Ugurlu E N. Impact of endometrioma and
bilaterality on IVF / ICSI cycles in patients with endometriosis.
J Gynecol Obstetrics Human Reproduction 2020:101839.
7. Endometriosis cooperative group, Chinese society of Obstetrics
and gynecology. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of
endometriosis. Chin J Obstetrics Gynecol 2015;10(3):161-9.
8. Ministry of health. Notice of the Ministry of health on revising
relevant technical specifications, basic standards and ethical
principles of human assisted reproductive technology and
human sperm bank. Bulletin of the Ministry of health of the
people’s Republic of China, 2003;(3):1-10.
9. Evans MB, Decherney AH. Fertility and endometriosis. Clin
Obstetrics Gynecol 2017;60(3):497-502.
10. Miller JE, Ahn SH, Monsanto SP, Khalaj K, Koti M, Tayade
C. Implications of immune dysfunction on endometriosis
associated infertility. Oncotarget 2017;8(4):7138-47.
11. Yin Y , Mao Y , Liu A, Shu L, Yuan C, Cui Y , et al. Insufficient
Cumulus Expansion and Poor Oocyte Retrieval in
Endometriosis-Related Infertile Women. Reproductive Sci
2021:1-9.
12. Khan Z. Fertility-related considerations in endometriosis.
Abdominal Radiol 2020;45:1754-61.
13. Danhof NA, Van Wely M, Koks CA, Gianotten J, De Bruin JP,
survey results showed that the pregnancy rate and live
birth rate of patients treated with ultra-long protocol
were higher than those treated with modified long
protocol and antagonist protocol, and the abortion rate
was significantly lower than those treated with modified
long protocol and antagonist protocol, indicating that
the ultra-long protocol can significantly improve the
pregnancy outcome of patients with endometriosis
complicated with infertility The transplantation rate and
clinical pregnancy rate of fresh cycle were analyzed.
The results of this study also showed that the total
number of days of GN and the total amount of GN in the
super long protocol group were lower than those in the
modified long protocol group and the antagonist group,
indicating that the super long protocol was convenient
for medication and less injection times, which directly
affected the clinical compliance and patient acceptance.
The reason may be the decrease of estrogen level in
the process of promoting ovulation, which improves
endometrial receptivity and avoids ovarian hyper
stimulation[12].
The number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes and
normal cleavage in the modified long protocol group
was significantly higher than that in the super long
protocol group and the antagonist protocol group.
The number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes and
normal cleavage in the super long protocol group was
higher than that in the antagonist protocol group. This
study found that the pregnancy rate and live birth rate
of modified long protocol were high, and the abortion
rate was low [13]. GnRH-a is a drug that can compete
with endogenous GnRH to act on the pituitary gland,
which can make the pituitary GnRH-a receptor in a
desensitized state, thus inhibiting the ovarian secretion
of related hormones[14]. In this study, GnRH-a was used
in both modified long protocol and super long protocol
to achieve the effect of pituitary down regulation.
However, the antagonist scheme also has its clinical
advantages. The GN releasing hormone used in this
scheme has a wide range of application, avoids the
transient increase effect of GnRH-a, does not need the
down-regulation process, has short treatment cycle, and
is flexible and convenient to use[15].
In conclusion, modified long protocol has clinical
advantages in improving the number of IVF oocytes
and laboratory embryos, but the pregnancy rate and live
birth rate of super long protocol are higher than those of
modified long protocol and antagonist protocol, and the
abortion rate is significantly lower than that of modified
long protocol and antagonist protocol. In addition, the
www.ijpsonline.com
Special Issue 3, 2021Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
144
embryo quality in Thai native heifers. Tropical Animal Health
and Production 2017;49(3):633-9.
Cohlen BJ, et al. The SUPER study: protocol for a randomised
controlled trial comparing follicle-stimulating hormone and
clomiphene citrate for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine
insemination. BMJ open 2017;7(5):e015680.
14. Sallam HN, Garcia‐Velasco JA, Dias S, Arici A, Abou‐Setta
AM. Long‐term pituitary down‐regulation before in vitro
fertilization (IVF) for women with endometriosis. Cochrane
Database of Sys Rev 2006;1(1):CD004635.
15. Chankitisakul V , Pitchayapipatkul J, Chuawongboon P,
Rakwongrit D, Sakhong D, Boonkum W, et al. Comparison of
three superovulation protocols with or without GnRH treatment
at the time of artificial insemination on ovarian response and
This article was originally published in a special issue,
“Evolutionary Strategies in Biomedical Research and
Pharmaceutical Sciences” Indian J Pharm Sci 2021:83(3)
Spl issue;139-144
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which
allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially,
as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under
the identical terms
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.