Full text
2,529 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Understanding the drivers of mast seeding is important for predicting reproductive dynamics in perennial plants. Here, we evaluate the performance of four statistical methods for identifying weather-associated drivers of annual seed production, i.e, weather cues: climate sensitivity profile, P-spline regression, sliding window analysis, and peak signal detection. Using long-term seed production data from 50 European beech (Fagus sylvatica) populations and temperature records, we assessed each method’s ability to detect a benchmark window around the summer solstice. All methods successfully identified biologically meaningful windows, but their performance varied with data quality, signal strength, and sample size. Sliding window and climate sensitivity profile methods showed the best balance of accuracy and robustness, while peak signal detection had lower consistency. Cue identification was more reliable with at least 20 years of data, and predictive accuracy was highest when models were based on seed trap data. A simulation study showed method-specific sensitivity to signal strength, with the sliding window performing best. This simulation further validated the methods by testing their ability to detect a predefined cue window under varying signal strengths. Our findings provide a means to improve masting forecasts through a practical guide for selecting appropriate cue identification methods under varying data constraints.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2C05X
Biology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Forest Sciences, Life Sciences, Plant Sciences
phenology, seed production, Weather, climate change
Published: 2025-06-16 23:05
Last Updated: 2025-09-16 05:42
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Data are archived on the OSF Repository at the following link: \url{https://osf.io/u23vy/}. The case study code is accessible on Github \url{https://github.com/ValentinJourne/weatheRcues/tree/main/Application_MASTREE}. A R vignette tutorial is available at \url{https://valentinjourne.github.io/weatheRcues/articles/weatheRcues.html}.
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.