Results
183
Variant detection 184
Variant calling yielded approximately 41 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 21 C. virginalis 185
and 203 C. mloto specimens of which ~31 million ( 74.7%) passed all variant filtering criteria. The accessible 186
genome size excluding recently discovered inversion regions (see methods) was 545 Mbp corresponding to a SNP 187
density of 75 SNPs per kbp. 188
189
Population genetic structure provides evidence of three geographically widespread C. mloto clades 190
Performing principal component (PC) analysis and constructing a neighbour-joining (NJ) tree of pairwise 191
differences of all samples, we confirmed that all C. mloto formed a monophyletic clade with respect to the samples 192
identified as C. virginalis (Supplementary Fig. V). The first PC clearly separated C. mloto samples from all 193
sampling locations from the single C. virginalis population from Nkhata Bay (10 % variance explained). Since our 194
collections from fisheries catches did not initially distinguish between the two species, this result suggests that C. 195
mloto is the dominant pure utaka species in commercial and artisanal fisheries of Lakes Malawi and Malombe. For 196
further analyses, we focused on the 203 specimens belonging to C. mloto. 197
Structure/admixture analysis of C. mloto samples revealed an interesting pattern in that identified ancestries did not 198
perfectly reflect geographic proximity. Although most individuals of the same sampling location were attributed to 199
the same cluster, the different clusters spanned a wide geographic range with individuals from non-adjacent 200
sampling locations being attributed to the same cluster, while geographically intermediate populations were 201
attributed to different clusters (Fig. 2AThis trend was consistent for different choices of ancestral populations (K) 202
(Supplementary Fig. IV). For several populations, some individuals were inferred to draw some or all of their 203
ancestry from a cluster different from the majority of individuals, consistent with the presence of distinct local 204
populations and, in the case of partial ancestry, gene flow, which will be further investigated below. 205
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
A PC analysis of C. mloto individuals broadly supported the results of the admixture analysis in that it identified 206
genetic clustering inconsistent with a simple isolation by distance pattern (Fig 2B). Instead, the first PC separated a 207
clade consisting of most Lake Malombe individuals, all individuals from Nkhudzi Bay on the western shoreline of 208
the southeast arm of Lake Malawi, all individuals from Nkhotakota on the central western shore of Lake Malawi, 209
some individuals from Namiasi Palm Beach at the southernmost tip of the south east arm of Lake Malawi as well as 210
a single individual from Malembo in the south west arm of Lake Malawi. These individuals formed a monophyletic 211
sister clade to all other individuals in an NJ tree of C. mloto specimens (Fig. 3). In the following, we refer to this 212
genetic cluster as mloto A clade. 213
The second PC separated samples more gradually, with individuals from the northern most population at Chilumba 214
and most individuals from the Namiasi Palm Beach population at the southern tip of Lake Malawi at the two 215
extremes and the mloto A clade that separated along PC1 at values close to zero. However, the clustering of other 216
populations did not reflect a clear geographic trend: individuals with a wide range of geographic origins clustered 217
next to the Namiasi Palm Beach cluster, including samples from Chiweta, Nkhata Bay, and Senga Bay along the 218
western shore of Lake Malawi as well as individuals from the southeast and southwest arm populations. Conversely, 219
individuals from other south west arm populations, as well as from Makanjila on the south eastern coast of Lake 220
Malawi, and a single sample from Namiasi Palm Beach, clustered in proximity to the northern most samples from 221
Chilumba. In the NJ tree, the described spread along PC2 corresponds to two reciprocally monophyletic clades, 222
which we refer to as clades mloto B and mloto C, in the following, for the clades including samples from Chilumba 223
(negative PC2) and Nkhata Bay (positive PC2), respectively. An exception to this are two samples from Msaka on 224
the eastern shores of the southwest arm that clustered basally to both mloto B and mloto C and intermediate along 225
PC2. This is consistent with admixed ancestry between the clades, as also inferred by Admixture (Fig. 2A), and 226
further investigated below. 227
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
228
Figure 2. Relationships among the Copadichromis mloto populations visualised by population Admixture and229
Principal Component (PC) analysis. (a) Population structure patterns of C. mloto as inferred by Admixture230
(Alexander et al. 2009) assuming K = 3 ancestral populations; for the other K values see Supplementary Fig. IV. (b)231
Principal Component (PC) analysis of C. mloto populations. 232
nd
re
)
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
233
234
Figure 3. Neighbour-joining tree constructed from pairwise distances showing the three genetic clades of C. mloto235
The branches corresponding to the three genetic clades are coloured in red ( mloto A), green ( mloto B), and purple236
(mloto C), respectively. Black branches correspond to the ancestral sequence used for rooting and to putatively237
admixed individuals. Relative branch length is fixed for better visibility and thus not proportional to genetic distance238
(See Supplementary Fig. XII for a tree with distances). Representative photos of breeding males from each genetic239
clade are given (Fig. 6). 240
241
Differential genetic exchange between Copadichromis virginalis and C. mloto populations 242
243
To test whether the evolutionary separation between C. virginalis and C. mloto corresponded to a clean bifurcation244
or whether C. virginalis and the identified subclades and populations of C. mloto continued to exchange genetic245
material, we calculated the f4 admixture ratio – a measure of excess allele sharing of a clade P2 with a cl ade P3,246
relative to P2's sister clade P1. Specifically, we estimated a potential contribution of C. virginalis to a given C. mloto247
population compared to another C. mloto population, where we defined populations as all samples of a specific248
sampling location that fall into the same C. mloto clade as identified above. The test revealed strong (5- 25%) and249
highly significant excess allele sharing of all mloto C populations with C. virginalis compared to all mloto A250
.
ple
ly
ce
tic
on
tic
3,
to
fic
nd
A
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
populations and most mloto B populations (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, the mloto C populations from Chilumba, Mbenji 251
Islands, and Namiasi Palm Beach showed 9-10% excess allele sharing with C. virginalis compared to other mloto C 252
populations. Finally, mloto B populations showed 4-10% excess allele sharing with C. virginalis compared to mloto 253
A populations. Overall, these results suggest differential exchange of genetic material between C. virginalis and 254
different C. mloto populations, with the highest levels of C. virginalis contributions in some mloto C populations 255
and the lowest in mloto A. 256
257
Evidence for local genetic exchange between C. mloto clades 258
Next, we wanted to test whether the three C. mloto clades are fully reproductively isolated entities or whether gene 259
flow has occurred between the clades after their initial sp lit. In the former case of clean splits between the clades 260
without subsequent gene flow, we would expect that individuals from two given clades are equally closely related to 261
each other irrespective of their geographic origin, while in the latter case of cross-clade genetic exchange, we would 262
expect cross-clade excess allele sharing of the populations involved, meaning that different populations of one clade 263
show variation in their genetic distance to an outgroup population. We first checked for signals of excess allele 264
sharing of the two samples from Msaka which clustered basally to the mloto B and C clades and found that these 265
samples showed highly elevated f4 admixture ratios of up to 42% with mloto A populations relative to most mloto B 266
and C populations, while also generally closer to mloto B than to mloto C populations. This provides further 267
evidence for the admixed status of these two samples with ancestries related to mloto A and mloto B clades as 268
already suggested by the Admixture analysis. 269
270
Overall, we found strong evidence for genetic exchange between the different C. mloto clades with 49% of f4 ratio 271
tests significant above multiple testing (Bonferroni FWER < 0.05). If this pattern were due to relatively recent gene 272
flow, we would expect a trend in which individuals from different clades are relatively more closely related to each 273
other if they originate from nearby sampling locations. To investigate this, we tested whether excess allele sharing 274
between populations of different clades depended on their relative geographic distance. We found that most clade 275
comparisons showed a significantly positive correlation between relative geographic proximity and signatures of 276
excess allele sharing (Pearson's r = 0.25-0.38) except for comparisons that tested excess allele sharing of different 277
mloto A or mloto C populations with mloto B, which showed no significant correlation with geographic location 278
(Fig. 4.b). Taken together, our results are consistent with the presence of three widely distributed groups of C. mloto 279
that have (occasionally) been exchanging genetic material in places where they were in contact, but st ill retain their 280
separate genetic identities. 281
282
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
283
Figure 4. Dtrios for gene flow test in Copadichromis mloto and C. virginalis populations. (a) f4 admixture ratio tests284
of the form f4 (P1, P2, P3, Outgroup) in which P1 and P2 are C. mloto populations and P3 C. virginalis, segregated285
by C. mloto clade adherence of P1 and P2. (b) f4 admixture ratios plotted against relative geographic proximity286
among the Mloto clades. Points are coloured by C. mloto clade adherence of P1, P2, P3 populations in tests f4 (P1,287
P2, P3, Outgroup) (See Methods). 288
sts
ted
ity
1,
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
289
Figure 5. Population genetic summary statistics (a) Nucleotide diversity ( ) per bp calculated in windows of290
1Mbp. (b) Average inbreeding Coefficient (F) per population (with n>1). (c ) Tajima’s D in windows of 100kb per291
population (with n>1). Observed allele frequency spectra for (d) the Lake Malombe population of clade mloto A; (E)292
the Namiasi palm beach population of clade mloto B , and (f) the Msaka population of clade mloto C . Black293
dots/lines show the respective expectations for neutrally evolving populations of constant size. 294
295
C. mloto populations show strong excess of rare genetic variants 296
297
Investigating population genetic summary statistics, we found relatively similar levels of nucleotide diversity among298
populations and clades (Fig. 5A, supplementary Table XI). The relatively largest variation is seen among mloto C299
populations with the relatively smallest value of 0.1336% ± 0.0139 for the Chilumba population and the largest300
value of 0.1414% ± 0.0149 for the Nankhwali trawler population. Unexpectedly, despite its peripheral geographic301
location and recent demographic changes due to fishing, the mloto A population from Lake Malombe (0.1398% ±302
of
er
E)
ck
ng
C
est
hic
±
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
0.0141) showed one of the highest values of genetic diversity. With 0.1365% ± 0.0149, the estimated nucleotide 303
diversity for C. virginalis was at the lower end of values measured for C. mloto populations. 304
305
Inbreeding coefficients, measuring a deficiency of heterozygote genotypes relative to Hardy-Weinberg expectations, 306
were moderately positive in all populations (Fig. 5B), consistent with either moderate degrees of (historic) mating 307
between related individuals or population substructuring. However, the fact that relatively high inbreeding 308
coefficients coincide with relatively low nucleotide diversity – the highest values most variable along the genome 309
being seen in the least diverse Chilumba mloto C – suggests that inbreeding coefficients reflect within population 310
demographic events rather than residual population structure. C. virginalis showed the second largest inbreeding 311
coefficient with little variation of it along the genome, a signal which might point to a historic population bottleneck. 312
313
To gain further insight into how utaka genetic diversity patterns have been shaped by past demographic events, we 314
computed Tajima's D, a summary of the distribution of allele frequencies (Fig. 5C). For the population of each clade 315
with largest sample size, we also computed full site frequency spectra (SFS) and compared them to expected spectra 316
under neutral evolution (Fig. 5D-F). These analyses revealed an excess of rare genetic variants (negative Tajima's D) 317
compared to neutral expectations in all populations, with strongly negative Tajima's D values close to -2 being found 318
for populations across the C. mloto clades and also for C. virginalis. Such an excess of rare genetic variants can for 319
example be caused by historic population expansion or by directional selection. That said, the presence of negative 320
values of Tajima's D at a genome-wide scale, without large genomic variation (small error bars in Fig. 5C), suggests 321
that the observed strong excess of rare genetic variants is mainly driven by strong population expansion in the time 322
frame of the (largely shared) coalescent history of present day populations, rather than by positive selection, which 323
would lead to genomically more localised allele frequency changes. 324
325
Colour of male breeding dress varies with genetic clade membership 326
327
To investigate potential morphological differences between the different clades, we qualitatively assessed variation 328
in male breeding dress across C. mloto clades based on photographs (Fig. 6). Male breeding dress is a key trait in 329
reproductive isolation of Malawi cichlids that often differs between sister species (Maan and Sefc, 2013). 330
Unfortunately, we only had photos or preserved specimens available for a subset of the individuals, namely 17 males 331
of clade mloto A (all except one from Lake Malombe), 20 males of clade mloto C, and only two males of mloto B . 332
Although the present sample size is too small for quantitative conclusions, the data suggests that the general pattern 333
of black body and yellow dorsal fin colouration of breeding males common to many utaka shows clade specific 334
variation. Specifically, all examined males of mloto A showed clear yellow colouration in the dorsal fin covering the 335
whole fin at the anterior end and extending relatively far towards the posterior end at the upper fin margin (while the 336
lower margin has a blackish colour). At the same time, mloto A males generally featured a yellow blaze on the 337
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
forehead above the eyes, a pattern that can be hard to spot on photographs but is very apparent in examined338
specimens. Therefore, we tentatively refer to the mloto A breeding dress morphotype as "Yellow Head Yellow339
Dorsal" (YHYD). Breeding males of mloto C showed a dorsal fin colouration generally similar to mloto A, albeit340
with more variation in the relative amounts of black and yellow, but they generally do not show any discernible341
yellow blaze on their forehead, a morphotype to which we tentatively refer as "Black Head Yellow Dorsal"342
(BHYD). Finally, the two mloto B in male breeding dress, one from Nankhwali and one from Chiweta, showed a343
strong yellow blaze on their forehead but no or only very little yellow in the ir dorsal fin, wherefore we refer to their344
morphotype as "Yellow Head Black Dorsal" (YHBD). In summary, we found tentative evidence for clade- specific345
variation in male breeding dress, but a more comprehensive set of matched sequence and phenotype data wil l be346
necessary to scrutinise morphological differentiation among genetic clades. 347
348
349
350
351
Figure 6. Representative males in breeding colouration in the three cryptic clades of Copadichromis mloto. A)352
Copadichromis mloto Yellow Head Yellow Dorsal (YHYD) “mloto A clade”, B) Copadichromis mloto Yellow Head353
ed
w
eit
ble
al"
a
eir
fic
be
A)
ad
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
Black Dorsal (YHBD) “ mloto B clade”, C) Copadichromis mloto Black Head Yellow Dorsal (BHYD) “ mloto C 354
clade”. 355
356
References
493
494
Alexander, D.H., J. Novembre & K. Lange, 2009. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. 495
Genome Research: 19, 1655–1664. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.094052.109 496
Anseeuw, D., G.E. Maes, P. Busselen, D. Knapen, J. Snoeks & E. Verheyen, 2008. Subtle population structure and 497
male-biased dispersal in two Copadichromis species (Teleostei, Cichlidae) from Lake Malawi, East Africa. 498
Hydrobiologia: 615, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9565-z 499
Anseeuw, D., J.A.M. Raeymaekers, P. Busselen, E. Verheyen & J. Snoeks, 2011. Low Genetic and Morphometric 500
Intraspecific Divergence in Peripheral Copadichromis Populations (Perciformes: Cichlidae) in the Lake 501
Malawi Basin. International Journal of Evolution Biology: 2011, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/835946 502
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
Arnegard, M.E., J.A. Markert, P.D. Danley, J.R. Stauffer, A.J. Ambali & T.D. Kocher, 1999. Population structure 503
and colour variation of the cichlid fish Labeotropheus fuelleborni Ahl along a recently formed archipelago of 504
rocky habitat patches in southern Lake Malawi. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences: 266, 505
119–130. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0611 506
Banda, M.C., J. Chisambo, R.D. Sipawe, K.R. Mwakiyongo & O.L.F. Weyl, 2001. Fisheries Research Unit 507
Research Plan. Government of Malawi, Department of Fisheries Fisheries Bulletin. 1–54. 508
Blais, J., M. Plenderleith, C. Rico, M.I. Taylor, O. Seehausen, C. Van Oosterhout & G.F. Turner, 2009. Assortative 509
mating among Lake Malawi cichlid fish populations is not simply predictable from male nuptial colour. BMC 510
Evolutionary Biology: 9, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-53 511
Blumer, M. et al. Chromosome-scale inversions contribute to species divergence and sex 512
determination in the Malawi cichlid adaptive radiation. Manuscript in preparation. 513
Brawand, D., C.E. Wagner, Y.I. Li, M. Malinsky, I. Keller, S. Fan, O. Simakov, A.Y. Ng, 514
Z.W. Lim, E. Bezault, J. Turner-Maier, J. Johnson, R. Alcazar, H.J. Noh, P. Russell, 515
B. Aken, J. Alföldi, C. Amemiya, N. Azzouzi, J.F. Baroiller, F. Barloy-Hubler, 516
A. Berlin, R. Bloomquist, K.L. Carleton, M.A. Conte, H. D’Cotta, O. Eshel, L. Gaffney, 517
F. Galibert, H.F. Gante, S. Gnerre, L. Greuter, R. Guyon, N.S. Haddad, W. Haerty, 518
R.M. Harris, H.A. Hofmann, T. Hourlier, G. Hulata, D.B. Jaffe, M. Lara, A.P. Lee, 519
I. MacCallum, S. Mwaiko, M. Nikaido, H. Nishihara, C. Ozouf-Costaz, D.J. Penman, 520
D. Przybylski, M. Rakotomanga, S.C.P. Renn, F.J. Ribeiro, M. Ron, W. Salzburger, 521
L. Sanchez-Pulido, M.E. Santos, S. Searle, T. Sharpe, R. Swofford, F.J. Tan, 522
L. Williams, S. Young, S. Yin, N. Okada, T.D. Kocher, E.A. Miska, E.S. Lander, 523
B. Venkatesh, R.D. Fernald, A. Meyer, C.P. Ponting, J.T. Streelman, K. Lindblad-Toh, 524
O. Seehausen, Di & F. Palma, 2015. The genomic substrate for adaptive radiation in 525
African cichlid fish. Nature: 513, 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13726 526
Camacho, J. et al. Pervasive evolutionary adaptation of visual pathways in deep-water dwelling 527
Lake Malawi cichlids. Manuscript in preparation. 528
Chavula, G.M.S., M.S. M'balaka, E. Gondwe, M. Ngochera, J.S. Halafo, A.H. Shechonge, N.P. Ga 529
bagambi, A.S. Mbonde, D. Banda, N. Muyumbana, T.J. Lawrence, M.Z. Ajode, 530
S. Smith, C. Jonasse, G.Z. Kanyerere, & B.P. Ngatunga, 2023. Lake Malawi/Niassa/Nyasa 531
basin: Status, challenges, and research needs. Journal of Great Lakes Research: 49, 102241. 532
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2023.102241. 533
Danecek, P., J.K. Bonfield, J. Liddle, J. Marshall, V. Ohan, M.O. Pollard, A. Whitwham, T. Keane, S.A. McCarthy, 534
R.M. Davies, & H. Li, 2021. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience:10. 535
https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giab008 536
Danley, P.D., J.A. Markert, M.E. Arnegard, & T.D. Kocher, 2000. Divergence with Gene Flow in the Rock-537
dwelling cichlids of Lake Malawi. Evolution: 54, 1725. 538
Duftner, N., K.M. Sefc, S. Koblmüller, B. Nevado, E. Verheyen, H. Phiri, & C. Sturmbauer, 2006. Distinct 539
population structure in a phenotypically homogeneous rock-dwelling cichlid fish from Lake Tanganyika. 540
Molecular Ecology: 15, 2381–2395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02949.x 541
Eccles, D.H., & E. Trewavas, 1989. Malawian cichlid fishes. The classification of some 542
Haplochromine genera. Lake Fish Movies, Herten, Germany, 335 pp. 543
Enberg, K., C. Jørgensen, E.S. Dunlop, Ø. Varpe, D.S. Boukal, L. Baulier, S. Eliassen, 544
& M. Heino, 2012. Fishing-induced evolution of growth: Concepts, mechanisms and the 545
empirical evidence. Marine Ecology: 33, 1– 25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2011.00460.x 546
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United States (FAO)., 1993. Report of the expert consultation on 547
utilization and conservation of aquatic genetic resources, Grottaferrata, Italy, 9-13 November, 1992. FAO 548
Fish. Report 491. Rome, FAO. 58p. 549
Heino, M., B. Díaz Pauli, & U. Dieckmann, 2015. Fisheries-Induced Evolution. Annual Review of Ecology, 550
Evolution and Systematics: 46, 461– 480. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054339 551
IIles, T.D., 1960. A group of zooplankton feeders of the genus Halpochromis (Cichlidae) in Lake 552
Nyasa. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 2, 1959: 257-280. 553
Ivory, S.J., M.W. Blome, J.W. King, M.M. McGlue, J.E. Cole, & A.S. Cohen, 2016. Environmental change explains 554
cichlid adaptive radiation at Lake Malawi over the past 1.2 million years. Proceedings of the National 555
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America:113, 11895–11900. 556
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611028113 557
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
Jørgensen, C., B. Ernande, & Ø. Fiksen, 2009. Size-selective fishing gear and life history evolution in the Northeast 558
Arctic cod. Evolutionary Applications: 2, 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00075.x 559
Kanyerere, G.Z., D. Kaonga, O. Mponda, B. Nkhoma, & E. Ngulande, 2018. Status of the large-scale commercial 560
trawl fisheries in Southern Lake Malawi. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management: 21, 121– 131. 561
https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2018.1457388 562
Abundance, Spatial Distribution, Size and Species Composition of Fish Stocks in Lake Malombe. 563
Konings, A., 2019. Copadichromis virginalis (amended version of 2018 assessment). The IUCN Red List of 564
Threatened Species 2019: e.T60879A155042587. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-565
3.RLTS.T60879A155042587.en. Accessed on 16 February 2024. 566
Konings, A., 1999. Description of Three New Copadichromis Species (Labroidei; Cichlidae) from Lake Malawi, 567
Africa. Tropical Fish Hobbyist: 63–84. 568
Maan, E.M., K.M. & Sefc, 2013.Colour variation in cichlid fish: Developmental mechanisms, 569
selective pressures and evolutionary consequences. Seminars in Cell and Developmental 570
Biology:24, 516-528.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.05.003. 571
Madeleine J. H, H. Van oppen, G. Turner, L. Rosanna, J. Robinson, C. Deutsch, M. Genner, & G. M. Hewitt, 1998. 572
Assortative mating among rock-dwelling cichlid fishes supports high estimates of species richness from Lake 573
Malawi. Molecular Ecology: 7, 991–1001. 574
Malinsky, M., M. Matschiner, & H. Svardal, 2021. Dsuite - Fast D-statistics and related admixture evidence from 575
VCF files. Molecular Ecology Resources: 21, 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13265 576
Malinsky, M., H. Svardal, A.M. Tyers, E.A. Miska, M.J. Genner, G.F. Turner, & R. Durbin, 2018. Whole-genome 577
sequences of Malawi cichlids reveal multiple radiations interconnected by gene flow. Nature Ecology and 578
Evolution: 2, 1940–1955. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0717-x 579
Marty, L., U. Dieckmann, & B. Ernande, 2015. Fisheries-induced neutral and adaptive evolution in exploited fish 580
populations and consequences for their adaptive potential. Evolutionary Applications: 8, 47–63. 581
https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12220 582
Masonick, P., A. Meyer, & C.D. Hulsey, 2022. Phylogenomic Analyses Show Repeated Evolution of Hypertrophied 583
Lips among Lake Malawi Cichlid Fishes. Genome Biology and Evolution:14, 1–15. 584
https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evac051 585
Nevado, B., S. Mautner, C. Sturmbauer, & E. Verheyen, 2013. Water-level fluctuations and metapopulation 586
dynamics as drivers of genetic diversity in populations of three Tanganyikan cichlid fish species. Molecular 587
Ecology: 22, 3933–3948. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12374 588
Ngochera, M., S. Donda, M. Hara, & E. Berge, 2018. Defragmenting resource management on the southeast arm of 589
Lake Malawi: Case of fisheries. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management: 21, 139–151. 590
https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2018.1475182 591
Pereyra, R., M.I. Taylor, G.F. Turner, & C. Rico, 2004. Variation in habitat preference and population structure 592
among three species of the Lake Malawi cichlid genus Protomelas. Molecular Ecology: 13, 2691–2697. 593
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02224.x 594
Purcell, S., B. Neale, K. Todd-Brown, L. Thomas, M. Ferreira, D. Bender, J. Maller, P. Sklar, P. De Bakker, M. 595
Daly, & P. Sham, 2007. PLINK: a toolset for whole-genome association and population-based linkage 596
analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics: 81. 597
R Core Team, 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for 598
Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ 599
Rick, J.A., J. Junker, I.A. Kimirei, E.A. Sweke, J.B. Mosille, C. Dinkel, S. Mwaiko, O. Seehausen, & C.E. Wagner, 600
2022. The Genetic Population Structure of Lake Tanganyika’s Lates Species Flock, an Endemic Radiation of 601
Pelagic Top Predators. Journal of Heredity:113, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esab072 602
Salzburger, W., B.V. Bocxlaer, & A.S. Cohen, 2014. Ecology and evolution of the African Great Lakes and their 603
faunas. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics: 45, 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-604
ecolsys-120213-091804 605
Scherz, M.D., P. Masonick, A. Meyer, & C.D. Hulsey, 2022. Between a Rock and a Hard Polytomy: Phylogenomics 606
of the Rock-Dwelling Mbuna Cichlids of Lake Malawi. Systematic Biology: 71, 741–757. 607
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syac006 608
Shaw, P.W., G.F. Turner, M.R. Idid, R.L. Robinson, & G.R. Carvalho, 2000. Genetic population structure indicates 609
sympatric speciation of Lake Malawi pelagic cichlids. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological 610
Sciences:267, 2273–2280. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1279 611
Sturmbauer, C., S. Baric, W. Salzburger, L. Rüber, E. Verheyen, 2001. Lake Level Fluctuations Synchronize 612
Genetic Divergences of Cichlid Fishes in African Lakes. Molecular Biology and Evolution: 18, 144–154. 613
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint
Svardal, H., F.X. Quah, M. Malinsky, B.P. Ngatunga, E.A. Miska, W. Salzburger, M.J. Genner, G.F. Turner, & R. 614
Durbin, 2020. Ancestral hybridization facilitated species diversification in the Lake Malawi cichlid fish 615
adaptive radiation. Molecular Biology and Evolution: 37, 1100–1113. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz294 616
Taylor, M.I., & E. Verheyen, 2001. Microsatellite data reveals weak population substructuring in Copadichromis sp. 617
`virginalis kajose’, a demersal cichlid from Lake Malawi, Africa. Journal of Fish Biology: 59, 593–604. 618
https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.2001.1670 619
Turner, G.F., D.A. Crampton, A. Van Huysduynen, & H. Svardal, 2022. Taxonomic investigation 620
of the zooplanktivorous Lake Malawi cichlids Copadichromis mloto (Iles) and C. virginalis 621
(Iles). bioRxiv pre-print. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.10.483679 622
Turner, G., 1996. Offshore cichlids of Lake Malawi. Cichlid Press, Lauenau, Germany; 240 pp. ISBN 3-928457-623
33-0. 624
Tweddle, D., G.F. Turner, & M. Seisay, 1995. Changes in species composition and abundance as a consequence of 625
fishing pressure in Lake Malombe, Malawi. In: Pitcher, T.J. & Hart, P.J.B. (eds) The Impact of Species 626
Changes in African Lakes. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 413–424. 627
Van Oppen, M.J.H., G.F. Turner, C. Rico, J.C. Deutsch, K.M. Ibrahim, R.L. Robinson, 628
& G.M. Hewitt, 1997.Unusually fine-scale genetic structuring found in rapidly speciating 629
Malawi cichlid fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society and London B: 264, 1803-1812. 630
Van Rossum, & G., F.L. Drake, 2009. Python 3 Reference Manual, Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace 631
Van Zwieten, P.A.M., C. Béné, & J. Kolding, 2011. Review of tropical reservoirs and their fisheries-The cases of 632
Lake Nasser, Lake Volta and Indo-Gangetic Basin reservoirs. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 633
1–148. 634
Weyl, O.L.F., K.R. Mwakiyongo, & D.S. Mandere, 2004. An assessment of the Nkacha net fishery of Lake 635
Malombe, Malawi. African Journal of Aquatic Science: 29, 47–55. 636
https://doi.org/10.2989/16085910409503791 637
638
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591058doi: bioRxiv preprint