Morphological characterization of moulting in the Atlantic horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus : phylogenetic conservation among chelicerates and evolutionary convergence of ecdysis linked to head shield patterns

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,823 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Arthropods must periodically moult their exoskeleton to permit growth, a conserved developmental process whose morphological and behavioural execution varies widely among lineages. Horseshoe crabs (Limulidae) are members of Xiphosura, a chelicerate lineage with a fossil record extending as far back as the Ordovician and provide a valuable comparative framework for studying the evolution of moulting strategies in Arthropoda. Despite their importance, detailed morphological characterization of moulting in horseshoe crabs remains scarce, limiting developmental studies and broader comparative analyses. Here, we provide a detailed morphological characterization of the moulting process in the Atlantic horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus. Morphological changes in specific anatomical structures, including the anterior margin of the prosoma, lateral spines and dorsal spinous process of the opisthosoma, were observed during the moulting process. By tracking these morphological markers, such as retraction of the epidermis from the cuticle and degree of corrugation of the epidermis, we were able to identify individuals in the early and late pre-moult stage, predict the onset of ecdysis, and distinguish post-moult and intermoult stages. We compare ecdysis patterns in L. polyphemus with other arthropod taxa, both extant and fossil. We find that, despite differences in behavioural execution, ecdysis in L. polyphemus shares features with other chelicerates, and that both phylogenetic signal and convergent patterns are evident across Arthropoda. This study offers a robust, non-invasive method for determining moult stages in juvenile horseshoe crabs and provides insights into diversity and constraints of ecdysis in Arthropoda. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00