Ephemeral signatures of phylosymbiosis in dermal microbiomes within the requiem shark family (Carcharhinidae)

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,898 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Full text loading... Abstract The elasmobranch dermal microbiome may be important for buffering effects of environmental stress on host health and population viability via functional metabolic interactions. Dermal microbiomes among elasmobranch orders co-vary with host phylogeny (phylosymbiosis), indicating functional co-evolution with their hosts at deep phylogenetic splits. However, the extent of phylosymbiosis and potential for functional co-evolution within particularly species-rich elasmobranch families is unknown. Here we re-analyse Illumina amplicon sequence data from the 16S rRNA gene from eight Carcharhinid shark species (plus one Ginglymostomatid outgroup) across six independent studies and explicitly examine the extent of phylosymbiosis in dermal microbiomes within this family. We found extensive divergence in OTU abundance and functional metabolic capacity between studies, driven by disparity in OTU sharing and probably reflecting geographical and seasonal factors. Total microbiome structure was incongruent with shark phylogeny, providing no evidence for phylosymbiosis when considering all species and OTUs. However, using bootstrapping and subsampling methods, we identified several subsets of OTUs where Bray-Curtis dissimilarity supported perfect topological congruence with shark phylogeny or strong associations with phylogenetic distances, but not both. Partial Mantel tests identified ten candidate OTUs that supported a moderately strong signal of phylosymbiosis across all shark species and included the immunostimulant skin symbiont genera Lactiplantibacillus and Alcaligenes. Overall, this provides provisional evidence for phylosymbiosis in a minority fraction of the elasmobranch dermal microbiome within the Carcharhinidae family and will necessitate coordinated large-scale studies to establish generality of these findings. - Received: - Version Posted:

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00