Full text
39,073 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Do patients comply with 12-hour lithium blood level timing? Findings from a controlled clinical trial and a real-world clinical setting | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Do patients comply with 12-hour lithium blood level timing? Findings from a controlled clinical trial and a real-world clinical setting Søren L. Jacobsen , Christian L. Kraft , Andrew A. Nierenberg , Torben A. Devantier , Ole Köhler-Forsberg doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.17.24315010 Søren L. Jacobsen 1 Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry , Denmark 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University , Denmark BSc Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Christian L. Kraft 3 Departments of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry , Denmark MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Andrew A. Nierenberg 4 Dauten Family Center for Bipolar Disorder Treatment Innovation, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA, USA 5 Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Torben A. Devantier 3 Departments of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry , Denmark MD, PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ole Köhler-Forsberg 1 Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry , Denmark 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University , Denmark MD, PhD, DMSc Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: karkoe{at}rm.dk Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background Lithium blood levels are measured routinely 12 hours after lithium dosing, but no study has evaluated the actual compliance of patients with the 12-hour levels. Methods First, we used the US multicenter clinical trial “Bipolar CHOICE” (n=145 patients treated with lithium with N=287 lithium blood tests), where participants reported the time since the last lithium dose at lithium blood tests. Second, we included all lithium blood tests (3,179 individuals, 52,837 blood tests) from hospitals and private practitioners in the Central Denmark Region (CDR, approximate population 1.3 million) during 2012-2022 including time of lithium blood tests and the registered time when patients were supposed to take their lithium dose. Results In Bipolar CHOICE, participants took the lithium blood test at a mean/median of 12.8/12 hours (SD=9.1, IQR=10.5-14) after the lithium dose, but the range was 0.5-120 hours and 44.9% had the blood test taken 14 hours after the lithium dose. Those with a blood test >14 hours after the lithium dose had significantly lower lithium levels (0.41 vs. 0.64). In the CDR, the mean/median time was 14.5/13.7 (SD=3.8, IQR=12.0-15.8) and 49.7% had the blood test taken 14 hours after the supposed intake of lithium. Those with >16 hours between lithium intake and the lithium blood test were more often followed by general practitioners and showed higher creatinine concentrations. Conclusions Approximately half of lithium blood tests do not comply with guideline-based recommendations for 12-hour trough levels, emphasizing the need for solutions solving this clinical need. Background Lithium represents a first-line mood-stabilizing treatment option for bipolar disorder ( 1 - 4 ). Treatment dosages are based on the clinical effect and lithium blood levels ( 4 , 5 ), which can be measured easily and accurately. Guidelines recommend measuring lithium blood levels during dose changes but also regularly when a patient is on a stable dose ( 4 , 6 , 7 ). Furthermore, lithium levels are measured to avoid high concentrations and hence potential side effects of lithium treatment, such as long-term effects on the kidneys ( 8 - 14 ). Standard practice for >50 years has been that lithium levels should be measured 12 hours after the patient took the last lithium dose ( 15 ), with most guidelines recommending a window between 10 and 14 hours ( 4 , 6 , 7 ). Standard practice is that the patient should take the lithium dose in the evening and the blood test the next morning before a possible morning dose. This timing is important as the lithium concentration varies considerably in the time between two lithium intakes. However, not only is adherence to lithium treatment low ( 16 ) and regular therapeutic drug monitoring often not performed ( 17 , 18 ), but many patients find it difficult to follow the instructions to take their lithium 12 hours before a blood test. Hence, several factors may contribute to a discrepancy between the actual 12-hour lithium level and the measured lithium concentration. Notwithstanding, the latter provides a basis for clinical decision-making. Despite the clear clinical importance of assaying the 12-hour lithium level, no study has evaluated whether patients actually comply with the recommended 12-hour blood test timing. We aimed to investigate the compliance with standard timing guidelines for lithium blood tests by using a large representative clinical trial and an observational study population of lithium-treated patients. Methods Setting This study is based on two representative cohorts of patients with bipolar disorder with distinct advantages, being 1) the clinical “Bipolar CHOICE” US multicenter trial with specific patient-reported information on the time of the last lithium dose, and 2) a Danish observational setting representing data from everyday clinical work in the Central Denmark Region (CDR). The CDR is one of five administrative regions in Denmark responsible for the healthcare system (approximate population 1.3 million). Participants in Bipolar CHOICE The Bipolar CHOICE trial ( 24 ) was a 24-week multi-site, randomized comparative effectiveness trial conducted at 11 US-sites, comparing lithium carbonate to quetiapine. Subjects provided verbal and written informed consent prior to participation and all Institutional Review Boards of the different sites approved the study protocol. The rationale, design, and specific methods of Bipolar CHOICE are reported in detail elsewhere ( 24 ). For Bipolar CHOICE, 692 patients aged between 18 and 62 years were screened, whereof 482 were randomized. A total of 240 individuals were randomized to lithium carbonate. Bipolar CHOICE applied broad inclusion and limited exclusion criteria to maximize heterogeneity of the sample and generalizability of the results. Participants were at study entry required to have a DSM-IV-TR bipolar I or bipolar II diagnosis and to be at least mildly symptomatic (Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) ≥3 ( 25 )). The bipolar disorder diagnosis was determined using the extended Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, an electronic version of a validated structured diagnostic interview. Clinical interviews obtained demographic information and medical history. Lithium blood levels and time since last lithium dose in Bipolar CHOICE Among the 240 patients randomized to lithium in the Bipolar CHOICE trial, lithium levels were measured via an antecubital vein blood sample after 2, 16 and 24 weeks of treatment at normal follow-up visits. Lithium levels are expressed in milliequivalents per liter (mEq\L). At these visits, patients reported the number of hours since their last lithium dose before the blood test. Furthermore, levels of creatinine were measured at baseline (i.e., week 0) and after 16 and 24 weeks. The target lithium concentration was 0.6 mEq\L, corresponding to an approximate dose of 900 mg. Patients started with lithium treatment at study entry; hence, the 2-week visit represents a visit during up-titration. Most patients were on their stable maintenance dose at weeks 16 and 24. Participants in the CDR In the other part of the study, we used data from the CDR, which has registered information on the time point when patients were supposed to take their lithium dose and the time stamp for the lithium blood test. Since 2012, all blood tests in the CDR at hospitals and private practitioners (i.e., including both private practicing psychiatrists and general practitioners) have been registered, thus covering all lithium blood tests in the CDR. Furthermore, information on all prescribed medications is available, such as lithium, but without information on specific doses. Approval for the present study was granted by the Legal Office in the Central Denmark Region in accordance with the Danish Health Care Act §46, Section 2. According to Danish Law, patient consent and approval from ethical/institutional review boards are not required for studies of this type. We identified all individuals with available data on lithium blood testing and supposed time of lithium intake during the period from January 1, 2012, to July 31, 2022. This resulted in a total of 3,779 patients and 52,837 blood tests measuring lithium and/or creatinine. We excluded some blood tests. First, we only included blood tests taken between 6 am and 6 pm to restrict to routine samples and exclude acute blood tests taken in connection with hospitalization or emergency room contacts (e.g., due to suspected lithium poisoning), which resulted in an exclusion of 446 blood tests. Second, we restricted to blood tests with P-lithium values <1.5 mmol/l to avoid cases of lithium-poisoning, resulting in an exclusion of 321 blood tests. Lithium blood levels and time since last lithium dose in the CDR Among the remaining 52,070 lithium blood tests, we calculated the time between the supposed lithium intake (e.g., at 8 pm) and the time stamp for the blood-test (e.g., at 9.30 am) and used this as a proxy for the time in hours between the lithium intake and the lithium blood test (in this example 13.5 hours, i.e., from 8 pm to 9.30 am). This was necessary as we only had the hourly timestamp for the supposed lithium intake, and not the patient-reported time of lithium intake. In the case of individuals with a morning dose of lithium, we calculated the time between the most recent dose (e.g., 8 pm the previous evening) and expected that individuals did not take the morning dose before the lithium blood test, as recommended by guidelines. Statistical analysis All analyses were performed using STATA version 18.0. Variables are expressed as percentages and mean or median values including standard deviations (SD) or interquartile ranges (IQR). First, we calculated the mean and percentages of blood tests that were taken 12 hours after the most recent lithium dose. This was self-reported in Bipolar CHOICE, while in the CDR, this was defined as lithium blood tests taken between 11.5 and 12.5 hours after the supposed lithium intake. Second, we calculated the number of lithium blood tests that were taken within the guideline-recommended interval of 10 to 14 hours after the last lithium dose. Third, we plotted the measured lithium blood concentration and the time since the last lithium dose (i.e., patient-reported in Bipolar CHOICE and calculated in the CDR) to illustrate the correlation between these two factors. In the CDR data, we plotted this depending on whether the lithium blood test was ordered from a psychiatric hospital setting (i.e., an inpatient or outpatient psychiatric hospital department) or by non-hospital settings (i.e., private psychiatrists or other private practitioners, with the vast majority being general practitioners). The purpose of this differentiation was to evaluate if the relation between the lithium blood concentration and time since last lithium intake was different in these two settings. A priori, we speculated that there is less awareness about and hence attention to taking lithium blood tests as close to 12-hours after last lithium intake as possible in non-hospital settings than in psychiatric hospital settings. Therefore, clinicians in non-hospital settings would also be less likely to take into account any significant deviations from the 12 hours when interpreting lithium blood test results. Patients in a non-hospital setting would thus be at higher risk of having their lithium blood tests taken considerably later than 12 hours after last lithium intake, with this falsely low lithium level representing the basis for clinical decision-making on the lithium dose. As a consequence, a higher number of patients may be on a higher lithium dose than intended in a non-hospital compared to a psychiatric hospital setting. Fourth, in the CDR data, we furthermore plotted the time in hours between the supposed lithium intake and the lithium blood test (e.g., 16 hours) depending on the last supposed lithium intake (e.g., 8 or 10 pm). This was done to show patterns of the supposed lithium intake in a real-world setting and to illustrate whether there are differences in the time between lithium intake and lithium blood tests depending on the time of day the patients are supposed to take their lithium (e.g., how many do take lithium at time points that complicate correct 12-hour blood sampling, such as only a morning dose or an evening dose at 6 pm). Finally, in the CDR, we calculated the mean (SD) time between the supposed last lithium intake and the lithium blood test stamp depending on calendar year (i.e., 2012, 2013, etc.) to check for potential differences over time. Results Bipolar CHOICE Of the 240 patients randomized to lithium carbonate in the Bipolar CHOICE trial, a total of 145 (mean age 39.3, 59.4% women) had at least once reported the time since last lithium intake at the same visit when serum lithium levels were measured. The 145 patients yielded 287 blood tests after 2 (N=93), 16 (N=97) and 24 (N=97) weeks. The mean time since the last lithium dose was 12.8 hours (SD=9.1; range 0.5-120) and the median time was 12 hours (IQR=10.5-14). A total of 158 (55.1%) lithium blood tests were taken between 10-14 hours after the lithium dose whereof 78 (27.2%) were taken at 12 hours, while 129 (44.9%) blood tests were taken 14 hours after the last lithium dose. We found an association between a longer time since the last lithium intake and a lower lithium blood level ( Figure 1A and Table 1 ). This was independent of the lithium dose, as we found similar lithium doses and levels of creatinine among those with 20 hours since the last lithium dose ( Table 1 ). The creatinine concentration was higher in the three groups where blood tests were taken <14 hours since the lithium dose. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1: Characteristics depending on the time since the last lithium dose in A) the Bipolar CHOICE trial and B) the Central Denmark Region. Download figure Open in new tab Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1: The correlation between the time since the last lithium dose and the lithium blood concentration in A) the Bipolar CHOICE clinical trial (N=291) and B) the Central Denmark Region (N=52,837), with the latter being divided into psychiatric and private practice treatment settings. CDR We identified 3,177 lithium-treated individuals (mean age 45.5, 61.9% women) who had 52,070 blood tests taken from January 1, 2012, to July 31, 2022. Of the 3,177 individuals, 2,816 (88.6%) were treated with lithiumcitrate. A total of 28,432 (57.1%) lithium blood tests were taken in a psychiatric hospital setting and 21,339 (42.9%) by non-hospital settings (i.e., primarily private practitioners). The mean time between the supposed time of lithium intake and the time stamp for the lithium blood test was 14.5 hours (SD=3.8), while the median was 13.7 hours (IQR=12.0-15.8). A total of 9,454 blood tests (18.2%) were taken approximately 12 hours after the supposed lithium intake (i.e., between 11.5 and 12.5 hours after the supposed lithium intake), while 25,856 blood tests (49.7%) were taken 14 hours after the last lithium dose. Of these 25,856, the vast majority (24,164, 93.5%) were taken >14 hours, as opposed to 20 hours after lithium intake, where 69% were via private practitioners, whereas only 30% of blood tests taken 8-10 hours after intake were via private practitioners. We found no significant differences regarding age and sex ( Table 1 ) and between calendar years ( sTable 1 ). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Supplementary Table 1: Presenting the time between the last supposed lithium intake and the lithium blood test depending on calendar year of the lithium blood test. The mean lithium blood concentration decreased with longer time since the last supposed lithium intake ( Figure 1B ). This was more pronounced for lithium blood tests ordered in a specialized psychiatric setting (e.g., mean 12-hour level of 0.66 and mean 20-hour level of 0.56), while among blood tests ordered by private practitioners, the concentrations were almost identical over time (e.g., mean 12-hour level 0.66 and mean 20-hour level 0.63). Regarding creatinine, we found an increase depending on a longer time between the supposed lithium intake and the lithium blood test ( Table 1B ). Those with 16-20 hours between lithium intake and the blood test had a mean creatinine of 90, while those <14 hours had a mean creatinine between 76 and 78. The mean age was similar between these groups. Next, we illustrated the time between the supposed lithium intake and the lithium blood test depending on the supposed time point for the lithium intake ( Figure 2 ). We found a clear pattern that when the supposed lithium intake was earlier than 8 pm, most lithium blood tests were taken >14 hours after the last supposed lithium intake. Patients who were supposed to take their lithium medication at 9, 10 or 11 pm, had a mean of approximately 12 hours between the lithium intake and the lithium blood test. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2: Among 3,177 patients in the CDR, showing the correlation between the time when patients were supposed to take their lithium medication (x-axis) and the time in hours between the lithium intake and the registered time stamp of the lithium blood test (y-axis). Discussion This study has three main findings. First, approximately half of lithium blood tests substantially deviate from the recommended 12-hour post-dose timing, posing a clear risk of negatively impacting clinical decision-making. Second, our data indicate that lithium-treated patients under the care of general practitioners (who made up the vast majority of private practitioners in this study), to a lesser degree comply with the 12-hour timing. Third, the latter seems to be associated with higher creatinine levels, which could indicate that lithium-treated patients under the care of general practitioners are at higher risk of long-term kidney damage due to higher lithium concentrations. Hence, the most important finding from this study is that many lithium blood tests do not comply with the 12-hour timing. We found very similar numbers in the clinical trial with self-reported data and the observational study with estimations based on registry data (i.e., 45% and 50%), indicating that approximately half of lithium blood tests are drawn outside the recommended interval of 10-14 hours after the lithium dose. Only a minority (27% and 18%, respectively) of lithium blood tests were taken 12 hours after the last lithium dose. This has clear clinical implications, as the 12-hour lithium blood level represents an important tool to the clinician when determining a patients lithium dose. As also shown by the present data, a deviation from the 12-hour timing can result in rather large deviations in lithium blood concentrations. This is particularly important as many patients continue with lithium treatment for many years or even decades. In Denmark, lithium treatment should only be initiated by psychiatrists, but patients are usually treated in specialized psychiatric settings (e.g., a bipolar disorder outpatient clinic) for less than two years. After this, patients are mostly followed by their general practitioners (in Denmark, there are few private practicing psychiatrists), who have less expertise in lithium treatment. Hence, there is a risk that general practitioners are not aware of the necessity of the 12-hour blood test timing, potentially resulting in lithium dosages based on, and not adjusted for, incorrectly timed blood tests. We found interesting differences in creatinine concentrations between the clinical and the observational datasets. In Bipolar CHOICE, we found slightly higher creatinine levels among blood tests taken <14 hours after the last lithium dose, with these blood tests also showing higher lithium concentrations. This seems reasonable, as higher lithium concentrations directly affect kidney functioning and hence explain the higher creatinine levels. However, in the observational dataset, we found the opposite trend. Those with >16 hours between lithium intake and the lithium blood test had higher creatinine levels. In addition, we did not observe a similar decrease in lithium concentration among those blood tests taken >16 hours after the last lithium dose. A subgrouping into specialized hospital settings versus non-hospital settings showed that blood tests taken >16 hours after the last lithium dose were particularly often ordered by private practitioners. This could indicate that lithium is dosed based on a falsely low lithium blood concentration by clinicians with less expertise in lithium treatment (e.g., general practitioners interpreting an 18-hour level as the 12-hour level and prescribing higher lithium blood concentrations based on this falsely low lithium concentration), leading to higher creatinine levels over time. As lithium treatment often lasts for several years or even decades, this may result in an increased risk for long-term kidney damage. Strengths and limitations The primary strength of this study is the use of data from a controlled clinical trial and a large observational setting representing real-world clinical practice, showing similar numbers in settings with self-reported time between lithium intake and the blood test and when estimating this based on registered time stamps. The primary limitation of the CDR data is that we have no information on the time for the actual intake of the lithium medication, but only the registered time point for when the patient is supposed to take the medication. The fact that the lithium blood concentration only decreased slightly with the time since last lithium dose in the CDR data may be explained by that the registered time does not represent the actual time for lithium intake and/or missing knowledge by clinicians and patients on the necessity for 12-hour timing. Indeed, as the registered time for lithium intake may not represent the actual time for lithium intake (e.g., registered for intake at 6 pm but the actual intake by the patient is at 8 pm), a blood test coded as being 17 hours after the last lithium dose may actually represent a blood test that is closer to the 12-hour level. Therefore, we do not know whether patients actually took their lithium at the registered time or at other time points that fit better with 12-hour timing. Nevertheless, it is reassuring that the numbers are highly similar to the clinical trial with self-reported data. Conclusion Approximately half of lithium blood tests do not comply with the 12-hour timing, although the 12-hour trough level has been the gold standard for informing clinicians about individual lithium blood concentrations for >50 years. This increases the risk for unprecise clinical decisions on lithium dosage that could impact individual patients, e.g., prescribing a higher lithium dose based on a presumed 12-hour lithium blood concentration that is falsely low. Furthermore, the present data indicate that non-compliance with 12-hour timing seems to be particularly frequent among general practitioners and may correlate with higher creatinine levels, which may affect long-term risks on the kidneys. These findings, therefore, emphasize the need to improve the clinical management of lithium blood level testing, which would have the potential to optimize the long-term treatment and follow-up of lithium-treated patients. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors References (1). ↵ Cipriani A , Pretty H , Hawton K , Geddes JR . Lithium in the prevention of suicidal behavior and all-cause mortality in patients with mood disorders: a systematic review of randomized trials . Am J Psychiatry 2005 Oct ; 162 ( 10 ): 1805 – 1819 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science (2). BALANCE investigators and collaborators , Geddes JR , Goodwin GM , Rendell J , Azorin JM , Cipriani A , et al. Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial . Lancet 2010 Jan 30; 375 ( 9712 ): 385 – 395 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science (3). Licht RW . Lithium: still a major option in the management of bipolar disorder . CNS Neurosci Ther 2012 Mar ; 18 ( 3 ): 219 – 226 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed (4). ↵ Yatham LN , Kennedy SH , Parikh SV , Schaffer A , Bond DJ , Frey BN , et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder . Bipolar Disord 2018 Mar ; 20 ( 2 ): 97 – 170 . OpenUrl CrossRef (5). ↵ Malhi GS , Gershon S , Outhred T. Lithiumeter: Version 2.0 . Bipolar Disord 2016 Dec ; 18 ( 8 ): 631 – 641 . OpenUrl (6). ↵ Hiemke C , Baumann P , Bergemann N , Conca A , Dietmaier O , Egberts K , et al. AGNP consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry: update 2011 . Pharmacopsychiatry 2011 Sep ; 44 ( 6 ): 195 – 235 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science (7). ↵ Reddy D , Reddy MS . Serum Lithium Levels: Ideal Time for Sample Collection! Are We Doing it Right? Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 2014 ; 36 ( 3 ): 346 – 347 . OpenUrl PubMed (8). ↵ Kessing LV , Gerds TA , Feldt-Rasmussen B , Andersen PK , Licht RW . Use of Lithium and Anticonvulsants and the Rate of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Study . JAMA Psychiatry 2015 Dec ; 72 ( 12 ): 1182 – 1191 . OpenUrl PubMed (9). Presne C , Fakhouri F , Noel LH , Stengel B , Even C , Kreis H , et al. Lithium-induced nephropathy: Rate of progression and prognostic factors . Kidney Int 2003 Aug ; 64 ( 2 ): 585 – 592 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science (10). Pottegard A , Hallas J , Jensen BL , Madsen K , Friis S. Long-Term Lithium Use and Risk of Renal and Upper Urinary Tract Cancers . J Am Soc Nephrol 2015 May 4. (11). Shine B , McKnight RF , Leaver L , Geddes JR . Long-term effects of lithium on renal, thyroid, and parathyroid function: a retrospective analysis of laboratory data . Lancet 2015 Aug 1; 386 ( 9992 ): 461 – 468 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed (12). Kjaersgaard G , Madsen K , Marcussen N , Christensen S , Walter S , Jensen BL . Tissue injury after lithium treatment in human and rat postnatal kidney involves glycogen synthase kinase-3beta-positive epithelium . Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2012 Feb 15; 302 ( 4 ): F455 – 65 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science (13). Frye MA , Denicoff KD , Bryan AL , Smith-Jackson EE , Ali SO , Luckenbaugh D , et al. Association between lower serum free T4 and greater mood instability and depression in lithium-maintained bipolar patients . Am J Psychiatry 1999 Dec ; 156 ( 12 ): 1909 – 1914 . OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science (14). ↵ Thomsen K , Schou M. Avoidance of lithium intoxication: advice based on knowledge about the renal lithium clearance under various circumstances . Pharmacopsychiatry 1999 May ; 32 ( 3 ): 83 – 86 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science (15). ↵ Amdisen A. Serum Lithium Determinations for Clinical Use . Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1967 ; 20 : 104 – 108 . OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science (16). ↵ Kessing LV , Sondergard L , Kvist K , Andersen PK . Adherence to lithium in naturalistic settings: results from a nationwide pharmacoepidemiological study . Bipolar Disord 2007 Nov ; 9 ( 7 ): 730 – 736 . OpenUrl CrossRef (17). ↵ Marcus SC , Olfson M , Pincus HA , Zarin DA , Kupfer DJ . Therapeutic drug monitoring of mood stabilizers in Medicaid patients with bipolar disorder . Am J Psychiatry 1999 Jul ; 156 ( 7 ): 1014 – 1018 . OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science (18). ↵ Nederlof M , Egberts TC , van Londen L , de Rotte MC , Souverein PC , Herings RM , et al. Compliance with the guidelines for laboratory monitoring of patients treated with lithium: A retrospective follow-up study among ambulatory patients in the Netherlands . Bipolar Disord 2018 Nov 25. (19). Ward ME , Musa MN , Bailey L. Clinical pharmacokinetics of lithium . J Clin Pharmacol 1994 Apr ; 34 ( 4 ): 280 – 285 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science (20). Tyrer SP , Grof P , Kalvar M , Shopsin B. Estimation of lithium dose requirement by lithium clearance, serum lithium and saliva lithium following a loading dose of lithium carbonate . Neuropsychobiology 1981 ; 7 ( 3 ): 152 – 158 . OpenUrl PubMed (21). Chiu CC , Shen WW , Chen KP , Lu ML . Application of the Cockcroft-Gault method to estimate lithium dosage requirement . Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2007 Jun ; 61 ( 3 ): 269 – 274 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed (22). Perry PJ , Alexander B , Dunner FJ , Schoenwald RD , Pfohl B , Miller D. Pharmacokinetic protocol for predicting serum lithium levels . J Clin Psychopharmacol 1982 Apr ; 2 ( 2 ): 114 – 118 . OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science (23). Radhakrishnan R , Kanigere M , Menon J , Calvin S , Srinivasan K. Comparison of three a-priori models in the prediction of serum lithium concentration . Indian J Pharmacol 2012 Mar ; 44 ( 2 ): 234 – 237 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed (24). ↵ Nierenberg AA , Sylvia LG , Leon AC , Reilly-Harrington NA , Shesler LW , McElroy SL , et al. Clinical and Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder (Bipolar CHOICE): a pragmatic trial of complex treatment for a complex disorder . Clin Trials 2014 Feb ; 11 ( 1 ): 114 – 127 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed (25). ↵ Spearing MK , Post RM , Leverich GS , Brandt D , Nolen W. Modification of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale for use in bipolar illness (BP): the CGI-BP . Psychiatry Res 1997 Dec 5; 73 ( 3 ): 159 – 171 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science (26). Levey AS , Coresh J , Greene T , Stevens LA , Zhang YL , Hendriksen S , et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate . Ann Intern Med 2006 Aug 15; 145 ( 4 ): 247 – 254 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science (27). Levey AS , Stevens LA , Schmid CH , Zhang YL , Castro AF , 3rd . , Feldman HI , et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate . Ann Intern Med 2009 May 5; 150 ( 9 ): 604 – 612 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science (28). Stevens LA , Schmid CH , Greene T , Zhang YL , Beck GJ , Froissart M , et al. Comparative performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equations for estimating GFR levels above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Am J Kidney Dis 2010 Sep ; 56 ( 3 ): 486 – 495 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted October 22, 2024. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Do patients comply with 12-hour lithium blood level timing? Findings from a controlled clinical trial and a real-world clinical setting Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Do patients comply with 12-hour lithium blood level timing? Findings from a controlled clinical trial and a real-world clinical setting Søren L. Jacobsen , Christian L. Kraft , Andrew A. Nierenberg , Torben A. Devantier , Ole Köhler-Forsberg medRxiv 2024.10.17.24315010; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.17.24315010 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Do patients comply with 12-hour lithium blood level timing? Findings from a controlled clinical trial and a real-world clinical setting Søren L. Jacobsen , Christian L. Kraft , Andrew A. Nierenberg , Torben A. Devantier , Ole Köhler-Forsberg medRxiv 2024.10.17.24315010; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.17.24315010 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (573) Allergy and Immunology (865) Anesthesia (304) Cardiovascular Medicine (4457) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (445) Dermatology (383) Emergency Medicine (610) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1517) Epidemiology (15244) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1132) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6621) Geriatric Medicine (669) Health Economics (1002) Health Informatics (4557) Health Policy (1372) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1615) Hematology (543) HIV/AIDS (1272) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15936) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1106) Medical Education (624) Medical Ethics (147) Nephrology (670) Neurology (6635) Nursing (346) Nutrition (999) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1148) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3348) Ophthalmology (980) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (421) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (665) Pediatrics (1696) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (693) Primary Care Research (714) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5463) Public and Global Health (9257) Radiology and Imaging (2210) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1371) Respiratory Medicine (1198) Rheumatology (598) Sexual and Reproductive Health (716) Sports Medicine (532) Surgery (714) Toxicology (100) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a03745210a6ddfa9',t:'MTc4MDA3NjI3Nw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.