Response to divergent selection on meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,809 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Meiotic recombination is a key driver of evolution in sexually reproducing organisms, reshaping genetic diversity by generating novel allelic combinations. The rate of recombination varies substantially across living organisms depending on cis- or trans-acting genetic elements, as seen in many species, including the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we report on an experimental evolution-based study to better understand the factors shaping this natural variation. Starting with a genetically diverse population of S. cerevisiae, we have carried out recurrent divergent selection on recombination rate using a fluorescence-based sorting approach in four independent lineages. After ten generations, we observed an average response of recombination rate of +28% after positive selection and −24% after negative selection, within the interval used for selection. In the adjacent region, however, we observed a weaker response in the opposite direction, and no response in four other unlinked genomic regions. Whole-genome sequencing of individuals selected for high recombination revealed mixed outcomes in the four independently evolved lineages. All four lineages showed selection for high recombination locally, with particular haplotypes heavily favored and sequence- or structural variation-based heterozygosity selected against within the selection interval. However, only two of the four lineages showed increases in genome-wide recombination rate. Overall, this experimental evolution approach provides original and useful insights into the evolvability of the meiotic recombination rate and the associated genetic determinants. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Main Figures files added: Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00