Endovaginal Medical Ozone Treatment as an Adjuvant in Endometriosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
This double-blind randomized controlled trial investigated endovaginal medical ozone treatment as an adjuvant therapy for endometriosis, evaluating its effects.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial studied endovaginal medical ozone treatment as an adjuvant therapy for women with endometriosis, enrolling 30 participants assigned to weekly active ozone applications or placebo for 10 weeks. Outcomes were measured at baseline and post-treatment using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Endometriosis Health Profile-30, Female Sexual Function Index, and Beck Anxiety Inventory. The ozone group showed significant reductions in pain and improvements in quality of life, sexual function, and anxiety symptoms compared with placebo, with no serious adverse events reported and favorable tolerability. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it tests endovaginal medical ozone as an adjuvant intervention in a randomized controlled trial and reports pain, quality-of-life, sexual function, and anxiety outcomes.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
1,830 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (35)
- Can symptomatology help in the diagnosis of endometriosis? Findings from a national case–control study—Part 1 via openalex
- Clinical Management of Endometriosis via openalex
- Dysmenorrhea, Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain in Adolescents via openalex
- Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Physiotherapy on Urinary, Bowel, and Sexual Functions in Women with Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial via openalex
- Endometrial stem/progenitor cells and their role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis via openalex
- Endometriosis via openalex
- Epidemiology of endometriosis: a large population‐based database study from a healthcare provider with 2 million members via openalex
- Impact of endometriosis on female sexual function: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis via openalex
- Ozone therapy ameliorates inflammation and endometrial injury in rats with pelvic inflammatory disease via openalex
- Physical pain and emotion regulation as the main predictive factors of health-related quality of life in women living with endometriosis via openalex
- Polypoid colorectal endometriosis with abundant leiomyoma-like smooth muscle cell proliferation treated by endoscopic resection via openalex
- Repetitive surgery for recurrent symptomatic endometriosis: What to do? via openalex
- The role of gut and genital microbiota and the estrobolome in endometriosis, infertility and chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Treatment utilization for endometriosis symptoms: a cross-sectional survey study of lifetime experience via openalex
- Vaginal and rectal microbiome contribute to genital inflammation in chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- doi:10.7150/ijbs.41940 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejmra1810764 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s43032-019-00113-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.08.029 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/09513590.2020.1812570 via openalex
- doi:10.4103/2045-9912.260652 via openalex
- doi:10.2174/0929867323666151221150420 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.007 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2018.09.037 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.05.093 via openalex
- doi:10.4103/2045-9912.215752 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.07.059 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.taap.2012.12.001 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/ijms20164009 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.taap.2006.06.009 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/ijms232012586 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2022.103900 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/biology12121512 via openalex
- doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.842229 via openalex
- doi:10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo40 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:37:26.266404+00:00